Biomedical subjects

M C García-Alvarez-Coque

Publications and source records attributed to M C García-Alvarez-Coque.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Optimised procedures for the reversed-phase liquid chromatographic analysis of formulations containing tricyclic antidepressants.

The chromatographic behaviour (retention, selectivity, peak shape and resolution) of seven tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), amitryptiline, clomipramine, doxepin, imipramine, maprotiline, nortryptiline and trimipramine, was examined. Conventional unendcapped Cs and C18 columns and an endcapped XTerra MS C18 column recommended for the analysis of basic compounds were used together with acetonitrile-water and micellar sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS)-pentanol mobile phases. The two best combinations were XTerra C18/acetonitrile, which yielded the largest efficiencies and resolution, and C8/SDS-pentanol, which eliminated the peak tails that were still observed with the XTerra C18 column. Both the systems were used to develop simple chromatographic procedures for the control of TCAs in pharmaceutical formulations using UV detection. The selected mobile phase compositions were 35% (v/v) acetonitrile (XTerra C18 column) and 0.075 M SDS-6% (v/v) pentanol (C8 column), both at pH 3. Satisfactory recoveries were achieved in both cases, with intra- and inter-day relative standard deviations (RSDs) always below 0.6 and 2.0%, respectively. The preparation of the samples was simple in both modes, since a previous extraction of the drugs was not needed. The micellar mode has, however, the advantage of using a smaller amount of organic solvent, which is retained in the micellar SDS solution. The C8 column is also less expensive.

Acetonitriles↗

PubMed2003

Net analyte signal as a deconvolution-oriented resolution criterion in the optimisation of chromatographic techniques.

The performance of two multivariate calibration measurements, multivariate selectivity (SEL(s)) and scalar net analyte signal (scalar NAS), as chromatographic objective functions (COFs), was investigated. Since both assessments are straightforwardly related to the quantification of analytes in the presence of interferents, they were expected to confer new features in the optimisation of compound resolution, not present in conventional assessments. These capabilities are especially interesting in situations of low resolution, where peak deconvolution becomes an attractive alternative. For comparison purposes, chromatographic resolution (R(s)) and peak purity (p(s)) were used as reference COFs. In order to correlate COFs with the probability of deconvolution error, an artificial peak crossing was used to generate 73 different peak arrangements, which were deconvolved using three different methods. SEL(s) exhibited the best correlation, which allowed predicting properly the risk of obtaining inaccurate deconvolutions. The optimisation of a poorly resolved mixture of 16 aromatic compounds by reversed-phase liquid chromatography with methanol-water and acetonitrile-water mobile phases was examined to investigate the differences in performance among the resolution criteria. In situations like these, SEL(s) tends to consider acceptable mobile phase compositions with partial coelution, which permits however the deconvolution with low errors. In contrast, p(s) selects compositions where the resolution of some compounds is sacrificed to enhance the separation of others. Scalar NAS was not so favourable as expected, since it depends on sampling frequency and peak widening. SEL(s) was not affected by these factors.

Acetonitriles↗

PubMed2003

Improvement of peak shape and separation performance of beta-blockers in conventional reversed-phase columns using solvent modifiers.

A comparative study of peak shape, elution behavior, and resolution of 16 beta-blockers (acebutolol, alprenolol, atenolol, bisoprolol, carteolol, celiprolol, esmolol, labetalol, metoprolol, nadolol, oxprenolol, pindolol, practolol, propranolol, sotalol, and timolol) chromatographed with hybrid mobile phases of triethylamine (TEA)-acetonitrile and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-propanol is performed using conventional reversed-phase columns and isocratic elution. Both solvent modifiers (TEA and SDS) prevent the interaction of the basic drugs with the alkyl-bonded phase. However, the protection mechanisms of silanols on the packing are different. Whereas TEA associates with the silanol sites (blocking ion-exchange processes or repelling the solutes), the long hydrophobic chain of SDS is inserted in the bonded organic layer with the sulfate group protruding outside, which makes the stationary phase negatively charged. The effects of TEA, acetonitrile, SDS, and propanol on the elution strength, efficiency, peak asymmetry, and resolution are examined under an experimental design basis that is assisted by computer simulation to reach more general conclusions. The combination of improved peak shapes, larger selectivity, and a smaller range in retention among compounds of extreme polarity leads to the observation that a greater number of beta-blockers can be resolved with a hybrid micellar system.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2002

Peak deconvolution in one-dimensional chromatography using a two-way data approach.

