PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Delannes

Publications and source records attributed to M Delannes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

[The French preliminary experience of the use of a seed-projector for exclusive iodine 125 prostate brachytherapy: feasibility and acute toxicity].

PURPOSE: To analyse a new technique for prostate brachytherapy with permanent Iodine implants characterized by the use of a seed projector after a 3D dosimetric peroperative treatment planning (FIRST technique). PATIENTS AND METHOD: 395 patients have been treated in France with this technique in six radiotherapy centres between November 2002 and December 2005 for a localized prostate cancer. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (3.3%) developped a urinary retention, and respectively 7.8 and 26.5% an acute RTOG grade 3 and 2 toxicity. The 6-weeks IPSS score was equal or lower to 15 in 73% with a 11 median IPSS value. A failure of the loading with the seed-projector, leading to a manual loading of the seeds, occurred in 9 patients (2.3%) in two centres, directly related to the loading procedure with the seed-projector in 5 cases. The median duration of the procedure was reduced by 30 minutes for the patients treated in 2005. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study establishes the feasibility of the routine use of a seed projector for permanent iodine 125 prostate implants with an initial tolerance similar to the best results published for other implants techniques.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed2006

[Clinical practice guidelines: 2006 update of recommendations for the radiotherapeutic management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma (sarcoma of the extremity, uterine sarcoma and retroperitoneal sarcoma].

CONTEXT: The National French Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC) initiated the update of clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma in collaboration with the French Sarcoma Group (GSF-GETO), specialists from French public universities, general hospitals and private clinics and with the French National Cancer Institute. This work is based on the methodology developed in the "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project. OBJECTIVES: To update SOR guidelines for the management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma previously validated in 1995. METHODS: The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts who define the CPGsaccording to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. Once the guidelines have been developed, they are reviewed by independent reviewers. RESULTS: This article presents the updated recommendations for radiotherapeutic management. The main recommendations are: 1) irradiation before or after surgical treatment is the standard for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity and uterine sarcoma; 2) no systematic irradiation should be done in case of retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed2005

[Brachytherapy for soft tissue sarcomas. Technique and therapeutic indications].

The role of brachytherapy in the therapeutic strategy of soft tissue sarcomas has been difficult to assess due to the fact it has been during a long time institution-specific. However, the experience gained specially with low dose-rate treatments has allowed formulating guidelines for technical rules and patient selection. Brachytherapy used as an isolated treatment combined with surgery has proven to be effective in high-grade sarcomas, compared to surgery alone, in a unique randomized trial. Beside, a number of data have shown that the combination of brachytherapy and external beam irradiation could be superior to brachytherapy or external beam irradiation alone in the treatment of tumors with high-grade, or central location, locally advanced or on contact with neurovascular structures. Brachytherapy alone, combined with surgery, is of interest for conservative treatment of recurrent sarcomas occurring in previously irradiated areas. The occurrence of side effects remains acceptable if technical guidelines are followed, for surgery as well as for brachytherapy, using the most modern available treatment techniques. Brachytherapy should be at the moment an integrated part of the multidisciplinary treatment of soft tissue sarcomas.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed2004

[Management of soft tissue sarcomas in first isolated local recurrence: a retrospective study of 83 cases].

