PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M C van Bruggen

Publications and source records attributed to M C van Bruggen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Plasma levels of nucleosomes and nucleosome-autoantibody complexes in murine lupus: effects of disease progression and lipopolyssacharide administration.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of disease progression and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration on the presence of nucleosomes, antinucleosome reactivity, and nucleosome-Ig complexes in the circulation of MRL and control mice. METHODS: Plasma samples from lupus-prone (MRL/lpr and MRL/+) and control (CBA, Swiss, and BALB/c) mice were tested in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the presence of nucleosomes, antinucleosome antibodies, and nucleosome-Ig complexes. Nucleosome kinetics, apoptosis induction, and phagocytosis of apoptotic cells were also analyzed in MRL/lpr, MRL/+, and CBA control mice after a single injection of LPS or phosphate buffered saline. RESULTS: Nucleosomes were found in the circulation of MRL/lpr and MRL/+ mice from week 4 onward. Nucleosomes were also detected in young control mice, but with increasing age, the nucleosomes disappeared. Antinucleosome antibodies, nucleosome-Ig complexes, and albuminuria were found only in the MRL/lpr mice. LPS administration led to a significant increase in circulating nucleosomes (3-8-fold) in all strains tested. In only the MRL/lpr mice was this increase followed by a significant decrease in antinucleosome titers and an increase in nucleosome-Ig complexes. The number of apoptotic cells in the thymus after LPS was significantly higher in the MRL/lpr mice than in the MRL/+ and CBA control mice. LPS caused a profound reduction (50-70%) of the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by peritoneal macrophages, which was comparable for all strains. CONCLUSION: In MRL lupus-prone mice, nucleosomes are persistently present in the circulation, whereas in control mice, nucleosomes are present only at a young age. The formation of antinucleosome antibodies and nucleosome-Ig complexes is a characteristic feature of MRL/lpr mice. LPS administration increases systemic nucleosome release due to an enhancement of apoptosis and a decrease in the clearance of apoptotic cells.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2000

Histone-containing immune complexes are to a large extent responsible for anti-dsDNA reactivity in the Farr assay of active SLE patients.

Increased titres of anti-dsDNA antibodies, especially if of high avidity, are associated with renal exacerbations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). One of the most reliable assays to measure anti-dsDNA antibodies, the Farr assay, is believed to detect preferentially high avidity antibodies. Purified non-complexed monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against nucleosomes, obtained from mice with SLE, are not reactive in the Farr assay, but can become so once complexed to nucleosomes. These Farr-positive, nucleosome containing, immune complexes were also able to bind in vivo to the glomerular basement membrane (GBM), predominantly via heparan sulphate (HS). To evaluate whether in SLE patients the same kind of immune complexes are responsible for Farr reactivity, IgG from serum or plasma was isolated under dissociating and physiological conditions. We observed that after purification under dissociating conditions, Farr reactivity was significantly decreased (P<0.0001) in contrast to reactivity with histones and two 'control' antigens: Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) and Ro/SS-A. Reactivity with nucleosomes also decreased after purification, although to a lesser extent. Plasma purified under physiological conditions showed no decrease in Farr reactivity. The importance of histones for the generation of immune complexes is supported by the two following observations. Firstly, the presence of histones could be demonstrated in serum and plasma of SLE patients but not in serum of healthy controls or in IgG preparations purified under dissociating conditions. Secondly, Farr reactivity of purified IgG preparations could be restored by addition of purified histones. From these studies we conclude that histones containing immune complexes are responsible for a large part of the Farr reactivity in active SLE, and are therefore indirectly implicated in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Role of nucleosomes for induction and glomerular binding of autoantibodies in lupus nephritis.

