PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Abdalla

Publications and source records attributed to M Abdalla.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Diagnostic difficulties of pelvic splenosis: case report.

We report the case of a 38-year-old woman who presented with chronic lower abdominal pain. Her past medical history included a splenectomy due to abdominal trauma. Ultrasound examination revealed four pelvic tumors which, upon laparotomy, were found to be the result of splenosis. Approximately 100 cases of splenosis have been reported but only a minority of them have been published in the gynecological literature. Our case indicates that those involved in pelvic scanning (even of asymptomatic women) and/or treating those complaining of lower abdominal pain or presenting with pelvic tumors should be aware of splenosis as a possible diagnosis.

Abdominal Pain↗

In vitro assessment of anti - cutaneous leishmaniasis activity of some Sudanese plants.

Examination of crude methanol extracts of four Sudanese plants (Azadirachta indica, Acacia nilotica, Balanites aegyptiaca and Allium sativa) revealed that only three species had a considerable in-vitro anti-leishmanial activity on Leishmania major promastigotes. The plants Azadrachta indica, Allium sativa, and Acacia nilotica gave a LC50 of 10.2, 4.94, and 89.38 microg/ml, respectively. Extracts of Balanites aegyptiaca had a moderate biological activity on L major promastigotes.

Journal Article↗

Serious perinatal complications of non-proteinuric hypertension: an international, multicentre, retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of births complicated by either a pre-existing or a gestational non-proteinuric hypertension, presenting at <34 weeks' gestation, and the associated incidence with 1 or more serious perinatal complications or birth weight <3rd centile for gestational age. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted in 5 international centres, from 1998 to 2002, where "tight" control (normalization) of blood pressure (BP) is the norm. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes were used to identify women who delivered at > or =20 weeks' gestation, with any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. Women were included if they had a diastolic blood pressure (dBP) of 90 to 109 mm Hg, due to either a pre-existing or a gestational non-proteinuric hypertension, presenting at <34 weeks' gestation. Women were excluded if they had ongoing severe hypertension, or if at presentation with dBP of 90 to 109 mm Hg, they had 1 or more of the following: proteinuria, an indication for "tight" control of BP or imminent delivery, or a known intrauterine fetal death or lethal fetal anomaly. Data were collected on paper forms, scanned into an electronic database, and summarized descriptively by type of hypertension. RESULTS: There were 305 eligible women (0.7% deliveries, 12.8% hypertensive deliveries) identified with non-proteinuric hypertension that was either pre-existing (133 [43.6%]) or gestational (172 [56.4%]). Regardless of hypertension type, 16.4% (n = 50) of pregnancies were complicated by birth weight <3rd centile or 1 or more serious perinatal complications, 34.3% (n = 100) by preterm birth, 30.8% (n = 94) by preeclampsia, and 2.0% (n = 6) by serious maternal complications. CONCLUSION: Non-proteinuric pre-existing or gestational hypertension, presenting before 34 weeks' gestation, identifies a subpopulation of hypertensive pregnant women at both substantial perinatal risk and maternal risk. The CHIPS (Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study) trial is designed to determine how best to manage the hypertension of such women in order to optimize perinatal outcome.

Adult↗

Efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (the LIDO study): a randomised double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Levosimendan, a novel calcium sensitiser, improves myocardial contractility without causing an increase in myocardial oxygen demand. We compared the effects of levosimendan and dobutamine on haemodynamic performance and clinical outcome in patients with low-output heart failure. METHODS: Patients were recruited into a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial. Under continuous haemodynamic monitoring, an initial loading dose of levosimendan of 24 microg/kg was infused over 10 min, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1 microg kg(-1) min(-1) for 24 h. Dobutamine was infused for 24 h at an initial dose of 5 microg kg(-1) min(-1) without a loading dose. The infusion rate was doubled if the response was inadequate at 2h. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with haemodynamic improvement (defined as an increase of 30% or more in cardiac output and a decrease of 25% or more in pulmonary-capillary wedge pressure) at 24 h. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 103 patients were assigned levosimendan and 100 dobutamine. The primary haemodynamic endpoint was achieved in 29 (28%) levosimendan-group patients and 15 (15%) in the dobutamine group (hazard ratio 1.9 [95% CI 1.1-3.3]; p=0.022). At 180 days, 27 (26%) levosimendan-group patients had died, compared with 38 (38%) in the dobutamine group (0.57 [0.34-0.95]; p=0.029). INTERPRETATION: In patients with severe, low-output heart failure, levosimendan improved haemodynamic performance more effectively than dobutamine. This benefit was accompanied by lower mortality in the levosimendan group than in the dobutamine group for up to 180 days.

