PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Clerico

Publications and source records attributed to M Clerico.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Every-other-day interferon beta-1b versus once-weekly interferon beta-1a for multiple sclerosis (INCOMIN Trial) II: analysis of MRI responses to treatment and correlation with Nab.

BACKGROUND: In RRMS, clinical exacerbations are usually associated with different types of active lesions at MRI, including: hyperintense lesions on T1-weighted post-gadolinium sequences; new hyperintense lesions or enlarging old lesions on PD/T2-weighted scans; or new hypointense lesions on T1-weighted pre-Gd sequences. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: Primary outcome was the occurrence of patients with at least one active MRI lesion of the different types indicated above during treatment with 250 microg every other day (EOD) interferon beta (IFNbeta)-1b or 30 microg once weekly (OW) IFNbeta-1a in outpatients with RRMS (INCOMIN Trial). RESULTS: The number of patients with at least one 'active' lesion, evaluated over the two-year follow-up, was significantly (P = 0.014) lower in the EOD IFNbeta-1 b arm (1 3/76, 17%) then in the OW IFNbeta-1a arm (25/73, 34%). NAb frequency over two-year follow-up was 22/65 (33.8%) in the EOD IFNbeta-1b arm and 4/62 (6.5%) in the OW IFNbeta-1a arm, significantly greater in the EOD IFNbeta-1b arm. CONCLUSIONS: The development of MRI active lesions is strongly reduced by EOD-IFNbeta-1b compared with OW-IFNbeta-1a, indicating that EOD-IFNbeta-1b is more effective than OW-IFNbeta-1a in reducing ongoing inflammation and demyelination in MS. Logistic regression showed that NAb status did not affect the risk of MRI activity.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed2001

Interferon-beta dose and efficacy: the OPTIMS study.

Interferon beta (IFN-beta) reduces exacerbation rates in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), but some patients do not respond to treatment. Recent studies have shown a clear dose-response effect on the reduction of exacerbation rates, and on burden of disease accumulation and active lesion frequency seen on MRI. During treatment with 8 MIU IFN-beta we noticed a 30% rate of treatment failure. We then treated non-responders with 12 MIU IFN-beta and observed significant improvement in the clinical signs of disease activity. In order to compare the efficacy of two different doses of IFN-beta-1b, a multicenter study for the optimization of interferon for MS (OPTIMS) has been organized. The design of the study is presented here.

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗
PubMed2000

Treatment of brain metastases of small-cell lung cancer: comparing teniposide and teniposide with whole-brain radiotherapy--a phase III study of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: Approximately 60% of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) develop brain metastases. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) gives symptomatic improvement in more than 50% of these patients. Because brain metastases are a sign of systemic progression, and chemotherapy was found to be effective as well, it becomes questionable whether WBRT is the only appropriate therapy in this situation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase III study, SCLC patients with brain metastases were randomized to receive teniposide with or without WBRT. Teniposide 120 mg/m(2) was given intravenously three times a week, every 3 weeks. WBRT (10 fractions of 3 Gy) had to start within 3 weeks from the start of chemotherapy. Response was measured clinically and by computed tomography of the brain. RESULTS: One hundred twenty eligible patients were randomized. A 57% response rate was seen in the combined-modality arm (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 69%), and a 22% response rate was seen in the teniposide-alone arm (95% CI, 12% to 34%) (P<.001). Time to progression in the brain was longer in the combined-modality group (P=.005). Clinical response and response outside the brain were not different. The median survival time was 3.5 months in the combined-modality arm and 3.2 months in the teniposide-alone arm. Overall survival in both groups was not different (P=.087). CONCLUSION: Adding WBRT to teniposide results in a much higher response rate of brain metastases and in a longer time to progression of brain metastases than teniposide alone. Survival was poor in both groups and not significantly different.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Pharmacokinetics of mitomycin C in pelvic stopflow infusion and hypoxic pelvic perfusion with and without hemofiltration: a pilot study of patients with recurrent unresectable rectal cancer.

This pilot study was conducted to evaluate the advantage in drug delivery for regional chemotherapy in patients with unresectable recurrent rectal carcinoma by different methods. For this research, the pharmacokinetic advantages of mitomycin C delivery by four different methods were compared: intraaortic infusion with aortic stopflow; intraaortic infusion with inferior vena cava stopflow; intraaortic infusion with aortic and inferior caval vein stopflow (hypoxic pelvic perfusion); and hypoxic pelvic perfusion with hemofiltration. The results of this study indicate that pelvic stopflow infusion followed by hypoxic pelvic perfusion significantly increases mitomycin C concentrations in the blood coming from the tumor site. Also, use of hemofiltration reduces mitomycin C levels in peripheral blood after high-dose regional chemotherapy. Further investigations involving more patients should be carried out in the future to validate these results.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1996

