Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M Bousoño.
The aim is to investigate the association between apolipoprotein E (ApoE) and panic disorder (PD). Genotyping 92 PD patients [Diagnostic Statistic Manual IV (DSM IV) criteria] and 174 controls no differences were found between both groups. Variation in the ApoE-gene was not associated with the development of PD.
The recognition of the importance of evaluating the quality of life of patients with schizophrenia highlighted the importance of developing appropriate instruments. In this paper we review the available quality of life instruments focusing on their conceptual framework, structure, administration and psychometric properties. First, we address the generic instruments that have been validated for schizophrenic populations, namely the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL), the Medical Outcome Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). Then, we focus on instruments that have been specifically developed for patients with schizophrenia and other or severe mentally illness such as the Quality of Life Scale (QLS), the Quality of Life Interview (QoLI), the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile (LQoLP), the Sevilla Quality of Life Questionnaire (SQLQ), the Personal Evaluation of Transitions in Treatment (PETIT), and the Quality of Life Questionnaire in Schizophrenia (S-QoL).
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype and schizophrenia. METHOD: We genotyped 106 schizophrenic out-patients [Diagnostic Statistic Manual IV (DSM-IV) criteria] and 250 healthy volunteers (hospital staff and blood donors) from Asturias (Northern Spain). The ApoE genotypes (epsilon2, epsilon3, epsilon4-alleles) were determined after polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, followed by digestion with the restriction enzyme Cfol and electrophoresis on a 4% agarose gel. RESULTS: No significant differences in ApoE-allele frequencies between patients and controls was found, although an increased 64-frequency was recorded in patients compared with controls [9.0% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.124; odds ratio (OR) = 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.82-2.70]. ApoE-genotype frequencies did not differ between both groups. The mean age of onset for schizophrenic patients that carried the epsilon4-allele was not significantly different from that of patients without this allele. CONCLUSION: Variation in the ApoE gene was not associated with the development of schizophrenia in our population. ApoE-genotypes did not modify the age of onset of the disease.
AIM: To measure the prevalence of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and other drug use in young males entering compulsory military service in Asturias (northern Spain) and to define trends in MDMA use in this group during the period from 1995 to 1999. We also sought to determine whether MDMA users have distinct personality features or higher levels of sensation seeking. METHODS: 3,634 conscripts [mean age (SD) = 20.19 years (2.52)] who entered military service during the period between 1995 and 1999 were evaluated using the World Health Organization (WHO) questionnaire for drug consumption, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-A (EPQ-A), and the Zuckerman Sensation Seeking Scale. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of lifetime, previous year and previous month MDMA use among military recruits between 1995 and 1999 was 10.9, 7.8 and 4.5%, ranking fifth among illicit drugs ever used. Once individuals used MDMA for the first time, they were likely to use it again, with 71% of individuals who had ever used MDMA reporting that they had used it during the past year (ranking second only to hallucinogens), and 41% reporting having used it in the last month. Compared to recruits who had never used MDMA (but who may have used other illicit drugs), MDMA users had a more extensive drug abuse history. Recruits who had used MDMA during the year prior to study had significantly higher scores on the Neuroticism and Psychoticism Subscales of the EPQ-A, and reported higher levels of sensation seeking.
UNLABELLED: The aim of this study is to describe the situation of Spanish obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients and compare it to that of the general population and other patient groups. METHODS: Thirty-six OCD patients on maintenance treatment were evaluated using the Y-BOCS, SF-36, and DAS-S. Their SF-36 scores were compared to Spanish norms and to those obtained from U.S. OCD patients, schizophrenic outpatients, depressed outpatients, heroin dependents, patients on hemodialysis, and kidney transplant recipients. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent of the patients had severe or extremely severe symptoms. Their quality of life was worse when compared with the Spanish norms in all SF-36 areas, but especially with respect to mental health. In contrast to U.S. OCD patients, social functioning is more impaired in the Spanish OCD patients. OCD patients reported the same quality of life as schizophrenics in the areas of mental health, but better in the areas of physical health. Compared with heroin dependents and depressed patients, their quality of life was worse. On mental health scales, OCD patients scored worse than somatic patients. CONCLUSIONS: OCD in the Spanish population was shown to be associated with worse quality of life than for any other patient group (including physical groups), except schizophrenics.
