PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M A Thornby

Publications and source records attributed to M A Thornby.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Effect of distractive auditory stimuli on exercise tolerance in patients with COPD.

We tested the hypothesis that a distractive stimulus, such as music, introduced during exercise can reduce perception of respiratory effort at any given level of exercise, whereas sensory deprivation increases effort perception. Thirty-six patients with moderate COPD participated in four sessions of symptom-limited exercise. The first session familiarized the subject with the protocol. The other sessions were performed under partial visual isolation while listening to music (M), or to grey noise (GN), or in silence (SIL), presented in randomized order. Subjects graded their respiratory effort using the Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale. Total exercise time (EXT) and external work (WT) were objective indices of exercise tolerance. EXT was 22% longer with M than with either GN or SIL (p < 0.001), and WT was 44% and 53% greater with M than with GN or SIL, respectively (p < 0.001). These increases occurred at a heart rate that was only a few beats higher than during GN or SIL (104 +/- 3 bpm for M and 101 +/- 3 bpm for GN and SIL), a minimal difference that was statistically significant (p < 0.001). At every level of exercise, perceived exertion with M was lower than for either GN or SIL (p < 0.001). Although the respective RPE was higher for SIL than for GN (p < 0.01) at every level of exercise, WT and EXT were no different. These data indicate that perceived effort can be significantly influenced by external factors. This in turn suggests that the use of distractive stimuli during exercise training programs with patients with COPD may significantly decrease perceived symptoms of respiratory discomfort, thus allowing the patient to exercise to a higher intensity, and potentially achieving more effective exercise reconditioning training.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Bimanual skill development in pediatric below-elbow amputation: a multicenter, cross-sectional study.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the following in children with unilateral below-elbow amputation: (1) development of bimanual functional skills, (2) development patterns relative to able-bodied children, and (3) the relationship between duration of prosthetic wear and bimanual functional performance. Sixty-nine children with unilateral below-elbow amputation, all less than ten years old, were assessed on 14 prosthesis-assisted bimanual ADL, including play, feeding, dressing, and hygiene activities, which have been studied previously in able-bodied children. Bimanual ADL skill development was not delayed in five of the 14 comparisons to previously published standards, but most development patterns had multimodal, nonmonotonic performance profiles. Duration of prosthetic wear and other factors previously believed to contribute to good prosthetic function were not well correlated to ADL skills (r less than .52). Although these children had no CNS dysfunction, it is apparent that below-elbow amputation impedes pediatric ADL skill development. The cause of these delays appears to be complex and is not expressed uniformly among all children; thus, the delays observed are not simply due to mechanical deficiencies of the prosthetic restoration.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Prosthetic management of children with limb deficiencies.

Children with amputations present challenging management problems. Surgical management, prosthetic fitting options, and training regimens have progressed substantially over the past several decades. Clinicians should be familiar with the available technological options to provide children with amputations the best possible care. The plethora of small components available for lower- and upper-limb prostheses indicates the desirability of managing juvenile patients in an interdisciplinary, specialized clinical setting where the advantages and disadvantages of prosthetic options can be related to the particular needs and wishes of each young client and the client's family. Although prostheses are not anatomical avatars, careful appliance prescription and training, coordinated with the child's growth and developmental changes, can optimize the benefits the child derives from the prosthesis.

Adolescent↗