A broad array of therapeutic options is currently available for the management of patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. While acute termination of tachycardias is readily achieved, either by vagal maneuvers or intravenous medication, the decision to embark on a long-term therapeutic plan to prevent recurrences must be clinically individualized. When a chronic pharmacologic approach is desired, electrophysiologic testing is invaluable for confirming the diagnosis and selecting appropriate medication. However, the growing awareness of potential proarrhythmic effects and the inconvenience and expense of lifelong drug therapy, coupled with other advances in the field, have made nonpharmacologic approaches more attractive. This is especially so for symptomatic younger patients. The definitive cure rates achievable with surgery are now being approached by transcatheter AV nodal modification procedures that ablate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia while preserving anterograde AV nodal conduction. Over the next decade, it is likely that the latter technique will become widely used for the long-term management of symptomatic AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗

PubMed1988

Renal artery stenosis in heart failure.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aged↗

PubMed1988

Relation of acute antiarrhythmic drug efficacy to left ventricular function in coronary artery disease.

This study assessed the relation between acute antiarrhythmic drug efficacy and left ventricular (LV) function in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias, that is, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Electrophysiologic studies (n = 560) were performed in 201 patients, separated for analysis into less than 30 and greater than or equal to 30% ejection fraction groups. Coronary artery disease was present in all patients. The 8 acute antiarrhythmic regimens were procainamide, quinidine, mexiletine, mexiletine + type 1A agent, flecainide or indecainide, amiodarone, amiodarone + type 1A and "miscellaneous" agents. At least 1 successful acute antiarrhythmic regimen was found in 47% of patients and in a significantly greater proportion of patients with ejection fraction greater than or equal to 30% (52 of 81 = 64%) than in those with ejection fraction less than 30% (43 of 120 = 36%, p less than 0.001). Drug trials were successful (initiation of less than 15 repetitive ventricular responses) in 32% of patients with ejection fraction greater than or equal to 30% versus 19% of those with ejection fraction less than 30% (p less than 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 ejection fraction groups in type of heart disease, acute antiarrhythmic dosages or mean serum drug levels. A logistic regression analysis incorporating multiple clinically relevant factors found that ejection fraction was the only factor that correlated significantly with drug success or failure (p less than 0.002). Acute antiarrhythmic drug efficacy relates to LV function per se or to other pathophysiologic mechanisms of which ejection fraction may be a marker.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1986

Oral antiarrhythmic agents for ventricular arrhythmias.

Ventricular tachyarrhythmia is the most common terminal event causing sudden cardiac death. Risk stratification using 24-hour Holter monitoring to identify ventricular ectopy and noninvasive techniques to detect abnormal left ventricular function is becoming routine. Many cardiologists treat patients with potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias even though it is unknown as yet whether sudden cardiac death can be prevented. Patients with lethal ventricular arrhythmias are always treated. A number of new oral antiarrhythmic agents have become available to the clinician. The modified Vaughan-Williams classification system categorizes the drugs according to their electrophysiologic and clinical characteristics. The class IC antiarrhythmic agents are emerging as the potential drugs of first choice for patients with benign or potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. The betablockers (class II) are used as antiarrhythmic agents, particularly in the presence of active myocardial ischemia or high catecholamine levels and in the postmyocardial infarction patient. Amiodarone (class III) may cause serious side effects and is reserved for patients with lethal ventricular arrhythmias when all other available agents have failed.

Administration, Oral↗