PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Backhaus

Publications and source records attributed to M Backhaus.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

[Imaging of osteoarthritis of the peripheral joints].

Pain and loss of function are the clinical signs of osteoarthritis (OA). Conventional x-rays confirm the diagnosis or provide important hints for differential diagnosis. In the natural course of OA, x-rays are performed at longer intervals when pain increases or therapy is without effect, especially if more invasive therapies, or even surgery, becomes necessary. The advantages of x-rays are worldwide availability, cost effectiveness, very long experience with this imaging method and the possibility of storing the images for long periods of time. The typical findings of OA can be detected only roughly by quantitative methods. In many patients, grading of OA does not correlate well with the clinical symptoms. X-ray changes are part of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for OA of the hand, hip and knee. Ordinary s-rays can depicting bone with a higher local resolution than any other imaging technique. Soft tissues and cartilage can be visualized only indirectly. In OA, ultrasound is the method to depict intra-articular effusion at an early stage. Osteophytes or the degree of synovitis are also visible. Concomitant changes in tendons, bursae or cartilage, such as structures in the hip, shoulder and knee, can be evaluated. MRI is an appropriate tool for describing changes in cartilage volume and concomitant soft-tissue alterations. For qualitative cartilage imaging, MRI has, to date, not been fully validated. Bone scans (bone scintigraphy) allow the differentiation of inflammatory from degenerative joint affections and may add information on the activity of the subchondral bone, which may develop to a prognostic marker of OA. This survey represents recommendations of the Commission "Imaging Techniques" of the German Rheumatology Society regarding the technical and individual conditions, indications, practical guidance and the typical findings of imaging in OA.

Arthrography↗
PubMed2006

[Imaging methods in rheumatology: imaging in psoriasis arthritis (PsA)].

Conventional radiography is still the standard method of imaging in PsA since it displays many joints at the same time, thereby allowing different types of joint involvement to be recognized. Moreover, thanks to the high resolution of radiography, bony changes in a single joint are depicted in a brilliant way. Several features of psoriatic arthritis allow the distinction from rheumatoid arthritis, including the frequent involvement of the distal interphalangeal joints, asymmetry of joint involvement, axial involvement of finger joints, oligoarticular involvement; however, symmetric polyarthritis is also possible. At the level of the single joint, there are signs of severe destructive changes potentially leading to mutilation and at the same time signs of periostal bone proliferation and ankylosis may be present. Bony proliferation and/or osteolysis are not restricted to the joint region but can affect also the total phalanx with bone apposition or concentric osteolysis which may lead to a complete disappearance of phalanxes. For purposes of quantification of radiographic changes scoring methods are used that were originally developed for rheumatoid arthritis. So far, there is only one validated scoring method that was specifically designed for PsA and that takes into account both features of PsA, damage as well as proliferation of bone. In contrast to conventional radiography, MRI and sonography are able to visualize inflammatory processes within the soft tissue (joint capsules, tendon sheaths, tendon insertions, etc.), allowing an estimation of disease activity. Scintigraphy is nonspecific and can only be used to detect clinically silent inflammatory spots. The relatively frequent spinal (axial) involvement is similar to that seen in ankylosing spondylitis. However, unilateral sacroiliitis, asymmetry of syndesmophytes and development of parsyndesmophytes may distinguish PsA from ankylosing spondylitis. While conventional radiography demonstrates the bony consequences of inflammation in the spine, MRI also shows the active inflammatory changes in sacroiliacal joints and vertebrae.

Arthritis, Psoriatic↗
PubMed2006

[New developments in joint ultrasonography].

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography has become an established imaging technique in rheumatology. The ability of ultrasonography to visualize soft tissue changes provides a possibility for differentiating between exudative and proliferative synovial tissue changes. Superficial cartilage and bone lesions can be detected earlier by ultrasonography than by conventional radiography. The application of Doppler and power Doppler ultrasonography is helpful for the detection of early inflammation. Current studies with ultrasound contrast media demonstrate its benefit in the differentiation of inflammatory processes. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is helpful in the diagnosis of early arthritis, especially in patients with inconspicuous conventional radiography or suspicious clinical findings. It is a convenient method for follow-up analysis, and therefore has an impact on the monitoring of therapy. It is patient-friendly and is an important tool for the diagnostic work-up of arthritis.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2005

Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a prospective long term follow up study comparing conventional radiography (CR), ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of bone erosions and synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) finger joints. METHODS: The metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints II-V (128 joints) of the clinically dominant hand of 16 patients with RA were included. Follow up joint by joint comparisons for erosions and synovitis were made. RESULTS: At baseline, CR detected erosions in 5/128 (4%) of all joints, US in 12/128 (9%), and MRI in 34/128 (27%). Seven years later, an increase of joints with erosions was found with CR (26%), US (49%) (p<0.001 each), and MRI (32%, NS). In contrast, joint swelling and tenderness assessed by clinical examination were decreased at follow up (p = 0.2, p<0.001). A significant reduction in synovitis with US and MRI (p<0.001 each) was seen. In CR, 12 patients did not have any erosions at baseline, while in 10/12 patients erosions were detected in 25/96 (26%) joints after 7 years. US initially detected erosions in 9 joints, of which two of these joints with erosions were seen by CR at follow up. MRI initially found 34 erosions, of which 14 (41%) were then detected by CR. CONCLUSION: After 7 years, an increase of bone erosions was detected by all imaging modalities. In contrast, clinical improvement and regression of synovitis were seen only with US and MRI. More than one third of erosions previously detected by MRI were seen by CR 7 years later.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Interobserver reliability in musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a "Teach the Teachers" rheumatologist course.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the interobserver reliability of the main periarticular and intra-articular ultrasonographic pathologies and to establish the principal disagreements on scanning technique and diagnostic criteria between a group of experts in musculoskeletal ultrasonography. METHODS: The shoulder, wrist/hand, ankle/foot, or knee of 24 patients with rheumatic diseases were evaluated by 23 musculoskeletal ultrasound experts from different European countries randomly assigned to six groups. The participants did not reach consensus on scanning method or diagnostic criteria before the investigation. They were unaware of the patients' clinical and imaging data. The experts from each group undertook a blinded ultrasound examination of the four anatomical regions. The ultrasound investigation included the presence/absence of joint effusion/synovitis, bony cortex abnormalities, tenosynovitis, tendon lesions, bursitis, and power Doppler signal. Afterwards they compared the ultrasound findings and re-examined the patients together while discussing their results. RESULTS: Overall agreements were 91% for joint effusion/synovitis and tendon lesions, 87% for cortical abnormalities, 84% for tenosynovitis, 83.5% for bursitis, and 83% for power Doppler signal; kappa values were good for the wrist/hand and knee (0.61 and 0.60) and fair for the shoulder and ankle/foot (0.50 and 0.54). The principal differences in scanning method and diagnostic criteria between experts were related to dynamic examination, definition of tendon lesions, and pathological v physiological fluid within joints, tendon sheaths, and bursae. CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal ultrasound has a moderate to good interobserver reliability. Further consensus on standardisation of scanning technique and diagnostic criteria is necessary to improve musculoskeletal ultrasonography reproducibility.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

EULAR report on the use of ultrasonography in painful knee osteoarthritis. Part 1: prevalence of inflammation in osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of inflammation in subjects with chronic painful knee osteoarthritis (OA), as determined by the presence of synovitis or joint effusion at ultrasonography (US); and to evaluate the correlation between synovitis, effusion, and clinical parameters. METHODS: A cross sectional, multicentre, European study was conducted under the umbrella of EULAR-ESCISIT. SUBJECTS: had primary chronic knee OA (ACR criteria) with pain during physical activity >or=30 mm for at least 48 hours. Clinical parameters were collected by a rheumatologist and an US examination of the painful knee was performed by a radiologist or rheumatologist within 72 hours of the clinical examination. Ultrasonographic synovitis was defined as synovial thickness >or=4 mm and diffuse or nodular appearance, and a joint effusion was defined as effusion depth >or=4 mm. RESULTS: 600 patients with painful knee OA were analysed. At US 16 (2.7%) had synovitis alone, 85 (14.2%) had both synovitis and effusion, 177 (29.5%) had joint effusion alone, and 322 (53.7%) had no inflammation according to the definitions employed. Multivariate analysis showed that inflammation seen by US correlated statistically with advanced radiographic disease (Kellgren-Lawrence grade >or=3; odds ratio (OR)=2.20 and 1.91 for synovitis and joint effusion, respectively), and with clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of an inflammatory "flare", such as joint effusion on clinical examination (OR=1.97 and 2.70 for synovitis and joint effusion, respectively) or sudden aggravation of knee pain (OR=1.77 for joint effusion). CONCLUSION: US can detect synovial inflammation and effusion in painful knee OA, which correlate significantly with knee synovitis, effusion, and clinical parameters suggestive of an inflammatory "flare".

