PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Concha

Publications and source records attributed to M Concha.

134 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Repetitive nontreated episodes of grade 1B or 2 acute rejection impair long-term cardiac graft function.

BACKGROUND: Episodes of grade 1B or 2 acute heart rejection are usually not treated, and most of them resolve spontaneously. METHODS: With the aim to assess long-term outcome in patients with repetitive nontreated episodes of low-grade (1B, 2) acute rejection, we have studied 141 heart transplant recipients in whom the evolutive pattern of acute rejection during the first 6 months after transplantation could be determined. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (31%) had only grade 0 or 1A acute rejection episodes (pattern A); 23 patients (16%) had three or more episodes of grade 1B or 2 acute rejection without 3A or more advanced rejection (pattern B); 48 patients (34%) had one or two episodes of grade 3A, 3B, or 4 acute rejection only during the first 6 months after transplantation (pattern C); and 26 patients (19%) had three or more episodes of grade 3A, 3B, or 4 acute rejection (pattern D). Overall mortality was 11%, 26%, 19%, and 46% for patients with patterns A, B, C, and D, respectively. No difference was found among patterns with regard to incidence of graft atherosclerosis. Left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 year after transplantation was significantly lower (p < 0.05) for patients with pattern B (50% +/- 5% versus 59% +/- 7%, 59% +/- 11%, and 56% +/- 6% for patterns A, C, and D, respectively); cardiac index also was lower for patients with pattern B than for those with pattern A (3.6 +/- 0.6 versus 4.1 +/- 0.6 L/min/m2, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although mortality was higher for patients with more severe episodes of acute rejection, only repetitive nontreated episodes of grade 1B or 2 rejection significantly impaired long-term graft function.

Female↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Lovastatin versus bezafibrate for hyperlipemia treatment after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Elevation in total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and a decrease in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol plasma concentrations are common in heart transplant recipients. The pathogenesis of this hyperlipemia after heart transplantation is complex. Currently available antilipemic agents are difficult to use because their adverse effects are potentiated by immunosuppressor treatment. The present investigation was carried out to test the safety and efficacy of lovastatin and bezafibrate in 18 patients with hyperlipemia after heart transplantation. METHODS: In this crossover study, after 3 months of dietary recommendations, the subjects were randomly assigned to an 8-week period of lovastatin treatment (10 mg/day) followed by an additional 8-week period of treatment with bezafibrate (400 mg/day) or vice versa. The two treatments were separated by an 8-week washout period. RESULTS: Both drugs reduced total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apoprotein B concentrations. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was only increased with bezafibrate. The total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratios were decreased under both treatments, but these changes were greater with bezafibrate. Apo AI levels increased with lovastatin. Bezafibrate produced a rise in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and reduced total and very low-density lipoprotein triglycerides and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Both drugs decreased intermediate density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but the effect of bezafibrate on intermediate-density lipoprotein triglycerides was significantly greater. The two drugs were well tolerated and liver enzymes, creatine kinase, and renal function remained stable.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Visceral Kaposi's sarcoma without mucocutaneous involvement in a heart transplant recipient.

Kaposi's sarcoma has been occasionally reported in heart transplant recipients, but its occurrence without mucocutaneous involvement is extremely rare. In these uncommon cases, the tumor can be indistinguishable from opportunistic infections, making diagnosis difficult. The case of a patient in whom visceral Kaposi's sarcoma was diagnosed by necropsy 6 months after heart transplantation is reported.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Results of heart transplantation in recipients with active infection.

Although active infection in the recipient is generally considered to be an absolute contraindication for heart transplantation, seven of our first 104 transplant patients (6.7%) had active severe infection within the week before transplantation. Because of unstable clinical condition of these recipients, heart transplantation was performed when an adequate donor was offered, in spite of infection. Patients were managed with cyclosporine as the only immunosuppressive therapy during the first week after transplantation. Mortality rate and incidence of acute rejection were not different for these seven patients than for the remaining 97 patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Influence of heart transplantation on the natural history of patients with severe congestive heart failure.

In an attempt to study the influence of heart transplantation on the natural history of patients with severe congestive heart failure, we have reviewed our experience with 240 consecutive patients who were New York Heart Association class IV or III/IV, who had left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35%, who were younger than 65 years of age, and who were assessed for heart transplantation in our hospital since May 1986. Mean age was 47 +/- 12 years. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 20% +/- 6%. Eighty-seven percent were male. New York Heart Association class was IV in 88% and III/IV in 12%. The cause was ischemic heart disease in 35% of patients, valvular heart disease in 13% of patients, and primary dilated cardiomyopathy in 52% of patients. At initial assessment, heart transplantation was considered to be not indicated in 30% of patients, indicated in 51% of patients, and contraindicated in 19% of patients. During a follow-up of 13 +/- 13 months (2 to 64 months), 110 patients underwent transplantation (46%). Posttransplantation actuarial probability of survival was 70% at 3 years. Three-year probability of survival free from transplantation was significantly lower for patients older than 55 years of age (p < 0.05), for those with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 20% (p < 0.05), ischemic causes (p < 0.05), New York Heart Association class IV (p < 0.001), and indication/contraindication for transplantation (p < 0.001); no difference was noted for gender.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Actuarial Analysis↗