Cardiac Output, Low↗

Ketorolac, diclofenac, and ketoprofen are equally safe for pain relief after major surgery.

BACKGROUND: Ketorolac is approved for the relief of postoperative pain but concerns have been raised over a possible risk of serious adverse effects and death. Two regulatory reviews in Europe on the safety of ketorolac found the data were inconclusive and lacked comparison with other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of serious adverse effects with ketorolac vs diclofenac or ketoprofen in adult patients after elective major surgery. METHODS: This prospective, randomized multicentre trial evaluated the risks of death, increased surgical site bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, acute renal failure, and allergic reactions, with ketorolac vs diclofenac or ketoprofen administered according to their approved parenteral and oral dose and duration of treatment. Patients were followed for 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 11,245 patients completed the trial at 49 European hospitals. Of these, 5634 patients received ketorolac and 5611 patients received one of the comparators. 155 patients (1.38%) had a serious adverse outcome, with 19 deaths (0. 17%), 117 patients with surgical site bleeding (1.04%), 12 patients with allergic reactions (0.12%), 10 patients with acute renal failure (0.09%), and four patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (0.04%). There were no differences between ketorolac and ketoprofen or diclofenac. Postoperative anticoagulants increased the risk of surgical site bleeding equally with ketorolac (odds ratio=2.65, 95% CI=1.51-4.67) and the comparators (odds ratio=3.58, 95% CI=1.93-6.70). Other risk factors for serious adverse outcomes were age, ASA score, and some types of surgery (plastic/ear, nose and throat, gynaecology, and urology). CONCLUSION: We conclude that ketorolac is as safe as ketoprofen and diclofenac for the treatment of pain after major surgery.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

Use of the Tesio catheter for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal failure: a 2-year prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The Tesio catheter system has been proposed to be a reliable source of vascular access for the dialysis patient with low rates of infection and other complications. Whether such catheters provide reliable short- and long-term access remains undetermined. METHODS: This study prospectively examined all Tesio lines inserted over a 2-year period in patients with end-stage failure with careful recording of all catheter complications and reasons for catheter loss. RESULTS: 100 catheters were inserted in 82 patients giving a total experience of 13,749 catheter days; 74 catheters were inserted into the jugular veins, the remainder into the femoral veins; 82 insertions were covered with antibiotics. At the end of the study, 29 catheters remained in situ. Of the remaining 71 catheters, 27 catheters were removed because of fashioning of definitive access. Nine catheters were lost due to infection and 10 were lost due to non-function; 19 patients died with a functioning catheter. Episodes ofnon-function were the major complications, although catheter patency was restored in 90% of cases utilizing urokinase and warfarin. Overall 80% of femoral and 16% of jugular catheters required anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Tesio catheters inserted into the jugular or femoral veins can provide excellent access whilst awaiting definitive dialysis access. They are well-tolerated with a low complication rate compared to standard temporary central venous catheters. Non-function remains a significant problem, especially in femoral catheters, which should be anticoagulated following insertion. Because of our results we suggest that these catheters be used as part of the co-ordinated approach to the management of vascular access in end-stage renal failure patients without definitive access.

Adolescent↗

A protocol of urokinase infusion and warfarin for the management of the thrombosed haemodialysis catheter.

BACKGROUND: Catheter dysfunction remains a significant cause of catheter loss and interrupted haemodialysis sessions. A number of regimens utilizing urokinase have been used but the optimum management of this common problem remains undetermined. METHODS: The study took place over 2 years and evaluated a protocol of urokinase infusion (25,000 U in 48 ml saline run at 4 ml/h via each limb of the catheter) followed by warfarin for restoration of catheter patency. RESULTS: Forty-eight urokinase infusions were used for 41 episodes of catheter dysfunction. Catheter patency was restored in 95% and only one catheter was lost. Recurrent thrombosis occurred in eight of 10 catheters not anticoagulated. Once anticoagulated, catheters worked well. Further episodes of non-function were related to a sub-therapeutic INR. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a high success rate for our protocol. We suggest an aggressive approach to the management of catheter thrombosis with urokinase used by infusion and carefully controlled anticoagulation to maintain the INR in the range 2-2.5.