Aged↗
PubMed2005

EULAR report on the use of ultrasonography in painful knee osteoarthritis. Part 2: exploring decision rules for clinical utility.

BACKGROUND: Synovial inflammation (as defined by hypertrophy and effusion) is common in osteoarthritis (OA) and may be important in both pain and structural progression. OBJECTIVE: To determine if decision rules can be devised from clinical findings and ultrasonography (US) to allow recognition of synovial inflammation in patients with painful knee OA. METHODS: A EULAR-ESCISIT cross sectional, multicentre study enrolled subjects with painful OA knee who had clinical, radiographic, and US evaluations. A classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was performed to find combinations of predictor variables that would provide high sensitivity and specificity for clinically detecting synovitis and effusion in individual subjects. A range of definitions for the two key US variables, synovitis and effusion (using different combinations of synovial thickness, depth, and appearance), were also included in exploratory analyses. RESULTS: 600 patients with knee OA were included in the analysis. For both knee synovitis and joint effusion, the sensitivity and specificity were poor, yielding unsatisfactory likelihood ratios (75% sensitivity, 45% specificity, and positive LR of 1.36 for knee synovitis; 71.6% sensitivity, 43.2% specificity, and positive LR of 1.26 for joint effusion). The exploratory analyses did not improve the sensitivity and specificity (demonstrating positive LRs of between 1.26 and 1.57). CONCLUSION: Although it is possible to determine clinical and radiological predictors of OA inflammation in populations, CART analysis could not be used to devise useful clinical decision rules for an individual subject. Thus sensitive imaging techniques such as US remain the most useful tool for demonstrating synovial inflammation of the knee at the individual level.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Interobserver reliability of rheumatologists performing musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a EULAR "Train the trainers" course.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interobserver reliability among 14 experts in musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) and to determine the overall agreement about the US results compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which served as the imaging "gold standard". METHODS: The clinically dominant joint regions (shoulder, knee, ankle/toe, wrist/finger) of four patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases were ultrasonographically examined by 14 experts. US results were compared with MRI. Overall agreements, sensitivities, specificities, and interobserver reliabilities were assessed. RESULTS: Taking an agreement in US examination of 10 out of 14 experts into account, the overall kappa for all examined joints was 0.76. Calculations for each joint region showed high kappa values for the knee (1), moderate values for the shoulder (0.76) and hand/finger (0.59), and low agreement for ankle/toe joints (0.28). kappa Values for bone lesions, bursitis, and tendon tears were high (kappa = 1). Relatively good agreement for most US findings, compared with MRI, was found for the shoulder (overall agreement 81%, sensitivity 76%, specificity 89%) and knee joint (overall agreement 88%, sensitivity 91%, specificity 88%). Sensitivities were lower for wrist/finger (overall agreement 73%, sensitivity 66%, specificity 88%) and ankle/toe joints (overall agreement 82%, sensitivity 61%, specificity 92%). CONCLUSION: Interobserver reliabilities, sensitivities, and specificities in comparison with MRI were moderate to good. Further standardisation of US scanning techniques and definitions of different pathological US lesions are necessary to increase the interobserver agreement in musculoskeletal US.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

First clinical evaluation of sagittal laser optical tomography for detection of synovitis in arthritic finger joints.