PURPOSE: To analyse the management and clinical outcome of patients treated for a first isolated local recurrence of soft tissue sarcoma (trunk or extremities) and to identify prognosis factors. PATIENTS AND MATERIAL: This is a retrospective study of 83 adult patients treated between 1980 and 1999. Mean tumor size was 6 cm. Most sarcomas were located in extremities (N =74), were deep (N =60), and proximal (N =53). Thirty involved nerves or vessels. Histologic subtypes were mainly grade 2 (42%) or 3 (36%) histocytofibrosarcomas (49%) and liposarcomas (20%). Surgical treatment of recurrences consisted in wide excision (32 cases), marginal resection (46 cases), five patients requiring amputation. Final results were R0 (N =33), R1 (N =47) or R2 (N =3) resection. Beside surgery, six patients received neoadjuvant and seven others adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-three patients received postoperative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (mean dose 55 Gy) and 26 interstitial (192)Ir low dose rate brachytherapy (BCT) (mean dose 45 Gy for BCT alone, 22 Gy when associated with EBRT), 19 patients being re-irradiated. RESULTS: Mean follow up was 59 months. Thirty-seven (45%) tumors relapsed, 62% locally as first event. Nineteen patients developed secondary distant metastases. Multivariate analysis showed only tumour depth (P =0.05) and re-resection for primary R1 resection for the recurrence (P =0.018) being independent prognosis factors for tumour control, radiotherapy (EBRT and/or BCT) being significant in univariate analysis (P =0.05). Overall survival rate was 73, 54, and 47% at respectively 3, 5 and 10 years, and was 65, 35 and 32% after a further local recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed trunk (P =0.0001) or inferior extremity locations (P =0.023), symptomatic (P =0.001), high grade (P =0.01), deep (P = 0.01) tumours, and the occurrence of a further local failure (P =0.004) as unfavourable characteristics for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Because of the high relapse rate in this series, a first isolated local recurrence of STS increases mainly the risk of a subsequent local relapse. Quality of local treatment for the first local relapse is decisive. When a conservative treatment is feasible, it should combine surgical resection and radiotherapy, brachytherapy being the best suited in previously irradiated patients. Efforts have to be pursued to increase quality of the treatment of primary tumours, at best performed in centers that have expertise in this field.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Brachytherapy for coronary restenosis: state of art in 2003].

Based on therapeutic approach for benign diseases, vascular brachytherapy decreases smooth vascular muscle cells proliferation and multiplication which lead to the formation of the neo-intima. The radioactive positive action affects arterial recoil due to post angioplasty vessel injury. Randomised studies has shown good angiographic results up to 6 months of follow-up, with 50% in-stent restenosis rate decrease and on the analysed segment as well. Decrease on Mace and TLR show statistically significance. Results don't correlate with emitter and bêta emitters had been introduced in France recently. Vascular brachytherapy is actually indicated for in-stent restenosis, there is no evidence to perform this treatment for de novo lesion. Geographic miss, source centering, late thrombosis and pullback procedure may interfere with treatment quality. IVUS allows best target volume determination to a higher quality level. Internationals guidelines such as Eva-Gec-Estro recommendations could increase treatment safety and enable development of an optimal technique.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2003

[Brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcomas].

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumors with a high risk or local recurrence and a risk of distant metastases. Standard treatment advocated is the combination of conservative resection and external radiotherapy. Brachytherapy is an integrated part of the multidisciplinary treatment. Brachytherapy can increase local control with good functional results. Primary exclusive brachytherapy has been used and is effective and safe in high grade sarcomas (randomized trial of MSKCC). Brachytherapy seems to be important as part of the treatment of central localization (shoulder, groin) and sarcomas with positive resection margins, but its relation with external radiotherapy has to be defined. Brachytherapy used with special guidelines allows to obtain an improved local control with an acceptable level of complication.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed2000

Low-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy combined with external beam irradiation in the conservative treatment of soft tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Conservative treatment of soft tissue sarcomas most often implies combination of surgical resection and irradiation. The aim of this study was to evaluate low-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy, delivered as a boost, in the local control of primary tumors, with special concern about treatment complications. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1986 and 1995, 112 patients underwent intraoperative implant. This report focuses on the group of 58 patients with primary sarcomas treated by combination of conservative surgery, intraoperative brachytherapy, and external irradiation. Most of the tumors were located in the lower limbs (46/58-79%). Median size of the tumor was 10 cm, most of the lesions being T2-T3 (51/58-88%), Grade 2 or 3 (48/58-83%). The mean brachytherapy dose was 20 Gy and external beam irradiation dose 45 Gy. In 36/58 cases, iridium wires had to be placed on contact with neurovascular structures. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 54 months, the 5-year actuarial survival was 64.9%, with a 5-year actuarial local control of 89%. Of the 6 patients with local relapse, 3 were salvaged. Acute side effects, essentially wound healing problems, occurred in 20/58 patients, late side effects in 16/58 patients (7 neuropathies G2 to G4). No amputation was required. The only significant factor correlated with early side effects was the location of the tumor in the lower limb (p = 0.003), and with late side effects the vicinity of the tumor with neurovascular structures (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy allows early delivery of a boost dose in a reduced volume of tissue, precisely mapped by the intraoperative procedure. Combined with external beam irradiation, it is a safe and efficient treatment technique leading to high local control rates and limited functional impairment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

[Cervical adenocarcinomas: diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic aspects in a 49 case-control study].

