Evaluation of the elderly with cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
Biomedical subjects
M Aapro
Publications and source records attributed to M Aapro.
Depression in breast cancer patients: the need for treatment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antidepressive Agents↗
Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. 304 Study Group.
PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel with mitomycin plus vinblastine (MV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=392) were randomized to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks (n=203) or mitomycin 12 mg/m2 i.v. every 6 weeks plus vinblastine 6 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks (n=189), for a maximum of 10 3-week cycles. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, docetaxel produced significantly higher response rates than MV overall (30.0% v 11.6%; P < .0001), as well as in patients with visceral involvement (30% v 11%), liver metastases (33% v 7%), or resistance to previous anthracycline agents (30% v 7%). Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival were significantly longer with docetaxel than MV (19 v 1 weeks, P=.001, and 1 1.4 v 8.7 months, P=.0097, respectively). Neutropenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with docetaxel (93.1 % v62.5%; P < .05); thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with MV (12.0% v 4.1%; P < .05). Severe acute or chronic nonhematologic adverse events were infrequent in both groups. Withdrawal rates because of adverse events (MV, 10.1%; docetaxel, 13.8%) or toxic death (MV, 1.6%; docetaxel, 2.0%) were similar in both groups. Quality-of-life analysis was limited by a number of factors, but results were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is significantly superior to MV in terms of response, TTP, and survival. The safety profiles of both therapies are manageable and tolerable. Docetaxel represents a clear treatment option for patients with MBC progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.
Adult↗
Optimal selection of antiemetics in children receiving cancer chemotherapy.
Only a few studies have been carried out specifically on the prevention of nausea and vomiting in children receiving chemotherapy. In these patients older antiemetic drugs such as metoclopramide and phenothiazines had moderate efficacy and induced significant side effects, especially marked sedation and extrapyramidal reactions. In comparative trials the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have shown better efficacy and tolerability than chlorpromazine or metoclopramide combined with dexamethasone. The combination of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist plus dexamethasone is superior to a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist alone and should be the standard antiemetic prophylaxis in all paediatric patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. The optimal dose and scheduling of these antiemetic drugs need to be studied, as well as the antiemetic efficacy, in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced delayed and anticipatory emesis in children.
Antiemetics↗
Docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have failed alkylating chemotherapy: a preliminary report of the randomized phase III trial. 303 Study Group.
Three hundred twenty-six patients who had failed prior alkylating agents, given either as adjuvant therapy or therapy for advanced breast cancer or both, were randomly assigned to treatment with up to seven cycles of doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 or docetaxel (Taxotere, Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) 100 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks. The two arms of the study were well-matched for age, performance status, previous therapy, and the nature of the metastatic disease. Forty-seven percent of the docetaxel-treated patients and 49% of the doxorubicin-treated patients were defined as having disease that showed primary or secondary resistance. Overall, 48% of patients treated with docetaxel had an objective response. This was significantly greater than the 33% response rate seen in doxorubicin-treated patients (P = .008). Among those patients classified as having resistant disease, the difference was equally clear cut (response rate, 47% v 25%; P = .003). Overall median time to response was 12 weeks with docetaxel and 23 weeks with doxorubicin. Febrile neutropenia, grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting, and cardiotoxicity were significantly more common among the doxorubicin-treated patients, while diarrhea grade 3-4, skin toxicity, neurologic toxicity, fluid retention, and allergy of any grade were significantly more likely in the docetaxel-treated patients. This study demonstrates for the first time the superiority in terms of response rate of a taxoid over an anthracycline in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗
Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.
