PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M B Barton

Publications and source records attributed to M B Barton.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Technology enhancements and changes in radiotherapy throughput in New South Wales.

AIMS: To assess the effect that the age of linear accelerators and recent changes in technology have had on linear accelerator throughput in New South Wales, Australia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Duration was measured (time of patient entry into the treatment room to time of exit) of each radiotherapy treatment fraction delivered on each linear accelerator over a 5-day period. Patient-, treatment- and equipment-based variables were collected for all treatment fractions, and assessed for their effect on fraction duration. Comparisons were made between these data and similar productivity data collected from a study carried out in 1996. Since the sample sizes for both the study periods were large enough, the distributions of the means were assumed normal (Central Limit Theorem). Specific analyses were carried out to assess the affect that new technologies, such as automatic field-sequencing (AFS) and multi-leaf collimator (MLC), have had on fraction duration. RESULTS: A total of 12 892 treatment fields and 4316 treatment fractions were delivered on 27 linear accelerators over 135 days. Comparison between the 2003 and 1996 productivity data showed an increase in the mean number of patients treated per hour by 11% and fields treated per hour by 31%. The mean number of fields treated per fraction increased by 15%. The mean fraction duration was reduced by 13% for linear accelerators of less than the median age of 7 years that were equipped with MLC/AFS, or both, compared with older linear accelerators without AFS and MLC. This reduction was more obvious for complex techniques, such as four-field breast treatments (27% decrease in fraction duration). The mean number of fields treated per hour was 43% more on the newer machines equipped with AFS and MLC. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in productivity has been observed between the 1996 and 2003 study periods, as measured by patients or fields per hour, despite an increase in treatment complexity as measured by fields per fraction. The application of AFS and MLC, and the use of newer linear accelerators, significantly shortened the mean duration per fraction for the common treatment techniques.

Hospital Departments↗
PubMed2005

The development of a new basic treatment equivalent model to assess linear accelerator throughput.

AIMS: The basic treatment equivalent (BTE) model was developed in 1996 in an attempt to improve the measurement of linear accelerator throughput in radiotherapy. This study aimed to assess the effect of treatment set-up and patient characteristics on fraction duration, to update the BTE model and to determine the better throughput measure between fields per hour and BTE per hour. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stopwatch measurements of the duration of each radiotherapy treatment fraction delivered on each linear accelerator in participating New South Wales radiation oncology departments over a 5-day period in 2003 were undertaken. Patient, equipment and staff data were collected to assess the effect of these variables on fraction duration. A new BTE equation was derived, including the most significant variables. Statistical comparison of fields and BTE per unit time was made to assess the better predictor of fraction duration. RESULTS: Data collected on 27 linear accelerators in 13 departments included a total of 135 days of linear accelerator operation, 4316 fractions and 12 892 treatment fields. Seventeen factors significantly influenced fraction duration (P < 0.01). These accounted for 46% of the total variance in the models. The eight most influential predictors of prolonged fraction duration were included in the BTE model. These were as follows: high number of fields, high number of port films/electronic portal imaging, absence of automatic field-sequencing and multi-leaf collimation, high number of junctions, use of bolus and first fraction of a treatment course. The BTE per hour was shown to be a better predictor of throughput than fields per hour. CONCLUSIONS: The BTE model is a better measure of linear accelerator throughput. It incorporates weightings for treatment and patient factors that significantly influenced fraction duration. This measure could be routinely collected by the radiation oncology departments and included in the electronic radiotherapy information systems.

Data Collection↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of patterns of care in lung cancer in three area health services in New South Wales, Australia.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in New South Wales (NSW). The incidence of and mortality from lung cancer differ throughout different area health services in NSW. AIM: To compare patterns of care in lung cancer among three area health services in NSW. METHODS: South-western Sydney Area Health Service (SWSAHS), Northern Sydney Area Health Service (NSAHS) and Hunter Area Health Service (HAHS) residents diagnosed with lung cancer in 1996 were identified from the NSW Central Cancer Registry and their medical records were reviewed. The main outcome measures were specialist care, investigations, treatment and survival. RESULTS: The study population comprised 256 SWSAHS, 270 NSAHS and 212 HAHS residents. NSAHS residents were older, with a median age of 73 years compared with 68 years in SWSAHS and 70 years in HAHS (P = 0.001). The performance status and stage distributions of the populations were similar. Twenty per cent of HAHS residents did not have a pathological diagnosis compared with 10% in SWSAHS and 9% in NSAHS (P = 0.005). Forty-five per cent of HAHS residents received no treatment compared with 25 and 22% in SWSAHS and NSAHS, respectively (P < 0.001). Despite these differences, there was no significant difference in overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer patterns of care were significantly different among the areas. The variability of practice identified in this study needs to be addressed to ensure optimum care for all patients with lung cancer. Although there was no significant difference in survival, under-utilization of efficacious treatment is likely to have affected patients' quality of life.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Lung cancer patterns of care in south western Sydney, Australia.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in New South Wales (NSW). There is a significantly higher incidence of lung cancer in the South Western Sydney Area Health Service (SWSAHS) than the NSW average. The aim of this study was to document patterns of lung cancer care for SWSAHS residents. METHODS: SWSAHS residents diagnosed with lung cancer in 1993 and 1996 were identified from the NSW Central Cancer Registry and their medical records reviewed. RESULTS: The study population comprised 527 patients of median age 68 years. 12% did not see a lung cancer specialist, 9% did not have a pathological diagnosis, and 28% did not receive any active treatment throughout the course of their illness. The median survival was 6.7 months and the 5 year overall survival was 8% (95% CI 6 to 10). The rates of pathological diagnosis, specialist referral, and treatment decreased with older age and poorer performance status. CONCLUSIONS: The management of lung cancer patients in SWSAHS is suboptimal. A significant proportion of patients are not receiving treatment. To improve patient care and outcomes, all lung cancer patients should be referred to a specialist for management, ideally in a multidisciplinary setting. Both consumers and general practitioners need to be educated about options available for the management of lung cancers and ageist and nihilistic attitudes need to be overcome.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Measuring access to effective care among elderly medicare enrollees in managed and Fee-for-Service care: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to compare access to effective care among elderly Medicare patients in a Staff Model and Group Model HMO and in Fee-for-Service (FFS) care. METHODS: We used a retrospective cohort study design, using claims and automated medical record data to compare achievement on quality indicators for elderly Medicare recipients. Secondary data were collected from 1) HMO data sets and 2) Medicare claims files for the time period 1994-95. All subjects were Medicare enrollees in a defined area of New England: those enrolled in two divisions of a managed care plan with different physician payment arrangements: a staff model, and a group model; and the Medicare FFS population. We abstracted information on indicators covering several domains: preventive, diagnosis-specific, and chronic disease care. RESULTS: On the indicators we created and tested, access in the single managed care plan under study was comparable to or better than FFS care in the same geographic region. Percent of Medicare recipients with breast cancer screening was 36 percentage points higher in the staff model versus FFS (95% confidence interval 34-38 percentage points). Follow up after hospitalization for myocardial infarction was 20 percentage points higher in the group model than in FFS (95% confidence interval 14-26 percentage points). CONCLUSION: According to indicators developed for use in both claims and automated medical record data, access to care for elderly Medicare beneficiaries in one large managed care organization was as good as or better than that in FFS care in the same geographic area.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases: an evaluation of outcome measures.