Anticoagulants↗

Histological evaluation of electrosurgery and formocresol pulpotomy techniques in primary teeth in dogs.

The purpose of this study was to compare pulpal and periapical tissue reactions to electrosurgery versus formocresol pulpotomy techniques in the primary teeth of dogs. The study was conducted on 33 primary teeth of three mongrel dogs between the ages of one to three months. Each dog had three teeth treated by Formocresol Pulpotomy with Mechanical Coronal Pulp Removal (FC), three teeth treated by Electrosurgery Pulpotomy with Mechanical Coronal Pulp Removal (ES/MCPR), three teeth treated by Electrosurgery Pulpotomy with Electrosurgical Coronal Pulp Removal (ES/ECPR), and two teeth serving as untreated Controls. Dogs one, two and three were sacrificed performing the pulpotomies at two, four and six weeks, respectively. The pulp, periapical tissue and after surrounding bone were submitted to histological examination and the histological reaction was recorded. The results were fourteen out of 18 unfavorable and zero out of three favorable histological reactions occurred in the FC treated teeth. Six out of 18 unfavorable and one out of three favorable histological reactions occurred in the ES/MCPR treated teeth. Nine out of 18 unfavorable and two out of three favorable histological reactions occurred in the ES/ECPR treated teeth. One out of 18 unfavorable and zero out of three favorable histological reactions occurred in the untreated Control teeth. The conclusion of this study is that of the three experimental groups, the teeth treated by Electrosurgery Pulpotomy with either Mechanical or Electrosurgical Coronal Pulp Removal exhibited less histopathological reaction than the teeth treated by Formocresol Pulpotomy.

Animals↗

The misoprostol third stage of labour study: a randomised controlled comparison between orally administered misoprostol and standard management.

OBJECTIVE: To compare misoprostol with standard oxytocic regimens in the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Obstetric unit in a large teaching hospital. METHODS: One thousand women randomised to 500 microg misoprostol given orally or to standard oxytocic regimens of oxytocin, oxytocin with ergometrine, or ergometrine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of postpartum haemorrhage and the incidence and severity of side effects. RESULTS: Postpartum haemorrhage occurred in 12% of women given misoprostol and in 11% of women given standard oxytocic drugs (relative risk (RR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79, 1.55). Blood loss of 1000 mL or more occurred in 2% of women in each group. Nausea, headache, dizziness and tiredness were less frequent with misoprostol (RR (95% CI) 0.71 (0.59, 0.84); 0.53 (0.38, 0.74); 0.73 (0.61, 0.87) and 0.88 (0.83, 0.94) respectively). The main side effects of misoprostol were shivering (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.69, 2.25) and a rise in temperature (difference in mean rise 0.34 degrees C, 95% CI 0.26, 0.42). CONCLUSION: Oral misoprostol for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage was comparable to standard oxytocics. Many side effects were less common with misoprostol but shivering and pyrexia were more common. Larger randomised trials are needed before establishing the equivalence between misoprostol and standard oxytocic drugs in the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage.

Administration, Oral↗

Low uptake of eye services in rural India: a challenge for programs of blindness prevention.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate service uptake in a rural Indian population served by outreach eye camps and to identify barriers to uptake. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A routine eye camp was conducted within 5 km of each of 48 randomly selected villages of typically Hindu, backward-caste communities. Subsequently, participatory rural appraisal-community mapping, focus groups, matrix ranking, and semistructured interviews-was undertaken to explore community views of eye problems. An eye examination was conducted on persons with eye problems who did not attend the eye camp. Predictors of attendance were identified by multilevel regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 749 adults with an eye problem, 51 (6.8%) attended the eye camp. Independent predictors of attendance were being male (odds ratio = 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.5) and living within 3 km of the camp (odds ratio = 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-12.5). Of the 552 persons who did not attend the eye camps and had an eye examination, 242 (43.8%) had low vision (visual acuity <6/18 to > or =3/60 in presenting better eye) and 38 (6.9%) were blind in both eyes. Cataract surgery was recommended for 197 (35.8%) of the persons who did not attend the eye camps. Of 109 persons with a previous cataract operation, 42 (38.5%) had low vision and 11 (10.1%) were blind. Fear (principally of eye damage), cost (direct and indirect), family responsibilities, ageism, fatalism, and an attitude of being able to cope (with low or no vision) were the principal barriers to attending the eye camps. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of people who could have benefited from eye treatment were not using available services. Poor visual outcomes were observed in surgically treated persons.