The aim of this study was to examine the early and late complications rate of central venous access ports connected to the Groshong catheter for long-term chemotherapy delivering. All patients suffering from a neoplastic disease, who required long-term chemotherapy and underwent insertion of implantable ports during a 21-month period (1 October 1994-30 June 1996) were prospectively studied. A single type of port was used, constructed of titanium and silicone rubber (Dome Port, Bard Inc., Salt Lake City, U.S.A), connected to an 8 F silastic Groshong catheter tubing (Bard Inc.). A team of different operators (two general surgeons, one interventional radiologist and four anaesthesiologists) was involved in inserting the port. All devices were placed in the operating room under fluoroscopic control. A central venous access form was filled in by the operator after the procedure and all ports were followed prospectively for device-related and overall complications. Data from the follow-up of these patients were entered in the form and collected in a database. Follow-up continued until the device was removed, the patient died or the study was closed. 178 devices, comprising a total of 32,089 days in situ, were placed in 175 patients. Three patients received a second device after removal of the first. Adequate follow-up was obtained in all cases (median 180 days, range 4-559). 138 devices (77.5%) were still in situ when the study was closed. Early complications included six pneumothoraxes, three arterial punctures and two revisions for port and/or catheter malfunction (overall early complications in 8 patients). Late complications included 3 cases (1.68% of devices) of catheter rupture and embolisation (0.093 episodes/1000 days of use), 2 cases (1.12% of devices) of venous thrombosis (0.062 episodes/1000 days of use), 1 case (0.56% of devices) of pocket infection (0.031 episodes/1000 days of use), and 4 cases (2.24% of devices) of port-related bacteraemias (0.124 episodes/1000 days of use). Infections were caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus (4 cases) and Bacillus subtilis (1 case); they required port removal in 3 out of 5 cases. This study represents the largest published series of patients with totally implantable access ports connected to Groshong catheters; this device is a good option for long-term access to central veins and delivery of chemotherapeutic regimens, including continuous intravenous infusions. The low incidence of major complications related to implantation and management of these devices support increased use in oncology patients.
Adolescent↗
A double-blind crossover study comparing prophylactic intravenous granisetron alone or in combination with dexamethasone as antiemetic treatment in controlling nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy.
The efficacies of granisetron plus dexamethasone and granisetron alone in controlling nausea and vomiting during two consecutive cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy given for up to 5 days were compared in a two-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. In all, 110 evaluable patients received either dexamethasone, 20 mg i.v., or matching placebo, plus open-label granisetron, 3 mg i.v., given on each chemotherapy day. At cycle 2, patients crossed over to the alternative treatment; 72 patients completed the crossover. In these 72 patients, the complete response rates over 24 h for granisetron plus dexamethasone and granisetron plus placebo in cycle 1 were 87% and 70% (ns), respectively. In cycle 2 the complete response rates over 24 h were 73% and 62% (ns). Combining the two cycles, the complete response rates over 24 h were 80.6% (granisetron plus dexamethasone) and 65.3% (granisetron plus placebo; P = 0.015). Granisetron plus dexamethasone was significantly more effective in terms of times to less than complete response (P = 0.041), to first episode of moderate/severe nausea (P = 0.04), to first episode of vomiting (0.03) and to use of rescue medication (P = 0.02). Adverse events tended to be minor, with asthenia and insomnia the most common. Of those patients who expressed a preference, 67% preferred granisetron plus dexamethasone (P < 0.05). A single dose of dexamethasone added to granisetron thus enhances the efficacy of granisetron alone in preventing nausea and vomiting after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
Adolescent↗
Phase II trials of docetaxel (Taxotere) in advanced ovarian cancer--an updated overview.
Docetaxel (Taxotere) has been studied at a dose of 100 mg/m2 i.v. as a one hour infusion every 3 weeks, in four phase II trials in patients with extensively pretreated ovarian cancer. A total of 340 patients were treated, including 256 patients in two separate EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) trials and 84 patients in two trials in the U.S.A. All patients had received prior cisplatin or carboplatin therapy and the treatment-free interval was less than 4 months in 155 patients. The overall response rate using conventional UICC criteria was 30% among 315 evaluable cases (95% confidence interval: 24-36%). Among 155 patients whose disease was most refractory (i.e. treatment-free interval was less than 4 months), the overall response rate was 28% (95% confidence interval: 19-36%). Response duration ranged from 4 to 17 months. Grade IV neutropenia was a common finding and fluid retention was observed. The incidence of febrile neutropenia ranged from 8 to 44% of patients with two deaths (i.e. 0.6% of the total treated) related to neutropenic sepsis. Docetaxel and paclitaxel (Taxol) have comparable activities in ovarian cancer. Ongoing studies with docetaxel include its use in patients as part of first-line therapy, as well as in patients refractory to paclitaxel. To prevent the development of fluid retention, these now involve the routine use of steroid prophylaxis. It is expected that docetaxel will prove to be an important addition to the drugs available for the treatment of ovarian cancer.