Two schedules of teniposide with or without cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized trial to investigate the value of the addition of cisplatin to teniposide (VM26) and to investigate the schedule dependence of the topoisomerase II inhibitor VM26, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-five NSCLC patients were randomized to receive VM26 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 or 360 mg/m2 on day 1 only, either as a single drug or in combination with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Response rates, side effects, and survival were compared according to the 2 x 2 factorial design of this study. RESULTS: The response rate of the two cisplatin-containing arms was superior to that of the two arms that contained VM26 only (22% v 6%, P < .001); progression-free survival and survival times were also longer in the cisplatin-containing arms (median, 4.3 v 2.2 months, P = .003; median 7.2 v 5.9 months, P = .008, respectively). Toxicity was significantly higher in the cisplatin-containing arms; the most frequent side effects were leukopenia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. The schedule of VM26 did not significantly influence the response rate, progression-free survival interval, or survival duration. However, the response rate of the 1-day administration was significantly lower than that of the 3-day administration when given as single drugs. CONCLUSION: The addition of cisplatin to VM26 improves the response rate, progression-free survival interval, and survival duration over VM26 alone, although at the cost of a significant increase in toxicity. Cisplatin should be considered as the basis for combination chemotherapies in advanced NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Cisplatin and etoposide combination chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic thymoma. A phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: Thymomas are rare neoplasms of the mediastinum. The role of chemotherapy in advanced thymomas is not fully established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Lung Cancer Cooperative Group, 16 patients with recurrent or metastatic malignant thymoma were entered over 6 years onto a study of combination chemotherapy that consisted of cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A median of six courses per patient was administered. Main side effects of treatment were leukopenia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. Five complete responses and four partial responses were obtained, with a median response duration of 3.4 years. The median progression-free survival and survival times were 2.2 years and 4.3 years, respectively, with a median follow-up duration of 7 years. CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin and etoposide is highly effective and well tolerated in advanced thymoma. The investigation of this combination in a neoadjuvant setting in unresectable invasive thymoma is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Combination chemotherapy with carboplatin and methotrexate in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. A phase II study.

The activity and toxicity of a carboplatin (300 mg/m2, day 1) and methotrexate (50 mg/m2, days 8 and 15) combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer (UC) was evaluated in the present study. A total of 49 patients entered the study: 44 patients were evaluable for response, and 48 for toxicity. A complete response (CR) was found in 4/44 patients (9.1%) and a partial remission (PR) in 12/44 patients (27.2%) for an overall response rate of 16/44 (36.3%). Stable disease was found in 21/44 patients (47.7%), and progressive disease in 7/44 patients (15.9%). Survival was significantly longer in responding patients than nonresponders (median: 62 weeks vs 50 weeks, P < .05). Hematologic and renal toxicities were mild, thrombocytopenia and leukopenia being the most relevant side effects. The first consecutive 7 patients received methotrexate also on day 22; 5 of them underwent grade III-IV hematologic toxicity, so methotrexate on day 22 was omitted in the subsequent patients. No toxic deaths were reported. CBDCA and MTX combination chemotherapy is well tolerated and moderately active in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer and may represent a valid alternative to cisplatin-containing regimens in patients with poor performance status and/or impaired renal function.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A phase III study of the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: The EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group conducted a randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in chemotherapy naive patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The primary objectives of this study were to investigate whether the CF regimen was in anyway superior to the CABO regimen and to detect any superiority of these two combinations over cisplatin alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred eighty-two patients were randomized to one of three treatments: (1) methotrexate (40 mg/m2) days 1 and 15, bleomycin (10 mg) and vincristine (2 mg) days 1, 8 and 15, cisplatin (50 mg/m2) day 4, repeated every 21 days, (2) cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and 5-FU (1 g/m2 x 4), repeated every 21 days, and (3) cisplatin (50 mg/m2) days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days. After 3 cycles, all responding and stable disease patients in the three arms of the study continued with cisplatin alone. RESULTS: The overall response rates to CABO (34%) and CF (31%) were superior to C (15%) (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). In addition, complete response rate to CABO (9.5%) was superior to that of C (2.5%) (p = 0.02), and also superior to that of CF (1.7%) (p = 0.01). Response was associated with performance status and prior treatment, but by multivariate analysis treatment type was the important determinant of response (p = 0.0006). Although CABO and CF were superior to C with respect to time to progression within the first 6 to 8 months after randomization, there was no overall difference in progression-free survival or survival between the three arms of the study. Both hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity were worse in the combination chemotherapy arms. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the CF regimen has no advantage over the CABO regimen, which in fact showed a higher complete response rate. Both combinations showed improved response rates but also more toxicity and no improvement in overall survival in comparison with cisplatin alone.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Preoperative concurrent radiation therapy and cisplatinum continuous infusion in IIIa (N2) non small cell lung cancer. A pilot study.

