PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M C Corley

Publications and source records attributed to M C Corley.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale.

AIM OF THE STUDY: This methodological research developed and evaluated the moral distress scale from 1994 to 1997. BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Although nurses confront moral questions in their practice daily, few instruments are available to measure moral concepts. The methodological design used a convenience sample consisted of 214 nurses from several Unites States hospitals. The framework guiding the development of the moral distress scale (MDS) included Jameton's conceptualization of moral distress, House and Rizzo's role conflict theory, and Rokeach's value theory. Items for the MDS were developed from research on the moral problems that nurses confront in hospital practice. The MDS consists of 32 items in a 7-point Likert format; a higher score reflects a higher level of normal distress. RESULTS: Mean scores on each item ranged from 3.9 to 5.5, indicating moderately high levels of moral distress. The item with the highest mean score (M=5.47) was working where the number of staff is so low that care is inadequate. Factor analysis yielded three factors: individual responsibility, not in the patient's best interest, and deception. No demographic or professional variables were related to moral distress. Fifteen percent of the nurses had resigned a position in the past because of moral distress. CONCLUSION: The results support the reliability and validity of the MDS.

Adult↗

Hostility toward caregivers as a selection criterion for transplantation.

Researchers have focused on hostility and aggression of psychiatric patients but little is known about what effects transplant candidates' hostility toward their caregivers has on the care the candidates receive. Hostility is defined as any verbal, nonverbal, or physical behavior which threatens persons or property. Although hostility may be one of the precipitating factors in the need for an organ transplant, it may also be a response of the patient to his or her condition. This study focused on whether transplant coordinators felt that hostility should be used as a criterion for accepting or rejecting a transplant candidate. A nonexperimental descriptive survey design targeted 559 organ transplant coordinators who were members of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization. Many coordinators in this study (62%) felt that a hostile candidate should not receive an organ transplant. Different methods of caring for hostile patients should be explored, especially for those who are antagonistic and who exhibit aggressive behaviors. Given the scarcity of donor organs, ethical principles must guide the allocation of these organs and the selection of transplant recipients.

Adult↗

Attitude, self-image, and quality of life of living kidney donors.

The purpose of this research was to assess the attitude, self-image, and quality of life of living kidney donors. This research employed an exploratory design. Instruments included Simmons and colleagues' (1977, 1987) measures on donor attitude and self-image, Ferrans and Powers (1992) scale on quality of life, and Cantril's (1965) ladder of life. Social desirability was also measured. Fifty-five living kidney donors from one transplant program participated in the research. Donations had been made recently or as long as 25 years ago. The research determined that men were significantly more ambivalent about donating than women. Significantly higher levels of predicted self-esteem and independence were found in African-American donors, those with higher levels of education, and those who had recently donated a kidney. Scores on quality of life were high for all donors, and they expected that their quality of life would improve in the next 5 years. Social desirability scores were high for 65% of the donors. The quality of life of donors is high and similar to other healthy persons from reported research. The findings in the difference in self-esteem and independence between those who donated before and after 1990 as well as the social desirability scores are reasons to conduct further research on living donors.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Use of backrest elevation in critical care: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Use of lower backrest positions occurs frequently and is a factor in the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia. OBJECTIVES: To determine the usual bed elevation and backrest position in a medical intensive care unit and their relationship to hemodynamic status and enteral feeding. METHODS: Data were collected in a 12-bed medical respiratory intensive care unit for 2 months. A protractor was used to measure the elevation of the head of the bed. Hemodynamic status was defined by systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure measurements retrieved from each patient's flow sheet. RESULTS: The sample included 347 measurements of 52 patients. Mean backrest elevation was 22.9 degrees, and 86% of patients were supine. Backrest position differed significantly (P = .005) among nursing shifts (days, evenings, nights) but not for systolic (r = -0.04, P = .49), diastolic (r = 0.01, P = .83), or mean arterial blood pressure (r = -0.01, P = .84). Backrest elevation did not differ significantly between patients who were receiving enteral feedings and patients who were not (P = .23) or between patients receiving intermittent versus continuous nutrition (P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: Use of higher levels of backrest elevation (> or = 30 degrees) is minimal and is not related to use of enteral feeding or to hemodynamic status. The rationale for using lower backrest positions for critically ill patients may be based on convenience, the patient's comfort, or usual patterns in the unit. However, the dangers of supine positioning and its relationship to aspiration and ventilator-associated pneumonia should not be minimized.

Critical Care↗

Rationing organs using psychosocial and lifestyle criteria.