A deconvolution methodology for overlapped chromatographic signals is proposed. Several single-wavelength chromatograms of binary mixtures, obtained in different runs at diverse concentration ratios of the individual components, were simultaneously processed (multi-batch approach), after being arranged as two-way data. The chromatograms were modelled as linear combinations of forced peak profiles according to a polynomially modified Gaussian equation. The fitting was performed with a previously reported hybrid genetic algorithm with local search, leaving all model parameters free. The approach yielded more accurate solutions than those found when each experimental chromatogram was fitted independently to the peak model (single-batch approach). The improvement was especially significant for those chromatograms where the peaks were severely affected by the tails of the preceding compounds. Peak shifts among chromatograms, which are a usual source of non-bilinearity, were modelled in a continuous domain instead of in a discrete way, which avoided some drawbacks associated with latent variable methods. An experimental design involving simulated chromatograms was applied to check the method performance. Five main factors affecting the deconvolution were examined: concentration pattern, chromatographic resolution, number of batches and replicates, and noise level, which were evaluated using first- and second-order figures of merit. The method was also tested on three real samples containing compounds showing different overlap. Four multi-batch deconvolution methods were considered differing in the nature of the processed information and kind of peak matching among chromatograms. In all cases, the multi-batch deconvolution yielded better performance than the single-batch approach.

Chromatography↗

PubMed2002

Prediction of the retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography using solute-mobile phase-stationary phase polarity parameters.

A previously reported algorithm, based on the equation: log k = (log k)o + p(PN(m) - PN(s)), that relates the retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography with solute (p), mobile phase (PN(m)) and stationary phase (PN(s)) relative polarity parameters, is improved. The retention data reported by several authors for different sets of compounds, eluted with acetonitrile-water and methanol-water mixtures, are used to test the algorithm and elaborate a database of p values. The methodology is successfully applied to predict the retention using PN(m), values calculated as PN(m) = 1.00 - (2.13phi)/(1+1.4phi) for acetonitrile-water and PN(m) = 1.00 - (1.33phi)/(l1 + 0.47phi) for methanol-water, phi being the organic solvent volumetric fraction. The polarity parameters are demonstrated to be useful to transfer retention data between solvent systems and between columns. Accordingly, the retention in a solvent system is predicted by characterising the working column with a small training set of compounds having diverse polarities, and using the p values known for another solvent system or column. The p polarity parameter is found to be a good descriptor of the retention, allowing the prediction of the expected elution order and peak overlaps.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

Parabolic-Lorentzian modified Gaussian model for describing and deconvolving chromatographic peaks.

A new mathematical model for characterising skewed chromatographic peaks, which improves the previously reported polynomially modified Gaussian (PMG) model, is proposed. The model is a Gaussian based equation whose variance is a combined parabolic-Lorentzian function. The parabola accounts for the non-Gaussian shaped peak, whereas the Lorentzian function cancels the variance growth out of the elution region, which gives rise to a problematic baseline increase in the PMG model. The proposed parabolic-Lorentzian modified Gaussian (PLMG) model makes a correct description of peaks showing a wide range of asymmetry with positive and/or negative skewness. The new model is shown to give better fittings than other models as the Li, log-normal or Pap-Pápai models, which have a different mathematical basis. The model parameters are also related to peak properties as the skewness and kurtosis. The PLMG model is applied to the deconvolution of peaks in binary mixtures of structurally related compounds that are highly overlapped (retention times in min): oxytetracycline (9.00)--tetracycline (10.20), sulfathiazole (3.67)--sulfachloropyridazine (3.93), and sulfisoxazole (5.14)--sulfapyridine (5.24). The use of non-linear least-squares calibration in combination with the PLMG model gave superior results than the classical multiple linear least-squares and partial least-squares regressions. The proposed method takes into account run to run changes in retention time that occur along the injection of standards and samples, and the possible interactions that exist between the coeluting compounds. This decreases significantly the quantitation errors.

Chromatography↗

PubMed2002

Micellar liquid chromatography: suitable technique for screening analysis.

