PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Chollet-Rivier

Publications and source records attributed to M Chollet-Rivier.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Anaesthesia for procedures in the intensive care unit.

Taking in charge severely ill patients in the intensive care environment to manage complex procedures is a performance requiring highly specific knowledge. Close collaboration between anaesthetists and intensive care specialists is likely to improve the safety and quality of medical care. Three forms of anaesthetic care should be considered in clinical practice: sedation and analgesia; monitored anaesthetic care; and general anaesthesia or conduction block anaesthesia. Even in the field of sedation and analgesia, the anaesthesiologist can offer expertise on new anaesthetic techniques like: the most recent concepts of balanced anaesthesia in terms of pharmacokinetics and dynamics, favouring the use of short-acting agents and of sedative-opioid combinations. New modes of administration and monitoring intravenous anaesthesia have been developed, with potential application in the intensive care unit. These include the use of target-controlled administration of intravenous drugs, and of electroencephalographic signals to monitor the level of sedation.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2001

Endovascular treatment of aortic rupture by blunt chest trauma.

BACKGROUND: The usual treatment of blunt aortic injury (BAI) is prompt surgery. Frequently severe injuries to the brain or lungs exclude further surgical treatment. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of placing endovascular stent-grafts. METHODS: From 1992 through 1999, in our primary and referral trauma center, 26 acute BAI, 21 males and 5 females, mean age 40.2+/-16.3 yrs were diagnosed. The last 4 patients underwent prospectively endovascular repair with Talent endograft. Endoprosthesis parameters were measured on three-dimensional spiral CT reconstruction. While waiting for devices, blood pressure was aggressively lowered and aortic lesions were monitored by transesophageal echography. RESULTS: Stent-graft deployment was successful in all 4 patients. There were no complications of endoleak, stent migration, paraplegia or death. Angiographic exclusion was complete in all 4 patients. CT scans at a mean follow-up of 11+/-5 months showed complete healing of the aortic wall in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: For stable acute BAI, endovascular stent-graft repair is feasible and safe, and is an effective therapeutic alternative to open surgery. Because of the normal proximal and distal wall in aortic injuries, endoluminal treatment might be the therapy of choice in the near future.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Placement of aortic endoprostheses.

Endovascular stent-grafting has found its place in the elective treatment of 60% of abdominal or thoracic aortic lesions. The morbidity and mortality rates are clearly lower than those of classical repair but the results are suboptimal with 9% residual endoleaks at 6 months. Anesthetic management with extensive monitoring even under local anesthesia remains mandatory and tends to reduce the postoperative care requirements. Future development will allow emergent endovascular treatment of ruptured aorta and further improvement will decrease the rate of late endoleaks.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1992

Midazolam-flumazenil vs. propofol in ambulatory ENT endoscopic procedures.

Two total intravenous anaesthesia techniques were compared in an open study of 80 ambulatory patients undergoing ENT endoscopic procedures randomly assigned to two groups: Group I midazolam-flumazenil n = 40, Group II propofol n = 40. The mean doses including induction were 0.75 +/- 0.31 mg kg-1 h-1 for midazolam and 171 +/- 64 micrograms kg-1 min-1 for propofol for 46.3 +/- 17.7 min and 50.3 +/- 24.8 min respectively. At the end of the procedure flumazenil 8.1 +/- 1.9 micrograms kg-1 was administered to Group I patients followed by a flumazenil continuous infusion at a minimal arousal rate (MAR) of 0.24 +/- 0.1 micrograms kg-1 min-1, and propofol discontinued in Group II patients. Baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were similar in both groups and remained so during the procedure and recovery. In patients with cardiovascular disease, large variations (greater than or equal to 40% of baseline values) occurred more frequently in the propofol group whereas large variations in patients with no cardiovascular disease occurred more frequently in the midazolam group (P less than 0.05). Early recovery was more rapid after midazolam (P less than 0.05) whereas late criteria for recovery (maze and ambulation tests) were met more rapidly after propofol (P less than 0.05). It is concluded that with the midazolam-flumazenil sequence, early recovery is faster and haemodynamic stability better maintained in poor cardiovascular risk patients, whereas with propofol, street-fitness is more rapidly obtained, and haemodynamic stability better maintained in good risk patients.

Adolescent↗