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to search for potential diagnostic, therapeutic and prognosis differences between a series of 49 adenocarcinomas of the cervix and a matched series of epidermoid carcinomas. METHODS: Forty-nine adenocarcinomas were treated between 1978 and 1992 and retrospectively compared to a series of 98 paired epidermoid carcinomas. RESULTS: The adenocarcinoma incidence is 5.4%. There was no significant difference for age distribution, parity, or hormonal status. There was also no significant difference for clinical features. Stage I appeared more frequently in the adenocarcinoma group (stage I: 69.4%, stage II: 14.3%, stage III: 14.3%, stage IV: 2%). Stage I are also more frequently found in the adenocarcinoma group (69.4% versus 42. 9%, p< 0,05). Combined radio-surgical treatment was proposed more often for the adenocarcinoma group (respectively radio-surgery combination 73%, radiotherapy alone 18%, surgery 9%); in the epidermoid carcinoma group, combined radio-surgical treatment and radiotherapy were the usual treatment (46%); surgery alone appeared in third rank place (8%). Adenocarcinoma pelvic recurrences appeared more frequently (28.6% for adenocarcinoma group versus 13.3% for epidermoid group p< 0.05), while distant recurrence was the same (12. 2% for adenocarcinoma group versus 11.2% for epidermoid group, p< 0. 05). Five years overall survival rate was worse for the adenocarcinoma group (52% versus 63.7%, p< 0.05) but the difference was not significant for the disease free survival rate. Only for stage Ib, there are also more pelvic recurrences (35.4% versus 13.1%, p< 0.05), more distant recurrences (9.6% versus 2.6%, p< 0.05), and lower overall survival for adenocarcinomas (58.7% versus 88.5%, p< 0. 01). CONCLUSION: The incidence of adenocarcinomas is slightly increasing (absolute value in our experience) and the low stages seem to be more frequent in our experience probably by staging inaccuracy. Adenocarcinoma prognosis seems to be worse because of its poor radio-sensitivity. It seems necessary to optimize clinical staging and therapeutic protocols excluding radiotherapeutic approach, including surgical purposes or radio-surgical associations if unfavorable histological features or tumoral enlargement (T> 3 cm) are found.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed1999

Impact of radiotherapy on local control and survival in uterine sarcomas: a retrospective study from the Grup Oncologic Català-Occità.

PURPOSE: In order to provide more information for the clinician and to analyze the impact of radiation therapy on the loco-regional disease-free interval (LRFI), disease-free interval (DFI) and specific overall survival (OS), a multicentric retrospective study of uterine sarcomas has been undertaken using cases reported to the Grup Oncològic Català-Occità (GOCO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred three patients were selected for this study with a median follow-up period of 49 months. Patients were restaged using the FIGO classification for endometrial adenocarcinoma. Radiotherapy was administered postoperatively to the entire pelvis in 52% of cases (54/103) and was combined with brachytherapy in 24 patients. Mean given dose was 48 Gy, with a 95% confidence interval of 45 to 50 Gy. Variables have been tested for homogeneity between hospitals. Univariate and multivariate analyses have also been carried out. RESULTS: Mean age of the selected patients was 59 years (range 35-84). Stages were distributed as follows: 66 patients (64%) in Stage I; 16 in Stage II (15.5%); 12 in Stage III (11.5%); 9 patients in Stage IVa (9%). Pathological distribution was 41.5% leiomyosarcoma, 39% mixed Mullerian tumours, 16.5% stromal sarcomas, and 2.9% of a miscellaneous group. Overall survival for the entire group was 63.7% and 56% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Probability of LRFI reached 59.8% at 2 years and 57.4 at 5 years. The DFI at 2 and 5 years were 52.9 % and 48.7%, respectively. The LRFI probability was 41% and 36% at 2 and 5 years, respectively, without radiotherapy and reached 76% at 2 and 5 years among those patients treated with radiotherapy. There was also an increase in DFI probability because of the effect of radiotherapy, from 35% to 68.5% and from 33% to 53% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. The overall survival probability for patients treated with radiotherapy was 76% and 73% at 2 and 5 years, respectively and 51% at 2 years and 37% at 5 years without radiotherapy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that radiotherapy improved LRFI, DFI, and overall survival. CONCLUSION: We conclude that postoperative radiotherapy in our series of patients diagnosed with uterine sarcoma has an impact on loco-regional and disease-free progression intervals and survival.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Value of imaging in the management of advanced stage ovarian cancer "experience of 72 computed tomographic examinations"].