The authors analyzed the incidence of sexual dysfunction (SD) with different selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline) and hence the qualitative and quantitative changes in SD throughout time in a prospective and multicenter study. Outpatients (192 women and 152 men; age = 39.6 +/- 11.4 years) under treatment with SSRIs were interviewed with an SD questionnaire designed for this purpose by the authors and that included questions about the following: decreased libido, delayed orgasm or anorgasmia, delayed ejaculation, inability to ejaculate, impotence, and general sexual satisfaction. Patients with the following criteria were included: normal sexual function before SSRI intake, exclusive treatment with SSRIs or treatment associated with benzodiazepines, previous heterosexual or self-erotic current sexual practices. Excluded were patients with previous sexual dysfunction, association of SSRIs with neuroleptics, recent hormone intake, and significant medical illnesses. There was a significant increase in the incidence of SD when physicians asked the patients direct questions (58%) versus when SD was spontaneously reported (14%). There were some significant differences among different SSRIs: paroxetine provoked more delay of orgasm or ejaculation and more impotence than fluvoxamine, fluoxetine and sertraline (chi 2, p < .05). Only 24.5% of the patients had a good tolerance of their sexual dysfunction. Twelve male patients who suffered from premature ejaculation before the treatment preferred to maintain delayed ejaculation, and their sexual satisfaction, and that of their partners, clearly improved. Sexual dysfunction was positively correlated with dose. Patients experienced substantial improvement in sexual function when the dose was diminished or the drug was withdrawn. Men showed more incidence of sexual dysfunction than women, but women's sexual dysfunction was more intense than men's. In only 5.8% of patients, the dysfunction disappeared completely within 6 months, but 81.4% showed no improvement at all by the end of this period. Twelve of 15 patients experienced total improvement when the treatment was changed to moclobemide (450-600 mg/day), and 3 of 5 patients improved when treatment was changed to amineptine (200 mg/day).
UNLABELLED: Sexual dysfunction secondary to the use of antidepressants, especially clomipramine or SSRI's is an adverse effect that is often underestimated and according to earlier studies, this can affect approximately 60% of the patients. This presents as a decrease in libido, alterations in the ability to reach orgasm/ejaculation, and an erectile dysfunction or a decreased vaginal lubrication. This dysfunction appears to be related with the resulting increase in serotonin and with the stimulation of serotonin 5HT2 receptors. OBJECTIVES: 1) Evaluate the effect of amineptine, a drug with an increased dopamine transmission and scant serotonin transmission, on the sexual function of depressed patients who begin treatment, and 2) evaluate whether the change to amineptine improves the sexual function in patients who presented sexual dysfunction after beginning treatment with a SSRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, observational, open and multicentric design. 111 patients with an average age of 41.3 years (36 men, 75 women) were distributed into three groups: Group 1 (n= 26): patients with depression (DSM IV) who begin de novo treatment with amineptine 200 mg/day. Group 2 (n= 47): depressed patients undergoing treatment with a SSRI who show a favorable response and who present sexual dysfunction secondary to a poorly tolerated treatment, so the treatment is changed to 200 mg/day of amineptine. Group 3 (n= 38): patients with the same characteristics as those of group 2, but whose treatment was changed to 20 mg/day of paroxetine. The < > (Montejo et al, 1996) was used together with the Hamilton Depression Scale, the IGC Scale, and an adverse events scale, over a 6 months follow up period during which visits took place at: baseline, month 1, month 2, month 3, and month 6. RESULTS: In group 1, treated with amineptine from the beginning, of the 5 patients who showed a decrease in the libido at the beginning of the treatment, only one still presented this in the 6th month. The Hamilton Scale decreased from 23.12 (baseline) to 5.25 after 6 months. After substituting amineptine for SSRI's in patients with sexual dysfunction, the incidence of any type of sexual dysfunction decreased significantly from 100% (baseline) to 55.3% after 6 months. (P< 0.001). The incidence of delayed orgasm dropped to 15.8%, anorgasmia to 17.4%, and impotence dropped to 15.8% in this group, with the antidepressant effect that had already been achieved with the SSRI being maintained. However, in group 3 there was barely any improvement on the sexual function after changing to paroxetine (20 mg/day), with the baseline incidence being 100% and the incidence after 6 months being 89.7%. In this last group the antidepressant effect present at the baseline level, was maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Amineptine was shown to be an effective antidepressant in the patients studied, and did not cause secondary sexual dysfunction, and even improved the dysfunction that was present in some patients. In those patients previously treated with SSRI's, amineptine is able to significantly improve the sexual dysfunction and yet maintain the efficacy of the antidepressive treatment used before these 6 months. On the other hand, Paroxetine did not improve the sexual dysfunction of the people in whom this drug substituted another SSRI, as this is an adverse effect common to the entire group of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibiting drugs. Amineptine showed a good safety and tolerance profile. Its most common side effect (anxiety/restlessness) disappeared 2 months after the beginning of the treatment.