Attitude to Health↗

The hope and the hazards of using compliance data in randomized controlled trials.

This paper aims to elucidate both the advantages and limitations of using compliance data in the reporting of treatment differences in clinical trials, illustrating the issues with some recent examples. While analysis by intention-to-treat should remain the principal reporting approach for most major clinical trials, arguments are put forward as to why supplementary analyses taking account of compliance can be of value. However, continued recognition of the potential biases inherent in all such selective analysis is of key importance. Some of the possible analytical approaches are presented along with suggestions on interpretation. Particular emphasis is on one case study, a large European trial in obesity incorporating repeated measures of weight loss, drug plasma level and pill count data. In working on compliance data in clinical trials, the statistician's main responsibilities may be to undertake a cohesive analysis strategy not influenced by data dredging, to achieve clarity of exposition without undue complexity or oversimplification, and to provide appropriately cautious interpretations which take account of selection biases and data limitations.

Appetite Depressants↗

Randomised comparison of percutaneous angioplasty vs continued medical therapy for hypertensive patients with atheromatous renal artery stenosis. Scottish and Newcastle Renal Artery Stenosis Collaborative Group.

BACKGROUND: Data from randomised studies are lacking on the value of interventional procedures in the management of atheromatous renal artery stenosis. This randomised prospective trial compared the effects on blood pressure (BP) and renal function of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty vs medical therapy in hypertensive patients with both unilateral and bilateral disease. METHODS: A total of 135 eligible patients were identified, of whom 55 (44%) were randomised. Eligible patients had sustained hypertension, with a minimum diastolic BP of 95 mm Hg on at least two anti-hypertensive drugs. Renal artery stenosis was defined by renal angiography as at least 50% stenosis in the affected vessel. All patients were observed during an initial 4-week run-in period on a fixed drug regimen and subsequent changes measured from this 4-week baseline. RESULTS: Blood pressure fell during the run-in period in all groups. In patients with bilateral renal artery stenosis randomised to angioplasty, a statistically significant (P<0.05) fall in BP was observed at latest follow-up (range 3-54 months). The mean fall in BP at latest follow-up in the angioplasty group, corrected for the medical group response, was 26/10 mm Hg. In patients with unilateral renal artery stenosis, no statistically significant or clinically important differences in outcome were observed between the two groups. No significant differences or trends in serum creatinine were observed between or within any group during follow-up. Major outcome events (death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, dialysis) were similar in the angioplasty and medical groups during follow-up. In the 40/135 patients undergoing angioplasty, serious or potentially serious complications attributable to the procedure were observed in 11 patients, bleeding at the arterial site (8 patients) being the most frequent. CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive patients with atheromatous renal artery stenosis, percutaneous renal angioplasty results in a modest improvement in systolic BP compared with medical therapy alone. This benefit was confined to patients with bilateral disease. No patient was 'cured', renal function did not improve, and intervention was accompanied by a significant complication rate.

Adult↗

A novel diagnostic index for use in the breast clinic.

The diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination, mammography, ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in discriminating between benign and malignant breast lesions has been retrospectively assessed in 603 patients who attended the Professorial Breast Clinic and then underwent surgical biopsy, in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, between January 1989 and September 1992. In this series of patients, FNA cytology gave the highest overall prediction of malignancy (92.6%) with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 98%, whilst ultrasonography gave the lowest correct overall prediction (75.6%), with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 79%. Using all the available findings (clinical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, FNA) as well as the patients' age, a stepwise logistic discriminant analysis was used to derive a mathematical equation for use as a novel diagnostic index. Weighted scores, derived from each variable, were used in the discriminant equation to predict the likelihood of malignancy in patients of different ages (>90%). For young patients (<35 years) the discriminant analysis predicted the diagnosis in 98% of women correctly. Quadruple assessment provides an opportunity for establishing the likely diagnosis in most patients the same day they visit the Breast Clinic. The diagnostic index, currently being evaluated prospectively in our breast clinic, may be a further aid to establishing a correct diagnosis.

Adult↗

Induction of abortion with mifepristone (RU 486) and oral or vaginal misoprostol.