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: To place computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of advanced stages of ovarian tumors throughout two years experience (1991-1992) of a Cancer Medical Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study of 72 pelvic-abdominal CT examinations of 47 patients in stages III and IV, at the time of the initial diagnosis or during the treatment. The equipment used is a General Electric CE 10,000. The technique was conventional (digestive and intravenous opacification). These examinations were performed by practicing radiologists exclusively in cancerological units. RESULTS: Carried out in immediate post-operative patients incompletely surgically examined, CT allows the quantification of residue and therefore a new staging in two-thirds of the cases. In the process of adjuvant chemotherapy, CT reveals the persistence of residue in 71% of the cases with therapy implications. At the time of follow-up, CT is revealing of abnormalities in 74% of the cases carried out to systematic content, in 60% of the cases with concomitant elevation of CA 125 level. Abnormalities are always present when CT is carried out from clinical symptoms and elevation of CA 125 level (3 cases in 3). Localized recurrence was only described in 7.6% of the cases. CONCLUSION: CT is of relative usefulness for the assessment and surveillance of advanced stages of cancers. It contributes with accordance to the literature clarifying the criteria as "impossibility of resection" and according to our series, it contributes in redefining the stage; it participates, during the process of adjuvant therapy of avoiding the unuseful second-look procedures, without predicting "complete response"; finally it participates during the follow-up to the collection of the localized recurrence only situation susceptible to benefit from an efficient surgical treatment.

CA-125 Antigen↗
PubMed1996

Recurrences of rectal cancers: results of a multimodal approach with intraoperative radiation therapy. French Group of IORT. Intraoperative Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Prognosis of recurrent rectal cancer remains poor, mainly because of the difficulties of achieving a satisfactory local control. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) allows for the delivery of a complementary single dose to the tumor residues or to the tumor bed and could be useful jn a multimodal treatment. In an attempt to evaluate this interest, a retrospective analysis of patients treated with IORT in six French hospitals has been performed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data have been collected in 73 patients (41 men), with a mean age of 62 years, treated with IORT. Initial rectal tumors were large (mean diameter: 45 mm), partially or totally fixed to the contiguous structures in 39%, and with nodal involvement in 50% of the cases. Initial surgery had been a sphincter-sparing surgery in 67%; external radiation therapy had been delivered in 52%, and a chemotherapy had been given in 10% of the patients. Recurrences were isolated (without metastases) in 86%, and were posterior or posterolateral in 55% of the cases. Surgery allowed for a complete macroscopical resection in 57%, a partial resection with gross residual disease in 29%, and no resection in 14% of the recurrences. Intraoperative radiation therapy was delivered in a dose of 10 to 25 Gy (mean 18.5) through localizators of a mean diameter of 75 mm (60 to 110). External radiation therapy, either preoperative or postoperatively was given to 30 patients without prior radiation therapy. Ten patients received additional chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil. RESULTS: Four postoperative deaths occurred. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 16 patients and some complications were probably related to the IORT procedure. Four long-term complications were observed. Overall actuarial survival occurred in 72.4% of the patients at 1 year, in 44.6% at 2 years, and in 30.6% at 3 years. Twenty-one local failures have been observed. Actuarial local control occurred in 71.3% of the patients at 1 year, 47.7% at 2 years, and 31.3% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative radiation therapy is a complementary treatment for recurrences of rectal cancer. It provides encouraging results, particularly in some selected situations, when patients have not previously been treated with external radiation therapy. Further studies of multimodal treatments are necessary.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Intraoperative radiation therapy in recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix: report of the French intraoperative group on 70 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and oncologic results of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for recurrent uterine cervical carcinoma in a cohort of patients treated in seven French institutions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1985 to 1993, 70 patients with pelvic recurrences underwent IORT with/ without external radiation therapy (ERT) and chemotherapy (CT). Treatment modalities for recurrence were IORT alone (40 out of 70), IORT + ERT (30 out of 70), additional chemotherapy (20 out of 70). Gross complete resection (CR) was performed in 30 out of 70 cases, partial resection (PR) in 37 out of 70, and unspecified surgery in 3 out of 70. Sixty-five patients had electron beam IORT and 5, 100 KV photon IORT. Mean IORT cone size, electron beam energy, and dose (calculated at the 90% isodose line) were, respectively, 75 mm (40 to 90), 12 MeV (6 to 20), and 18 Gy (10 to 25) after CR and 80 mm (45 to 100), 15 MeV (7 to 24), and 19 Gy (10 to 30) after PR. RESULTS: Mean follow-up after IORT was 15 months (2 to 69). One, 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 47, 17, and 8%, respectively; median survival was 11 months and local control, 21%. Median survival and local control rates increased after CR (13 months, 27%) vs. PR (10 months, 17%) and when initial treatment consisted of surgery (S) alone (15 months, 25%) vs. radiation therapy (RT +/- S) (10 months, 16%). However, these differences were not statistically significant. No death-related toxicity was observed. Grade 2 or 3 toxicity was observed in 19 out of 70 patients (27%), including 9 not directly IORT-related complications (13%) (three digestive tract fistulas, one rectal stricture, three urinary fistulas, two infections) and 10 directly IORT-related complications (14%) (five neuropathies, four ureteral obstructions, and one rectal stricture). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study demonstrates the feasibility of IORT. The usefulness of IORT still needs to be evaluated in primary treatment of advanced stages of cervical carcinoma.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Interstitial brachytherapy for penile carcinoma: a multicentric survey (259 patients).

