PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Arostegui

Publications and source records attributed to M Arostegui.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Critical care medicine in a private hospital.

Technologic advances in the past ten years, coupled with the advent of a new specialty of critical care medicine, have made it possible for patients to survive major surgical procedures and critical illnesses which, ten years ago, would have resulted in certain death. In 1979, a group of emergency physicians, with training and experience in critical care medicine, initiated a program of critical care at Cedars of Lebanon Health Care Center, a private nonprofit hospital. This program provides critical care physician (intensivist) coverage similar to that presently available in emergency departments throughout the country. This program has completely changed the pattern of practice in the critical care area. Since its implementation, critical care procedures and aggressive therapy are provided around the clock. We believe that such coverage is essential and suggest that, just as the emergency department became fully staffed ten years ago, in the future, most intensive care units of private hospitals of 300 beds or more will be covered by intensivists working around the clock to provide care at the time it is needed.

Emergency Medicine↗

Performance rating scale for peer and self assessment.

A performance rating scale was developed and tested on a class of junior medical students who rated themselves and four to ten of their peers. When 928 ratings were factor analysed, two strong factors, knowledge and relationship, emerged. Test-retest reliabilities were good. Validity was measured by correlation of ratings with grades, and though both sources of ratings correlated significantly with grades given by faculty, peer ratings were more highly related to grades than were self ratings. Students tended to rate themselves lower than they were rated by their peers. Grades are probably not the best estimate of performance, but are currently one of the most reliable. Use of the scale to judge performance of physicians in practice has not been tested. The question of how such evaluation of peer and self would relate to other measures of quality of care is raised.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