PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M D Culler

Publications and source records attributed to M D Culler.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Regulation of insulin and glucagon secretion from rat pancreatic islets in vitro by somatostatin analogues.

Somatostatin is an inhibitor of hormone secretion through specific receptors (sst1-5). The aim of this study was to investigate the putative regulatory role of somatostatin analogues on the secretion of insulin and glucagon by rat pancreatic islets. After 48 h exposure only the non-selective agonists (somatostatin, octreotide and SOM-230) inhibited insulin accumulation. The inhibition of insulin secretion was accompanied by increased islet insulin contents. None of the analogues showed a consistent effect on the glucagon accumulation in the medium after 48 h. Since we observed a difference in the regulatory effect between the non-selective and selective analogues, combinations of selective analogues were studied. Combination of sst2+sst5 agonists inhibited the medium insulin accumulation, while combination of sst1+sst2 analogues caused a decrease in glucagon accumulation. After removal of somatostatin a rebound effect with increased insulin secretion were observed. This effect was reversed after 6 h. For SOM-230 insulin secretion continued to be suppressed even after the analogue was removed and returned to control values after 3 h. As for glucagon secretion there was an initial decline after culture with octreotide, while the other substances failed to induce any changes. In summary, non-selective somatostatin analogues or combinations of receptor selective analogues may cause inhibition of hormone secretion from rat pancreatic islets. For insulin and glucagon, combinations of sst2+sst5 and sst1+sst2, respectively may exert this effects. Thus, our data suggest that more than one sst must be involved to down-regulate islet glucagon and insulin secretion.

Animals↗

Effects of chimeric somatostatin-dopamine molecules on human peripheral blood lymphocytes activation.

BIM 23A761, selective for somatostatin receptors subtypes 2, 5 and the dopamine receptor subtype 2, and BIM 23A757 with affinity for SSTR2 and DAR2 were studied on human PBL proliferation and activation. BIM 23A761 was significantly more potent than specific SSTR and DAR2 agonists in suppressing lymphocyte proliferation induced by mitogen or alloantigen, while BIM 23A757 was more potent than specific SSTR2 and DAR2 agonists in suppressing antigen induced proliferation only. Both molecules displayed enhanced potency in suppressing IFNgamma and IL-6 secretion compared with the SSTR and DAR2 analogs, while only BIM 23A761 was able to inhibit IL-2 secretion and its effect is more potent than the control analogs. Furthermore BIM 23A761 inhibit cell progression into the S phase and then into the G2/M, while BIM 23A757 inhibited bromodeoxyuridine incorporation only during the S phase. Both chimeric molecules resulted significantly more effective than the respective controls.

Adult↗

Novel synergistic mechanism for sst2 somatostatin and TNFalpha receptors to induce apoptosis: crosstalk between NF-kappaB and JNK pathways.

Somatostatin is a multifunctional hormone that modulates cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Mechanisms for somatostatin-induced apoptosis are at present mostly unsolved. Therefore, we investigated whether somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (sst2) induces apoptosis in the nontransformed murine fibroblastic NIH3T3 cells. Somatostatin receptor subtype 2 expression induced an executioner caspase-mediated apoptosis through a tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 (Src homology domain phosphatase-1)-dependent stimulation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) activity and subsequent inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinase JNK. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) stimulated both NF-kappaB and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) activities, which had opposite action on cell survival. Importantly, sst2 sensitized NIH3T3 cells to TNFalpha-induced apoptosis by (1) upregulating TNFalpha receptor protein expression, and sensitizing to TNFalpha-induced caspase-8 activation; (2) enhancing TNFalpha-mediated activation of NF-kappaB, resulting in JNK inhibition and subsequent executioner caspase activation and cell death. We have here unraveled a novel signaling mechanism for a G protein-coupled receptor, which directly triggers apoptosis and crosstalks with a death receptor to enhance death ligand-induced apoptosis.

Animals↗

The effect of selective sst1, sst2, sst5 somatostatin receptors agonists, a somatostatin/dopamine (SST/DA) chimera and bromocriptine on the "clinically non-functioning" pituitary adenomas in vitro.

