PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Danhof

Publications and source records attributed to M Danhof.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Mechanism-based PK/PD modeling of the respiratory depressant effect of buprenorphine and fentanyl in healthy volunteers.

The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of buprenorphine and fentanyl for the respiratory depressant effect in healthy volunteers. Data on the time course of the ventilatory response at a fixed P(ET)CO(2) of 50 mm Hg and P(ET)O(2) of 110 mm Hg following intravenous administration of buprenorphine and fentanyl were obtained from two phase I studies (50 volunteers received buprenorphine: 0.05-0.6 mg/70 kg and 24 volunteers received fentanyl: 0.075-0.5 mg/70 kg). The PK/PD correlations were analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. A two- and three-compartment pharmacokinetic model characterized the time course of fentanyl and buprenorphine concentration, respectively. Three structurally different PK/PD models were evaluated for their appropriateness to describe the time course of respiratory depression: (1) a biophase distribution model with a fractional sigmoid E(max) pharmacodynamic model, (2) a receptor association/dissociation model with a linear transduction function, and (3) a combined biophase distribution-receptor association/dissociation model with a linear transduction function. The results show that for fentanyl hysteresis is entirely determined by the biophase distribution kinetics, whereas for buprenorphine hysteresis is caused by a combination of biophase distribution kinetics and receptor association/dissociation kinetics. The half-time values of biophase equilibration (t(1/2, k(eo))) were 16.4 and 75.3 min for fentanyl and buprenorphine, respectively. In addition, for buprenorphine, the value of k(on) was 0.246 ml/ng/min and the value of k(off) was 0.0102 min(-1). The concentration-effect relationship of buprenorphine was characterized by a ceiling effect at higher concentrations (intrinsic activity alpha=0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.62), whereas fentanyl displayed full respiratory depressant effect (alpha=0.91, 95% CI: 0.19-1.62).

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Buprenorphine induces ceiling in respiratory depression but not in analgesia.

BACKGROUND: We measured the effect of two weight adjusted i.v. doses (0.2 mg per 70 kg and 0.4 mg per 70 kg) of the potent opioid buprenorphine on analgesia and respiratory depression in healthy volunteers. The aim of the study was to compare buprenorphine's behaviour with respect to the occurrence of ceiling (or apparent maximum) in these typical micro-opioid protein-(MOP) receptor effects. METHODS: Ten subjects (5 males) received 0.2 mg per 70 kg, 10 others (5 males) 0.4 mg per 70 kg i.v. buprenorphine. Steady-state inspired minute ventilation at a fixed end-tidal Pco(2) of 7 kPa was measured before drug infusion and at regular intervals after drug infusion. Experimental pain was induced using transcutaneous electrical stimulation and a gradually increasing current. Pain tolerance was measured at regular intervals before and after drug infusion. The studies lasted 8 h. RESULTS: After infusion of the drug ventilation showed a rapid decline and reached peak depression between 150 and 180 min after drug administration. This effect was dose-independent with respect to timing and magnitude. At peak respiratory depression minute ventilation was 13.1 (sd 1.8) litre min(-1) in the 0.2 mg group vs 12.0 (sd 1.3) litre min(-1) in the 0.4 mg group (n.s.). At buprenorphine 0.2 mg a small short-lived analgesic effect was observed with a maximum increase in pain tolerance current of 6.7 (sd 2.8) mA occurring at 75 min after drug administration. Peak analgesic effect was 29% above baseline current. In contrast, buprenorphine 0.4 mg caused a large and long-lived analgesic effect with a maximum increase in pain tolerance current of 23.8 (sd 7.4) mA occurring at 130 min after drug administration. Peak analgesic effect was 160% above baseline current (0.4 vs 0.2 mg, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: While buprenorphine's analgesic effect increased significantly, respiratory depression was similar in magnitude and timing for the two doses tested. We conclude that over the dose range tested buprenorphine displays ceiling in respiratory effect but none in analgesic effect.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Prediction of headache response in migraine treatment.

