Biomedical subjects

M D Tsakanikos

Publications and source records attributed to M D Tsakanikos.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Towards a universal newborn hearing screening.

Hearing loss is a common problem which, if remaining undetected during early childhood, could affect the patient's linguistic and mental abilities permanently. Although recommended, mass hearing screening has so far been problematic or even impossible due to several reasons. The available otoacoustic emission devices appear to be effective tools for universal hearing screening. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and practicability of a new device for recording click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (cEOEs) on a pediatric population. Sixty children aged between 6 days and 14 years were evaluated audiologically both by auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and otoacoustic emissions. The latter were obtained by using the well-known ILO88v3.92 otoacoustic analyser and a new, portable device ('Echocheck', Otodynamics Ltd, UK). Sensitivity and specificity of cEOEs recorded by 'Echocheck'was found to be 93% and 91%, respectively, when compared to ABR results. Additionally, 'Echocheck' recordings were proved to be much easier to perform, needing considerably less time in comparison with those of the ILO88 system. In our opinion, 'Echocheck' as well as all similar portable devices--screeners--may represent a much-desired solution for implementing universal hearing screening programmes.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2001

Incidence of hearing loss among children presented with speech-language delay.

Infants' first attempts to communicate with their environment begin shortly after birth. However, real words appear by age of 12-15 months. Any delay in expressing their needs verbally beyond this age is defined as speech delay and may be associated with a variety of pathological conditions. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of hearing impairment in those children presented with speech delay. Ninety-one speech-delayed children were audiologically assessed between March 1993 and March 1995. In 25 out of 91 children (27.4%) a moderate to severe hearing loss was detected, either sensorineural or conductive. The increased incidence of hearing impairment found in this group mandates a thorough hearing evaluation for any case of speech-language delay.

Child↗

PubMed1999

Otoacoustic emission-based hearing screening of a Greek NICU population.

The pressing need for early identification of hearing-disabled children has led to the development of several neonatal hearing screening programmes world-wide. Today otoacoustic emissions represent a widely used methodology for identification of neonatal hearing impairment. The purpose of the present study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (cEOAEs) in a Greek NICU population and compare the cEOAE data to the final hearing status of these children. A total of 438 ears of 223 neonates at high risk for hearing impairment were tested with both brainstem response audiometry (ABR) and cEOAEs. In 107 neonates the final hearing status was determined by using behavioural and playtone audiometry, at an age greater than 2 1/2 years. The sensitivity and specificity of the cEOAEs were found to be 90 and 92.4% when compared to ABR results and 90.9 and 91.1% when compared to the children's hearing status, respectively. Click-EOAEs have been proved to be highly effective in determining whether or not hearing impairment really exists. Since conventional ABR does not meet the requirements for large scale screening programmes, the cEOAEs represent a reliable alternative.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed1997

Profound hearing loss and presence of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in the neonate: a report of two cases.

Evoked otoacoustic emissions using click stimulus (cEOEs) were recorded in 450 consecutive children over a 12-month period. Of this group, 102 were babies treated in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), classified as High Risk neonates according to the criteria of the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Audiologic examination in the latter was completed by auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Two of the neonates showed a profound hearing loss accompanied by strong cEOEs. The two cases are described and discussed together with the possibilities and limitations of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in the auditory screening of the neonatal population. Despite the reported rare possibility of pure retrocochlear disorders, when cEOEs are used for neonatal screening purposes there is an actual risk of missing a profound hearing loss. Nevertheless, the use of cEOEs in combination with ABR may contribute to the differential diagnosis between cochlear and retrocochlear lesions.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed1993

Evaluation of acoustic reflectometry in detecting otitis media in children.

Accurate detection of middle-ear effusion in children is not only useful but also necessary for diagnosis, management and follow-up of otitis media. A relatively new device, the Acoustic Otoscope (model 101, ENT Medical Devices) has been introduced for detecting middle-ear fluid in children. We tested 158 ears and the diagnosis was confirmed by acoustic admittance, acoustic reflex and pneumatic otoscopy. We propose 4.5 as a better breakpoint (the number on the vertical scale of the instrument which is the lower limit indicating middle-ear effusion) than 4.0 which is proposed by the manufacturer. In our results the 4.5 breakpoint maximizes both positive and negative predictive values (83 and 82% respectively) with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity (86 and 79% respectively) in detection of otitis media. Our clinical experience with this instrument, during the past 2 years, has led us to conclude that it is simple, non-invasive and objective. Unlike tympanometry, it requires no hermetic seal and is effective even if the child is crying. However, it is not sensitive enough when there are bubbles or negative pressure in the middle ear. When the user is aware of the flexibility of the instrument's breakpoints (in our opinion this is an advantage of the device) for different uses and different populations, the reflectometer often reduces the need for tympanometry and confirms the otoscopic examination.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