The aim of the work was to investigate the effects of somatostatin analogs acting selectively on sst1 (BIM-23926), sst2 (BIM-23120) and sst5 (BIM-23206) receptor subtypes on the viability of "clinically non-functioning" pituitary adenomas in vitro. The effects of native SST (SST-14), a SST/DA chimera (BIM-23A387) and a D(2)-dopamine receptor agonist bromocriptine (BC) were also examined. The study was performed on 10 surgically removed pituitary macroadenomas, diagnosed before surgery as "non-functioning". A part of each tumor was mechanically dispersed and digested with collagenase to isolate the tumoral cells. Another part of each tumor was fixed, embedded in paraffin and immunostained to reveal the pituitary hormones and SST receptor subtypes (sst1, sst2A, sst2B, sst3, sst4, sst5). The tumoral cell suspensions were incubated for 24 h with the substances mentioned above. The quantity of viable cells was estimated using the EZ4U system. The results were compared with the immunohistochemical evaluation of the hormonal profile of adenoma and the sst receptor subtype immunoreactivities present. The findings indicate that selective sst1, sst2 and sst5 receptors agonists, SST/DA chimera and D(2)-dopamine receptor agonist bromocriptine affect the viability of some, but not all, "clinically non-functioning" pituitary adenomas in vitro. The most effective was bromocriptine. The investigated somatostatin analogs including SST/DA chimera exerted roughly similar inhibitory effects. Further studies are needed to fully evaluate the potential usefulness of these compounds in the pharmacological treatment of "non-functioning" pituitary tumors.

Adenoma↗

Endogenous ghrelin regulates episodic growth hormone (GH) secretion by amplifying GH Pulse amplitude: evidence from antagonism of the GH secretagogue-R1a receptor.

Ghrelin was purified from rat stomach as an endogenous ligand for the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor. As a GHS, ghrelin stimulates GH release, but it also has additional activities, including stimulation of appetite and weight gain. Plasma GH and ghrelin secretory patterns appear unrelated, whereas many studies have correlated ghrelin variations with food intake episodes. To evaluate the role of endogenous ghrelin, GH secretion and food intake were monitored in male rats infused sc (6 mug/h during 10 h) or intracerebroventricularly (5 microg/h during 48 h) with BIM-28163, a full competitive antagonist of the GHS-R1a receptor. Subcutaneous BIM-28163 infusion significantly decreased GH area under the curve during a 6-h sampling period by 54% and peak amplitude by 46%. Twelve hours after the end of treatment these parameters returned to normal. Central treatment was similarly effective (-37 and -42% for area under the curve and -44 and -49% for peak amplitude on the first and second days of infusion, respectively). Neither peripheral nor central BIM-28163 injection modified GH peak number, GH nadir, or IGF-I levels. In this protocol, food intake is not strongly modified and water intake is unchanged. Subcutaneous infusion of BIM-28163 did not change plasma leptin and insulin levels evaluated at 1200 and 1600 h. On the contrary, central BIM-28163 infusion slightly increased leptin and significantly increased insulin concentrations. Thus, endogenous ghrelin, through GHS-R1a, acts as a strong endogenous amplifier of spontaneous GH peak amplitude. The mechanisms by which ghrelin modifies food intake remain to be defined and may involve a novel GHS receptor.