The cardinal feature of systemic lupus erythematosus is the formation of anti-nuclear antibodies. In recent years, it has become clear that the nucleosome is a major autoantigen that drives this T cell-dependent autoimmune response, as exemplified by the presence of nucleosome-specific T helper cells and the high prevalence of nucleosome-specific autoantibodies. The only way to generate nucleosomes in vivo is by the process of apoptosis. There is growing evidence that in systemic lupus erythematosus apoptosis is disturbed, leading to the release of nucleosomes. Moreover, apoptosis-induced modifications of these autoantigens may render them more immunogenic, especially if the removal of apoptotic cells is insufficient. The first indications for the impaired clearance of apoptotic cells in systemic lupus erythematosus are emerging. Nucleosomes are also important for mediating tissue lesions, especially glomerulonephritis. In lupus nephritis nucleosomes, nucleosome-specific antibodies and nucleosome/IgG complexes have been identified in the glomerular immune deposits. Via their cationic histone part nucleosomes mediate the binding of anti-nuclear antibodies to intrinsic constituents of the glomerular basement membrane, such as the anionic heparan sulfate and collagen IV. Appreciation of this binding mechanism may lead to new treatment strategies, as shown for non-coagulant heparinoids.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Decreased staining of heparan sulfate in non-lesional skin of a subgroup of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) are components of the basement membrane of various tissues. They are composed of a core protein and of the negatively charged glycosaminoglycan side chain heparan sulfate, which is covalently bound to the core protein. We previously found that in both human and murine lupus nephritis, heparan sulfate staining in the basement membrane of the glomerulus is almost completely absent, and that there was an inverse correlation between heparan sulfate staining and glomerular immunoglobulin deposits. As immunoglobulin deposits are also present in the skin of systemic lupus erythematosus patients, we investigated the heparan sulfate staining pattern in the basement membrane of the dermal-epidermal junction. furthermore, we studied whether there was a correlation between heparan sulfate staining and deposition of immunoglobulin in the basement membrane of this junction, and between heparan sulfate staining and the presence of anti-DNA antibodies in the serum. Biopsies of non-lesional skin of 21 systemic lupus erythematosus patients (15 anti-DNA positive and 6 anti-DNA negative patients at the time of biopsy) were stained for the HSPG-core protein (mAb JM-72), highly sulfated stretches within heparan sulfate (JM-13), the low sulfated regions of heparan sulfate (mAb JM-403) and for immunoglobulin depositions. Abnormal and discontinuous staining of the low sulfated parts of heparan sulfate using mAb JM-403 in the basement membrane was found in skin biopsies of 4 out of 15 systemic lupus erythematosus patients with anti-DNA antibodies. In contrast, all specimens of anti-DNA negative patients showed normal continuous staining. Staining with JM-13 and JM-72 showed normal linear staining in both groups. The decreased heparan sulfate staining was correlated significantly with the presence of immunoglobulin deposits in the basement membrane. The subgroup could not be identified by its clinical picture. Our results suggest similar but not identical pathways in systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis and skin of systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Antigen specificity of anti-nuclear antibodies complexed to nucleosomes determines glomerular basement membrane binding in vivo.

Monoclonal anti-nuclear antibodies which are complexed to nucleosomes are able to bind to the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) in vivo, whereas purified antibodies do not bind. The positively charged histone moieties in the nucleosome are-responsible for the binding to anionic determinants in the GBM. We tested the hypothesis that the specificity of the autoantibodies complexed to the nucleosome influences the glomerular binding of the antibody-nucleosome complex. We induced the formation of these immune complexes in vivo, by intraperitoneal inoculation of hybridomas producing monoclonal anti-nuclear antibodies (four anti-histone, three anti-double stranded (ds)DNA and three anti-nucleosome antibodies) into nude BALB/c mice. In ascites and plasma from the mice inoculated with these hybridomas, nucleosome/autoantibody complexes were detected in comparable amounts. Immunofluorescence of kidney sections revealed that about 60% of the mice inoculated with anti-nucleosome or anti-dsDNA hybridomas had immunoglobulin deposits in the GBM, whereas only 15% of the mice with anti-histone hybridomas showed these deposits (p < or = 0.04). In the Matrigel-ELISA (used as a GBM surrogate) ascites from anti-nucleosome or anti-DNA hybridomas displayed significantly higher titers (p < or = 0.002) than ascites from anti-histone hybridomas. In conclusion, nucleosome/immunoglobulin complexes comprising anti-nucleosome or anti-dsDNA auto-antibodies do bind more frequently to the GBM in vivo than nucleosome/immunoglobulin complexes containing anti-histone antibodies. It therefore appears that the specificity of the antibody bound to the nucleosome is a critical determinant for the nephritogenic potential of the nucleosome-autoantibody complex.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Nucleosomes and histones are present in glomerular deposits in human lupus nephritis.

