Medical screening of older drivers.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M Bédard.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Health care providers in three nursing homes in Ontario were surveyed to determine educational needs, barriers to meeting these needs, and the preferred format for education. Of the 415 health care providers asked to participate, 225 completed the questionnaire. Need was expressed for the majority of the 35 educational topics identified, including the role of the palliative care team, management of physical symptoms, pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of pain, stress management, spiritual needs, culture and death, and counseling. Group discussions and seminars were favored over traditional lectures. The primary factors influencing attendance at a palliative care workshop were loss of pay and time and location of the workshop.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To validate reference standards for the assessment of capacity to complete an advance directive and to develop and test three simple screening instruments. METHODS: We administered five measures of capacity to 96 older subjects from nursing homes, retirement homes, and homes for the aged. The measures included two reference standard evaluations: an assessment by a specially trained nurse in collaboration with a multidisciplinary team (Competency Clinic assessment) and geriatrician assessment using a decisional aid. Three screening instruments were also included: a Generic Instrument designed for any advance directive, a Specific Instrument designed for the "Let Me Decide" advance directive, and the Standardized Mini-Mental Status Examination (SMMSE). The screening instruments and the geriatrician's assessment were administered twice to half of the respondents to determine interrater agreement. RESULTS: The chance-corrected agreement for the assessment by two geriatricians was 0.78, and for agreement between the geriatricians and Competency Clinic assessments it was 0.82. Agreement for the Generic and Specific screening instrument assessments by two observers was 0.77 and 0.90, respectively. The areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve relating the results of the three screening instruments to the Competency Clinic assessment were 0.82 for the Generic Instrument, 0.90 for the Specific Instrument, and 0.94 for the SMMSE; chance is an unlikely explanation for the difference between these three values (P < or = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Using rigorous methods, health workers can make reproducible and valid assessments of capacity to complete an advance directive. The SMMSE accurately differentiates people who can learn about and ultimately complete advance directives from those who cannot.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the interrater and intrarater reliability of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) with the Standardized Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (SADAS). DESIGN: A randomized, double blind trial. Sixteen university students were randomized to administer either version of the instrument. Subjects were randomized to three assessments, at 2-week intervals, using the ADAS or the SADAS. Each subject's first and third tests were administered by the same rater, the second by a different rater. SETTING: A geriatric outpatient clinic in a university teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four patients with possible or probable Alzheimer's disease living in the community or in a long-term care facility. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the interrater reliability of total ADAS and SADAS scores. Secondary outcomes were ADAS and SADAS cognitive scores, noncognitive scores, duration of testing, and sample size estimates. RESULTS: The interrater reliability of the SADAS total score was significantly better than that of the ADAS (interrater ICC 0.93 SADAS vs 0.83 ADAS), and the interrater standard deviation of the total SADAS score was lower than that of the ADAS (38%, P < .05). The SADAS cognitive subscale inter and intrarater reliability, although higher than the ADAS, was not significantly different when used by different raters (interrater ICC 0.91 SADAS vs 0.90 ADAS; intrarater ICC 0.88 SADAS vs 0.86 ADAS). The SADAS noncognitive subscale was significantly more reliable than the ADAS (interrater ICC 0.89 SADAS vs 0.42 ADAS; intrarater ICC 0.87 SADAS vs 0.70 ADAS; P < or = .05) and had a lower standard deviation between raters (59%; P < .01) and within raters (40%; P < .05) compared with the ADAS. CONCLUSION: The improved reliability of the SADAS total score means that investigators can now use this score as a primary outcome measure, and important behavioral symptomatology can be included as a marker for treatment efficacy in AD. The smaller standard deviation of the SADAS means that clinical trials using the SADAS as a primary outcome will demonstrate differences, if present, with smaller sample sizes than with the ADAS.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between physician characteristics, prescribing behaviour and patient outcomes. DESIGN: Descriptive study linking four provincial databases. SETTING: New Brunswick. PARTICIPANTS: All 366 general practitioners (GPs) (accounting for 40% of all physicians with a general licence in New Brunswick) who ordered at least 200 prescriptions for elderly beneficiaries of the New Brunswick Prescription Drug Program and saw at least 20 elderly patients in an office setting between Apr. 1, 1990, and Mar. 31, 1991. Physicians with palliative care practices were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURES: GPs' personal, professional and practice characteristics, their prescribing patterns, and mortality, morbidity (number of days in hospital per patient) and hip-fracture rates among their elderly patients. RESULTS: Compared with the GPs who had a lower mortality rate, those with a higher mortality rate prescribed more drugs overall (p < 0.001), specifically antidepressants, bronchodilators, cholesterol-lowering agents, gastrointestinal drugs, neuroleptics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). They also were more likely to be male (p < 0.01), had larger practices (p < 0.001), saw more patients per day (p < 0.05) and billed more per year (p < 0.001). Compared with the GPs who had a lower morbidity rate, those with a higher morbidity rate prescribed more drugs overall (p < 0.005), specifically bronchodilators, gastrointestinal drugs and NSAIDs. They also were more likely to be younger (p < 0.005) and male (p < 0.01), had fewer years in practice (p < 0.001), saw more patients per day (p < 0.05) and billed more per patient (p < 0.01). The GPs who had a higher hip-fracture rate prescribed more drugs overall (p < 0.001), notably antihypertensives, bronchodilators, cholesterol-lowering agents, gastrointestinal drugs and NSAIDs, than those who had a lower hip-fracture rate. They also had a larger practice (p < 0.001), practised more days per year (p < 0.005), had more patient visits per year (p < 0.05) and billed more per year (p < 0.001). Younger male GPs who practised with relatively more intensity and prescribed more drugs per patient had practices with higher morbidity, mortality and hip-fracture rates among their elderly patients than the other GPs. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant relation between certain physician characteristics, their prescribing behaviour and patient outcomes. Further study is required to determine what physician characteristics and prescribing behaviours for specific illnesses contribute to patient outcomes. Regional differences should also be examined, as should incentives in this fee-for-service system. Linkage of these types of provincial databases may help in the evaluation of physicians' performance and in the development of strategic interventions and practice guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the reliability of instruments used in clinical trials involving cognitively impaired older adults when the instruments are administered in-home rather than in-clinic and to compare withdrawal rates is these two groups. DESIGN: This study was part of a larger n-of-1 clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of a MAO/A inhibitor (Brofaromine) in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Participants were initially assessed at the clinic (baseline) and then randomly allocated to in-home or in-clinic assessments for the remainder of the trial. The baseline and second assessment (performed before initiation of the treatment) were used for the reliability analysis. Withdrawal rates were examined over the course of the 6-month trial. SETTING: Assessments took place at a geriatric clinic in an urban university teaching hospital and at residences of some of the patients. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-six Alzheimer's disease patients participated in the study, of which, 22 were randomized to in-home assessments and 24 to in-clinic assessments. MEASUREMENTS: Test-retest reliability was measured for all five instruments used in the study and was based on the first two assessments. Sample size requirements, based on within-group variance, were calculated. Withdrawal rates were obtained for the total duration of the trial. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability of the instruments, as determined by intraclass correlations, was good in both groups but favored in-clinic for all but one instrument (range: 0.47-0.90 for in-home vs 0.57-0.92 for in-clinic). Sample size requirements based on reliability assessment data were found to be larger for some instruments when administered in-home. Only four in-home patients withdrew before completion of the study, compared with eight in-clinic patients. CONCLUSION: The results suggest the in-home assessments in cognitively impaired older adults may result in lower withdrawal rates but may necessitate larger sample sizes to offset larger test-retest variability.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a relation between physician characteristics and prescribing for elderly patients. DESIGN: Descriptive study linking two provincial databases. SETTING: New Brunswick. PARTICIPANTS: All general practitioners (GPs) in New Brunswick who ordered at least 200 prescriptions for elderly beneficiaries of the New Brunswick Prescription Drug Program between Apr. 1, 1990, and Mar. 31, 1991; eligible GPs accounted for 376 (40%) of all physicians with a general licence in New Brunswick. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: GPs' personal and professional characteristics (age, sex, family practice accreditation, country of training and number of years in practice), practice characteristics (number of practice days, number of patients seen and medical services provided per day, average amount of billing per patient, total number of patients seen and their average age, and total amount of billings) and number of prescriptions by category of drug. RESULTS: High prescribers and low prescribers did not differ significantly in age, number of years in practice, mean practice size or patient age. Compared with the low prescribers the high prescribers were more likely to be male, have been trained in Canada and be qualified by the Canadian College of Family Physicians. Also, they had more practice days, saw more patients per day, performed more services per day, billed more per patient and billed on average 30% more during the study period. Overall, the high prescribers ordered on average 45% more prescriptions than the low prescribers. CONCLUSION: There is a significant relation between certain physician characteristics and prescribing behaviour. Further study is required to examine the relation between these variables and patient outcomes.
Clinical pharmacokinetics represents a way to ensure that a patient is receiving an optimal dose of a given drug for a specific indication. Pharmacokinetic consultation services have been implemented in many teaching hospitals and tertiary care facilities in the past. This project evaluated the feasibility of expanding the process to several community hospitals with one coordinator. Twenty-seven hospitals, members of the Ottawa Valley Regional Drug Information Service, were approached. Fifty-two pharmacists from 21 sites agreed to participate. Four modules were taught: basic principles, theophylline, aminoglycosides, and digoxin. Regular follow-up meetings were arranged so pharmacists from different hospitals could share their administrative and patient-specific problems and solutions. After two years, 16 departments have implemented a clinical pharmacokinetic service and monitor 82% of targeted drug levels. The pharmacists trained in clinical pharmacokinetics through the project recommended changes in the regimen in 45% of all their consultations. Eight-one percent of these were accepted and implemented by physicians. These results indicate that pharmacists from small community hospitals can be trained by one individual to provide clinical pharmacokinetic services with minimal supervision. It also shows that these hospitals have a need for such services.