Adult↗
Phase I-II study of vinorelbine in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: a regimen with a low subjective toxic burden.
BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine, is an active drug in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and has a favorable toxicity profile. Its combination with other effective and well-tolerated cytotoxics may thus be beneficial. We investigated the therapeutic effect of a combination of vinorelbine plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in this phase I-II study and treated with 5-fluorouracil (350 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 to 3), folinic acid (100 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 to 3) and vinorelbine given on days 1 and 3 at the dose of 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1), or 30 mg/m2 (dose level 2). Therapy was given on an outpatient basis every three weeks. RESULTS: Phase I: Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred at the second dose level of vinorelbine (30 mg/m2), with two out of three patients developing severe constipation ('ileus-like syndrome' grade 4), and fever (grade 2). Consequently, the dose evaluated in the phase II study was 25 mg/m2. Phase II: Objective responses were observed in 24 of 39 evaluable patients (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 47% to 77%). There were seven complete responses (18%), 17 partial responses (44%), and for nine patients (23%) disease was stable. Only six patients (15%) experienced disease progression. The median response duration was 10 months (range 6 to 24+) and the median time to progression was eight months (range 2 to 24+). Granulocytopenia was the most frequently observed side effect, with a grade 4 nadir being observed in 30 patients (77%), with four hospital admissions due to febrile neutropenia. Nausea, vomiting, and anorexia were mild to moderate and reported by less than half of the patients. Alopecia was moderate and occurred in about one-third of the patients. The other side effects were mild and easily manageable. CONCLUSIONS: This effective combination chemotherapy of vinorelbine, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid is comparable to other first-line regimens in terms of efficacy, and is subjectively well tolerated, thus deserving a test in randomized trials in the advanced and adjuvant settings.
Adult↗
Elective surgery for gastrointestinal tumours in the elderly.
The geriatric population is expanding and clinical decision-making is often complicated by the effects of ageing. Age should not be the only parameter considered when addressing medical problems. Elderly subjects have been denied surgery because of their presumed higher mortality and morbidity. The present review summarises the physiology of the aged and discusses operative risks, mortality and morbidity rates as well as therapeutic results for the different gastrointestinal sites when affected by cancer. Reports on surgical treatments are revisited and compared to the same procedures delivered to younger patients in the context of the ethical issue of offering the best care to every patient. Elective operations by surgical oncologists are found to be safe with the exception of major liver resections. Complication rates and mean hospital stay do not differ between the two age groups provided the procedure is conducted with the best-known technique in expert hands. A drop in operative morbidity has occurred in the past three decades. Several investigators have emphasised the marked increase in morbidity and mortality experienced by elderly patients when undergoing emergency procedures. Associated diseases have to be properly assessed, as the elderly have a frail physiological balance with a reduced capacity for recovery from traumatic events including major surgical procedures. Careful preoperative evaluation, intraoperative conduct and postoperative care are presently achieved in almost every major hospital. Good clinical practice is based on the balance between probability of cure and toxic effects. Treatment of the elderly should no longer be based on untested beliefs and personal opinions. The elderly should be accrued for prospective clinical evaluation and should not be denied optimal surgical treatment.
Aged↗
Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive operable breast cancer: results of a randomized trial. The International Collaborative Cancer Group.
PURPOSE: To determine whether a combination chemotherapy regimen that contains epirubicin (fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide [FEC]) is superior to the standard cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) combination in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The International Collaborative Cancer Group (ICCG) conducted a large randomized trial in which two alternative schedules were used according to participating center: CMF1 versus FEC1 and CMF2 versus FEC2. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-nine patients were entered onto the trial. At a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, no significant benefit for the anthracycline-containing regimen was observed in terms of relapse-free (P = .61) or overall survival (P = .13). FEC1 and CMF1 appear to be of similar efficacy, but there is a suggestion that FEC2 may be superior to CMF2, since patients who received FEC2 had improved overall (P = .02) and relapse-free survival (P = .03) rates. Nausea and vomiting and alopecia were more common in the epirubicin-containing regimen (P = .001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the FEC2 regimen, in which epirubicin replaced the methotrexate in CMF, is the preferable adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for premenopausal patients with operable axillary node-positive breast cancer.
Adult↗
The scientific rationale for developing taxoids.
