PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Bixon

Publications and source records attributed to M Bixon.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Charge transport in DNA via thermally induced hopping.

In this contribution we advance and explore the thermally induced hopping (TIH) mechanism for long-range charge transport (CT) in DNA and in large-scale chemical systems. TIH occurs in donor-bridge-acceptor systems, which are characterized by off-resonance donor-bridge interactions (energy gap DeltaE > 0), involving thermally activated donor-bridge charge injection followed by intrabridge charge hopping. We observe a "transition" from superexchange to TIH with increasing the bridge length (i.e., the number N of the bridge constituents), which is manifested by crossing from the exponential N-dependent donor-acceptor CT rate at low N (< N(X)) to a weakly (algebraic) N-dependent CT rate at high N (>N(X)). The "critical" bridge size N(X) is determined by the energy gap, the nearest-neighbor electronic couplings, and the temperature. Experimental evidence for the TIH mechanism was inferred from our analysis of the chemical yields for the distal/proximal guanine (G) triplets in the (GGG)(+)TTXTT(GGG) duplex (X = G, azadine (zA), and adenine (A)) studied by Nakatani, Dohno and Saito [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5893]. The TIH sequential model, which involves hole hopping between (GGG) and X, is analyzed in terms of a sequential process in conjunction with parallel reactions of (GGG)(+) with water, and provides a scale of (free) energy gaps (relative to (GGG)(+)) of Delta = 0.21-0.24 eV for X = A, Delta = 0.10-0.14 eV for X = zA, and Delta = 0.05-0.10 eV for X = G. We further investigated the chemical yields for long-range TIH in (G)l(+)Xn(G)l (l = 1-3) duplexes, establishing the energetic constraints (i.e., the donor - bridge base (X) energy gap Delta), the bridge structural constraints (i.e., the intrabridge X-X hopping rates k(m)), and the kinetic constraints (i.e., the rate k(d) for the reaction of with water). Effective TIH is expected to prevail for Delta less than or approximately equal to 0.20 eV with a "fast" water reaction (k(d)/k(m) approximately 10(-3)) and for Delta < 0.30 eV with a "slow" water reaction (k(d)/k(m) approximately 10(-5)). We conclude that (T)n bridges (for which Delta approximately equals 0.6 eV) cannot act in TIH of holes. From an analysis based on the energetics of the electronic coupling matrix elements in G(+)(T-A)n(GGG) duplexes we conclude that the superexchange mechanism is expected to dominate for n = 1-4. For long (A)n bridges (n > or approximately equal to 4) the TIH prevails, provided that the water side reaction is slow, raising the issue of chemical control of TIH through long (A)n bridges in DNA attained by changing the solution composition.

DNA↗

Long-range charge hopping in DNA.

The fundamental mechanisms of charge migration in DNA are pertinent for current developments in molecular electronics and electrochemistry-based chip technology. The energetic control of hole (positive ion) multistep hopping transport in DNA proceeds via the guanine, the nucleobase with the lowest oxidation potential. Chemical yield data for the relative reactivity of the guanine cations and of charge trapping by a triple guanine unit in one of the strands quantify the hopping, trapping, and chemical kinetic parameters. The hole-hopping rate for superexchange-mediated interactions via two intervening AT base pairs is estimated to be 10(9) s(-1) at 300 K. We infer that the maximal distance for hole hopping in the duplex with the guanine separated by a single AT base pair is 300 +/- 70 A. Although we encounter constraints for hole transport in DNA emerging from the number of the mediating AT base pairs, electron transport is expected to be nearly sequence independent because of the similarity of the reduction potentials of the thymine and of the cytosine.

Journal Article↗

Charge transfer and transport in DNA.

We explore charge migration in DNA, advancing two distinct mechanisms of charge separation in a donor (d)-bridge ([Bj])-acceptor (a) system, where [Bj] = B1,B2, . , BN are the N-specific adjacent bases of B-DNA: (i) two-center unistep superexchange induced charge transfer, d*[Bj]a --> d[Bj]a+/-, and (ii) multistep charge transport involves charge injection from d* (or d+) to [Bj], charge hopping within [Bj], and charge trapping by a. For off-resonance coupling, mechanism i prevails with the charge separation rate and yield exhibiting an exponential dependence approximately exp(-betaR) on the d-a distance (R). Resonance coupling results in mechanism ii with the charge separation lifetime tau approximately Neta and yield Y approximately (1 + Neta)-1 exhibiting a weak (algebraic) N and distance dependence. The power parameter eta is determined by charge hopping random walk. Energetic control of the charge migration mechanism is exerted by the energetics of the ion pair state dB1+/-B2 . BNa relative to the electronically excited donor doorway state d*B1B2 . BNa. The realization of charge separation via superexchange or hopping is determined by the base sequence within the bridge. Our energetic-dynamic relations, in conjunction with the energetic data for d*/d- and for B/B+, determine the realization of the two distinct mechanisms in different hole donor systems, establishing the conditions for "chemistry at a distance" after charge transport in DNA. The energetic control of the charge migration mechanisms attained by the sequence specificity of the bridge is universal for large molecular-scale systems, for proteins, and for DNA.

DNA↗