BACKGROUND: Medical termination of pregnancy can be successfully performed with a combination of mifepristone (RU 486) and a prostaglandin analogue. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to compare oral with vaginal administration of the prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol for first-trimester abortion in women treated initially with mifepristone. METHODS: The study population consisted of 270 women seeking abortion within 63 days after the onset of amenorrhea. The dose of mifepristone was 600 mg, and the dose of misoprostol was 800 micrograms. The study had two primary end points: expulsion of the conceptus without the need for a surgical procedure, and abortion within four hours after the administration of misoprostol. RESULTS: Expulsion of the conceptus without the need for a surgical procedure occurred in 95 percent of the women who received misoprostol vaginally and in 87 percent of those who received it orally (P = 0.03). The rate of continued pregnancy was 7 percent with the oral regimen and 1 percent with the vaginal regimen (P = 0.01). Ninety-three percent of the women receiving misoprostol vaginally had abortions within four hours, as compared with only 78 percent of the women receiving the drug orally (P < 0.001). Vomiting and diarrhea were reported more frequently by the women who received oral misoprostol than by those who received vaginal misoprostol (P = 0.04 and P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: After the administration of mifepristone, vaginal administration of misoprostol is more effective and better tolerated than oral administration for the induction of first-trimester abortion.

Abortion, Induced↗

Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, causes, prevention and treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence and causes of postnatal maternal morbidity. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey of postnatal patients. Further data extracted from SMR1 returns, case records and the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank. SETTING: Postnatal care in a teaching maternity hospital, midwife delivery hospital, general practitioner maternity units and in the community. SUBJECTS: Twenty percent random sample of deliveries (1249 women) surveyed one week, eight weeks and 12 to 18 months after delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of self reported maternal morbidity, treatment received, readmission rates and causes for readmission. RESULTS: Of mothers in the sample 85% (99% CI 82-88%) reported at least one health problem in hospital, rising to 87% (84-90%) of those at home; 76% (71-81%) reported at least one health problem after eight weeks post-delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal morbidity is extensive and under-recognised after delivery. Measures to reduce and alleviate it must be sought.

Community Health Services↗

Stepwise or couple antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis?: women's preferences and willingness to pay.

Several antenatal cystic fibrosis carrier screening trials have offered women testing by either the stepwise or the couple method. In this study, both approaches were described to women attending an antenatal clinic, who were then asked which method they preferred. An estimate of the value to women of each type of test was also ascertained using a "willingness to pay" (WTP) method. Of 450 women, 279 (62%) preferred stepwise screening, 117 (26%) preferred couple screening, and 54 (12%) had no preference. Mean WTP for stepwise screening was 19 pounds (95% CI 17.50 pounds-20.50 pounds), and that for couple screening was 18 pounds (95% CI 16.50 pounds-19.50 pounds). The majority of women preferred stepwise screening although the average WTP for each method was similar.

Anxiety↗

Feasibility of monitoring patient based health outcomes in a routine hospital setting.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of monitoring health outcomes in a routine hospital setting and the value of feedback of outcomes data to clinicians by using the SF 36 health survey questionnaire. DESIGN: Administration of the questionnaire at baseline and three months, with analysis and interpretation of health status data after adjustments for sociodemographic variables and in conjunction with clinical data. Exploration of usefulness of outcomes data to clinicians through feedback discussion sessions and by an evaluation questionnaire. SETTING: One gastroenterology outpatient department in Aberdeen Royal Hospitals Trust, Scotland. PATIENTS: All (573) patients attending the department during one month (April 1993). MAIN MEASURES: Ability to obtain patient based outcomes data and requisite clinical information and feed it back to the clinicians in a useful and accessible form. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 542 (95%) patients at baseline and 450 (87%) patients at follow up. Baseline health status data and health outcomes data for the eight different aspects of health were analysed for individual patients, key groups of patients, and the total recruited patient population. Significant differences were shown between patients and the general population and between different groups of patients, and in health status over time. After adjustment for differences in sociodemography and main diagnosis patients with particularly poor scores were identified and discussed. Clinicians judged that this type of assessment could be useful for individual patients if the results were available at the time of consultation or for a well defined group of patients if used as part of a clinical trial. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring routine outcomes is feasible and instruments to achieve this, such as the SF 36 questionnaire, have potential value in an outpatient setting. IMPLICATIONS: If data on outcomes are to provide a basis for clinical and managerial decision making, information systems will be required to collect, analyse, interpret, and feed it back regularly and in good time.

Adolescent↗