PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Di Maso

Publications and source records attributed to M Di Maso.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Computer-assisted method development and optimization in high-performance liquid chromatography.

This paper reports the use of DryLab, a computer simulation software package, to assist in the development and optimization of a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for the separation of a model drug candidate and its degradation products. Prior to the optimization process, columns with various bonded phases are evaluated for their chromatographic performance using the sample of interest. Simultaneous optimization of two separation variables and the use of resolution maps to predict the optimal conditions are illustrated. Options to optimize column conditions (column length and flow-rate) to further reduce run time are briefly discussed. The accuracy of DryLab-predicted retention times and resolution is compared with experimental values. The DryLab software used in this study provided satisfactory predictions for the selected model, with average errors of less than 3.5 and 11.8% for retention time and resolution, respectively.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗

Application of pressurized liquid extraction technology to pharmaceutical solid dosage form analysis.

The technique of pressurized liquid extraction has been evaluated for the extraction of active ingredients from pharmaceutical dosage forms using montelukast sodium oral chewable tablets as a model. The extraction method was optimized for the number of extraction cycles, extraction time, extraction solvent composition and temperature. Samples were extracted using two cycles of water for 2 min with a cell temperature of 40 degrees C and a pressure of 1.0 x 10(4) kPa, to disintegrate the tablet, followed by three cycles of methanol for 3 min at 70 degrees C and 1.0 x 10(4) kPa, to solubilize montelukast sodium. The method demonstrated an extraction efficiency of 98.2% of label claim and an RSD of 1.3% (n=10), as compared to 97.6% and an RSD of 0.9% obtained using a validated mechanical extraction method.

Chromatography, Liquid↗