From April 1991 to September 1993, 18 patients affected by a presumed operable IIIa (N2) non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with histologically confirmed bulky mediastinal metastases, received preoperative concurrent radiation therapy and continuous infusion of cisplatinum (CDDP). The radiotherapy consisted of 2 Gy given 5 days a week for a total dose of 50 Gy; CDDP was administered by means of a central catheter and a portable pump at the daily dose of 6 mg/m2 given on the same days as the radiation therapy (total dose: 150 mg/m2). Two weeks after the end of the treatment, the patients were reevaluated: 5 patients had either local or distant disease progression, the other 13 were submitted to thoracotomy: 12 received a complete resection and 1 patient underwent only a mediastinal lymphadenectomy, because pneumonectomy was impossible due to lack of respiratory function. No histological evidence of cancer cells was observed in the specimens of 6 patients (33%). Radiological response rate was 61% (11/18); resection rate was 66% (12/18) and complete resection rate was 61% (11/18). There was one postoperative death (5%). The 3 year actuarial survival rate is 63.6% for the patients who received a resection with a median survival time of 18 months. All non operated patients died within one year. Combined preoperative treatment was well tolerated. Better results were achieved in patients with squamous cell carcinoma who had a complete resection following a total tumor sterilization with radio-chemotherapy.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1993

Antiemetic activity of oral lorazepam in addition to methylprednisolone and metoclopramide in the prophylactic treatment of vomiting induced by cisplatin. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study with crossover design.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that lorazepam has a definite role as an antiemetic drug in antiemetic cocktails. In this study we examined the antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide (200 mg) and methylprednisolone (1000 mg) with or without lorazepam. METHODS: Sixty patients treated with cisplatin-containing regimens were entered into a randomized, double-blind study with cross-over. Lorazepam 2.5 mg or placebo were administered orally the evening before therapy and just after the beginning of fluid infusion for chemotherapy. Degree of nausea and number of vomiting episodes, together with somnolence, were recorded on a data flow sheet and visual-analogue scales. RESULTS: 100 cycles (50 patients) are evaluable. In 39 cycles there was no nausea and vomiting, in 74 cycles acceptable control of emesis was reached (0-2 episodes of vomiting), without significant differences among the two arms. However, nausea was shorter in lorazepam arm (p < 0.01), and 80% of the patients preferred treatment with lorazepam (p < 0.003). Anxiety was reduced in the patients treated with lorazepam (p < 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Lorazepam improves tolerability to cisplatin-containing chemotherapy, mainly by influencing the psychological status of the patient and favoring the amnestic process.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

[Treatment of N2-3 pulmonary carcinoma. Preoperative radio-chemotherapy].

Preoperative integrated neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy was performed in 8 patients suffering from NSCLC bronchial carcinoma at stages IIIA-IIIB (N3 mediastinal). After treatment, 7 patients underwent apparently radical pulmonary exeresis, whereas the patient with adenocarcinoma (T2 N2 M0) was not operated due to the recurrence of disease following supraclavicular lymph node metastasis. Preoperative radio-chemotherapy allows the sub-staging of the disease and the insertion of these patients into the operating programme.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Phase II trial of weekly 4-epi-doxorubicin (epirubicin) in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

We tested 4'-epi-doxorubicin (epirubicin) in 15 patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck which progressed after conventional therapy. The drug was administered at the dosage of 25 mg/m2 weekly. No patient achieved objective response. Toxicity was minimal. Epirubicin given at this dose and schedule revealed no activity in heavily pretreated patients with cancer of the head and neck.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed1986

Fungal colonization in patients with cancer of the upper respiratory tract.

Fungal opportunistic infections are a danger for immunocompromised hosts, such as patients with malignancies, especially in a hospital environment. We studied a group of patients with solid tumors of the respiratory tract on admission and after twenty days of hospitalization. Colonization by moulds and/or yeasts was frequently found. Preventive measures should be applied to avoid colonization inside the hospital. The importance of overcrowding, sanitation and diet is pointed out.

Female↗
PubMed1984

Comparison of methylprednisolone and metoclopramide in the prophylactic treatment of cis-platin-induced nausea and vomiting.

Sixty-one patients undergoing treatment with cis-platin-containing regimens were given prophylactically either metoclopramide or methylprednisolone, in order to reduce the gastrointestinal side effects. Vomiting occurred in 79% of the cycles (128/162), and had a distressing intensity in 39.5% of cycles (64/162). No significant differences were observed between metoclopramide and methylprednisolone with respect to number and duration of vomiting episodes and duration of nausea and anorexia. Two of 6 patients benefited from substitution of metoclopramide for methylprednisolone; only 1/11 benefited from the substitution of methylprednisolone for metoclopramide. Metoclopramide and methylprednisolone, at the dosage and schedule used, were well tolerated and moderately active in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by cis-platin; their use in combination could further improve these results.

Adult↗