Triptans are efficacious for the acute treatment of migraine attacks. Yet, defining a concentration-effect relation for these compounds is difficult as the dynamics of the migraine attack are not thoroughly understood. The objective of this investigation was to develop a disease model to predict measures of headache in randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials investigating oral sumatriptan as a paradigm compound. A hidden Markov model based on the states of response (no relief, relief, and pain free) and headache scores (observed variable) was used in conjunction with population pharmacokinetics. Model parameters were capable of predicting the course of headache relief, pain-free status and headache recurrence. It was shown that sumatriptan shortens mean transit times between states by up to 5 h. The potency of sumatriptan (EC(50)) was 9 ng/ml. These findings demonstrate the value of combining pharmacokinetic and efficacy information to model disease and characterize time-independent drug properties in a population of migraineurs.

Comorbidity↗
PubMed2005

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlations and biomarkers in the development of COX-2 inhibitors.

The mechanism by which COX inhibitors exert their analgesic effect is well established. However, data show no direct correlation between drug concentrations in plasma and the analgesic or adverse effects in chronic inflammatory conditions. This represents a major problem in the development of COX inhibitors, since it is difficult to predict the appropriate dosing regimen for the treatment of chronic inflammatory pain, based upon information from pre-clinical studies and eventually early clinical studies. The factors that determine response in inflammatory pain must be understood in order to make predictions about the time course of the analgesic effect. In this review the determinants of drug response and their variability will be discussed: physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics (PK), pathophysiology and disease progression. From a mechanistic point of view, endogenous mediators of inflammation might be used as a biomarker for the analgesic effect and safety assessment. Such a biomarker can be an intermediate step between drug exposure and response. In addition, its concentration-effect relationship could be characterized by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling. Indeed, recent investigations have shown that COX-2 inhibition, as determined by modelling of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels in the whole blood assay in vitro can be used as a marker to predict drug effects (analgesia) in humans. A model-derived parameter, IC80, (total and unbound) was found to correlate directly with the analgesic plasma concentration of different COX inhibitors varying in enzyme selectivity. These findings indicate that PGE2 and thromboxane B2 inhibition can be used to predict and select efficacious doses in humans.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of the respiratory effects of intravenous buprenorphine and fentanyl in humans and rats.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence from animal studies suggesting the existence of a ceiling effect for buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression. To study whether an apparent ceiling effect exists for respiratory depression induced by buprenorphine, we compared the respiratory effects of buprenorphine and fentanyl in humans and rats. METHODS: In healthy volunteers, the opioids were infused i.v. over 90 s and measurements of minute ventilation at a fixed end-tidal PCO2 of 7 kPa were obtained for 7 h. Buprenorphine doses were 0.7, 1.4, 4.3 and 8.6 microg kg(-1) (n=20 subjects) and fentanyl doses 1.1, 2.1, 2.9, 4.3 and 7.1 microg kg(-1) (n=21). Seven subjects received placebo. In rats, both opioids were infused i.v. over 20 min, and arterial PCO2 was measured 5, 10, 15 and 20 min after the start of fentanyl infusion and 30, 150, 270 and 390 min after the start of buprenorphine infusion. Doses tested were buprenorphine 0, 100, 300, 1000 and 3000 microg kg(-1) and fentanyl 0, 50, 68 and 90 microg kg(-1). RESULTS: In humans, fentanyl produced a dose-dependent depression of minute ventilation with apnoea at doses > or = 2.9 microg kg(-1); buprenorphine caused depression of minute ventilation which levelled off at doses > or = 3.0 microg kg(-1) to about 50% of baseline. In rats, the relationship of arterial PCO2 and fentanyl dose was linear, with maximum respiratory depression at 20 min (maximum PaCO2 8.0 kPa). Irrespective of the time at which measurements were obtained, buprenorphine showed a non-linear effect on PaCO2, with a ceiling effect at doses > 1.4 microg kg(-1). The effect on PaCO2 was modest (maximum value measured, 5.5 kPa). CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm a ceiling effect of buprenorphine but not fentanyl with respect to respiratory depression.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Propofol 6% as sedative in children under 2 years of age following major craniofacial surgery.

BACKGROUND: After alarming reports concerning deaths after sedation with propofol, infusion of this drug was contraindicated by the US Food and Drug Administration in children <18 yr receiving intensive care. We describe our experiences with propofol 6%, a new formula, during postoperative sedation in non-ventilated children following craniofacial surgery. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, children admitted to the paediatric surgical intensive care unit following major craniofacial surgery were randomly allocated to sedation with propofol 6% or midazolam, if judged necessary on the basis of a COMFORT behaviour score. Exclusion criteria were respiratory infection, allergy for proteins, propofol or midazolam, hypertriglyceridaemia, familial hypercholesterolaemia or epilepsy. We assessed the safety of propofol 6% with triglycerides (TG) and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels, blood gases and physiological parameters. Efficacy was assessed using the COMFORT behaviour scale, Visual Analogue Scale and Bispectral Index monitor. RESULTS: Twenty-two children were treated with propofol 6%, 23 were treated with midazolam and 10 other children did not need sedation. The median age was 10 (IQR 3-17) months in all groups. Median duration of infusion was 11 (range 6-18) h for propofol 6% and 14 (range 5-17) h for midazolam. TG levels remained normal and no metabolic acidosis or adverse events were observed during propofol or midazolam infusion. Four patients had increased CPK levels. CONCLUSION: We did not encounter any problems using propofol 6% as a sedative in children with a median age of 10 (IQR 3-17) months, with dosages <4 mg kg(-1) h(-1) during a median period of 11 (range 6-18) h.

Chemistry, Pharmaceutical↗
PubMed2005

Transdermal iontophoretic delivery of apomorphine in patients improved by surfactant formulation pretreatment.

The objective of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of transdermal iontophoretic delivery of R-apomorphine, a potent dopamine agonist, in combination with surfactant pretreatment in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. Iontophoresis patches were applied in 16 patients for 3.5 h, with 0.5 h of passive delivery followed by 3 h of current application at a current density of 250 microA/cm2. Eight of these patients were treated with a surfactant formulation prior to iontophoresis. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic effects, systemic and local side effects of R-apomorphine were assessed. The plasma concentration vs. time profiles upon iontophoresis of R-apomorphine were described successfully by a novel pharmacokinetic model. The model suggests that only 1.9% of the dose that has been released from the patch accumulated in the skin. The patients treated with the surfactant formulations showed a statistically significant increase of bioavailability (from 10.6+/-0.8% to 13.2+/-1.4%) and of the steady state input rate (from 75.3+/-6.6 to 98.3+/-12.1 nmol/cm2 h) compared to the control patients (iontophoresis without absorption enhancers). In five out of eight patients in the study group and in three out of eight patients in the control group, clinical improvement was observed.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2005

Cutaneous side-effects of transdermal iontophoresis with and without surfactant pretreatment: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Iontophoresis, a method that facilitates drug transport across skin by an external electrical field, offers the possibility for long-term transdermal delivery of compounds in a well-controlled manner. In general, the literature supports the contention that iontophoresis is a safe procedure. However, there are important medical issues concerning the epidermal and dermal effects of iontophoresis that have not been extensively investigated. Specific and strictly controlled studies on the dermal effect of iontophoresis are scarce. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the cutaneous side-effects of transdermal iontophoresis application in healthy human volunteers. METHODS: This was a single-blinded, randomized and parallel design study. In one group (n=12) subjects were treated nonocclusively with a surfactant formulation followed by iontophoresis (3-h application at a current density of 250 microA cm(-2)). In another group (n=12) iontophoresis alone was performed. No drug was included in these studies. The corresponding passive treatments served as controls. Noninvasive methods including sensation record, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin colour and the visual scoring were used to assess cutaneous effects. RESULTS: Tingling and itching were commonly experienced in the first 30 min of the current application. Iontophoresis in combination with the pretreatment induced significant increases in TEWL values and in skin redness, and resulted in slight to mild erythema and oedema compared with the control. Compared with the iontophoresis alone, the presence of surfactant pretreatment caused slightly more skin irritation (erythema and oedema) but did not further disturb the skin barrier function. CONCLUSIONS: The transdermal iontophoresis challenges the skin barrier function and induces transient mild skin irritation, but does not cause any permanent damage to the skin when applied for 3 h at a current density of 0.25 mA cm(-2).

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of blood-brain barrier transport of synthetic adenosine A1 receptor agonists.