AIM: To determine the psychometric properties of the Spanish versions of the following scales for assessing PTSD patients: TQ, CAPS-DX, DTS, TOP-8, and DGRP. METHODS: Data from 63 PTSD patients and 23 healthy subjects were analysed. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability (after 15 days) were calculated. Convergent validity was analysed by correlating subjects' scores with the number of symptoms (DSM-IV) and scores on the CGI scale. Discriminative capability was analysed by comparing TQ, CAPS-DX, DTS, TOP-8, and DGRP patients' scores with scores from healthy subjects, and between patients' subgroups according to the presence or absence of psychiatric comorbidity and to the degree of severity as determined by the CGI-S. RESULTS: CAPS-DX, DTS, TOP-8, and DGRP showed an adequate internal consistency (Cronbach alpha: 0.74-0.91) and all of them obtained ICC between 0.77 and 0.93. The five questionnaires were able to discriminate between patients and healty subjects, and between the patients' subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish versions of the TQ, CAPS-DX, DTS, TOP-8, and DGRP have shown adequate reliability and validity for assessing PTSD patients in daily clinical practice. CAPS-DX seems to be more adequate a diagnostic and DTS a severity rating scale.
OBJECTIVE: to determine the efficacy and tolerability of risperidone in schizophrenic outpatients. MATERIAL AND METHOD DESIGN: multicentre, observational, 6 month follow-up study. PATIENTS: 421 schizophrenic (ICD-10 criteria) outpatients previously treated with depot neuroleptics and who were switched from depot medication to risperidone due to inefficacy and/or low tolerability. ASSESSMENT: BPRS, CGI, GAF, UKU, and DAI were administered at baseline and months 1, 3, and 6. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: the Wilcoxon's T, Friedman's test, and Cochran's Q have been employed. RESULTS: Mean total dose of risperidone: 5.5 mg/d (SD 2.4). Scores on BPRS, CGI, GAF, UKU, DAI showed statistically significant improvements (p<0.0001). Significant decrease in the proportion of patients using anticholinergic drugs to control extrapyramidal symptoms and in the rate of hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: patients benefited from the change to risperidone in terms of efficacy, tolerance, compliance and admissions. Depot neuroleptic treated schizophrenic patients can benefit from treatment change to an oral atypic antipsychotic like risperidone to ease compliance, illness outcome and patient community integration.
INTRODUCTION: Despite the large number of scales to assess cognitive function, these are rarely used in clinical practice, both because of the time they require and because they do not give useful information to the clinician. The aim of this article is to present the characteristics and psychometric properties of a scale which aims, with its simplicity of use and design, to be of use in the clinical practice for measuring social cognition in psychosis. METHODS: The new GEOPTE Scale gathers information from two sources: the patient's subjective perception of his/her deficits and that of the informant or caregiver. It consists of 15 items (7 for basic cognitive functions and 8 for social cognition). The scale was applied to 87 patients with a diagnosis of psychosis (according to DSM-IV), and general clinical data, clinical global impression, mood and degree of insight were gathered. RESULTS: The GEOPTE Scale presented excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.84 for patient and 0.87 for informants). Factorial analysis identified two factors which explained a total variance of 39%. The first factor was related to the basic cognitive function items and the second to the social cognition items. Regarding the validity of the construct, the scores on the scale are closely related to clinical global impression, degree of insight and depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The GEOPTE Scale for measuring social cognition in psychosis has an excellent psychometric behavior both in the degree of internal consistency and in correlation with clinical global variables, mood and degree of insight.
OBJECTIVE: To measure health related quality of life (HRQL) and social functioning in schizophrenic patients treated with olanzapine under regular clinical practice conditions. METHODS: Out-patients diagnosed of schizophrenia and beginning treatment with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone or typical oral antipsychotics were included. Information on socio-demographic characteristics was obtained and in each visit (baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months) they were administered the generic HRQL questionnaire Euro-QoL-5D (EQ-5D) and the Social Functioning Scale (SFS). RESULTS: A total of 1,198 patients were followed-up for 12 months. Mean age (SD) was 38.6 (13.3) years and 62.9 % of them were men. In basal conditions the most affected dimensions of EQ-5D were anxiety/depression (76 %), and daily activities (73.6 %). After 12 months treatment the cohort of patients treated with olanzapine showed a better HRQL in the self-care dimension compared to all other treatments (p < 0.05), and in the dimensions of pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression and usual activities compared to the group treated with quetiapine and risperidone (p < 0.05). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D questionnaire showed a better health state after 12 months in the group treated with olanzapine compared to the groups of quetiapine or risperidone (p < 0.05). The SFS showed a better improvement in the cohort of olanzapine in the three studied dimensions after 12 months: isolation and social relationships in comparison to the risperidone group (p < 0.05), interpersonal communication in comparison to the risperidone and quetiapine group (p < 0.05) and independence performance in comparison to all the other treatments (p < 0,05). CONCLUSION: Schizophrenic patients treated with olanzapine for one year show a better improvement in HRQL and social functioning than those treated with other antipsychotics.
