PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M DiRienzo

Publications and source records attributed to M DiRienzo.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Time versus frequency domain techniques for assessing baroreflex sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Newer techniques to evaluate baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) are based on the analysis of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) time series in the time or frequency domain. These novel approaches are steadily gaining popularity, since they do not require injection of vasoactive substances, nor do they rely on a complex experimental set-up. AIM: This review outlines and compares some basic features of the latest methods to assess spontaneous baroreflex function. RESULTS: Modern techniques for the estimation of spontaneous BRS are based on a variety of signal processing schemes and derive information on the baroreflex function from different perspectives. Thus factors such as respiration and other non-stationary agents may have different influences on the estimates provided by each of these approaches. Notwithstanding such individual specificity, however, it has been observed that in several physiological and pathophysiological conditions these techniques often provide comparable information on BRS changes over time, particularly when the estimates are averaged over time windows of a few minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the general agreement in the pattern of BRS among most modern methods, it seems reasonable to employ the most validated of these techniques, for which data obtained in several studies are already available.

Animals↗

Spontaneous variability of regional haemodynamics in unanaesthetized rats.

AIM: To study the spontaneous variability in regional haemodynamics. METHODS: Twenty normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats were chronically instrumented with an arterial catheter and with pulsed Doppler flowmeters on the distal aorta, and the superior mesenteric and left renal arteries. After surgical recovery, the rats were monitored in unrestrained conditions. The recorded signals were analysed beat-to-beat to obtain means and coefficients of variation for mean arterial pressure, heart rate, regional blood flow velocity (consecutive 0.8-s periods) and indices of regional vascular resistance (0.8-s ratio of mean arterial pressure to mean blood flow velocity). RESULTS: Muscle and splanchnic blood flow velocities were markedly variable, with coefficients of variation of 12.8 +/- 0.8 and 12.2 +/- 1.7% (means +/- SEM), respectively, about twice as large as the coefficient of variation for mean arterial pressure (6.2 +/- 0.3%). The renal blood flow velocity was slightly less variable than the muscle and splanchnic blood flow velocities, with a coefficient of variation of 10.4 +/- 0.8%, but still markedly and significantly more variable than systemic arterial pressure. A contingency analysis of paired variations in any two given parameters (arterial blood pressure, heart rate, blood flow velocities and indices of vascular resistance) showed a concordant pattern, the only exception being a distinctly discordant trend for the covariations in muscle and splanchnic blood flow velocities. CONCLUSIONS: Regional blood flow velocity and vascular resistance have a larger degree of spontaneous variability than systemic arterial pressure. Renal blood flow velocity is also highly variable, suggesting that short-term stimuli that affect the renal blood vessels are not countered by autoregulation to any great degree. We conclude that while central factors may drive concordant regional haemodynamic variations, some opposing changes in regional blood flow velocity may cancel each other out, thereby reducing the variability in systemic blood pressure.

Animals↗