The role of patient psychosocial and lifestyle characteristics in decisions about the allocation of scarce health care resources has not been examined. In this national survey using the Criteria for Selection of Transplant Recipient (CSTR) Scale, organ transplant coordinators (N = 559) identified the psychosocial and lifestyle criteria they believe should be considered in patient selection/rejection for organ transplant. Using factor analysis to reduce the data, six factors were identified: current lifestyle/psychiatric problems, family/socioeconomic issues, habits, controlled lifestyle/psychiatric issues, cost, and stigmatized conditions. Patients who were in prison for a serious crime, used cocaine, had AIDS, or were HIV positive (criteria making up the Stigma factor), were more likely to be labeled for exclusion from transplant than those with other psychosocial/lifestyle characteristics. When transplant coordinators perceived that patients' psychosocial and lifestyle problems were under control or corrected, they were more likely to consider them for a transplant. For all but the cost factor, criteria were most stringent for heart transplants. Although over 90% of the coordinators assessed patients and participated in patient selection for transplant, master's prepared nurses were more likely than nurses with other educational preparation to be involved in organ recipient selection. These findings can serve as a prototype for how decisions are made for allocating other scarce health care resources.

Adult↗

Ethical dimensions of nurse-physician relations in critical care.

Recent research findings highlight the importance of nurse-physician collaboration for more positive patient outcomes. Nowhere is this more important than in addressing the ethical aspects of critical care practice. Differences in values, communication, trust, and responsibilities can precipitate conflict between nurses and physicians over ethical components of care. Strategies to address these ethical conflicts and improve nurse-physician collaboration are needed at both the organization and policy level.

Conflict, Psychological↗

The dark side of nursing: impact of stigmatizing responses on patients.

The current emphasis in nursing is on caring, what it involves and why it is the profession's responsibility. This article focuses on the opposite behaviors--the "dark side of nursing" (Jameton, 1992). By developing a fuller understanding of nurse behaviors labeled the "dark side of nursing," the profession can better comprehend what caring involves and develop innovative ways to reduce dark-side behaviors. Although marginalizing, labeling and stereotyping, and stigmatizing are related, the focus will be on stigmatizing responses to patients. A number of investigators document nurse stereotyping of suicidal patients, persons with AIDS, racial/ethnic groups, and sex offenders and the impact on patients. Social psychological theories on stereotyping and deviant behavior provide some explanation for the nurse's behavior. The organizational perspective, however, has not been employed to enhance our understanding of nor to eliminate this phenomenon. Combining an organizational perspective with the social psychological theory of negative stereotyping (stigmatizing) and philosophical theory involving ethics provides a more comprehensive theory for understanding the "dark side of nursing" and designing interventions to reduce the occurrence of this damaging behavior.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Environmental turbulence: staff nurse perspectives.

The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore staff nurses' perceptions of how turbulence in the internal environment affected their ability to provide patient care. The themes that emerged from the data point toward multiple factors impinging on a staff nurse's ability to provide quality care in today's healthcare environment. The authors discuss these factors, the consequences for staff nurses, patients, and the organization, and the implications for nursing administrators and their colleagues in hospital administration.

Adult↗

Moral distress of critical care nurses.

BACKGROUND: Constraint of nurses by healthcare organizations, from actions the nurses believe are appropriate, may lead to moral distress. OBJECTIVE: To present findings on moral distress of critical care nurses, using an investigator-developed instrument. METHODS: An instrument development design using consensus by three expert judges, test-retest reliability, and factor analysis was used. Study participants (N = 111) were members of a chapter of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, critical care nurses employed in a large medical center, and critical care nurses from a private hospital. A 32-item instrument included items on prolonging life, performing unnecessary tests and treatments, lying to patients, and incompetent or inadequate treatment by physicians. RESULTS: Three factors were identified using factor analysis after expert consensus on the items: aggressive care, honesty, and action response. Nurses in the private hospital reported significantly greater moral distress on the aggressive care factor than did nurses in the medical center. Nurses not working in intensive care experienced higher levels of moral distress on the aggressive care factor than did nurses working in intensive care. Of the 111 nurses, 12% had left a nursing position primarily because of moral distress. CONCLUSIONS: Although the mean scores showed somewhat low levels of moral distress, the range of responses revealed that some nurses experienced high levels of moral distress with the issues. Research is needed on conditions organizations must provide to support the moral integrity of critical care nurses.

Adult↗

Patient and nurse criteria for heart transplant candidacy.

The criteria nurses and patients believe should be used to allocate hearts for transplantation were explored and compared in a descriptive study. Although the majority of both groups agreed that patients with AIDS or who are HIV positive should not receive a transplant, the two groups agreed very little on the other criteria. This research has implications for clinical care and ethical decision making.

Adult↗

The clinical ladder. Impact on nurse satisfaction and turnover.

Nurse administrators have advocated clinical ladder programs to address salary compression of experienced nurses. However, few clinical ladder programs have survived the test of time. One possible explanation for the demise of these programs is the failure to assess nurses' satisfaction with clinical ladder programs. Ongoing assessment of these programs may provide a solution to early demise.

Adult↗

Environments that support ethical nursing practice.

Creating an ethical work environment in a health care organization is both necessary and difficult. In the process of providing care, nurses often make decisions with ethical implications. This decision making is enhanced when the work environment supports an ethical approach. Nursing can implement strategies to support ethical decision making.

Decision Making↗