PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

M C Mensor

Publications and source records attributed to M C Mensor.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Removable partial overdentures with mechanical (precision) attachments.

Mechanical attachments for overdentures have been available in various forms for over a century. The explosive interest in osseointegration and the effort on the part of the profession to avoid the complete denture as a treatment modality has stirred the interest in positive retentive elements for overdentures represented by the mechanical stud and bar attachments. The cited references provide a resource as a trouble-free guide in the selection and use of the various stud and bar attachment systems. The clinical examples show a pattern of application not generally discussed by the manufacturers, illustrating the simplicity of use with the options for all attachments including magnets. The discussion on magnets comes from 9 years of clinical experience. Rare earth magnets provide excellent adjunct retention, and their assembly follows the same protocol and complexity as stud attachment systems. All magnets, at the present state of the art, have a corrosion potential with the exception of the Laser Sealed Units (Golden Dental, Golden, CO). Finally, the mechanics of the attachment overdenture serves as an excellent training field for the osseointegrated prosthesis, be it the classic Brånemark (Nobelpharma USA, Chicago, IL) restorative or the implant overdenture concept.

Adult

Attachment fixation of the overdenture: part II.

Many attachment systems of the bar or stud type increase the stability of an overdenture. When selecting an attachment it is essential to consider the skill of the dentist-laboratory team as well as the dexterity of the patient and to use the easiest system that will still improve stabilization. Generally simplicity in design, ease of maintenance, and minimum leverage should be paramount considerations in selection. Use of a guide such as the EM Gauge and of the EM Attachment Selector significantly reduces the confusion in selecting attachments and increases the working armamentarium for stabilizing an overdenture.

Denture Design

Attachment fixation for overdentures. Part I.

Scientific evidence of both constructive and destructive movements of teeth has influenced the design and selection of attachments for overdentures. Dowel designs that would be acceptable for normal copings must be reconsidered in view of the mechanical effectiveness of parallel-walled dowels and screws. Coping designs for attachment overdentures must provide retention, resistance to rotation, and bulk when joined with the dowel and attachment, without negating the advantage of the reduced crown-root ratio. Splinting with a bar-type attachment (1) has advantages over splinting with a stud-type attachment that outweigh the disadvantages of bulk and (2) provides ease of replacement when one of several remaining teeth is excessively mobile. Part II will consider the various types of bar, stud, and auxillary attachments for the overdenture.

Dental Abutments