Interactive computer method for rating quality of life: comparison of chronic pain patients and healthy controls.
OBJECTIVE: This study presents information on the development of an interactive computer-based rating method of quality of life that assesses the multidimensional impact of chronic pain on the individual. METHOD: A software program assessing 20 categories of quality of life was created and administered to 103 chronic pain patients. Comparison data were obtained from 103 matched healthy controls. RESULTS: High variability was found among pain patients in their ratings of quality of life, and pain patients rated all categories lower than controls. Three groups emerged from a cluster analysis of the data reflecting high, mixed, and low ratings of satisfaction with quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The rating method was convenient, was easy for the patient to understand, and took very little time to administer. Further investigation of the validity and reliability of this tool is needed.