BACKGROUND: Recently we showed that antinuclear autoantibodies complexed to nucleosomes can bind to heparan sulphate (HS) in the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) via the histone part of the nucleosome. Histones have been identified in glomerular deposits in human and murine lupus nephritis. In addition, a decreased HS staining in the GBM was found, most probably due to masking by deposition of antibodies complexed to nucleosomes. METHODS: In this study we first investigated whether histones or nucleosomes could be identified in glomerular deposits in human lupus nephritis, and secondly whether the presence of these nuclear components was correlated with absence of HS staining. Kidney biopsies of SLE patients (11 with diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis (DPGN) and six with membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN)) and non-SLE glomerular diseases were stained for histones. DNA, nucleosomes, IgG and HS. RESULTS: Using a polyclonal anti-H3 1 21 antiserum, histones were detected in all patients with DPGN and in two of six patients with SLE-MGN (P < 0.01). Using a monoclonal antihistone antibody, histones were stained in three patients with DPGN, but in none of the biopsies with MGN. Using nucleosome specific monoclonal antibodies, nucleosomes were detected in five patients with DPGN, in two patients with MGN, but in none of the biopsies with non-SLE glomerulonephritis. HS staining was nearly absent in DPGN, whereas staining was only moderately reduced in patients with MGN and controls (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Using polyclonal and monoclonal antihistone antisera, histones were identified in all patients with DPGN and their presence was associated with a decrease of HS staining. Nucleosomes were identified in five of 11 patients with DPGN and in two of six patients with MGN. This is the first demonstration of nucleosomes in glomerular deposits in SLE nephritis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Heparan sulfate staining of the glomerular basement membrane in relation to circulating anti-DNA and anti-heparan sulfate reactivity: a longitudinal study in NZB/W F1 mice.

Reactivity of serum antibodies with heparan sulfate (HS) has been associated with human and murine lupus nephritis, although the aetiological significance of this association is not clear. Recent work from our laboratories showed that binding of these antibodies to HS could be mediated by histone containing immune complexes. In human lupus nephritis we found a strong decrease in HS staining in the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). The aim of this study was to elucidate the correlation in experimental systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) between albuminuria, staining of HS in the GBM and anti-DNA and anti-HS reactivity in plasma. We therefore studied NZB/W F1 mice during different stages of glomerular disease and compared them with age matched control NZB/W F1 mice without albuminuria. Anti-DNA and anti-HS reactivity were measured in longitudinally collected plasma samples and correlated with the onset of albuminuria, staining of HS in the glomerular basement membrane and deposition of immunoglobulins (Ig). HS staining was significantly decreased in the glomerular capillary loops of mice with prolonged proteinuria in comparison with age matched control mice (P = 0.0013). This decreased HS staining was correlated with increased Ig deposition in the capillary loops (tau = -0.42, P < 0.001), albuminuria (tau = -0.508, P < 0.001) and a decreased in anti-DNA levels measured in plasma (tau = 0.758, P < 0.005). Altered anti-HS reactivity in plasma did correlate with increased Ig deposition in the kidney (tau = 0.33, P < 0.05) but was not correlated with decreased staining of HS in the kidney. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that disappearance of staining of HS in the glomerular capillary loops is associated with albuminuria, increased Ig deposition in the glomerulus and decreased anti-DNA reactivity in plasma. Our findings are compatible with a model in which interaction ('masking') of HS with immune complexes consisting of anti-DNA antibodies and nucleosomes takes place.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Specificity of monoclonal anti-nucleosome auto-antibodies derived from lupus mice.