INTRODUCTION: We describe the different diseases in which conventional and second generation antipsychotic (APS) prescriptions are made. METHOD: Observational, retrospective, multicenter study based on the review of 300 clinical records of public and private sites, hospital and out-patient clinics, located in Salamanca, Vigo, Bilbao, Barcelona, Valencia, Oviedo and Malaga. RESULTS: The mean age of the population studied was 42 +/- 17 years; 56.6 % were men. Atypical drugs (67 %) were used basically versus classical ones (33 %). Classical APS are basically prescribed in bipolar disorder with/without psychotic symptoms (20.6 %), schizophrenia (18.3%) and delusional disorder (11.5 %). Atypical APS are fundamentally prescribed in schizophrenia (31.5 %), bipolar disorders with/without psychotic symptoms (12.5 %) and other psychotic disorders (8.9 %). When the psychotic disorders are considered by groups (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder with psychotic symptoms, delusional disorder and other psychotic disorders), classical APS are used in 47.4 % and atypical APS in 62.5%. APS were used ((outside the indication)) (off-label) in 32.8%, including resistant depressions, serious obsessive-compulsive disorder and borderline personality disorder, with similar percentages for both conventional and atypical ones. In dementia, atypical APS were used in 5.1 % versus 1.5 % of the conventional ones. The most frequent reasons for prescription of classical APS were control of psychotic symptoms (33.6 %), aggressiveness-agitation (31.3 %), severe insomnia (16 %), impulsivity (6.9 %) and severe anxiety (6.1 %). Atypical APS were preferably used in the control of psychotic symptoms (58.8%) and aggressiveness-agitation (25.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of APS basically occurs within their authorized indications (67.2 %). The off-label use (32.8 %) occurs both for the classical as well as atypical APS and occurs in serious diseases in which there are no alternative treatments.
UNLABELLED: The authors analyze the incidence of sexual dysfunction (SD) with different SSRIs (Fluoxetine, Fluvoxamine, Paroxetine and Sertraline) and hence the qualitative and quantitative changes in SD throughout time 308 outpatients (169 women, 139 men; mean +/- SD age = 41 +/- 7) under treatment with SSRIs were interviewed with an SD questionnaire designed for this purpose by the authors including questions about the following items decreased libido, delayed orgasm or anorgasmia, delayed ejaculation inability to ejaculation, impotence and general sexual satisfaction. Patients with the following criteria were included: normal sexual function before SSRIs intake, exclusive treatment with SSRIs or associated with benzodiazepines, previous heterosexual or self-orone current sexual practices. We excluded patients with previous sexual dysfunction, association of SSRIs with neuroleptics, recently hormone intake and significant medical illnesses. RESULTS: There is a significant increase in the incidence of SD when the physicians ask the patients direct questions (55.29%) versus spontaneous SD reported (14.2%). There are some significant differences among different SSRIs paroxetine provoked more delay of orgasm/ejaculation and more impotence than fluvoxamine, fluoxetine and sertraline (Chi square p < 0.05). Only 22.6% of the patients had a good tolerance about their sexual dysfunction. SD has positive correlation with the dose. The patients experienced substantial improvement in sexual function when the dose was diminished or the drug was withdrawn. Men showed more incidence of sexual dysfunction than women but women's sexual dysfunction was more intense than men. Seven of nine patients (77.7%) experienced total improvement when the treatment was changed to Moclobemide (450 mg/day) and two of four patients (50%) improved when treatment was changed to Amineptine.
AIM: To evaluate the impact of early retirement, quality of life and general health level of a sample of industrial workers. SUBJECTS: 78 early retired industrial workers were evaluated on two separate occasions, baseline and after three years. INSTRUMENTS: A sociodemographic and clinical "ad hoc" protocol and the Spanish versions ot the following scales: the Quality of Life Questionnaire (1) the GHQ-28 (2, 3) and the MMSE (4, 5), the Self-Concept Scale (6, 7) and the Depression-Anxiety Scale from Goldberg (8-10). RESULTS: Those retired for physical or accident purpose showed a worse self-image and greater levels of anxiety CONCLUSIONS: Being retired for physical or accident purpose plays a significant role in the development of psychopathology.