OBJECTIVE: To identify classifiers in images obtained with sagittal laser optical tomography (SLOT) that can be used to distinguish between joints affected and not affected by synovitis. METHODS: 78 SLOT images of proximal interphalangeal joints II-IV from 13 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were compared with ultrasound (US) images and clinical examination (CE). SLOT images showing the spatial distribution of scattering and absorption coefficients within the joint cavity were generated. The means and standard errors for seven different classifiers (operator score and six quantitative measurements) were determined from SLOT images using CE and US as diagnostic references. For classifiers showing significant differences between affected and non-affected joints, sensitivities and specificities for various cut off parameters were obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: For five classifiers used to characterise SLOT images the mean between affected and unaffected joints was statistically significant using US as diagnostic reference, but statistically significant for only one classifier with CE as reference. In general, high absorption and scattering coefficients in and around the joint cavity are indicative of synovitis. ROC analysis showed that the minimal absorption classifier yields the largest area under the curve (0.777; sensitivity and specificity 0.705 each) with US as diagnostic reference. CONCLUSION: Classifiers in SLOT images have been identified that show statistically significant differences between joints with and without synovitis. It is possible to classify a joint as inflamed with SLOT, without the need for a reference measurement. Furthermore, SLOT based diagnosis of synovitis agrees better with US diagnosis than CE.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Imaging techniques in rheumatology: sonography in rheumatoid arthritis].

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography has become an important diagnostic tool in rheumatoid arthritis. In Germany it is part of the rheumatology training, and many ultrasound courses provide further education. Only in the last five years the international importance of ultrasound in rheumatology has increased dramatically. Sonography can be performed as a bedside procedure and as an extension of the clinical investigation. It is easily tolerated by the patients, and it can be repeated any time. Sonography can have a great impact on therapeutic decisions. A > or = 5 MHz linear transducer is needed. Most transducers that are used for musculoskeletal ultrasound have about 7.5 MHz. Modern transducers with higher frequencies (>7.5 MHz) and high resolution improve the diagnostic value of the investigation. Sonography is superior to plain radiography to detect erosions as far as the region is accessible by ultrasound. It is more sensitive than the clinical investigation for the detection of synovitis, tenosynovitis, tendinitis, and bursitis as well as for the differentiation of these lesions. Color Doppler sonography aids in evaluating the activity of inflammation and in differentiating intraarticular structures. Carpal- and ulnar neuropathy occur secondary to rheumatoid arthritis and may lead to characteristic nerve swelling. Ultrasound-guided injections into joints and tendon sheets can be performed.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2003

[Imaging techniques in rheumatology: scintigraphy in rheumatoid arthritis].

Bone scintigraphy is an important tool for staging and follow-up in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and is part of the training for board certified physicians in nuclear medicine in Germany. Bone scintigraphy uses the accumulation of i.v. injected technetium-99m labeled phosphonates imaged with a gamma camera. Different phases can be defined: perfusion phase (0-60 s p. i.), blood pool phase (2-5 min p. i.), and bone (turnover) phase (2-5 h p. i.). The blood pool phase allowes judgement of inflammatory (soft tissue) components of joint disease ("arthritis"), the bone (turnover) phase of longer lasting bone processes ("arthrosis"). The technical details including documentation of the scintigraphic results are presented according to the procedure guidelines of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine (www.nuklearmedizin. de).

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2003

[Imaging techniques in rheumatology: magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis].

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the most modern and, at the same time, most technically advanced instrument of sectional imaging in diagnostic radiology. MRI is superior to other radiological procedures because of its excellent soft-tissue contrast, the possibility of multiplanar imaging and the missing of ionizing radiation. Exact differentiation and imaging of soft tissue and bony alterations is of significant evidence in early diagnosis and monitoring of inflammatory joint diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Besides securing of technical quality management, the physician's qualification in indication, conduction and evaluation of MRI plays a pivotal role. This development of MRI for rheumatological purposes needs standardized recommendations and investigation protocols, which are now summarized and presented by the rheumatologists and radiologists of the study group of "diagnostic imaging procedures" of the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh).

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2002

[Imaging in rheumatology].

SUMMARY: Conventional radiography, ultrasonography, scintigraphy, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are important diagnostic tools in rheumatology additional to clinical investigation. Radiography provides information both of the juxtaarticular and the abarticular bone. It is relevant in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, spondylarthropathies, and osteoporosis, and for the investigation of other regions like the thorax. Sonography is superior to radiography to delineate soft tissue structures such as effusions, tenosynovitis, tendinitis, paratendinitis, bursitis, and soft-tissue tumors, but also to evaluate bone surfaces. It helps to perform injections and punctures. Furthermore it is a new diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of temporal arteritis, Takayasu's arteritis, and Sjögren's syndrome. Echocardiography, abdominal and pleural sonography are also frequently used. MRI is useful to detect soft tissue lesions and bone lesions. It is helpful to depict synovial membrane, tendon, tendon sheaths, ligaments, cartilage, destructive joint processes, and rupture of synovial cysts. MRI is an established imaging technique in diagnosis of sacroiliitis and cervical arthritis as well as in diagnosis of osteonecrosis. It is an important diagnostic modality for demonstrating early arthritis. MRI is also of interest in diagnosis of neurological disorders of connective tissue diseases or vasculitis in rheumatology. Bone scintigraphy is an established imaging technique in diagnosis of skeletal diseases as well as in diagnosis of tumors. "Hot spots" are seen in locations of high bone turn over. Scintigraphy is also helpful to localize or exclude inflammation.

Diagnosis, Differential↗
PubMed2002

[Technique and value of arthrosonography in rheumatologic diagnosis--3: Ultrasound diagnosis of the ankle joint, foot and toes].

The clinical investigation of ankles, feet, and toes is frequently equivocal in rheumatology. Sonography can distinguish between underlying pathologies. We suggest following standard scans: 1) anterior longitudinal scan to diagnose effusions in the ankle and talonavicular joints, to display erosive and osteoarthrotic pathologies, and to diagnose tenosynovitis of the extensor tendons; 2) anterior transverse scan to document the findings in an additional dimension; 3) lateral transverse scan and 4) lateral longitudinal scan to diagnose tenosynovitis of the peroneus tendons; 5) medial transverse scan and 6) medial longitudinal scan to diagnose tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons; 7) posterior longitudinal scan and 8) posterior transverse scan to evaluate the Achilles tendon, the retrocalcaneal bursa, and the posterior recess of the ankle joint. Additionally we suggest optional scans: 9) plantar longitudinal scan for the plantar fascia and the plantar calcaneal surface; 10) distal anterior longitudinal scan to evaluate the midtalar joints; 11) distal anterior longitudinal scan to evaluate the toes; and 12) plantar, distal transverse scan to evaluate the flexor tendons of the toes. Additionally, the correlating longitudinal and transverse scans can be used to confirm the findings. The frequency of the transducer should be about 7.5 MHz for ankles and the peroneus, flexor, and extensor tendons. Ten to over 20 MHz are possible for more superficially located structures. Using modern equipment with higher resolution a hypoechoic border may be normal up to 3 mm in the ankle joints, the MTP joints, and around the peroneus tendons, and up to 4 mm around the tibialis posterior tendons.

Ankle Joint↗
PubMed2002

[Technical aspects and value of arthrosonography in rheumatologic diagnosis. 4: Ultrasound of the elbow].

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is an important imaging technique in the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases especially for early manifestation. It allows sensitive detection of small joint fluid collections as well as differentiation of soft tissue lesions and bone lesions. The following standard scans are suggested for sonographic evaluation of the elbow: 1) anterior humeroradial longitudinal scan, 2) anterior humeroulnar longitudinal scan to detect effusions, synovial proliferation, loose joint bodies, bone lesions (osteoarthritis/arthritis), 3) anterior transverse scan over the trochlea to evaluate these structures in an additional dimension, 4) posterior longitudinal scan and 5) posterior transverse scan of the olecranon fossa with flexed/extended elbow to evaluate the same objectives as the above mentioned scans and additionally to detect olecranon bursitis, and optional 6) distal dorsal longitudinal scan to differentiate soft tissue lesions such as rheumatoid nodules or gout tophi, 7) anterior transverse scan over the radius head to evaluate lesions of the radius head, tendopathy, calcinosis, 8) lateral humeroradial longitudinal scan to evaluate epicondylitis, 9) medial humeroulnar longitudinal scan to evaluate calcinosis, epicondylitis, signs of compression of the ulnar nerve. A linear transducer with a frequency of about 5-7.5 MHz is recommendable. The anterior distance between trochlea and the capitulum of the humerus between the bone and the joint-capsule of the elbow is > or = 2 mm in probable and > or = 3 mm in definite synovitis or effusions. Synovitis or effusions are probable if the difference between the right and left elbow is 1 mm, and they are definite if the difference is > or = 2 mm.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2002

[Technique and diagnostic value of musculoskelatal ultrasonography in rheumatology. Part 5: Ultrasonography of the shoulder].

