Malignant brain tumors (primary and metastatic) are apparently resistant to most therapeutic efforts. Several randomized trials have provided evidence supporting the efficacy of radiation therapy. Attempts at improving the results of external beam radiotherapy include altered fractionation, radiation sensitizers and concomitant chemotherapy. In low-grade gliomas, all clinical studies with radiotherapy have employed conventional dose fractionation regimens. In high-grade gliomas, hypofractionation schedules represent effective palliative regimens in poor prognosis subsets of patients; short-term survival in these patients has not allowed to evaluate late toxicity. In tumors arising within the central nervous system, hyperfractionated irradiation exploits the differences in repair capacity between tumour and late responding normal tissues. It may allow for higher total dose and may result in increased tumor cell kill. Accelerated radiotherapy may reduce the repopulation of tumor cells between fractions. It may potentially improve tumor control for a given dose level, provided that there is no increase in late normal tissue injury. In supratentorial malignant gliomas, superiority of accelerated hyperfractionated over conventionally fractionated schedules was observed in a randomized trial; however, the gain in survival was less than 6 months. At present no other randomized trial supports the preferential choice for altered fractionation irradiation. Also in pediatric brainstem tumors there are no data to confirm the routine use of hyperfractionated irradiation, and significant late sequelae have been reported in the few long-term survivors. Shorter treatment courses with accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy may represent a useful alternative to conventional irradiation for the palliation of brain metastases. Different considerations have been proposed to explain this gap between theory and clinical data. Patients included in dose/effect studies are not stratified by prognostic factors and other treatment-related parameters. This observation precludes any definite conclusion about the relative role of conventional and of altered fractionation. New approaches are currently in progress. More prolonged radiation treatments, up to higher total doses, could delay time to tumor progression and improve survival in good prognosis subsets of patients; altered fractionation may be an effective therapeutic tool to achieve this goal.

Central Nervous System Neoplasms↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Intratumoral beta interferon and systemic chemotherapy. Preliminary data in GBM patients.

Doses and schedules for treatment of malignant glial tumors, using IFN are still uncertain and controversial. In this study preliminary results of treatment of 10 glioblastoma multiforme patients are shown. Six patients were treated with local injection of beta-IFN through an Ommaya reservoir: 4 with beta-IFN followed by systemic chemotherapy (CDDP-VP16); we found that IFN alone was ineffective. Results were improved when local immunotherapy was associated with systemic chemotherapy. New drugs and investigation of possible pharmacological synergism are needed.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Preliminary data by cis-platin and etoposide using in primary glioblastoma.

In this preliminary study twenty-nine malignant glioma patients after surgery were treated using Cis-platin (CDDP) combined with etoposide (VP16). Superfractionated radiation therapy comes into chemotherapy. The time to tumor progression in GBM patients is encouraging result to continue in this treatment.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied