PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M D Rosko

Publications and source records attributed to M D Rosko.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Variations in the outcomes of care provided in Pennsylvania nursing homes. Facility and environmental correlates.

This research study utilizes indicators from federal and state surveys to evaluate variation in outcomes in 438 Medicare certified skilled nursing care facilities in Pennsylvania. First, a standardization function adjusting for patient characteristics known to influence outcomes was developed and estimated. The relationships between organizational and environmental characteristics and the chosen outcome indicators (i.e., differences between the actual and expected rate of mortality, pressure ulcers, urethral catheterization and physical restraints) were then analyzed by weighted least squares regression. Results suggest considerable interfacility variation in rates for these outcome indicators. A portion of this variation is significantly attributable to resident characteristics (P < or = 0.05). However, variation in outcomes in Pennsylvania facilities is also associated with facility characteristics (e.g., size and for-profit status), and environmental characteristics (e.g., per capita income and bed supply). Implications for nursing home management and policy are considered.

Aged↗

The use of standardized indicators as quality improvement tools: an application in Pennsylvania nursing homes.

The Institute of Medicine recommends the use of key quality indicators (resident outcomes that suggest the presence of good or bad care) as tools for interfacility comparison of the quality of care provided in nursing homes. In the spirit of this recommendation, the Health Care Financing Administration released selected results from its Medicare and Medicaid Annual Certification Survey to guide consumers in purchasing nursing home services. However, because this information is published without adjustment for resident characteristics that can influence the outcomes of nursing home care, its utility for policy-makers or consumers interested in variation in nursing home quality is limited. This research study utilizes federal and state survey data to evaluate variations in mortality, pressure ulcers, urethral catheterization, and physical restraint use in 438 Medicare-certified skilled nursing care facilities in Pennsylvania. A standardization function adjusting for resident characteristics known to influence outcomes is developed and estimated by ordinary least squares regression. Results suggest considerable variation in rates for these indicators across Pennsylvania nursing home facilities. Alternative uses for risk-adjusted key quality indicators as tools for improving nursing home quality and assisting potential consumers of nursing home care in making better informed choices are considered.

Aged↗

Measuring technical efficiency in health care organizations.

The rising cost of health care has created great interest in developing methods to increase the efficiency of health care organizations. Despite this interest most analyses of prospective payment and other programs designed to control expenditures have examined costs and not efficiency. This article examines a new technique--data envelopment analysis (DEA)--that facilitates the conduct of efficiency studies. The utility of DEA is analyzed by comparing this technique with other methods used to measure efficiency, by discussing the application of DEA in the health care industry and by assessing the validity of results from DEA studies. The article concludes with an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of DEA and suggestions for refining this technique.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗

All-payer rate-setting and the provision of hospital care to the uninsured: the New Jersey experience.

The New Jersey all-payer prospective payment system compensates hospitals for charity care and bad debts. This study examines its impact on the provision of care to self-pay patients. Self-pay patients include two types of uninsured individuals: (1) patients who cannot afford to pay their bill and (2) more affluent patients who can afford to pay but who evade collection. Using data for the period 1979-85, the study employed a sample of seventy-nine New Jersey hospitals that entered the all-payer system during the years 1980-82. A regression equation, which included independent variables to control for the community's pool of uninsured residents and the hospital's share of this pool, was estimated for the number of self-pay discharges. The results indicate that the volume of care provided to self-pay patients increased when the New Jersey all-payer system was introduced. The results also show that teaching hospitals and facilities in urban areas discharge a disproportionately large number of self-pay patients. Analysis of the operating margin ratio suggests that the all-payer system helped to restore the financial viability of hospitals that tend to provide larger amounts of services to the uninsured.

Economics, Hospital↗

Impact of the New Jersey all-payer rate-setting system: an analysis of financial ratios.

Although prospective payment may contain costs, many analysts are concerned about the unintended consequences of rate regulation. This article presents the results of a case-study analysis of the New Jersey rate-setting programs during the period 1977-1985. Using measures of profitability, liquidity, and leverage, data for New Jersey, the Northeast, and the United States as a whole are used to contrast the impact of two forms of prospective payment. After attempting alternative cost-containment methods, the New Jersey Department of Health implemented an all-payer system in which prospective rates of compensation were established for DRGs. The new rate-setting system was designed to control costs, improve access to care, maintain quality of services, ensure financial viability of efficient providers, and limit the payment differentials associated with cost shifting. The results of this study have a number of implications for the evaluation of all-payer rate regulation. First, although the New Jersey all-payer system was more successful than the partial-payer program in restraining the rate of increase in cost per case, savings were achieved without adversely affecting the viability of regulated hospitals. Second, the large differentials among payers that were associated with the partial-payer program were reduced dramatically by the all-payer program. Third, using the financial position of inner-city hospitals relative to suburban hospitals as a measure of equity, the all-payer system appeared to be a fairer method of regulating rates.

Catchment Area, Health↗

A comparison of hospital performance under the partial-payer Medicare PPS and state all-payer rate-setting systems.

Although the passage of PL 98-21 was accompanied by a flurry of interest in all-payer rate regulation, the popularity of all-payer systems has waned recently. This article attempts to determine if the move away from all-payer systems constitutes a lost opportunity. The performance of the partial-payer Medicare PPS is contrasted with that of the all-payer systems in Maryland and New Jersey. The analysis suggests that all-payer systems not only control costs more effectively than partial-payer systems, but also have inherent structural features conductive to limiting cost shifting and to funding uncompensated care. Analysis of data suggests that from the perspectives of payers, providers, and patients, all-payer rate-setting is more equitable than partial-payer systems.

Cost Control↗

DRGs and severity of illness measures: an analysis of patient classification systems.

Concerns about inefficiency and excessive expenditures has stimulated interest in the measurement of the output of the hospital, an organization that produces a wide variety of products. Diagnosis Related Groups and a number of severity measures including Disease Staging, the Severity of Illness Index, and Patient Management Categories are described and evaluated. Using criteria such as reliability, clinical validity, homogeneity, number of categories, and data acquisition costs, the analysis suggests that while none of the hospital patient classification systems is perfect, great strides have been made in reflecting the multiproduct nature of the hospital.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗

Evaluation of health care service diversification options in health care institutions and programs by portfolio analysis: a marketing approach.

Originally conceived as a technique to assess how well current activities contribute to the attainment of organizational goals, portfolio analysis also can be used as a marketing research tool for considering the relative merits of various diversification options under consideration by institutional decision makers. The authors describe the features of portfolio analysis and its use as a tool in the evaluation of health care diversification options. A case study of a hospital that has employed the method in its corporate planning and marketing efforts illustrates the use of this analysis technique.

Decision Making, Organizational↗

Short-term responses of hospitals to the DRG prospective pricing mechanism in New Jersey.

Short-term responses of hospitals to the New Jersey prospective payment system, which uses Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) to establish rates of compensation for all payers, were examined in this study. The sample consisted of 84 New Jersey hospitals that were subject to prospective payment and a comparison group of 76 hospitals. Hospitals comprising the comparison group located in eastern Pennsylvania, were reimbursed retrospectively. Regression equations, which included independent variables to control for market supply and demand conditions, were estimated for the cost per admission, cost per day, length of stay; and cases treated. The results indicate that increases in the cost per admission and cost per day were lower (P less than 0.05) in hospitals subject to the all payer DRG system than in those institutions that were reimbursed retrospectively. In addition, the results suggest that most of the cost savings attributed to the New Jersey DRG system are due to a reduction in the average length of stay. The paper concludes with policy implications.

Cost Allocation↗

Prospective payment based on case mix: will it work in nursing homes?

This article evaluates the potential efficacy of implementing a prospective payment system based on case mix in the nursing home industry. The analysis of structural differences between the nursing home and hospital industries suggests that the mechanism of compensating long-term care facilities should be based on functional health status rather than on diagnosis and that incentives to improve quality and access should be strengthened. The article assesses several systems of classifying patients that have been proposed as the basis for implementing a prospective payment system in the nursing home industry. The article concludes with a discussion of policy issues related to the appropriate unit of payment and the scope of regulatory authority.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

The impact of the New Jersey all-payer DRG system.

Two prospective payment systems that operated concurrently in New Jersey during 1980-1982 created a natural experiment and a unique opportunity to compare the effectiveness of the two systems in restraining cost increases. Our results indicate that during that period, annual increases in the cost per case were significantly less in hospitals that were subject to the all-payer DRG system than in those institutions that were paid under the Standard Hospital Accounting and Rate Evaluation (SHARE) program. We also found that, relative to the SHARE program, the DRG system appears to have increased admission rates and reduced length of stay.

Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans↗