The objective of this study was to identify and evaluate important patient-based outcomes that are specific to the palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases. We first conducted a literature review to identify and evaluate outcomes that are currently in use. To identify outcomes that are important to patients, in-depth patient interviews were conducted. Finally, issues identified through the interviews were quantified through a prospective survey, in which patients completed a questionnaire prior to commencing radiotherapy and again after 6 weeks. In our literature review, we found that there was no standardized definition of either response to radiotherapy or assessment of pain relief. Pain measurement in many studies was undertaken using very simple measures, which could possibly yield inaccurate results. The vast majority of studies did not include quality of life as an endpoint. The patient interviews and survey showed that chronic pain and associated limitation of movement were the disease symptoms causing the most concern. Having a clear, alert mind and being able in self-care were the aspects of daily living given the highest priority. Sustained pain relief and minimizing the risk of future complications were the main priorities relating to radiotherapy treatment. The practical aspects of treatment (travelling distance, remaining at home and brevity of treatment) were of least importance. This study indicates the complexity of evaluating the outcomes of palliative interventions, and confirms the deficiencies of pain relief as the primary end-point. The patient's quality of life is affected by many factors other than pain (such as limited mobility, reduced performance, side effects and impaired role functioning); hence a wider range of end-points is required. Greater sensitivity is required than in currently used end-points. Concurrent diseases as well as concurrent therapies can make it difficult to attribute effects with precision. Unless such factors are considered in research design, the results may prove unreliable.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2001

The relation of household income to mammography utilization in a prepaid health care system.

Managed care organizations should be expected to provide equivalent access to preventive and screening services to all members. We studied mammography in 1,667 women members of one HMO who had an overall utilization rate of 84.9%. Significant correlates of mammography utilization included age, estimated household income, and division of the managed care organization in which the member was enrolled. Each $10,000 increment of income increased mammography rates by 2.5 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4% to 3.6%), independent of age and division. Our findings suggest that coverage for mammography services is not sufficient to ensure equivalent use of screening across income groups.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits.

OBJECTIVE: To measure how often a breast-related concern was documented in medical records after screening mammography according to the mammogram result (normal, or true-negative vs false-positive) and to measure changes in health care utilization in the year after the mammogram. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Large health maintenance organization in New England. PATIENTS: Group of 496 women with false-positive screening mammograms and a comparison group of 496 women with normal screening mammograms, matched for location and year of mammogram. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 1) Documentation in clinicians' notes of patient concern about the breast and 2) ambulatory health care utilization, both breast-related and non-breast-related, in the year after the mammogram. Fifty (10%) of 496 women with false-positive mammograms had documentation of breast-related concern during the 12 months after the mammogram, compared to 1 (0.2%) woman with a normal mammogram (P =.001). Documented concern increased with the intensity of recommended follow-up (P =.009). Subsequent ambulatory visits, not related to the screening mammogram, increased in the year after the mammogram among women with false-positive mammograms, both in terms of breast-related visits (incidence ratio, 3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69 to 5.93) and non-breast-related visits (incidence ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.25). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians document concern about breast cancer in 10% of women who have false-positive mammograms, and subsequent use of health care services are increased among women with false-positive mammogram results.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms.

BACKGROUND: The cumulative risk of a false-positive mammogram can be substantial. We studied which variables affect the chance of a false-positive mammogram and estimated cumulative risks over nine sequential mammograms. METHODS: We used medical records of 2227 randomly selected women who were 40-69 years of age on July 1, 1983, and had at least one screening mammogram. We used a Bayesian discrete hazard regression model developed for this study to test the effect of patient and radiologic variables on a first false-positive screening and to calculate cumulative risks of a false-positive mammogram. RESULTS: Of 9747 screening mammograms, 6. 5% were false-positive; 23.8% of women experienced at least one false-positive result. After nine mammograms, the risk of a false-positive mammogram was 43.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 36.6%-53.6%). Risk ratios decreased with increasing age and increased with number of breast biopsies, family history of breast cancer, estrogen use, time between screenings, no comparison with previous mammograms, and the radiologist's tendency to call mammograms abnormal. For a woman with highest-risk variables, the estimated risk for a false-positive mammogram at the first and by the ninth mammogram was 98.1% (95% CI = 69.3%-100%) and 100% (95% CI = 99.9%-100%), respectively. A woman with lowest-risk variables had estimated risks of 0.7% (95% CI = 0.2%-1.9%) and 4.6% (95% CI = 1. 1%-12.5%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative risk of a false-positive mammogram over time varies substantially, depending on a woman's own risk profile and on several factors related to radiologic screening. By the ninth mammogram, the risk can be as low as 5% for women with low-risk variables and as high as 100% for women with multiple high-risk factors.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Comparing asthma care for Medicaid and non-Medicaid children in a health maintenance organization.