A population pharmacokinetic model is proposed for estimation of the brain distribution clearance of synthetic A1 receptor agonists in vivo. Rats with permanent venous and arterial cannulas in combination with a microdialysis probe in the striatum received intravenous infusions of 8-methylamino-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (MCPA) and 2'-deoxyribose-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (2'-dCPA) (10 mg kg(-1)). The clearance for transport from blood to the brain was estimated by simultaneous analysis of the blood and extracellular fluid concentrations using a compartmental pharmacokinetic model. The proposed pharmacokinetic model consists of three compartments describing the time course of the concentration in blood in combination with three compartments for the brain extracellular fluid concentrations. The blood clearance was 7.4 +/- 0.5 for MCPA and 7.2 +/- 1.4 ml min(-1) for 2'-dCPA. The in vivo microdialysis recoveries determined by the dynamic-no-net-flux method were independent of time with values of 0.21 +/- 0.02 and 0.22 +/- 0.01 for MCPA and 2'-dCPA, respectively. The values of the intercompartmental clearance for the distribution from blood to brain were 1.9 +/- 0.4 versus 1.6 +/- 0.3 mul min(-1) for MCPA and 2'-dCPA, respectively. It is concluded that on basis of the novel six-compartment model precise estimates of the rate of brain distribution are obtained that are independent of eventual differences in systemic exposure. The low brain distribution rates of MCPA and 2'-dCPA were consistent with in vitro tests. Furthermore, a slow elimination from the brain compartment was observed, indicating that the duration of central nervous system effects may be much longer than expected on the basis of the terminal half-life in blood.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2004

Long-term sedation with propofol 60 mg ml(-1) vs. propofol 10 mg(-1) ml in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients.

BACKGROUND: Hypertriglyceridaemia is the main cause of therapeutic failure during propofol use in long-term sedated mechanically ventilated patients. Propofol 60 mg ml(-1) has been developed to reduce fat and volume load for the critically ill patient. The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness of sedation, achievability of effective concentrations and the effects on serum lipid concentrations of propofol 60 mg ml(-1) vs. propofol 10 mg ml(-1) for long-term sedation in critically ill patients. METHODS: In this randomized, open, prospective study, 20 critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients who required sedation for a minimum of 48 h received propofol 60 mg ml(-1) or propofol 10 mg ml(-1) in doses as required during 2-5 days. RESULTS: No differences between propofol 60 mg ml(-1) and propofol 10 mg ml(-1) were observed in the effectiveness of sedation using the Ramsay Sedation score and the Subjective Sedation score, nor in relation to the propofol concentrations. Between the two groups, there were no significant differences in the daily propofol dose, number of daily infusion rate adjustments or need for additional sedatives. Mean serum triglyceride concentrations were higher in the propofol 10 mg ml(-1) group compared with the propofol 60 mg ml(-1) group [5.26 (3.19) vs. 3.22 (2.05) mmol l(-1), P > 0.05][mean (SD)]. Patients in the propofol 10 mg ml(-1) group received more fat from the propofol infusion than from the propofol 60 mg ml(-1) group [53.2 (29.6) vs. 10.0 (4.7) % compared with fat from nutrition, respectively]. A significant relationship was observed between the daily total fat dose and the serum triglyceride concentration (r2 = 0.32, P < 0.001), whereas there was no significant correlation between the daily propofol dose and the serum triglyceride concentration. CONCLUSION: Propofol 60 mg ml(-1) is a useful alternative to propofol 10 mg ml(-1) for the long-term sedation of critically ill patients. Sedation with propofol 60 mg ml(-1) reduces fat and volume load by 83%, which reduces the risk of hypertriglyceridaemia.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Mechanism-based modeling of the pharmacodynamic interaction of alphaxalone and midazolam in rats.