Animals↗

Efficacy of chimeric molecules directed towards multiple somatostatin and dopamine receptors on inhibition of GH and prolactin secretion from GH-secreting pituitary adenomas classified as partially responsive to somatostatin analog therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the potency of a somatostatin receptor (sstr)2-sstr5 analog, BIM-23244, of an sstr2-dopamine D2 receptor (sstr2-DAD2) molecule, BIM-23A387 and of new somatostatin-dopamine chimeric molecules with differing, enhanced affinities for sstr2, sstr5 and DAD2, BIM-23A758, BIM-23A760 and BIM-23A761, to suppress GH and prolactin (PRL) from 18 human GH adenomas that are partially responsive to octreotide or lanreotide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sstr2, sstr5 and DAD2 mRNA levels were determined by RT-PCR. The effect of drugs was tested in cell cultures at various concentrations. RESULTS: In all tumors, the sstr2, sstr5 and DAD2 mRNA levels were coexpressed (mean levels+/-s.e.m. 0.4+/-0.1, 5.3+/-1.9 and 2.0+/-0.4 copy/copy beta-glucuronidase). In 13 tumors, the maximal suppression of GH secretion produced by BIM-23A387 (30+/-3%) and BIM-23244 (28+/-3%) was greater than that produced by octreotide (23+/-3%). In six out of 13 tumors, BIM-23A758, BIM-23A760 and BIM- 23A761 produced greater maximal suppression of GH secretion than octreotide (33+/-5, 38+/-2 and 41+/-2 vs 24+/-2%). Their EC(50) values were 10, 2 and 4 pmol/l. BIM-23A761 was more effective than BIM-23A387 in GH suppression (41+/-2 vs 32+/-4%). The new chimeric molecules produced maximal PRL suppression greater than octreotide (62+/-8 to 74+/-5 vs 46+/-11%). CONCLUSIONS: Novel dopamine-somatostatin chimeric molecules with differing, enhanced activity at sstr2, sstr5 and DAD2, consistently produced significatly greater suppression of GH and PRL than either octreotide or single-receptor-interacting ligands in tumors from patients classified as only partially responsive to octreotide therapy. The higher efficacy of the chimeric compounds was, at least partially, linked to their high affinity for sstr2 (IC50 1-10 pmol/l). The other mechanisms by which such molecules produce an enhanced inhibition of GH remain to be elucidated.

Acromegaly↗

Dopamine receptor subtype 2 and somatostatin receptor subtype 5 expression influences somatostatin analogs effects on human somatotroph pituitary adenomas in vitro.

Dopamine (DA) and somatostatin (SRIF) receptor agonists inhibit growth hormone (GH) secretion by pituitary adenomas. We investigated DA subtype 2 receptor (DR2) and SRIF receptor (sst) subtypes 2 and 5 expression in 25 GH-secreting pituitary adenomas and tested in primary culture the effects on GH and prolactin (PRL) secretion of sst agonists selectively interacting with sst2 (BIM-23120), sst5 (BIM-23206), and sst2 and sst5 (BIM-23244). All adenomas expressed sst2; eight adenomas expressed both sst5 and DR2, eight sst5 but not DR2, and eight DR2 but not sst5. One tissue lacked expression of DR2 and sst5. GH secretion was inhibited by BIM-23120 in all samples, while it was reduced by BIM-23206 only in adenomas not expressing DR2. BIM-23120's inhibitory effects correlated with sst2 and DR2 expression, whereas DR2 expression correlated inversely with BIM-23206 inhibitory effects on GH secretion. In seven mixed GH-/PRL-secreting pituitary adenomas, PRL secretion was inhibited in sst5-expressing tumors by BIM-23206, but not by BIM-23120. BIM-23244 reduced PRL secretion only in adenomas expressing sst2, sst5 and DR2. sst5 and DR2 expression correlated directly with BIM23206 inhibitory effects on PRL secretion. Our results suggest that adenomas expressing DR2 are less likely to respond to clinically available SRIF analogs in terms of GH secretion inhibition. Therefore, drugs interacting also with DR2 might better control secretion of pituitary adenomas.

Acromegaly↗

BIM-23A760, a chimeric molecule directed towards somatostatin and dopamine receptors, vs universal somatostatin receptors ligands in GH-secreting pituitary adenomas partial responders to octreotide.