OBJECTIVE: To compare ambulatory visit patterns, rates of medication use, and emergency department and hospital utilization for children with asthma covered under Medicaid and commercial payers within the same health maintenance organization (HMO). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Eleven staff-model pediatric departments of an HMO. PATIENTS: A total of 1928 Medicaid and 11007 non-Medicaid children aged 2 to 18 years with at least 1 encounter with a diagnosis of asthma between October 1, 1991, and September 30, 1996. METHODS: We linked patient-level data from the HMO's automated medical record system for ambulatory encounters, a claims system for emergency department and hospital care, and an automated pharmacy dispensing database. Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients were compared for all encounter types and for prescribing and dispensing of beta-agonist and controller medications (inhaled corticosteroids and cromolyn sodium). Incidence rate ratios were calculated from Poisson regression models to control for age, sex, and, when appropriate, beta-agonist dispensing rate. The number of refills authorized on each prescription and the fraction of medications dispensed as refills compared with new prescriptions were compared for Medicaid and non-Medicaid patients. RESULTS: Medicaid-insured children in the HMO were 1.4 times (95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.5) more likely to receive care in emergency departments and 1.3 times (95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.5) more likely to be hospitalized for their asthma compared with non-Medicaid members. Medicaid and non-Medicaid enrollees had similar yearly rates of nonurgent (1.32 vs 1.17) and urgent (0.38 vs 0.31) ambulatory visits. Beta-agonists were dispensed roughly equally to Medicaid and non-Medicaid members. Although Medicaid patients were less likely to have controller medications dispensed (relative risk, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.74), they were equally likely to have them prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in ambulatory contact for Medicaid members do not explain the higher rates of emergency department visits and hospitalization in this population. Reasons for lower rates of dispensing of controller medications should continue to be investigated as one cause of increased morbidity for low-income children with asthma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

The effect of waiting for radiotherapy for grade III/IV gliomas.

AIM: To determine the effect of waiting time for radiotherapy on the overall survival of patients with high-grade gliomas. METHODS: We examined records of patients with grade III/IV gliomas who were referred to radiotherapy after surgery or biopsy - ECOG <3, any age, radical intent or palliative intent with dose >50 Gy, no interstitial or radiosurgery boost. Waiting time was defined in two ways, time from biopsy to radiotherapy and time from presentation to radiotherapy department to start of radiotherapy. RESULTS: There were 182 patients in the study having a median survival of 8.5 months, with a median follow up of 10.5 months. The group comprised of 63 (35%) grade III and 119 (65%) grade IV gliomas. Median times and ranges from biopsy and presentation to treatment were 26 days (4-78 days) and 15 days (1-62 days), respectively. The median dose was 60 Gy in a median of 30 fractions over a median of 46 days. Tumour progression before and during radiotherapy occurred in seven patients (4%) and 19 patients (11%), respectively. One hundred and seventy-nine patients died of disease. The seven patients whose tumour progressed before radiotherapy were excluded from the analysis of prognostic variables. In a multivariate analysis the variables that were significantly associated with worse survival were older age, reduced dose and prolonged waiting time from presentation. The risk of death increased by 2% for each day of waiting for radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: The study showed longer waiting time from presentation at radiotherapy department to treatment to be a significant predictor of overall survival for patients with high-grade glioma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Mantle planning: report of the Australasian Radiation Oncology Lymphoma Group film survey and consensus guidelines.