The screening capability of micellar liquid chromatography (MLC) is discussed using the reported chromatographic data of several sets of compounds (amino acids, beta-blockers, diuretics, phenethylamines, phenols, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, steroids and sulfonamides) and new results (sulfonamides and steroids). The chromatographic data are treated with an interpretive optimisation resolution procedure to obtain the best separation conditions. Usually, the pH and the concentration of surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS, or cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) for the optimal mobile phase were 2.5-3 and < 0.12 M, respectively. The nature and concentration of organic solvent depended on the polarity of the eluted compounds: a low volume fraction of propanol (approximately 1%, v/v) was useful to separate the amino acids, with log P(o/w) < -1 (where P(o/w) is the octanol-water partition coefficient). A greater concentration of this solvent (approximately 5-7%) was needed for compounds in the range -1 < log P(o/w) < 2, as with the studied diuretics and sulfonamides, and a high concentration of propanol (approximately 15%) or a low concentration of butanol (< 10%) had to be used for less polar compounds with 1 < log P(o/w) < 3, such as the beta-blockers. Pentanol (< 6%) was more suitable for the even less polar compounds with log P(o/w) > 3, such as the steroids. For basic drugs such as the phenethylamines (0 < log P(o/w) < 1.7), eluted with a micellar eluent of anionic SDS, propanol was too weak. A study is also shown for mixtures of sulfonamides (log P(o/w) = -1.2 to 1.7) and steroids (log P(o/w) = 3.0-8.1) eluted from conventional C18 columns with SDS mobile phases containing acetonitrile and 1-pentanol, respectively, which are compared with classical acetonitrile-water and methanol-water mixtures. The results complement a previous study on beta-blockers (log P(o/w) = -0.03 to 2.8) and reveal that MLC is a very competitive technique for the screening of compounds against conventional RPLC, due to its peculiar behaviour with regard to the selectivity and elution strength. The concentration of organic solvent needed to obtain sufficiently low retention times (even for highly hydrophobic steroids with log P(o/w) = 7-8) is also appreciably smaller for MLC, which reduces the environmental impact of the mobile phases.

Chromatography, Liquid↗

PubMed2002

Control of propranolol intake by direct chromatographic detection of alpha-naphthoxylactic acid in urine.

A rapid chromatographic procedure with a C18 column, a mobile phase of 0.15 M sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-10% (v/v) 1-propanol at pH 3 (0.01 M phosphate buffer), and fluorimetric detection, is reported for the control of propranolol (PPL) intake in urine samples, which are injected directly without any other treatment than filtration. The peak of PPL was only observed in samples taken a few hours after ingestion of the drug due to its extensive conjugation and metabolisation. The detection of several unconjugated PPL metabolites was therefore considered: desisopropylpropranolol (DIP), propranolol glycol (PPG), alpha-naphthoxylactic acid (NLT) and alpha-naphthoxyacetic acid (NAC). NLT showed the best characteristics: it eluted at a much shorter retention time than PPL, its concentration in urine samples was greater and it did not present any interference from endogeneous compounds in urine, common drugs or drugs administered in combination with PPL. The limit of quantification, measured as the concentration of analyte providing a relative standard deviation of 20%, was 24 ng/ml, and the day-to-day imprecision was below 4% for concentrations above 200 ng/ml. The procedure allows the routine control of PPL at therapeutic urine levels. Urinary excretion studies showed that the detection of NLT is possible at least up to 20-30 h after oral administration.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2002

Determination of furosemide in urine samples by direct injection in a micellar liquid chromatographic system.

A sensitive, selective and efficient micellar liquid chromatographic (MLC) procedure was developed for the determination of furosemide (4-chloro-N-furfuryl-5-sulfamoylanthranilic acid) in urine samples by direct injection and UV detection. The procedure makes use of a C18 reversed-phase column and a micellar mobile phase of 0.05 mol l(-1) sodium dodecyl sulfate-6% v/v propanol and phosphate buffer at pH 3 to resolve furosemide from its photochemical degradation products. The importance of protecting the standards and urine samples to be analysed from light in the assay of furosemide, avoiding its degradation, was verified. The limit of quantification was 0.15 microg ml(-1) and the relative standard deviation of the inter-day assay was 0.8-0.04% in the 6-82 microg ml(-1) range. Detection of urinary excretion of furosemide was followed up to 12 h after ingestion of the drug by a healthy volunteer. No potential interference from the major metabolite (furosemide acylglucuronide) and its hydrolytic product (4-chloro-5-sulfamoylanthranilic acid) was observed. Commonly administered drugs also did not interfere. The proposed MLC procedure permits the rapid and reproducible measurement of low levels of furosemide in a small amount of urine.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗

PubMed2001

Quantitative structure-retention and retention-activity relationships of beta-blocking agents by micellar liquid chromatography.