We report the comparative efficacy of a somatostatin receptor 1 and 5 subtypes (SSTR2 and SSTR5), and dopamine D2 (DAD2) compound, BIM-23A760, in suppressing GH secretion, in cell culture from human GH-secreting tumors, from patients partially responsive to long-term treatments with octreotide or lanreotide. In 18 tumors tested, the SSTR2, SSTR5, and DAD2 mRNAs were coexpressed. The SSTR2-selective analog, BIM-23197, the SSTR5-selective analog, BIM-23268, and the dopamine (DA) analog, BIM-53097, produced a mean maximal suppression of GH secretion (24 +/- 3, 20 +/- 3, and 20 +/- 3%, respectively) that was similar to that obtained with octreotide (23 +/- 3%). Nevertheless, based on individual responses, 60% of the tumors were mostly sensitive to the SSTR2 analog while 19 and 21% of the tumors were mainly responsive to the SSTR5 analog and to the DA analog, respectively. Among a series of new chimeric compounds that bind the SSTR2, SSTR5, and DAD2 receptors with variable affinities, BIM-23A760 produced greater maximal suppression of GH secretion than octreotide (38 +/- 2 vs 24 +/- 2%; p<0.03). The EC50 for BIM-23A760 was 2 pmol/l. In the presence of sulpride, the dose response inhibition of GH secretion by the trihybrid molecule, BIM-23A760, was partially reversed. The trihybrid produced also a maximal suppression of PRL greater than octreotide (74 +/- 5 vs 46 +/- 11%). When SSTRs pan inhibitors such as BIM-23A779 (binding affinity for SSTR1, SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR5, respectively: 2.5, 0.3, 0.6, 0.6 nmol/l) or SOM230 were tested for their suppressive effects on GH secretion, they were less potent than the previous dopastatin hybrid molecule. After a brief exposure to a SSTR2-selective analog, BIM-23197, or to a DA analog, BIM-53097, the maximal GH suppression was achieved during 12 h. Under exposure to BIM-23A760, in the same conditions, maximal suppression of GH secretion lasted for 24 h. Such a longer biological effect, yet not explained, probably participates in the higher efficacy of BIM-23A760. The higher efficacy of BIM-23A760 is, at least partially, linked to its high affinity for the SSTR2 receptor subtype (IC50: 3 pmol/l). As compared to the dopastatin compound, the lower efficacy of the universal somatostatin ligands in the inhibition of GH secretion of GH-secreting tumors argues for the use of drugs targeted, according to specific receptors expression and functionality which may vary among the various classes of tumors.

Acromegaly↗

Expression and function of somatostatin receptor subtype 1 in human growth hormone secreting pituitary tumors deriving from patients partially responsive or resistant to long-term treatment with somatostatin analogs.

The role of somatostatin (SS) receptor subtype 1 (SSTR(1)) in mediating the inhibitory effect of SS on growth hormone (GH) secreting pituitary tumors has been recently demonstrated. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of the selective SSTR(1) agonist BIM-23745 on in vitro GH secretion in GH-secreting pituitary tumor cells, deriving from patients resistant or partially responsive to octreotide long-acting release (octreotide-LAR) or lanreotide therapy in vivo and expressing SSTR(1) mRNA. In addition, the inhibiting effect of BIM-23745 on the GH secretion was compared with that of octreotide. Our data demonstrate that (1) SSTR(1) receptor was present in 56.25% (9/16) of the GH-secreting adenomas examined; (2) in all GH-secreting pituitary tumors that expressed SSTR(1), BIM-23745 significantly inhibited GH secretion in vitro, and (3) when SSTR(1) subtype was present in tumors from patients resistant to octreotide-LAR or lanreotide therapy, BIM-23745 was able to inhibit the in vitro GH secretion. In conclusion, the results of the current study suggest that SS analogs selective for the SSTR(1) may represent a further useful approach for the treatment of acromegaly in patients resistant or partially responsive to octreotide-LAR or lanreotide treatment in vivo.

Acromegaly↗

Evolving concepts in the quest for advanced therapeutic analogues of somatostatin.

A major challenge in developing somatostatin-based therapies, as well as an important question of basic physiology, is how to achieve functional specificity with an agent that has widespread actions. The natural somatostatin system achieves functional specificity in part through local somatostatin production at the site of action. Further selectivity may be achieved through the recently elucidated somatostatin receptor subtypes. To explore the relationship between the receptor subtypes and somatostatin-mediated functions, we have tested panels of selective somatostatin analogs in specific biological assays. Our studies have demonstrated complex, functional interactions between the somatostatin receptor subtypes. Specific combinations of somatostatin receptor subtypes in specific tissues may be either synergistic or antagonistic. By altering the expression ratio of the interacting receptors, the biological response to somatostatin can be influenced by environmental, hormonal and physiological status. In addition, inappropriate or unbalanced receptor expression may provide a novel mechanism of disease. These concepts take on an even broader context with the demonstration that somatostatin receptor subtypes also interact with other G-protein-coupled receptors. The insight gained from these studies has already resulted in several novel approaches to acromegaly therapy. Our further understanding of these complex cellular codes will provide the conceptual basis for future therapeutics with greatly enhanced efficacy and specificity.