The purpose of the present paper was to measure the variation in mantle planning in Australia and New Zealand. A chest X-ray (CXR) of a patient in the supine position with a neck node marked by wire was sent to every radiation oncologist in Australia and New Zealand. They were to mark on the CXR the lung blocks that they would use to treat this patient, assuming that the patient had stage IA Hodgkin's disease. These marks were compared with a small sample of radiologists who were asked to define the mediastinum on the same CXR. Radiation oncologists were also asked to complete a short questionnaire about other modifications to their treatment fields and their experience with this technique. One hundred and six films were sent out and 44 radiation oncologists replied. There was a maximum variation in the placement of their lung blocks of 6 cm. Half of the lung blocks were within a 2-cm range. One respondent said they would not use a mantle field to treat this patient. Mediastinal coverage was inadequate in at least 50% of cases. There was a very large variation in mantle field planning practices within Australia and New Zealand. For this reason Australasian Radiation Oncology Lymphoma Group has produced consensus guidelines for mantle block design. These are appended to the present paper.

Australia↗
PubMed2000

Breast cancer screening use by African Americans and Whites in an HMO.

OBJECTIVE: To examine racial differences in breast cancer screening in an HMO that provides screening at no cost. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of breast cancer screening among African-American and white women. Breast cancer screening information was extracted from computerized medical records. SETTING: A large HMO in New England. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: White and African-American women (N = 2,072) enrolled for at least 10 years in the HMO. MAIN RESULTS: Primary care clinicians documented recommending a screening mammogram significantly more often for African Americans than whites (70% vs 64%; P <.001). During the 10-year period, on average, white women obtained more mammograms (4.49 vs 3.93; P <.0001) and clinical breast examinations (5.35 vs 4.92; P <.01) than African-American women. However, a woman's race was no longer a statistically significant predictor of breast cancer screening after adjustment for differences in age, estimated household income, estrogen use, and body mass index (adjusted number of mammograms, 4.47 vs 4.25, P =.17; and adjusted number of clinical breast examinations, 5.35 vs 5. 31, P =.87). CONCLUSIONS: In this HMO, African-American and white women obtained breast cancer screening at similar rates. Comparisons with national data showed much higher screening rates in this HMO for both white and African-American women.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How?

CONTEXT: The clinical breast examination (CBE) is widely recommended and practiced as a tool for breast cancer screening; however, its effectiveness is dependent on its precision and accuracy. OBJECTIVE: To collect evidence on the effectiveness of CBE in screening for breast cancer and information on the best technique to use. DATA SOURCES: We searched the English-language literature using the MEDLINE database (1966-1997) and manual review of all reference lists, as well as contacting investigators of several published studies for clarifications and unpublished data. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: To study CBE effectiveness, we included all controlled trials and case-control studies in which CBE was at least part of the screening modality; for technique, we included both clinical studies and those that used silicone breast models. All 3 authors reviewed and agreed on the studies selected for inclusion in the pooled analyses. DATA SYNTHESIS: Randomized clinical trials demonstrated reduced breast cancer mortality rates among women screened by both CBE and mammography. Evidence of CBE's independent contribution was less direct; CBE alone detected between 3% and 45% of breast cancers found that screening mammography missed. The precision of CBE was difficult to determine because of the lack of consistent and standardized examination techniques. Studies on CBE precision reported fair agreement (kappa = 0.22-0.59). Pooling trial data, we estimated CBE sensitivity at 54% and specificity at 94%. The likelihood ratio of a positive CBE result is 10.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8-19.2), while the likelihood ratio of a negative test result is 0.47 (95% CI, 0.40-0.56). Longer duration of CBE and a higher number of specific techniques used were associated with greater accuracy. The preferred technique for CBE includes proper positioning of the patient, thoroughness of search, use of a vertical-strip search pattern, proper position and movement of the fingers, and a CBE duration of at least 3 minutes per breast. The value of inspection is unproved. Professional and lay examiners improved their sensitivity on silicone breast models after being taught this technique. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect evidence supports the effectiveness of CBE in screening for breast cancer. Although the screening clinical examination by itself does not rule out disease, the high specificity of certain abnormal findings greatly increases the probability of breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: frequency, evaluation, and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist about visits to primary care clinicians for breast symptoms in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To determine how often women present with breast symptoms, how these symptoms are evaluated, and how often cancer is diagnosed. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Staff-model division of a large health maintenance organization (HMO) in New England. PATIENTS: 2400 women who were 40 to 69 years of age as of 1 July 1983 and were continuously enrolled in the HMO until 30 June 1995. MEASUREMENTS: Information on all breast-related encounters from 1 July 1983 to 30 June 1993 was abstracted. Type of symptom, clinicians' findings and recommendations, and all subsequent evaluations were recorded. Cases of cancer diagnosed subsequent to the symptom were determined. RESULTS: Sixteen percent of the HMO population presented with a breast symptom during the 10-year period, for a rate of 22.8 presentations per 1000 person-years. Women younger than 50 years of age presented nearly twice as often as older women (P = 0.001). Women with breast symptoms had lower rates of screening than other women before presenting but higher rates of screening afterward (P < 0.001). Symptoms were evaluated beyond the initial visit in 66% of patients, and invasive procedures were performed in 27% of patients. Cancer was found in 6.2% of patients and 4.5% of episodes; rates of cancer detection varied significantly by type of symptom but not by patient age. CONCLUSIONS: Breast symptoms among women 40 to 70 years of age were common in this primary care practice. Evaluation beyond initial examinations was frequent, and invasive procedures were performed for 27% of patients. Cancer was diagnosed in more than 4% of episodes, indicating that follow-up of breast symptoms is important in primary care practices.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A survey of cancer curricula in Australian and New Zealand medical schools in 1997. Oncology Education Committee of the Australian Cancer Society.