The taxoid drugs, docetaxel (Taxotere) and paclitaxel (Taxol), represent a new class of antitumour agents which act by promoting the assembly and inhibiting the disassembly of microtubules. Docetaxel has been shown to be more potent than paclitaxel with regard to the formation and stabilization of microtubules in vitro. Docetaxel also has a higher cell uptake than paclitaxel and a longer intracellular retention time. Docetaxel is a more potent antitumour agent than paclitaxel in most model systems. The observation that the cytotoxic concentration for docetaxel is lower than that for paclitaxel in cultures of human haematopoietic cells supports the clinical observation that dose-limiting neutropenia is seen at a lower dose of docetaxel than paclitaxel. The concentration of docetaxel required to kill tumour cells in vitro is well within the plasma concentrations recorded in clinical studies, and docetaxel has shown extensive clinical activity against a variety of solid tumours. Most drugs are used in combination regimens in the clinic and combinations of docetaxel with other agents are under active investigation. The agents to be combined with docetaxel include those which showed synergism with docetaxel in vitro and can be delivered at optimal doses without additive toxicity.
Animals↗
Population pharmacokinetics of docetaxel during phase I studies using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling and nonparametric maximum-likelihood estimation.
Docetaxel, a novel anticancer agent, was given to 26 patients by short i.v. infusion (1-2 h) at various dose levels (70-115 mg/m2, the maximum tolerated dose) during 2 phase I studies. Two population analyses, one using NONMEM (nonlinear mixed-effect modeling) and the other using NPML (nonparametric maximum-likelihood), were performed sequentially to determine the structural model; estimate the mean population parameters, including clearance (Cl) and interindividual variability; and find influences of demographic covariates on them. Nine covariates were included in the analyses: age, height, weight, body surface area, sex, performance status, presence of liver metastasis, dose level, and type of formulation. A three-compartment model gave the best fit to the data, and the final NONMEM regression model for Cl was Cl = BSA(Theta1 + Theta02 x AGE), expressing Cl (in liters per hour) directly as a function of body surface area. Only these two covariates were considered in the NPML analysis to confirm the results found by NONMEM. Using NONMEM [for a patient with mean AGE (52.3 years) and mean BSA (1.68 m2)] and NPML, docetaxel Cl was estimated to be 35.6 l/h (21.2 lh-1 m-2) and 37.2 l/h with interpatient coefficients of variations (CVs) of 17.4% and 24.8%, respectively. The intraindividual CV was estimated at 23.8% by NONMEM; the corresponding variability was fixed in NPML in an additive Gaussian variance error model with a 20% CV. Discrepancies were found in the mean volume at steady state (Vss; 83.21 for NPML versus 1241 for NONMEM) and in terminal half-lives, notably the mean t1/2 gamma, which was shorter as determined by NPML (7.89 versus 12.2 h), although the interindividual CV was 89.1% and 62.7% for Vss and t1/2 gamma, respectively. However, the NPML-estimated probability density function (pdf) of t1/2 gamma was bimodal (5 and 11.4 h), probably due to the imbalance of the data. Both analyses suggest a similar magnitude of mean Cl decrease with small BSA and advanced age.
Adult↗
Cytotoxic agents with activity in breast cancer patients previously exposed to anthracyclines: current status and future prospects.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗
Early clinical studies with docetaxel. Docetaxel Investigators Group.
Docetaxel has been evaluated in six phase I studies involving a total of 234 patients with a wide variety of tumour types (50% had breast or ovarian cancer). The aims of these studies were to determine the optimal dosage schedule of docetaxel for use in subsequent phase II studies, and to characterise the pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles of docetaxel. Intravenous (i.v.) doses of docetaxel (5-115 mg/m2) were administered in various treatment schedules for a total of 790 courses. Cycles were repeated every 2-3 weeks. Dose-dependent neutropenia was the major dose-limiting adverse effect of docetaxel. Other adverse events reported included hypersensitivity, fluid retention, skin reactions, asthenia and alopecia. Anaphylactoid reactions occurred rarely. No abnormal cardiac activity was detected, and neurological adverse events were mild. Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 administered as a 1 h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks combined acceptable tolerability with complete neutropenic recovery. This dosage schedule was thus considered to be optimal for further investigation in phase II studies.
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