Sixteen beta-blocking agents (acebutolol, alprenolol, atenolol, bisoprolol, carteolol, celiprolol, esmolol, labetalol, metoprolol, nadolol, oxprenolol, pindolol, practolol, propranolol, sotalol and timolol) showing a large range of hydrophobicity (octanol-water partition coefficients, log P between -0.026 and 2.81) were subjected to micellar liquid chromatography with sodium dodecyl sulfate as micelle forming agent, and n-propanol as organic modifier. The correlation between log P and the retention factor extrapolated to a mobile phase free of micelles and organic modifier was investigated. The use of an interpolated retention factor or the retention factor for specific individual experimental mobile phases was however advantageous since the retention factors of all beta-blocking agents were measurable in the selected mobile phases. Good correlations with log P and with in vitro biological parameters (cellular permeability coefficients in Caco-2 monolayers and apparent permeability coefficients in rat intestinal segments) were found.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2001

Chromatographic analysis of phenethylamine-antihistamine combinations using C8, C18 or cyano columns and micellar sodium dodecyl sulfate-pentanol mixtures.

The chromatographic behaviour of binary and ternary mixtures of several phenethylamines (phenylephrine, phenylpropanolamine, ephedrine, pseudoephedrine and methoxyphenamine) and antihistamines (pheniramine, carbinoxamine, doxylamine, chlorpheniramine, dexchlorpheniramine, dexbrompheniramine, diphenhydramine, tripolidine, azatadine and phenyltoloxamine), found in cough-cold pharmaceutical preparations, was studied using C8, C18 and cyano columns, micellar mobile phases of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and pentanol and UV detection. Using a C8 column and mobile phases of 0.05 mol l-1 SDS-6% v/v pentanol or 0.15 mol l-1 SDS-2% v/v pentanol at pH 7, more than 30 different phenethylamine-antihistamine combinations can be resolved in < 15 min. Intra- and inter-day repeatabilities and reproducibilities evaluated at three different drug concentrations (0.5, 5 and 25 micrograms ml-1, n = 10) were below 1.6, 2.5 and 2.4%, respectively. The drug amounts found in 18 formulations agreed with those declared by the manufacturers within the tolerance limits, and with those obtained using a mobile phase of 55% v/v methanol at pH 7. No interference was observed from other accompanying drugs such as acetylsalicylic acid, ascorbic acid, betamethasone, bromhexine, caffeine, codeine, dextromethorphan, paracetamol, prednisolone, salicylamide and tartrazine. The proposed procedure has the advantage over the conventional aqueous-organic procedure of using a small amount of organic solvent, which is highly retained in the SDS solution. The efficiencies are also greater. On the other hand, in the micellar system, the retentions of phenethylamines and antihistamines are similar, although the compounds can be easily resolved. In contrast, using the methanol-water mobile phase, the phenethylamines are weakly retained, whereas the antihistamines usually show a high retention.

Chromatography↗

PubMed2000

Use of a three-factor interpretive optimisation strategy in the development of an isocratic chromatographic procedure for the screening of diuretics in urine samples using micellar mobile phases.

Screening of diuretics in urine is feasible through direct injection of the samples into the chromatographic system and isocratic reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) with micellar-organic mobile phases of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 1-propanol. The surfactant coverage of the chromatographic column makes the addition of organic competing amines less necessary than in conventional aqueous-organic RPLC to achieve well-shaped peaks. Also, the range of elution strengths of micellar mobile phases required to elute mixtures of hydrophobic and hydrophilic diuretics is smaller. This allows the isocratic separation of the diuretics within adequate analysis times. An interpretive methodology is applied to optimise the resolution of a mixture of 15 diuretics of diverse polarity and acid-base behaviour (althiazide, amiloride, bendroflumethiazide, benzthiazide, bumetanide, canrenoic acid, chlorthalidone, ethacrynic acid, furosemide, piretanide, probenecid, torasemide, triamterene, trichloromethiazide and xipamide), using pH and concentrations of surfactant and organic modifier in the mobile phase as separation factors. Twelve diuretics were resolved in 25 min using 0.055 M SDS-6.0% 1-propanol at pH 3.0. The mixture of 15 diuretics was also resolved with two mobile phases showing complementary behaviour: 0.05 M SDS-5.6% 1-propanol at pH 5.4 and 0.11 M SDS-5.4% 1-propanol at pH 4.2. The results were applied to the analysis of urine samples with limits of detection similar to those usually reported for aqueous-organic RPLC, taking into account that the samples were injected without any previous treatment to separate or preconcentrate the analytes.