Recently, anti-nucleosome antibodies, which do not bind to DNA or to individual histones, have been identified in longitudinal studies in lupus mice. These anti-nucleosome antibodies occur early in spontaneous SLE and are formed prior to other anti-nuclear specificities. However, nucleosomal epitopes are yet to be fully characterized. We selected a panel of six monoclonal anti-nucleosome antibodies (mAbs) (#2, #32, #34, PL2-6, LG8-1 and LG10-1) derived from lupus mice. These mAbs were tested in ELISA on subnucleosome structures and on a panel of 53 histone peptides, covering the entire sequence of the five histones. Two mAbs reacted with one of these peptides, but the reactivity hardly exceeded the background reactivity. Based on the nucleosome and subnucleosome ELISA we identified different recognition patterns. Three mAbs showed the highest reactivity towards the intact nucleosome. For two of them (#32 and LG8-1) the nucleosomal epitope was primarily located on H2A-H2B/DNA, whereas for mAb #34 this primary epitope was located on H3/H4/DNA. Two mAbs (#2 and PL2-6) showed the highest reactivity with H2A-H2B/DNA and one mAb (LG10-1) recognized H3-H4/DNA. In the subnucleosome ELISA all but one (mAb #32) recognized more than one epitope, including DNA complexed to a variety of cationic molecules. Comparing these reactivities we identified for all mAbs one specific nucleosomal epitope, whereas reactivity with other subnucleosomes was comparable to the reactivity towards DNA complexed with cationic molecules. In inhibition experiments both in ELISA and in immunofluorescence it was found that only one of the mAbs (i.e. PL2-6), recognizing an epitope on H2A-H2B/DNA as primary epitope, could be inhibited by H2A-H2B/DNA in fluid phase. The two mAbs recognizing an epitope on H3-H4/DNA as primary epitope could be inhibited by H3-H4/DNA in fluid phase. From these analyses, we conclude first that for these nucleosome specific mAbs linear histone peptides are not very important. Second, that these mAbs all recognize different epitopes on both H2A/H2B-DNA and H3/H4-DNA and third that some solid phase H2A/H2B-DNA epitopes are not expressed on fluid phase H2A/H2B-DNA. Our findings suggest that in SLE the nucleosome can act as auto-antigen and that there is no immunodominant beta cell epitope within the nucleosome.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Heparin and heparinoids prevent the binding of immune complexes containing nucleosomal antigens to the GBM and delay nephritis in MRL/lpr mice.

Monoclonal anti-nucleosome antibodies (mAbs) complexed to nucleosomal antigens can bind to DNA and to heparan sulfate (HS) in ELISA and to the GBM in vivo in a rat renal perfusion system, whereas non-complexed mAbs do not bind [1]. In this study, we analyzed whether heparin (HEP) or N-desulfated/acetylated heparins (DSA-HEP), structurally and functionally strongly related to HS, are able to prevent the binding of these complexed mAbs to DNA and to HS in vitro and to rat GBM in vivo. In ELISA the binding of nucleosome complexed antinucleosome antibodies to DNA and HS was inhibited dose-dependently by HEP, DSA-HEP and low molecular weight (LMW) DSA-HEP. Intravenous injection of nucleosome/anti-nucleosome immune complexes without heparin/heparinoids in BALB/c mice led to GBM binding, while simultaneous injection of heparin/heparinoids with complexed antibodies or pretreatment with heparin subcutaneously prior to injection of complexes prevented this binding. Subsequently, we tested the preventive effect of HEP, DSA-HEP and LMW-DSA-HEP on progression of renal disease in MRL/lpr mice. Treatment was started at an age of eight weeks in a dose of 50 micrograms daily. With all three drugs albuminuria was significantly delayed compared to PBS treated controls (cumulative incidence of proteinuria at 20 weeks in controls 60% vs. 13%, 14% and 6% respectively for HEP, DSA-HEP and LMW-DSA-HEP; P < 0.05). At week 21 the glomerulonephritis was histologically less severe in heparin/heparinoid treated animals (P = 0.02). In immunofluorescence the amount of immunoglobulin and C3 deposits in the glomerular capillary wall tended to be less in heparin/heparinoid treated mice compared to PBS treated controls (P = 0.07). Furthermore, at 20 weeks anti-HS levels in plasma of heparin/heparinoid treated mice were significantly lower (P < 0.05). We conclude that interaction of heparin or heparin analogs with HS reactive immune complexes containing nucleosomal antigens prevents the binding of these immune complexes to the GBM and delays nephritis in MRL/lpr mice.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Significance of anti-nuclear and anti-extracellular matrix autoantibodies for albuminuria in murine lupus nephritis; a longitudinal study on plasma and glomerular eluates in MRL/l mice.

The relationship between autoantibody reactivities and nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is unclear. We studied MRL/l mice which developed a considerable albuminuria (either mice with short ( < 1 week) or heavy and prolonged (3 weeks) albuminuria) and compared them with non-albuminuric age-matched controls, with young (12 weeks old) non-albuminuric mice and with mice which were followed for 36 weeks and did not develop albuminuria. In a longitudinal prospective study on plasma samples we correlated a variety of anti-nuclear reactivities and reactivities against extracellular matrix (ECM) components, with the onset of albuminuria. We found that at the onset of albuminuria, anti-DNA was higher while anti-nucleosome and anti-H2A/H2B-DNA subnucleosome reactivities were lower compared with age-matched non-albuminuric mice. We also studied glomerular eluates of these mice in ELISA and in indirect immunofluorescence (IF). In the eluates we found with IF that anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM)-tubular basement membrane (TBM) antibodies were already present in 12-week-old non-albuminuric mice. These eluates showed no anti-nuclear antibodies. In eluates of albuminuric mice more immunoglobulin was deposited, and anti-ECM, anti-DNA and anti-nucleosome reactivities were higher than in eluates of age-matched non-albuminuric mice. The deposition of anti-nucleosome antibodies preceded the deposition of anti-DNA antibodies since they were deposited to a greater extent in mice with a short albuminuria. We conclude that anti-GBM-TBM antibodies are the first autoantibodies that deposit in glomeruli of MRL/l mice at an early age. The onset of albuminuria is associated with additional deposition of both anti-ECM and anti-nuclear (anti-nucleosome and anti-DNA) antibodies, but the difference with non-albuminuric mice seems to be more quantitative than qualitative.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed1996

In vivo ANA is a fixation artifact: nucleosome-complexed antinucleosome autoantibodies bind to the cell surface and are internalized.

It has been suggested that binding of anti-double-standed DNA antibodies to cell surfaces, followed by internalization and nuclear binding (so called in vivo ANA) is of pathophysiological significance for tissue damage in systemic lupus erythematosus. We have shown before that pathogenic antinuclear antibodies complexed to nucleosomal antigens can bind to heparan sulfate in the glomerular basement membrane in vivo. Because nucleosomes are also reported to bind to the cell surface, we hypothesized that in vivo ANA is a property of antinuclear antibodies bound to nucleosomal antigens. Therefore, we studied three antinucleosome monoclonal antibodies (mAb) that exhibit in vivo ANA as seen by immunofluorescence in mice inoculated intraperitoneally with the hybridoma producing the mAb. The same mAb complexed to nucleosomal antigens after intravenous injection into mice induced in vivo ANA, in contrast to purified noncomplexed mAb. To study this in more detail, we incubated complexed mAb with various cell lines and found binding to the cell surface and subsequent internalization into cytoplasmic vesicles. However, no binding to the nucleus was observed by immunoelectron microscopy (IEM) and confocal laser microscopy. Noncomplexed mAb did not bind to the cell surface. Next, from mice bearing the hybridomas producing the mAb intraperitoneally, a small part of the kidney was snap frozen in liquid N2, fixed with acetone, and studied in immunofluorescence, whereas the remaining part of the kidney was fixed in vivo by renal perfusion with a mixture of 0.01 M sodium periodate, 0.075 M lysine HCl, 0.0375 M Na2HPO4, and 2% paraformaldehyde (PLP) and studied in both immunofluorescence and IEM. In the acetone-fixed kidney sections obtained without in vivo fixation we again observed in vivo ANA. However, after in vivo PLP perfusion fixation, no nuclear binding was found. In IEM, localization in cytoplasmic vesicles was seen. In conclusion, antinucleosome antibodies complexed to nucleosomal antigens can bind to the cell surface and are transported into the cytoplasm, but do not bind to the nucleus. The reported nuclear localization of antinuclear antibodies is caused by a fixation artifact.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

Decrease of heparan sulfate staining in the glomerular basement membrane in murine lupus nephritis.

Recently we found in biopsies of human lupus nephritis a nearly complete loss of heparan sulfate (HS) staining in the glomerular basement membrane (GMB). To clarify the relationship between HS staining and albuminuria in lupus nephritis, we studied MRL/lpr mice with short (< 7 days) or prolonged duration of albuminuria (14-21 days) and compared these with mice of different ages without albuminuria. Kidney sections were stained for mouse immunoglobulin (Ig), HS, heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG)-core protein and laminin in immunofluorescence. In mice with prolonged albuminuria HS staining in the glomerular capillary loops had almost completely disappeared, whereas staining was unaltered in non-albuminuric mice (P = 0.001). In mice with short duration of albuminuria, there was a tendency toward a decrease of HS staining (P = 0.06). The expression of HSPG-core protein and other extra cellular matrix (ECM) components was unaltered in all groups. HS staining correlated inversely with albuminuria (rs = -0.55; P < 0.001) and with staining of Ig deposits in the capillary loops (rs = -0.74; P < 0.001). Despite the nearly complete loss of HS staining in the GBM in mice with prolonged albuminuria, there was no change in glomerular HS content as assessed by agarose electrophoresis and HS inhibition ELISA. We conclude that the development of albuminuria in MRL/lpr mice is accompanied by a loss of HS staining in the GBM, probably due to the masking of HS by deposits of Ig. In vitro studies revealed that autoantibodies complexed to nucleosomal antigens can inhibit the binding of the anti-HS monoclonal antibody to HS. Whether this also occurs in vivo remains to be determined.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed1994

Clinical evaluation of a modified ELISA, using photobiotinylated DNA, for the detection of anti-DNA antibodies.

The measurement of anti-dsDNA antibodies is important for the diagnosis and the follow-up of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). For routine detection of anti-dsDNA, the Farr assay and the immunofluorescence technique (IFT) on Crithidia luciliae proved to be very useful. The anti-dsDNA ELISA is not used for routine purposes in our institute since it is flawed by false-positive results due to binding of negatively charged (immune) complexes to the employed precoat (protamine sulphate). Recently, a new anti-dsDNA ELISA has been described in which photobiotinylated dsDNA is coated to streptavidin coated plates. To investigate whether this modified ELISA is more specific than the classical anti-dsDNA ELISA, we tested sera of patients with SLE (n = 51), myasthenia gravis (MG, n = 25), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, n = 25) and Sjögren's syndrome (SS, n = 23) and sera of healthy blood bank donors (BBD, n = 25). In both assays the sera of the SLE patients gave significantly higher values than the sera of healthy blood bank donors. In the classical ELISA, 84% of the sera from patients with RA and 28% of sera of patients with MG were found positive. For the modified assay the figures were 8% and 24%, respectively. This modified ELISA was further studied and clinically evaluated by comparing it with the classical anti-DNA ELISA and two other anti-DNA assays (Farr assay and IFT), using 500 sera sent to our institute for routine anti-DNA determination and sera of an additional 75 healthy blood bank donors. Quantitatively, both ELISAs showed the same high degree of correlation with the IFT. The modified ELISA gave a better correlation with the Farr assay than the classical anti-DNA ELISA. From our data we conclude that the ELISA using photobiotinylated DNA is a more reliable assay than the classical anti-DNA ELISA.

Antibodies, Antinuclear↗
PubMed1994

Anti-nucleosome antibodies complexed to nucleosomal antigens show anti-DNA reactivity and bind to rat glomerular basement membrane in vivo.

Histones can mediate the binding of DNA and anti-DNA to the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). In ELISA histone/DNA/anti-DNA complexes are able to bind to heparan sulfate (HS), an intrinsic constituent of the GBM. We questioned whether histone containing immune complexes are able to bind to the GBM, and if so, whether the ligand in the GBM is HS. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) complexed to nucleosomal antigens and noncomplexed mAbs were isolated from culture supernatants of four IgG anti-nuclear mAbs. All noncomplexed mAbs showed strong anti-nucleosome reactivity in ELISA. One of them showed in addition anti-DNA reactivity in noncomplexed form. The other three mAbs only showed anti-DNA reactivity when they were complexed to nucleosomal antigens. After renal perfusion a fine granular binding of complexed mAbs to the glomerular capillary wall and activation of complement was observed in immunofluorescence, whereas noncomplexed mAbs did not bind. Immuno-electron microscopy showed binding of complexes to the whole width of the GBM. When HS in the GBM was removed by renal heparinase perfusion the binding of complexed mAb decreased, but did not disappear completely. We conclude that anti-nucleosome mAbs, which do not bind DNA, become DNA reactive once complexed to nucleosomal antigens. These complexed mAbs can bind to the GBM. The binding ligand in the GBM is partly, but not solely, HS. Binding to the GBM of immune complexes containing nucleosomal material might be an important event in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Pathophysiology of lupus nephritis: the role of nucleosomes.

Lupus nephritis is regarded as an immune complex mediated disease. Since anti-DNA antibodies are present in the circulation and in diseased glomeruli of patients with lupus nephritis, these antibodies have been assigned a pivotal role in the initiation of lupus nephritis. It remains however unclear how these antibodies become localized in the glomerulus. Contrary to the classical concept of glomerular deposition of DNA/anti-DNA complexes, it has been suggested that anti-DNA antibodies can interact with intrinsic glomerular antigens. Some anti-DNA antibodies can cross-react with heparan sulphate (HS), which is such an intrinsic constituent of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). Serum HS reactivity coincides with the occurrence of lupus nephritis. It was found that this HS reactivity was exhibited by anti-DNA antibodies complexed to nucleosomes and not by the antibody itself. Nucleosomes are DNA/histone complexes, present in the nucleus, which are released by dying cells. The histone part of the nucleosome is responsible for the binding to the GBM. Recently, it has become clear that also anti-nucleosome antibodies can bind to HS in the GBM via nucleosomes. These nucleosome-containing immune complexes exhibit anti-DNA reactivity in ELISA and Farr assay. It is now thought that nucleosomes released by dying cells bind to anti-DNA or anti-nucleosome antibodies in the circulation, giving rise to nephritogenic immune complexes. Alternatively, nucleosomes may bind to the GBM and serve then as planted antigen for subsequent binding of antibodies via an in situ mechanism. Binding of antibodies via both mechanisms leads to complement activation and damage of the GBM.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antibodies, Antinuclear↗