Biomedical subjects

M Bax

Publications and source records attributed to M Bax.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

The prognostic value of pre-procedural plasma C-reactive protein in patients undergoing elective coronary angioplasty.

AIMS: The acute phase reactant C-reactive protein is an important prognostic risk factor in patients with both stable and unstable coronary artery disease. The potential prognostic implications of an abnormal pre-procedural C-reactive protein concentration in patients undergoing elective coronary angioplasty may be relevant for subsequent treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pre-procedural plasma levels of C-reactive protein were measured in 501 patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing elective coronary angioplasty. The incidence of death or myocardial infarction during a 2-year follow-up was 10.6% (24/227) in patients with an increased C-reactive protein level (>3 mg. l(-1)) and 2.9% (8/274) in patients with a normal C-reactive protein level (RR 3.9, 95% CI 1.7-8.9). Survival without death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization or hospital admission for unstable angina was significantly lower in patients with an increased C-reactive protein vs patients with a normal C-reactive protein (log-rank 14.62, P<0.0001). Logistic regression analysis identified an increased C-reactive protein level as a strong independent predictor of event-free survival (RR 2.54, 95% CI: 1.44-4.47, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Pre-procedural C-reactive protein levels are increased in 45% of patients undergoing elective coronary angioplasty. An increased C-reactive protein level is a powerful independent prognostic indicator for subsequent cardiac events, suggesting that late clinical outcome is markedly influenced by pre-procedural systemic activation of inflammation.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesions.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary blood flow velocity reserve (CFR) represent physiological quantities used to evaluate coronary lesion severity and to make clinical decisions. A comparison between the outcomes of both diagnostic techniques has not been performed in a large cohort of patients with intermediate coronary lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: FFR and CFR were assessed in 126 consecutive patients with 150 intermediate coronary lesions (between 40% and 70% diameter stenosis by visual assessment). Agreement between outcomes of FFR and CFR, categorized at cut-off values of 0.75 and 2.0, respectively, was observed in 109 coronary lesions (73%), whereas discordant outcomes were present in 41 lesions (27%). In 26 of these 41 lesions, FFR was <0.75 and CFR>or=2.0 (group A); in the remaining 15 lesions, FFR was >or=0.75 and CFR<2.0 (group B). Minimum microvascular resistance, defined as the ratio of mean distal pressure to average peak blood flow velocity during maximum hyperemia, showed a large variability (overall range, 0.65 to 4.64 mm Hg x cm(-1) x s(-1)) and was significantly higher in group B than in group A (2.42+/-0.77 versus 1.91+/-0.70 mm Hg x cm(-1) x s(-1); P:=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the prominent role of microvascular resistance in modulating the relationship between FFR and CFR and emphasize the importance of combined pressure and flow velocity measurements to evaluate coronary lesion severity and microvascular involvement.

Angina Pectoris↗

PubMed2001

Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to perform a direct comparison between perfusion scintigraphic results and intracoronary-derived hemodynamic variables (fractional flow reserve [FFR]; absolute and relative coronary flow velocity reserve [CFVR and rCFVR, respectively]) in patients with two-vessel disease. BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the diagnostic accuracy of intracoronary-derived variables (CFVR, FFR and rCFVR) in patients with multivessel disease. METHODS: Dipyridamole technetium-99m sestamibi (MIBI) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) was performed in 127 patients. The presence of reversible perfusion defects in the region of interest was determined. Within one week, angiography was performed; CFVR, rCFVR and FFR were determined in 161 coronary lesions after intracoronary administration of adenosine. The predictive value for the presence of reversible perfusion defects on MIBI SPECT of CFVR, rCFVR and FFR was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics curves. RESULTS: The mean percentage diameter stenosis was 57% (range 35% to 85%), as measured by quantitative coronary angiography. Using per-patient analysis, the AUCs for CFVR (0.70 +/- 0.052), rCFVR (0.72 +/- 0.051) and FFR (0.76 +/- 0.050) were not significantly different (p = NS). The percentages of agreement with the results of MIBI SPECT were 76%, 78% and 77% for CFVR, rCFVR and FFR, respectively. Per-lesion analysis, using all 161 measured lesions, yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of three intracoronary-derived hemodynamic variables, as compared with the results of perfusion scintigraphy, is similar in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease. Cut-offvalues of 2.0 for CFVR, 0.65 for rCFVR and 0.75 for FFR can be used for clinical decision-making in this patient cohort. Discordant results were obtained in 23% of the cases that require prospective evaluation for appropriate patient management.

Adult↗

PubMed2001