Calibration↗

PubMed2000

Interpretive optimisation strategy applied to the isocratic separation of phenols by reversed-phase liquid chromatography with acetonitrile-water and methanol-water mobile phases.

An optimisation protocol is presented for the resolution of complex mixtures in isocratic RPLC with binary mobile phases of organic solvent and water, which is based on the prediction of peak position and shape of the individual compounds. A good description of the retention was achieved through the application of statistical weights to the widely used linear or quadratic relationships between the logarithm of the retention factor (log k) and the organic solvent concentration in the mobile phase. The maximisation of the product of peak purities for each compound is shown as a competitive resolution strategy versus the worst value of a selectivity parameter. Peak purities allow one to associate a single resolution value to each compound, which is not affected by the identity of the interfering peaks. It is shown how when full resolution is not achieved with a single mobile phase, the same experimental data set (retention factors, asymmetries and efficiencies) can be used for finding two or three optimal complementary mobile phases (CMPs). Each CMP resolves fully some compounds in the mixture, while the remaining compounds can overlap among them. The elementary limiting resolutions, which measure the maximal separation degree for each compound, are also given as a useful guide in the selection of the elution conditions. A mixture of 13 phenols (phenol, chloro-, bromo-, nitro- and methyl-derivatives), eluted with acetonitrile-water or methanol-water mobile phases, is used to show the proposed methodology.

Acetonitriles↗

PubMed2000

Complementary mobile-phase optimisation for resolution enhancement in high-performance liquid chromatography.

An optimisation methodology in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is presented for the selection of two or more mobile phases having an optimal complementary resolution. The complementary mobile phases (CMPs) are selected in such a way that each one resolves optimally only some compounds in the mixture, while the remainder, resolved by the other mobile phase(s), can overlap among them. The methodology is based on the computation of a peak purity measurement for each solute, using an asymmetrical peak model for peak simulation. Two global resolution criteria (product of elementary resolutions and worst elementary resolution) and two methods for solving the problem (a systematic examination of all possible solute arrangements, and the use of genetic algorithms to expedite the calculation time) were used to find the optimal CMPs. The CMP optimisation methodology was applied to the resolution of a mixture of 10 diuretics and beta-blockers, which could not be resolved using a single mobile phase; virtual baseline resolution was achieved, however, with two CMPs.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2000

Comparison of the performance of butanol and pentanol as modifiers in the micellar chromatographic determination of some phenethylamines.

A procedure was developed for the determination of several phenethylamines (amphetamine, arterenol, ephedrine, phenylephrine, phenylpropanolamine, mephentermine, methoxyphenamine, pseudoephedrine and tyramine), using micellar mobile phases of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a C18 column and UV detection. The drugs were eluted at short retention times with conventional acetonitrile-water or methanol-water mobile phases. In contrast, in the micellar system, they were strongly retained due to association with the surfactant adsorbed on the stationary phase, and needed the addition of butanol or pentanol to be eluted from the column. These modifiers allowed a simple way of controlling the retention. The chromatographic efficiencies obtained with the hybrid mobile phases of SDS-butanol and SDS-pentanol were also very high, mostly in the N=3000-7000 range, significantly greater than those achieved with a conventional acetonitrile-methanol-water mobile phase. Butanol and pentanol yielded similar selectivities, but the latter modifier permitted significantly shorter retention times than butanol, and was preferred to expedite the analysis of the pharmaceuticals. Most binary combinations of the nine phenethylamines can be resolved with these mobile phases. A mobile phase of 0.15 M SDS-5% pentanol was used to assay five of the phenethylamines (amphetamine, ephedrine, phenylephrine, phenylpropanolamine and pseudoephedrine) in 22 pharmaceutical preparations, which contained diverse accompanying compounds. The results agreed with the declared compositions and with those obtained with a mobile phase of methanol-acetonitrile-0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 3) 10:5:85, with no interferences and relative errors usually below 2%. However, with the aqueous-organic mobile phase, the retention time for phenylephrine was too low and could not be usually evaluated.