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterized by a dramatic neutrophil recruitment and repeated Pseudomonas infections in the lungs. To evaluate cytokine releasibility by airway epithelial cells in the context of CF, we studied primary nasal epithelial cells isolated from the upper airways and continuous epithelial cell lines from normal and CF subjects. Relatively low levels of interleukin (IL)-8, IL-6, and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were produced spontaneously by primary epithelial cells (< 50 pg/10(6) cells) and higher levels of colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) (1 to 2 ng/10(6) cells). Cells were stimulated with substances that are likely to be present in the inflamed lungs of CF patients-namely, the proinflammatory monokines IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) as well as neutrophil elastase and bacterial products from Pseudomonas (mucoid exopolysaccharide [MEP] and rhamnolipids). Both IL-1 and TNF alpha induced a dose-dependent release of IL-6 (5 to 10 ng/10(6) cells) and GM-CSF (2 to 3 ng/10(6) cells) by primary epithelial cells from eight normal volunteers. The TNF alpha/IL-1-stimulated GM-CSF release was blocked by the addition of 1 microM dexamethasone, whereas basal CSF-1 release was unaffected. Neutrophil elastase was a potent inducer of IL-8 and GM-CSF both in primary epithelial cells and in cell lines. Dexamethasone (1 microM) did not inhibit elastase-induced IL-8 release in either normal or CF epithelial cells. Rhamnolipids and MEP were found to stimulate the copious release of IL-8, GM-CSF, and IL-6 from epithelial cells, in a steroid-sensitive fashion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The diagnosis fibromyalgia (FS) requires the existence of tender points, routinely identified by clinical examination. We evaluated the interrater reliability of digital (thumb) examination for tender points by comparison with dolorimeter examination, a procedure considered to measure accurately muscle tenderness. Subjects were 15 patients with varying rheumatological diagnoses and anatomically widespread pain. In a physician blinded procedure, 2 rheumatologists determined the tender point count by digital examination at 18 points, and the tender point threshold by dolorimeter at 12 points. A pain threshold of 4 kg/1.77 cm2 or less defined the presence of tender points under both methods. Results indicate (1) classification as FS vs other diagnosis using pain complaint and digital examination for tender points, was moderately reliable (kappa = 0.74, p < 0.005); (2) interrater agreement about presence/absence of tenderness at individual points was not significantly lowered by digital examination (kappa = 0.51, p < 0.0001) relative to dolorimetry (kappa = 0.62, p < 0.0001); however, (3) analyses on the 12 anatomical points that were common to both methods indicated that digital examination resulted in significantly more anatomical points being considered tender relative to dolorimetry. Our findings indicate that digital and dolorimeter measures are equally reliable, but have poor concurrent validity for defining tender points in FS. Implications of these findings for the classification of fibromyalgia are discussed.
To test the hypothesis that postprandial rises of plasma glucose attenuate the motivation derived from positive tastes, we analyzed the effects of intraperitoneal (ip) injections of glucose on sham feeding, a preparation in which food intake is motivated primarily by taste sensations. Ip glucose suppressed sham feeding, with maximal suppressions approximately 42% but only when glucose was administered contiguous with oropharyngeal stimulation. The food intake inhibition produced by ip glucose interacted with palatability; smaller doses of glucose were required to suppress less concentrated sucrose solutions. Closing the gastric cannula increased the potency with which ip glucose inhibited eating, suggesting synergy of postabsorptive glucose with other postgastric satiety signals. The inhibition of eating produced by ip glucose did not result from malaise. Thus postabsorptive rises of plasma glucose decrease the ability of taste cues to drive ingestion and suggest that this phenomenon may contribute to spontaneous meal termination.
Data obtained with any research tool must be reproducible, a concept referred to as reliability. Three techniques are often used to evaluate reliability of tools using continuous data in aging research: intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Pearson correlations, and paired t tests. These are often construed as equivalent when applied to reliability. This is not correct, and may lead researchers to select instruments based on statistics that may not reflect actual reliability. The purpose of this paper is to compare the reliability estimates produced by these three techniques and determine the preferable technique. A hypothetical dataset was produced to evaluate the reliability estimates obtained with ICC, Pearson correlations, and paired t tests in three different situations. For each situation two sets of 20 observations were created to simulate an intrarater or inter-rater paradigm, based on 20 participants with two observations per participant. Situations were designed to demonstrate good agreement, systematic bias, or substantial random measurement error. In the situation demonstrating good agreement, all three techniques supported the conclusion that the data were reliable. In the situation demonstrating systematic bias, the ICC and t test suggested the data were not reliable, whereas the Pearson correlation suggested high reliability despite the systematic discrepancy. In the situation representing substantial random measurement error where low reliability was expected, the ICC and Pearson coefficient accurately illustrated this. The t test suggested the data were reliable. The ICC is the preferred technique to measure reliability. Although there are some limitations associated with the use of this technique, they can be overcome.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.