PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M D Jendresen

Publications and source records attributed to M D Jendresen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1993

Annual review of selected dental literature: report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry.

The annual review of selected dental literature this year cites 384 published papers and reports. This year's review contains more editorial comment than reviews of years passed. New data on the biological responses to materials is emphasized in several sections. Observations on new compounds able to prevent plaque formation are presented. Clinically relevant advances in knowledge concerning the etching of different tooth structures are reported along with the effect of etching procedures on the dental pulp. Evaluation of periodontal diseases in all age groups is a topic. Limitations of current diagnostic techniques in periodontal disease, temporomandibular disorders, and implant therapy are included. There are new views on the use of dental amalgam. The future use of dental mercury is predicted. Interest in new ceramic systems is indicated as the demand for esthetics continues. Clinical information is emphasized over scientific information throughout this year's review.

Dental Implants↗
PubMed1993

Quality of fixed prosthodontics after 15 years.

Interviews and/or clinical examinations by means of the California Dental Association quality evaluation system were carried out in a group of persons who had received extensive restorative treatments with fixed partial dentures 15 years before this study. The studied group consisted of 77 persons who agreed to participate from an original group of 150 persons selected at random from the Swedish Dental Insurance System records. Of the original group 20 had died, 17 were not traceable or not able to participate for medical reasons, and 36 declined to participate. Thirty-two per cent of the recorded reconstructions had been lost, and 8% partially lost during the 15-year period. Thirty-five per cent of the reconstructions were rated as Satisfactory, whereas the remaining ones had mixed clinical quality ratings. Failures and Not Acceptable quality ratings were found to be caused mainly by fractures, loss of retention, and/or dental caries.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Clinical behavior of 21st-century adhesives and composites.

The clinical behavior of future adhesives and composite materials for dental restorations will be significantly improved from the performance of today's restorative materials. The adhesives and composites available to the practicing dentists in 10 years will be designed and developed as preventive resin restorations. They will consist largely of adhesive-sealant and composite resin combinations. The new restoratives will be developed in response to early detection of caries, resulting in smaller lesions, and smaller restored surfaces exposed to the oral cavity. There will be less margin length, less vulnerability to wear, and less microleakage. The materials of the 21st century will be less technique sensitive in the hands of the clinician and therefore will result in fewer clinical failures. The advent of better wetting and better bonding adhesives to both enamel and dentin, combined with nonshrinking dental resins that are durable, esthetic, and biocompatible, will significantly improve available dental health care. The clinical behavior of these 21st-century materials should provide longer wearing, nonleaking, esthetic restorations that are easily manipulated and placed by clinicians at an economical cost to dental patients.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed1992

Report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry.

The committee screened several hundred articles, citing 518 published papers. Some are present quality in research, others provide clinical interest, and some are identified as misleading. New techniques in pulp physiology and pathology are reported. Laser use and techniques in prevention, restorative dentistry, and materials use are reported. Epidemiology of selected diseases and the results of various formulations for treatment are cited. Diagnosis of craniomandibular dysfunction is well represented as well as references to literature reviews and other sophisticated scientific investigation. Research on adhesives is presented in respect to bonding agents for dentin and enamel. Several clinical studies are included, along with customary laboratory reports on several materials.

Dental Materials↗
PubMed1991

Report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry.

Subjects of the past decade in the dental literature are reflected in this year's Committee report. We note the decrease in the prevalence of caries, the influence of dental implants, the advancements in dental materials, and the continued efforts to control adhesive events in the oral cavity. This year we included comments from and about many significant review articles published this past year. The Committee continues to be concerned about the quality of some of the work reported and the quality of the reporting. We have attempted to select the distinguished work, that which provides new information to our profession. The subjects covered include pulp biology, caries prevention, periodontics, implants, craniomandibular function and dysfunction, occlusion, and dental materials.

Dental Bonding↗
PubMed1990

Report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry.

The growth in the dental literature continues to escalate, as evidenced by the publication of at least 326 new books in 1988 and 1989 and more than 20 new journals in 1989. There still appears to be undue emphasis on quantity instead of quality of research. This proliferation in the literature poses ever increasing difficulties to this Committee in filtering out the articles that are of particular interest to the members of the Academy and identifying those that are most likely to have a major impact on dental practice and service. The subjects covered include periodontics, caries and preventive dentistry, craniomandibular disorders, occlusion, pulp biology, ceramics, and restorative dental materials.

Dental Caries↗
PubMed1989

Report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry.

Dental research continued to grow during 1988. Unfortunately the quality does not always parallel the quantity of publications. This report obviously does not encompass all of the literature but focuses on studies that are related to trends and to matters that are considered controversial. Likewise the particular interests of the members of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry were taken into consideration. The subjects covered include periodontics, preventive dentistry, bulp biology, craniomandibular disorders, ceramics, color in restorative dentistry, and dental materials.

Dental Materials↗
PubMed1986

Report of Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry.

A few personal points seem appropriate in summary. It is axiomatic that while research solves problems, it also creates them. As an example, it is an accepted fact that dentistry more than any other profession has made serious inroads into putting itself out of business through research. Each year this report takes note of the reduction in dental caries in children, which has thus triggered a change in the nature of general practice. Be this as it may, it is well to acknowledge that major dental diseases are not disappearing, but their patterns in the population are changing, accompanied by an expansion of other services. Despite the optimistic picture painted earlier in this report, it is grossly premature to acclaim the elimination of caries, and thereby a significant segment of restorative dentistry. Of course the younger age groups have been the major beneficiaries of caries reduction. As the child ages from 9 to 16 years, the percentage of mouths free of caries drops by one half. In addition, the disease pattern in the adult population is being altered because of a longer life span and loss of fewer teeth. Unquestionably what we will, and are already seeing, is not an elimination of restorative dentistry but a different target and changes in procedures because of new materials, therapy, and expanded scope of services. There is yet another subtle change in the trend of dental research and it deals with the reduction in the number of dental schools worldwide and smaller class sizes in those schools. Dental research thereby suffers because of the traditional link between education and research. Thus the potential pool of researchers becomes smaller and research monies for training programs for dental investigators, particularly in clinical research, decreases. This year a surprising number of articles are concerned with manpower as it relates to research priorities. So, it is indeed a time that both the profession and the scientific community find filled with controversy and frustration. Yet never has there been a time that offers more in challenges and rewards.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMed1984

Quality of extensive fixed prosthodontics after five years.

A group of 150 patients who had received extensive restorative treatment 5 years prior to this study was selected at random from the Swedish Dental Insurance System records in Malmo. Of the 133 respondents to a questionnaire, 109 participated in a clinical evaluation of 891 restorations including 498 crowns, 232 pontics, 6 removable partial dentures, and 155 adjacent or opposing metallic restorations. The clinical evaluation was performed by two trained examiners by means of the CDA quality evaluation for dental care. Ninety percent of the crowns and pontics, 80% of the adjacent or opposing metallic restorations, and all six partial dentures were rated satisfactory. Twenty-three percent of the crowns, 49% of the pontics, 17% of the adjacent or opposing restorations, and half the partial dentures rated in the range of excellence. Not acceptable ratings for crowns included 3.4% T ratings and 6.6% V ratings. For pontics, the corresponding percents were 9.5% and 0.4%, respectively. T ratings were in most cases indicative of overcontouring, whereas V ratings for crowns were usually given because of secondary caries. Marginal periodontitis was mainly associated with not acceptable ratings but was also observed in connection with satisfactory restorations. Only 2% of the restorations had been lost during the 5-year period after insertion.

Adult↗