PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M A Turturro

Publications and source records attributed to M A Turturro.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Patients' perceptions of route of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration and its effect on analgesia.

OBJECTIVE: There is a commonly held belief among health care providers that patients respond better to parenteral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) than to oral forms by virtue of the patients' belief that getting an injection means they are receiving "stronger" medicine. To the authors' knowledge, this effect has never been adequately documented in the literature. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of a placebo analgesic injection vs placebo oral analgesia on patients with acute musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: A convenience sample of emergency department (ED) patients with acute musculoskeletal pain secondary to trauma were enrolled. Patients received 225 mL of orange-flavored drink containing 800 mg of ibuprofen. Patients then received either a physiologically inactive starch tablet resembling ibuprofen 800 mg in taste and appearance or a physiologically inactive saline intramuscular (IM) injection resembling ketorolac 60 mg. Both patients and research nurses were blinded to the addition of ibuprofen to the drink and the inactive nature of subsequent medication. Pain was evaluated at time 0 and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes on a 10-mm visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Sixty-four patients completed the study protocol. The VAS scores between groups did not differ significantly at baseline or at each subsequent interval (p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: These results contradict the belief that parenteral medications confer a selective placebo effect stemming from patients' beliefs regarding route of administration and efficacy. Therefore, the routine use of IM administration of NSAIDs for suspected enhanced analgesia appears unwarranted.

Administration, Oral↗

Tramadol versus hydrocodone-acetaminophen in acute musculoskeletal pain: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of an oral tramadol preparation versus that of an oral hydrocodone-acetaminophen preparation in acute musculoskeletal pain. METHODS: A randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in an urban teaching emergency department with an annual census of 41,000. Participants comprised a convenience sample of 68 adult ED patients with acute musculoskeletal pain caused by minor trauma. Thirty-three patients received tramadol (100 mg), and 35 patients received hydrocodone-acetaminophen (5 mg hydrocodone with 500 mg acetaminophen). The drugs were prepared in identical-appearing capsules. Pain was evaluated by a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) at baseline and at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes after dosing. VAS scores were analyzed by 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA, and nominal data were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Mean pain scores did not differ at baseline (tramadol, 68.3+/-21.8; hydrocodone-acetaminophen, 69.1+/-17.8; P=NS) but were significantly lower in the hydrocodone-acetaminophen group beginning at 30 minutes through 180 minutes. There were 6 dropouts as a result of reported inadequate analgesia, 3 in each group (P=NS). The discharge diagnoses and prevalence of side effects did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: Tramadol provides inferior analgesia to hydrocodone-acetaminophen in ED patients with acute musculoskeletal pain.

Acetaminophen↗

Intramuscular ketorolac versus oral ibuprofen in acute musculoskeletal pain.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of IM ketorolac versus that of oral ibuprofen in acute musculoskeletal pain. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical trial. SETTING: Urban teaching emergency department with an annual census of 43,000. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 82 patients aged 18 to 70 years with acute musculoskeletal pain due to trauma. INTERVENTIONS: Forty-two subjects each received 60 mg ketorolac by IM injection and ingested a placebo capsule. Forty subjects each ingested 800 mg ibuprofen and received a placebo (saline) IM injection. Pain was evaluated with a 100-mm visual analog scale at baseline and 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, and 120 minutes after dosing. The prevalence of side effects was elicited in each patient. RESULTS: Mean pain scores improved in each group during the course of the study but did not significantly differ between groups at baseline or at any subsequent interval. The numbers of dropouts due to inadequate analgesia and prevalence of side effects in the two groups did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: IM ketorolac and oral ibuprofen provide comparable analgesia in ED patients with acute musculoskeletal pain.

Administration, Oral↗

Emergency echocardiography.

Emergency physicians need an understanding of the utility of echocardiography in the Emergency Department. With the recent emphasis of emergency department use of portable ultrasonography, emergency physicians will have the opportunity to gain proficiency in using echocardiography to diagnose certain conditions. Echocardiography may aid in the diagnosis of acute MI, pericardial effusion and tamponade, acute valvular dysfunction, acute aortic dissection, and post-traumatic cardiac disorders. An understanding of the potential limitations of echocardiography, combined with experience in its techniques, will ultimately help the emergency physician with its use in daily patient care.

Echocardiography↗

Hydrocodone versus codeine in acute musculoskeletal pain.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and prevalence of side effects of hydrocodone versus codeine in acute pain syndromes. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Sixty-two consecutive adult emergency department patients 18 to 70 years old with acute musculoskeletal pain. Patients using other analgesics or having any contraindication to opioid therapy were excluded. In addition, 12 patients were excluded because of insufficient data or study dropout. DESIGN/INTERVENTIONS: In a randomized, double-blind prospective manner, patients received either 5 mg hydrocodone with 500 mg acetaminophen or 30 mg codeine with 500 mg acetaminophen to take on discharge from the ED and every four hours thereafter as needed for pain. MEASUREMENTS: Pain intensity was evaluated by a visual analog scale at zero, one, two, four, eight, 24, and 48 hours. Specific side effects were sought, along with the number of patients reporting inadequate analgesia. MAIN RESULTS: Data were obtained on 50 subjects (25 per group). Mean and median pain scores did not differ significantly at time zero (x vs y, 6.03 vs 5.99 and 6.8 vs 6.1, respectively) or subsequent intervals. Side effects were noted in eight hydrocodone/acetaminophen and 18 codeine/acetaminophen patients (P = .005). No significant differences in gastrointestinal side effects were reported; however, less nausea or vomiting was reported in the hydrocodone group (P = .23). Central nervous system side effects (sedation or lightheadedness) were reported in six hydrocodone/acetaminophen patients compared with 16 codeine/acetaminophen patients (P less than .005). In addition, no hydrocodone/acetaminophen patients reported inadequate analgesia compared with six codeine/acetaminophen patients (P less than .05). CONCLUSION: Although pain scores were not significantly different, hydrocodone may be a more effective analgesic than codeine in acute musculoskeletal pain, as demonstrated by significantly fewer treatment failures. Central nervous system side effects are less common with hydrocodone than with codeine.

Acetaminophen↗

Contact lens complications.

Contact lens wearers who develop complications related to their lens use are likely to present to emergency departments for care. The pathophysiology of contact lens complications is outlined, and clinical presentations of various conditions related to both soft and hard lens wear are summarized. Guidelines for emergency department management are suggested.

Conjunctival Diseases↗