Although cancer of the penis is a rare disease, we have collected 506 cases through a multicentric study. In the present study we analyse the results obtained from 259 patients treated by interstitial brachytherapy from 1959 to 1989. Among the 259 patients, 184 males had exclusive brachytherapy (group A) while 75 received a combination of surgery and brachytherapy and/or external beam irradiation (EBI) (group B). Five- and 10-year survival rates are, respectively: overall survival, 66 and 52%; cause-specific survival, 88 and 88%; disease-free survival, 78 and 67%. One hundred and forty-three patients in group A (78%) and 48 (64%) in group B avoided mutilation of the penis while late side effects occurred in 137/259 patients (53%). Survival depends on the volume of the tumor and the presence of involved nodes; systematic groin dissection does not however seem advisable.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Intraoperative interstitial iridium brachytherapy in the management of soft tissue sarcomas: preliminary results of a feasibility phase II study.

Between May 1986 and June 1992, 48 patients with soft tissue sarcomas underwent 50 intraoperative interstitial implants in conjunction with conservative tumoral resections. Brachytherapy was part of the initial treatment in 27 cases and was done in 21 other previously treated patients. For the last ones brachytherapy was, in most of the cases, the only treatment in addition to surgery. The implant dose was 40-65 Gy. When combined with external irradiation the mean prescribed dose was 20 Gy (12-25 Gy). With a median follow-up of 33 months, the 3-year actuarial survival rate was 81% and the local disease-free survival 91.7%. Five local failures were observed only in patients with recurrent sarcomas: two were inside the treated volume and three outside (local failure 5/48 = 10.4%). Acute side-effects occurred in 11 patients (11/48 = 23%), with skin breakdown (two cases) infection and hematoma (one case), infection, lymphocele, secondary skin breakdown and vascular rupture (one case), infection and limited skin breakdown (two cases) and delayed healing (five cases). As a consequence, six patients required reoperation but no amputation was necessary. The functional results were good. Only three patients had a moderate limitation of movement. Late complications occurred in five patients: bone fracture (one case), leg oedemas not interfering with normal activity (three cases), peripheral neuropathy fibrosis related requiring surgery (one case). Therefore, this preliminary report shows that adjuvant intraoperative brachytherapy is feasible and is safe in treating soft tissue sarcomas, even in previously irradiated patients. However, further evaluation is needed to determine the real place of intraoperative implant in the management of soft tissue sarcomas.

Adolescent↗