Shoulder-related symptoms are very common in rheumatic diseases. For the evaluation of the diagnosis as well as for therapy and prognosis, an anatomic assignment is essential. Clinical investigations alone are often not capable to do this. Ultrasonography is a method to delineate bony surfaces as well as the soft tissues around the shoulder joints statically and even dynamically. For the purpose of rheumatic diseases, ultrasound standard scans help to detect the lesions at the biceps tendon, the bursae, the rotator cuff, the humeral head as well as in the acromial and sternoclavicular joints. Considering the limitations of the method (obesity, frozen shoulder, no findings under bony structures) and knowing the pitfalls and errors of the method, ultrasonography is a reliable, quick and low cost method for the diagnosis of rheumatic shoulder joint pathology. Compared to computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography should be used as a screening method. The following standard scans are suggested for sonographic evaluation of the shoulder: 1) anterior transverse scan and 2) anterior longitudinal scan at the bicipal groove to detect synovitis and tenosynovitis, 3) anterior transverse scan at the coracoacromiale window in the neutral position, 4) at maximal external rotation and 5) at maximal internal rotation to evaluate the rotator cuff, bursitis, synovitis and erosions, 6) anterior longitudinal scan at 90 degrees to the coracoacomiale window at maximal internal rotation to describe these findings in an additional dimension, 7) anterior-lateral longitudinal scan at the anterior lateral acromion to tuberculum majus to evaluate the distal part of the supraspinatus muscle, 8) posterior transverse scan at the fossa infraspinata lateral under the spina scapulae, 9) axillary longitudinal scan to evaluate synovitis, synovial proliferation, erosions at the humeral head, lesions at the glenoidale labrum, 10) anterior transverse scan at the acromioclavicular joint and 11) anterior oblique scan at the sternoclavicular joint to detect synovitis, synovial proliferation, erosion, osteophytes.

Acromioclavicular Joint↗
PubMed2002

[Technique and diagnostic value of musculoskeletal ultrasonography in rheumatology. Part 6: ultrasonography of the wrist/hand].

Sonography of the hands is especially helpful in the diagnosis of early arthritis. Sonography allows for a very sensitive detection of small joint-effusion, tenosynovitis and small erosive bone lesions earlier than conventional radiography. Musculoskeletal sonography is also helpful in morphological analysis of changes of the median nerve in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. The following standard scans are suggested for the sonographic evaluation of the wrist: 1. dorsal longitudinal scan along the radio-carpal joint, 2) along the ulno-carpal joint, and 3) dorsal transverse scan along the wrist to detect joint fluid collection, synovitis, tenosynovitis, ganglia, irregularities of the bone surface in osteoarthritis, and erosions due to inflammatory disease, 4) volar longitudinal scan along the radio-carpal joint, and 5) along the ulno-carpal joint, and 6) volar transverse scan along the wrist to diagnose the same objective as the above mentioned scans and to evaluate the median nerve in cases of carpal tunnel syndrome. Optional scans are the following: 7) ulnar longitudinal 8) transverse scan along the ulnar joint space and the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle to detect tenosynovitis and caput ulnae syndrome, 9) radial longitudinal, and 10). transverse scan along the joint space to diagnose synovitis and tenosynovitis. The following standard scans are suggested for the sonographic evaluation of the fingers: 1) volar longitudinal, 2) volar transverse scan in extension along the finger joints to detect effusion and synovial proliferation, tenosynovitis, irregularities of the bone surface (osteophytes, erosions), 3) dorsal longitudinal scans in extension and flexion >70 degrees along the CMC I, MCP, PIP and DIP joints to evaluate effusion and synovial proliferation, tenosynovitis or tendinitis, irregularities of the bone surface (osteophytes, erosions), and 4) dorsal transverse scans along the finger joints to evaluate these structures in an additional dimension. Optional 5) scans include the following: medial longitudinal scan along the MCP I, II, PIP and DIP joints, and 6) lateral longitudinal scan along the MCP V, PIP and DIP joints to evaluate the erosive bone process and joint instability. A linear transducer with a frequency of between 7.5 and 12 MHz is recommendable. The anterior distance between the bone and the joint-capsule of the wrist is > or = 3 mm in probable and > or = 4 mm in definite synovitis or effusions. Synovitis or effusions are probable if the difference between right and left wrist is > or = 1 mm, and they are definite if the difference is > or = 2 mm. A carpal tunnel syndrome is probable with a cross-sectional area of the median nerve of > or = 12 mm(2).

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