Carcinoma↗

Novel ghrelin analogs with improved affinity for the GH secretagogue receptor stimulate GH and prolactin release from human pituitary cells.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a recently identified 28-amino acid peptide is a potent GH secretagogue (GHS) produced predominantly by the stomach. Ghrelin stimulates GH secretion through binding to the GHS receptor in the hypothalamus and pituitary. In addition to the GH-releasing action, ghrelin has been found to be a powerful orexigenic factor. To assess the direct in vitro effects of ghrelin on human pituitary hormone secretion we have produced a panel of novel ghrelin analogs (molecular weight, 3323-3384; human native ghrelin, 3371) with enhanced affinity for the human GHS receptor (IC(50) 0.38-1.09 nM; human ghrelin, 1.2-2.2 nM). METHODS: The peptidic analogs were tested for their effect on GH secretion using dispersed human fetal pituitaries (21 to 23 weeks of gestation) and cultured GH- and prolactin (PRL)-secreting adenomas. The expression of the GHS receptor in normal (fetal and adult) human pituitary tissues, GH- and PRL-cell adenomas was established using RT-PCR. RESULTS: The effects of ghrelin, its analogs and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) alone or in combination on GH and PRL secretion were compared at various concentrations. The ghrelin analogs stimulated GH release by 35-60% from human fetal pituitary cells (1-10 nM; P<0.05) and by 50-75% from cultured pituitary adenomas (10 nM; P<0.05). This releasing effect was dose-dependent, achieving maximal stimulation with analog concentrations at 100 nM. Human ghrelin was less potent as compared with its analogs in stimulating human GH, in keeping with the improved binding affinity of the analogs for the GHS-1a receptor. The ghrelin analogs and GHRH had comparable effects on GH secretion from both normal and adenomatous cells, and in combination produced an additive stimulatory effect on GH (150%; P<0.0001). In contrast, ghrelin and its analogs induced a comparable increase in PRL release ranging between 25 and 40% (P<0.05) from fetal cells and 30 and 70% (P<0.001) from cultured PRL-cell and mixed GH-PRL adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: Our results have demonstrated for the first time that ghrelin analogs with enhanced affinity for the GHS receptor are potent stimulators of GH secretion from human pituitary cells, and thus may possess potential clinical therapeutic benefits.

Adenoma↗

An in vivo OctreoScan-negative adrenal pheochromocytoma expresses somatostatin receptors and responds to somatostatin analogs treatment in vitro.

A 52-yr-old woman presented with hypertension, elevated urinary vanillylmandelic acid, metanephrines, normetanephrines, and plasma chromogranin A (CgA), but normal urinary catecholamine levels. Abdominal ultrasonography and subsequent MRI imaging showed a 3 cm nodular lesion of the right adrenal gland also visualized by 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy consistent with a pheochromocytoma (PC). Her OctreoScan was negative. The patient underwent right adrenalectomy and histological examination showed a PC. The adrenal medulla tissue was examined for somatostatin (SRIH) receptor subtypes 1 to 5 (SSTR1 to 5) expression by RT-PCR. Cultured tumor cells were treated with either SRIH, Lanreotide (Lan), or an SSTR2 (BIM-23 120) or SSTR5 (BIM-23 206) selective agonist. CgA secretion was measured in the medium by ELISA and catecholamine levels by HPLC after 6h. Cell viability was assessed after 48h. RT-PCR analysis showed that SSTR1, 2, 3 and 4 were expressed. CgA secretion was significantly reduced by SRIH (- 80 %), Lan (- 35 %), and the SSTR2 selective agonist (- 65 %). Norepinephrine secretion was reduced by SRIH (- 66 %), Lan (- 40 %), and BIM-23 120 (- 70 %). Epinephrine and dopamine secretion was also inhibited by treatment with SRIH (- 90 % and - 93 %, respectively) and BIM-23 120 (- 33 % and - 75 %, respectively) but not by Lan. Cell viability was also significantly reduced by SRIH (- 30 %), Lan (- 10 %), and the SSTR2 selective agonist (- 20 %). The SSTR5 selective agonist did not modify either CgA and catecholamine secretion or cell viability. Our data show that SSTRs may be present in a PC although OctreoScan is negative in vivo, and that SRIH and its analogs may reduce both differentiated and proliferative functions in chromaffin cells in vitro. These findings suggest that SRIH analogs with enhanced SSTR2 affinity might be useful in the medical therapy of PC, even when an OctreoScan is negative.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗

Somatostatin inhibits tumor angiogenesis and growth via somatostatin receptor-3-mediated regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and mitogen-activated protein kinase activities.