The objective of the present investigation was to characterize the pharmacodynamic interaction between the synthetic neuroactive steroid alphaxalone and the benzodiazepine midazolam. The time course of the electroencephalographic (EEG) effect (11.5-30 Hz) was determined in rats in conjunction with plasma concentrations. Alphaxalone was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion of 0, 1.2, 2.2, or 5.2 mg over 360 min. Midazolam was administered as a 5-min intravenous bolus infusion of 4 mg.kg-1. The pharmacokinetic profiles of both drugs were described by a two-compartment model. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed. The EEG effect versus time profiles of midazolam and alphaxalone, when administered separately and in combination, were modeled on the basis of the recently proposed mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for GABAA receptor modulators, which contains separate expressions to describe the drug-receptor interaction and the stimulus-response relationship. The pharmacodynamic interaction between alphaxalone and midazolam was best characterized using an independent drug-drug interaction model without an expression for allosteric modulation of the effect of midazolam by alphaxalone. The final model contained an exponential expression to account for acute functional adaptation to the EEG effect upon continuous infusion of alphaxalone. The mechanism-based analysis showed that this functional adaptation is best explained by a change in the system-specific stimulus-response relationship, rather than the drug-receptor activation process. It is concluded that the pharmacodynamic interaction between alphaxalone and midazolam in vivo is best described using an independent interaction model without allosteric modulation.

Anesthetics↗
PubMed2003

Anticonvulsant drugs differentially suppress individual ictal signs: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis in the cortical stimulation model in the rat.

Antiepileptic drugs can suppress seizures completely, but they may also modify the appearance of drug-resistant seizures. In this study, the effects of three antiepileptic drugs on a seizure pattern were assessed by means of population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, yielding estimates of baseline response, EC50, and Hill slope. Lamotrigine did not affect eye closure, although it did suppress the other ictal signs in a concentration-dependent fashion. Midazolam suppressed forelimb clonus less potently than the other ictal signs; the same was observed for tiagabine with respect to eye closure. This study shows that ictal component analysis (ICA) in combination with PK/PD modeling may facilitate drug selection and dose optimization. The application of ICA is not restricted to a single seizure type or anticonvulsant drug and can be used to identify drug combinations that have a complementary action.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of the electroencephalogram effects of GABAA receptor modulators: in vitro-in vivo correlations.

A mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for neuroactive steroids, comprising a separate characterization of 1) the receptor activation process and 2) the stimulus-response relationship, was applied to various nonsteroidal GABAA receptor modulators. The EEG effects of nine prototypical GABAA receptor modulators (six benzodiazepines, one imidazopyridine, one cyclopyrrolone, and one beta-carboline) were determined in rats in conjunction with plasma concentrations. Population PK/PD modeling revealed monophasic concentration-EEG effect relationships with large differences in potency (EC50) and intrinsic activity between the compounds. The data were analyzed on the basis of the mechanism-based PK/PD model for (synthetic) neuroactive steroids on the assumption of a single and unique stimulus-response relationship. The model converged yielding estimates of both the apparent in vivo receptor affinity (KPD) and the in vivo intrinsic efficacy (ePD). The values of KPD ranged from 0.41 +/- 0 ng.ml(-1) for bretazenil to 436 +/- 72 ng.ml(-1) for clobazam and the values for e(PD) from -0.27 +/- 0 for methyl 6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate to 0.54 +/- 0.02 for diazepam. Significant linear correlations were observed between KPD for unbound concentrations and the affinity in an in vitro receptor bioassay (r = 0.93) and between e(PD) and the GABA-shift in vitro (r = 0.95). The findings of this investigation show that the in vivo effects of nonsteroidal GABAA receptor modulators and (synthetic) neuroactive steroids can be described on the basis of a single unique transducer function. In this paradigm, the nonsteroidal GABAA receptor modulators behave as partial agonists relative to neuroactive steroids.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2003

Dose-dependent EEG effects of zolpidem provide evidence for GABA(A) receptor subtype selectivity in vivo.

Zolpidem is a nonbenzodiazepine GABA(A) receptor modulator that binds in vitro with high affinity to GABA(A) receptors expressing alpha(1) subunits but with relatively low affinity to receptors expressing alpha(2), alpha(3), and alpha(5) subunits. In the present study, it was investigated whether this subtype selectivity could be detected and quantified in vivo. Three doses (1.25, 5, and 25 mg) of zolpidem were administered to rats in an intravenous infusion over 5 min. The time course of the plasma concentrations was determined in conjunction with the change in the beta-frequency range of the EEG as pharmacodynamic endpoint. The concentration-effect relationship of the three doses showed a dose-dependent maximum effect and a dose-dependent potency. The data were analyzed for one- or two-site binding using two pharmacodynamic models based on 1) the descriptive model and 2) a novel mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for GABA(A) receptor modulators that aims to separates drug- and system-specific properties, thereby allowing the estimation of in vivo affinity and efficacy. The application of two-site models significantly improved the fits compared with one-site models. Furthermore, in contrast to the descriptive model, the mechanism-based PK/PD model yielded dose-independent estimates for affinity (97 +/- 40 and 33,100 +/- 14,800 ng x ml(-1)). In conclusion, the mechanism-based PK/PD model is able to describe and explain the observed dose-dependent EEG effects of zolpidem and suggests the subtype selectivity of zolpidem in vivo.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Neuroactive steroids differ in potency but not in intrinsic efficacy at the GABA(A) receptor in vivo.

