PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Behnke

Publications and source records attributed to M Behnke.

56 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Measurement of cocaine and metabolites in urine, meconium, and diapers by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Analytical methods were evaluated for measuring cocaine (CO), benzoylecgonine (BE), and ecgonine methyl ester (EME) in urine and methanolic extracts from meconium and diapers by isotope dilution gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Volatile derivatives of the extracted drugs were generated before GC/MS analysis. Methanolic extracts from meconium and diapers were reconstituted in drug-free urine and treated as above. The limit of detection for the GC/MS method was calculated to be approximately 11 ng per mL. Within-run coefficients of variation (CVs) for urinary CO, BE, and EME were 5.7, 5.3, and 11.4 percent, respectively (N = 10); corresponding CVs for meconium 6.4, 10.7, and 21.9 percent (N = 8). Quantitative results were linear from 25 to 10,000 ng per g of meconium and 25 to 5,000 ng per mL of urine. Day-to-day precision varied from eight percent (CV) for BE in refrigerated or frozen urine to 34 percent for EME in refrigerated meconium. Recoveries of CO, BE, and EME from urine were 63, 19, and 42 percent, respectively; corresponding recoveries from meconium were 64, 21, and 25 percent. Cocaine and metabolites were extracted from wet but meconium-free diapers into methanol, which was evaporated before reconstituting in drug-free urine and extraction on a solid phase column. The CO, BE, and EME were detected in previously drug-free meconium after portions were deposited in a diaper which was wet with drug-positive urine. Unless precautions are taken to prevent extracorporeal contamination of meconium with urine, concentrations of CO and metabolites in meconium may be substantially augmented by contamination with urine. Analysis by GC/MS of CO and metabolites extracted from diapers provides an attractive alternative to collection of urine, which is difficult and may cause discomfort for the neonate.

Cocaine↗

Symbolic expression of feelings and depressive symptoms in high-risk pregnant women.

Pregnant women using rural health departments for prenatal care often experience chronic stressors (minority status, poor education, low income, young age, and single parenting of young children) that contribute to depression. Yet these same women may be reluctant to express their feelings. Because depression has been related to negative patterns of motherchild interaction and even newborn irritability, it is important to identify symptoms in high-risk mothers. For years, symbolic methods of expression have been used to reveal psychological traits or to identify clinical diagnoses, but few have been used to evaluate pregnant women. Women attending a rural health department were administered a comprehensive health and psychosocial questionnaire, including the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). They were then asked to complete a drawing expressing their feelings regarding their pregnancy. The relationship between CES-D scores and drawing ratings determined by two different methods of interpretation (expert, non-expert) was then examined. Non-expert art analysis was able to distinguish those women with the highest scores on the depression index, while expert analysis was able to discern racial differences consistent with risk status. Suggestions for the use of this drawing measure in the clinical setting are discussed. Alternative (non-verbal) methods of assessment that may improve communication with pregnant women are important for optimizing maternal and infant health and well-being and child development.

Black or African American↗