Butanols↗

PubMed2000

Furosemide assay in pharmaceuticals by Micellar liquid chromatography: study of the stability of the drug.

A simplified high-performance liquid chromatographic procedure is described for the determination of furosemide (4-chloro-N-furfuryl-5-sulphamoylanthranillic acid), which makes use of UV detection, a C18, reversed-phase column, and micellar mobile phases of sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) and 1-propanol at pH 3 buffered with phosphate system. The most adequate experimental conditions to handle furosemide solutions in the analytical laboratory are studied. The mixture of furosemide and its degradation products which are formed upon light exposition was resolved with a mobile phase of 0.04 M SDS-2% propanol. Separation of furosemide from its common impurities and the hydrolytic product, 4-chloro-5-sulphamoylanthranillic acid, was also possible. A mobile phase of larger elution strength, such as 0.06 M SDS-8%, propanol was preferred to assay furosemide in several dosage forms (tablets, capsules, injectables and drops). The validity of the procedure was checked by analysing 27 pharmaceuticals commercialised in several countries. The label claim percentages and coefficients of variation were in the 95-102% and 0.05-1.3% ranges, respectively. The results showed that the procedure is suitable for routine analysis of the diuretic.

Calibration↗

PubMed2000

Use of micellar mobile phases for the chromatographic determination of clorazepate, diazepam, and diltiazem in pharmaceuticals.

An ODS-2 column, a micellar mobile phase of high elution strength containing 0.1M sodium dodecyl sulfate and 3% (v/v) butanol, and ultraviolet detection at 230 nm are used for the determination of either of two benzodiazepines (clorazepate and diazepam) and a benzothiazepine (diltiazem) in pharmaceuticals. The procedure is shown to be competitive against conventional chromatography with methanol-water mobile phases, especially for diltiazem. The composition of the micellar mobile phase is selected using a predictive strategy based on an accurate retention model and assisted by computer simulation. Calibration graphs are linear at least in the 2.5 to 20 microg/mL, 4 to 20 microg/mL, and 5 to 40 microg/mL ranges for clorazepate, diazepam, and diltiazem, respectively. The intra- and interday repeatabilities (%) are clorazepate (1.7, 5.2), diazepam (0.43, 3.7), and diltiazem (0.36, 3.1). Limits of detection are well below the concentrations of the drugs found in the commercial pharmaceutical preparations analyzed. The drug contents evaluated with the proposed procedure are compared with the declared contents given by the manufacturers. The achieved percentages of label claim are usually between 95 and 104%.

Calibration↗

PubMed1999

Analysis of urine samples containing cardiovascular drugs by micellar liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection.

A simple direct injection chromatographic procedure with fluorimetric detection is successfully applied to the determination of mixtures of 4 diuretics (amiloride, bendroflumethiazide, piretanide, and triamterene) and 6 beta-blockers (acebutolol, atenolol, labetalol, metoprolol, nadolol, and propranolol), which are usually administered in combinations for the treatment of hypertension, in urine samples. The procedure makes use of C18 columns and micellar mobile phases of sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), propanol, and phosphate buffer at pH 3. The adequate resolution of most drugs is obtained with a chemometrics approach where the retention is modeled as a first step using the retention factors in only 5 mobile phases. Afterward, an optimization criterion that takes into account the position and shape of the chromatographic peaks is applied. A mobile phase of 0.11M SDS--8% propanol could resolve mixtures of 8 drugs and was adequate for the analysis of the combinations of diuretic and beta-blocker usually prescribed. However, a mobile phase of larger elution strength, such as 0.15M SDS--15% propanol, is preferred for the analysis of mixtures of amiloride-metoprolol, amiloride-labetalol, and triameterene-propranolol. The method is sensitive enough for the routine analysis of diuretics and beta-blockers at therapeutic urine levels with limits of detection in the 0.5-28-ng/mL range. Urinary excretion studies show that the detection of most drugs is possible up to 24-72 h after their ingestion.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