The objective of the present investigation was to characterize the in vivo EEG effects of (synthetic) neuroactive steroids on the basis of a recently proposed mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. After intravenous administration, the time course of the EEG effect of pregnanolone, 2beta-3alpha-5alpha-3-hydroxy-2-(2,2-dimethylmorpholin-4-yl)-pregnan-11,20-dione (ORG 21465), 2beta-3alpha-5alpha-21-chloro-3-hydroxy-2-(4-morpholinyl)-pregnan-20-one (ORG 20599), and alphaxalone was determined in conjunction with plasma concentrations in rats. For each neuroactive steroid the PK/PD correlation was described on the basis of a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with an effect compartment to account for hysteresis. The observed concentration EEG effect relationships were biphasic and characterized with a mechanism-based pharmacodynamic model, which is based on a separation between the receptor activation process and the stimulus-response relationship. A single unique biphasic stimulus-response relationship could be identified for all neuroactive steroids, which was successfully described by a parabolic function. The receptor activation process was described by a hyperbolic function. Estimates for the maximum activation (e(PD)) were similar for the different neuroactive steroids but values of the potency estimate (K(PD)) ranged from 157 +/- 16 ng. ml(-1) for pregnanolone, 221 +/- 83 ng. ml(-1) for ORG 20599, and 483 +/- 42 ng. ml(-1) for alphaxalone to 1619 +/- 208 ng. ml(-1) for ORG 21465. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the in vivo potency and the IC(50) in an in vitro [(35)S]t-butylbicyclophosphorothionate binding assay (r = 0.91). It is concluded that the new PK/PD model constitutes a new mechanism-based approach to the quantification of the effects of (synthetic) neuroactive steroids in vivo effects. The results show that the neuroactive steroids differ in potency but not in intrinsic efficacy at the GABA(A) receptor in vivo.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2002

Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of concentration-dependent hysteresis and biphasic electroencephalogram effects of alphaxalone in rats.

The neuroactive steroid alphaxalone reveals a complex biphasic concentration-effect relationship using the 11.5 to 30 Hz frequency band of the electroencephalogram (EEG) as biomarker. The purpose of the present investigation was to develop a mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model to describe this observation. The proposed model is based on receptor theory and aims to separate the drug-receptor interaction from the transduction of the initial stimulus into the observed biphasic response. Individual concentration-time courses of alphaxalone were obtained in combination with continuous recording of the EEG parameter. Alphaxalone was administered intravenously in various dosages. The pharmacokinetics were described by a two-compartment model, and parameter estimates for clearance, intercompartmental clearance, volume of distribution 1 and 2 were 158 +/- 29 ml. min(-1). kg(-1), 143 +/- 31 ml. min(-1). kg(-1), 122 +/- 20 ml. kg(-1) and 606 +/- 48 ml. kg(-1), respectively. Concentration-effect relationships exhibited a biphasic pattern and delay in onset of effect. The hysteresis was described on the basis of an effect-compartment model with C(max) as covariate. The pharmacodynamic model consisted of a receptor model, featuring a monophasic saturable receptor activation model in combination with a biphasic stimulus-response model. The in vivo affinity (K(PD)) was estimated at 432 +/- 26 ng. ml(-1). Unique parameter estimates were obtained that were independent of the dose and the duration of the infusion. In conclusion, we have shown that this mechanism-based approach, which separates drug- and system-related properties in vivo, was successfully applied for the characterization of the biphasic effect versus time patterns of alphaxalone. The model should be of use in the characterization of other biphasic responses.

Algorithms↗