Somatostatin was reported to inhibit Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) cell (KS-Imm) xenografts through an antiangiogenic activity. Here, we show that somatostatin blocks growth of established KS-Imm tumors with the same efficacy as adriamycin, a clinically effective cytotoxic drug. Whereas KS-Imm cells do not express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), endothelial cells express several SSTRs, in particular SSTR3. We investigated the molecular mechanisms and receptor specificity of somatostatin inhibition of angiogenesis. Somatostatin significantly inhibited angiogenesis in vivo in the matrigel sponge assay; this inhibition was mimicked by the SSTR3 agonist L-796778 and reversed by the SSTR3 antagonist BN81658, demonstrating involvement of SSTR3. In vitro experiments showed that somatostatin directly affected different endothelial cell line proliferation through a block of growth-factor-stimulated MAPK and endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase (eNOS) activities. BN81658 reversed somatostatin inhibition of cell proliferation, NO production, and MAPK activity, indicating that SSTR3 activation is required for the effects of somatostatin in vitro. Finally in vivo angiogenesis assays demonstrated that eNOS inhibition was a prerequisite for the antiangiogenic effects of somatostatin, because high concentrations of sodium nitroprusside, an NO donor, abolished the somatostatin effects. In conclusion, we demonstrate that somatostatin is a powerful antitumor agent in vivo that inhibits tumor angiogenesis through SSTR3-mediated inhibition of both eNOS and MAPK activities.

Amides↗

Somatostatin, but not somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5 selective agonists, inhibits calcitonin secretion and gene expression in the human medullary thyroid carcinoma cell line, TT.

Somatostatin (SRIH) analogs are commonly used to treat symptoms in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), that expresses SRIH receptors (SSTR1 to SSTR5), as does the human MTC cell line TT. The aim of this work was to evaluate whether SRIH, SSTR2 and SSTR5-selective agonists influence calcitonin (CT) secretion and gene expression in the TT cell line. CT secretion was evaluated by chemiluminescence, and gene expression was analyzed by Northern blot. TT cell line proliferation was also assessed by [(3)H] thymidine ([(3)H]thy) incorporation and viable cell number count. SRIH significantly (p < 0.05) reduced [(3)H]thy incorporation (approx. 50 %), viable cell number (approx. 20 %), CT secretion (-30 %) and CT gene expression (approx. 2-fold). Exposure to the SSTR2-selective agonist, BIM-23 120, and to the SSTR5-selective agonist, BIM-23 206, did not modify CT secretion and mRNA levels in TT cells. Thus, SRIH inhibits DNA synthesis, cell proliferation, CT secretion and CT gene expression in the TT cell line, while SSTR2 and 5 selective agonists, although influencing DNA synthesis and cell proliferation, do not modify CT gene expression, suggesting that SRIH may influence gene expression acting through SSTRs other than subtypes 2 and 5. Furthermore, these findings may explain the erratic response of MTC patients in terms of CT plasma levels to treatment with SRIH analogs, like octreotide and lanreotide, which interact mainly with SSTR2 and 5.

Blotting, Northern↗

Characterization of new selective somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (sst2) antagonists, BIM-23627 and BIM-23454. Effects of BIM-23627 on GH release in anesthetized male rats after short-term high-dose dexamethasone treatment.