OBJECTIVE: To assess teaching about cancer in medical schools in Australia and New Zealand. DESIGN AND SETTING: Postal survey of all 12 Australian and New Zealand medical schools in 1997. PARTICIPANTS: The Dean (or a nominee) of each medical school and the representative of each university on the Oncology Education Committee (OEC) of the Australian Cancer Society. OUTCOME MEASURES: Curriculum content, clinical placements and forms of teaching and assessment related to cancer; presence and composition of cancer curriculum planning, and assessment groups. RESULTS: 22 responses were received from 10 medical schools (from nine Deans or nominees and 13 OEC representatives). Implementation of cancer teaching and overall course structure varied considerably between schools. Nine of these 10 schools had a "cancer planning group", and four were using problem-based learning. Only five schools could readily provide detailed curriculum maps. Courses covered most areas of basic and clinical sciences outlined in the ACS ideal curriculum; chemotherapy and palliative care were taught in all courses, but other subjects were covered less often (e.g., clinical staging, radiation oncology and pain management were taught in nine schools, critical evaluation of medical literature in seven, and economic evaluation in five). Teaching on cancer in clinical placements also varied considerably (e.g., one school devoted no time to palliative care). DISCUSSION: There has been some improvement in delivery of cancer education in medical schools since 1993, but considerable variation in teaching practice and implementation remains. Difficulty in determining details of course content led directly to difficulty in assessing the quality of teaching about cancer.

Australia↗
PubMed1999

Radiotherapy for bone metastases: a critical appraisal of outcome measures.

Pain from bone metastases is a common problem in patients with advanced cancer, and radiotherapy plays an important role in its palliation. Single fraction treatments are often prescribed, but there is no clear consensus on this issue and clinical practice shows significant variability. This situation is unsatisfactory for all patients--the patient, the clinician, and the health care administrator. Randomized trials may use poor outcome measures and this contributes to practice variability. The credibility of outcome studies is often reduced due to poor study design, small sample sizes, and the use of endpoints that are both unreliable and unsuitable. The endpoints used have been narrowly defined, the patient's perspective has generally been overlooked, and quality of life has only once been used as an endpoint. A review of the current literature suggests that instruments specific to bone metastases are required. These must be based on patient experience, and rely on self-report. In addition, there is a need to understand the relative priority that patients attribute to treatment outcomes. The use of better instruments and methodologies in future trials will enhance the credibility of results and reduce practice variations.

Bone Neoplasms↗