We here report a pharmacological characterization of two new somatostatin (SS) receptor subtype-2 (sst2) selective antagonists by evaluating their GH-releasing activity when administered, by different routes, in anesthetized adult rats and in freely moving 10-d-old rats. Moreover, we describe the effect of these SS antagonists on the GH response to GHRH after short-term high-dose dexamethasone (DEX) treatment in young male rats. BIM-23454 and BIM-23627, given iv, were able to counteract the SS-induced inhibition of GH secretion occurring after urethane anesthesia in a dose-dependent manner. In DEX-treated animals, the GH response to GHRH was partially blunted (5-min peak values, 270 +/- 50 ng/ml in saline-treated vs. 160 +/- 10 ng/ml in DEX-treated, P < 0.05); however, the simultaneous administration of BIM-23627 (0.2 mg/kg, iv) restored higher amplitude GH pulse, leading to a significantly higher overall mean GH response (area under the curve, 4200 +/- 120 ng/ml/30 min vs. 2800 +/- 100 ng/ml/30 min after GHRH alone; P < 0.05). The SS antagonists showed a reduced GH-releasing effect when administered sc or ip, likely attributable to decreased bioavailability, as compared with the iv route. SS antagonist administration also increased plasma glucagon, insulin, and glucose levels. Based on prior reports that sst2 tonically suppresses glucagon secretion, the antagonist most likely increased glucagon secretion from the pancreatic alpha-cells, with resultant increases in plasma glucose and then insulin.

Anesthesia↗

Demonstration of enhanced potency of a chimeric somatostatin-dopamine molecule, BIM-23A387, in suppressing growth hormone and prolactin secretion from human pituitary somatotroph adenoma cells.

In acromegaly, the combination of somatostatin (SS) and dopamine (DA) agonists has been shown to enhance suppression of GH secretion. In the present study, a new chimeric molecule, BIM-23A387, which selectively binds to the SS subtype 2 receptor (sst(2); K(i) = 0.10 nM) and to the DA D2 receptor (D2DR; K(i) = 22.1 nM) was tested in cultures prepared from 11 human GH-secreting tumors for its ability to suppress GH and prolactin (PRL) secretion. The chimeric compound was compared with individual sst(2) and D2DR agonists of comparable activity at the individual receptors. All tumors expressed both sst(2) and D2DR mRNAs (0.8 +/- 0.2 and 4.7 +/- 0.7 copy/copy beta-glucuronidase mRNA, respectively). In cell cultures from seven octreotide-sensitive tumors, the maximal inhibition of GH release induced by the individual sst(2) and D2DR analogs and by BIM-23A387 was similar. However, the mean EC(50) for GH suppression by BIM-23A387 (0.2 pM) was 50 times lower than that of the individual sst(2) and D2DR analogs, either used individually or combined. Similar data were obtained in four tumors that were only partially responsive to octreotide. The inhibition of GH release by BIM-23A387 was only partially reversed by the D2R2 antagonist, sulpiride, or by the sst(2) antagonist, BIM-23454. Only when both antagonists were combined was the GH suppressive effect of BIM-23A387 totally reversed. Finally, BIM-23A387 produced a mean 73 +/- 6% inhibition of PRL in six mixed GH plus PRL tumors. These data demonstrate an enhanced potency of the chimeric molecule, BIM-23A387, in suppressing GH and PRL secretion from acromegalic tumors, which cannot be explained merely on the basis of binding affinity for SS and/or DA receptors.

Adenoma↗

Somatostatin receptor subtypes: targeting functional and therapeutic specificity.

Somatostatin is a regulatory peptide involved in a wide variety of biological functions throughout the body. A key physiological question, as well as the challenge to developing somatostatin-based therapeutics, is how functional specificity can be conferred in such a widespread, multifunctional hormonal system. With the discovery of distinct subtypes of the somatostatin receptor, we have attempted to elucidate the manner in which somatostatin selectively regulates specific biological functions using panels of somatostatin analogs that have been fully characterized for their unique selectivity and specificity for the various receptor subtypes. By testing these selective analogs in well-established biological assay systems, we and our collaborators have revealed functional interactions between the somatostatin receptor subtypes that can either potentiate or antagonize the cellular response to somatostatin. These observations have resulted in several novel concepts for treating acromegaly that should offer greater efficacy to a larger percentage of patients than current therapeutic options. Further, these studies are providing evidence of interaction between the somatostatin receptor subtypes and receptors of other G-protein-coupled receptor families. These various levels of interaction provide a means by which the cellular response to somatostatin can be exquisitely controlled and modified by both physiological status and disease. Greater understanding of these interactions will provide the conceptual basis for future therapeutics with enhanced efficacy and with greater cellular and functional specificity.

Animals↗