Biomedical subjects

M Dowsett

Publications and source records attributed to M Dowsett.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

New hurdles for translational research.

New guidelines for the collection and use of human tissues for research will impose new requirements on researchers to seek ethical approval and patient consent. This extends to the use of surplus tissue, such as breast cancer excision biopsies, which, until recently, have been regarded as having been 'abandoned' by the patient. This article argues that some of these new constraints provide hurdles to translational research that are unnecessary for patient protection. This is particularly significant when emerging technologies are expected to elicit major advances in clinical cancer research.

Biomarkers↗

PubMed2000

Effects of the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole on serum oestrogens in Japanese and Caucasian women.

PURPOSE: Substantial differences in plasma oestrogen disposition have been reported between Japanese and Caucasian women, but there are currently few data available on the relative endocrinological effects of aromatase inhibitors in these two groups. Hence, the effects of the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor anastrozole on serum oestrogen concentrations were compared in 24 healthy postmenopausal Japanese women and 24 healthy postmenopausal Caucasian women. METHODS: Anastrozole, 1 mg/day, was given once daily for 16 days. Serum oestradiol and oestrone sulphate levels were measured on three consecutive days beginning 2 days before the first dose, and on a further three consecutive days beginning on the penultimate day of dosing. Trough concentrations of anastrozole (measured 24 h after dosing) were also determined during the same periods. RESULTS: There were no substantial differences in plasma oestrogen concentrations between the Japanese and Caucasian women at baseline. On average, anastrozole suppressed serum oestradiol and oestrone sulphate levels by approximately 87% and 93%, respectively, for both Japanese and Caucasian women, and minimum plasma anastrozole concentrations at steady-state (anastrozole C(min)) were also similar in both groups. Statistical analysis of serum oestradiol and serum oestrone sulphate levels, and plasma anastrozole C(min) showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the Japanese and Caucasian women. CONCLUSION: Neither the pharmacodynamic effects of anastrozole on serum oestrogens nor the pharmacokinetics of anastrozole differ between postmenopausal Japanese and Caucasian women. Hence, these findings suggest that the therapeutic benefits of anastrozole in Caucasians will be predictive of the drug's effect in Japanese women and support the use of anastrozole in postmenopausal Japanese women with breast cancer.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Use of risk determinants for different breast cancer prevention strategies.

Almost all of the factors which are known to be associated with a high risk of breast cancer, other than high genetic risk, are associated with increased exposure to oestrogens. Thus, therapeutic manoeuvres targeted at oestrogen deprivation which have shown value in established breast cancers are attractive candidates for breast cancer prevention strategies. It is possible that such agents may reduce the incidence of ER-negative as well as ER-positive tumours. The potential use of these different drugs is restricted by menopausal status, e.g. aromatase inhibitors only after the menopause, and Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists prior to the menopause. There is a complex interplay between the anticipated benefit which may be derived from a respective agent and the side-effects associated with it. This article seeks to integrate the information from several sources and concludes that the prophylactic strategies should differ according to different risk profiles.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

PubMed2000

Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: why, when and how?

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is overexpressed, usually as a result of HER2 proto-oncogene amplification, in 20-30% of breast cancers. A HER2-positive status is generally associated with more aggressive disease and a worse prognosis. Furthermore, a positive HER2 status may predict the likelihood of resistance to some conventional therapies, as well as probably being predictive of sensitivity to anthracycline dose intensification. In addition to this prognostic/predictive value, HER2 is a target for specific therapy, with anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody therapy available in the USA. This article reviews the different assays used to determine HER2 status, discussing their relative advantages/disadvantages and the need for their standardisation before integration alongside other pathological indices into the clinical management of breast cancer.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed2000

Prognostic relevance of cerbB2 expression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients in a randomised trial of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy.

Recent advances in the detection and treatment of breast cancer have led to an intensive search for new markers of both prognosis and chemoresponsiveness. The oncogene cerbB2 has proved to be one of the most promising markers currently under study, both as a predictor of chemoresponsiveness and as a marker of poor prognosis. In addition the increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has led to the loss of standard prognostic criteria. In order to study the potential role of cerbB2 expression as an indicator of chemoendocrine resistance and poor prognosis, both before and after chemotherapy, we obtained tumour sections from 283 women enrolled onto a neoadjuvant trial. In this trial patients were randomised to receive either primary surgery followed by adjuvant chemoendocrine treatment or neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy followed by surgery. CerbB2 status was determined immunohistochemically on all of these patients. Thirty-eight percent of the tumours were cerbB2 positive. There was no significant difference in expression between the adjuvant (41%) and neoadjuvant arms (35%). CerbB2 positive patients were much more likely to have shown non-response to chemoendocrine therapy (p < 0.001) and had a worse DES (p < 0.05). The best prognosis was seen in cerbB2 negative patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy who showed a significantly better DFS (p < 0.05), than the cerbB2 negative patients receiving adjuvant therapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Recommendations for HER2 testing in the UK.

Determining the HER2 status of breast carcinomas is a prerequisite for the use of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin), which has recently been licensed for the treatment of metastatic disease. This necessitates a test based on archival material. The preferred analyses are immunohistochemistry with fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) as a follow up test for ambiguous results. Guidelines have been developed for standardised, well controlled procedures for the provision of reliable results. A group of three reference laboratories has been established to provide advice, quality assurance, and materials, where needed.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed2000

Prediction of clinical outcome from primary tamoxifen by expression of biologic markers in breast cancer patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate pretreatment clinical features and biological markers together with changes in these factors as predictors of response and relapse in patients receiving tamoxifen for primary breast cancer. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the primary breast cancer was performed before tamoxifen treatment in 54 patients and repeated after therapy on day 14, day 60, or on both days in a subset of 35 patients. These samples were evaluated for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki67, S-phase fraction and ploidy. The overall response to tamoxifen was 57% (31 of 54 patients). Pretreatment ER and PgR significantly predicted for response by univariate analysis (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.003, respectively). By multivariate analysis, ER expression was the only independent predictor of response, and it was associated with 27 times the likelihood of response (95% confidence interval, 6-136). Increase in PgR and decrease in Ki67 on day 14 significantly predicted for response to tamoxifen (P < 0.03 and P < 0.04, respectively). Lack of ER, clinical node-positive disease, and failure to decrease Ki67 on day 14 were significantly associated with increased risk of relapse (P < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, ER expression was the only independent predictor of relapse (P < 0.005). Pretreatment and early changes in molecular marker expression may assist in the prediction of response and clinical outcome in primary breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Antiproliferative effects of idoxifene in a placebo-controlled trial in primary human breast cancer.

Idoxifene is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator. It has reduced agonist activity on breast and uterine cells compared with tamoxifen and antiproliferative effects in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. Previous studies have shown that a short course of treatment with other antiestrogens prior to surgery caused a significant reduction of the growth fraction when measured by immunohistological staining using the mouse monoclonal antibody Ki67. In this study, we assessed the effect of idoxifene on biological markers of cell proliferation (Ki67) and apoptosis (TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling), and estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) expression was also evaluated. Core-cut biopsies were obtained in 77 postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer at diagnosis. Patients were randomized to 40 mg/day idoxifene or placebo for 14-21 days prior to obtaining a second biopsy sample at surgical resection. The percentage of Ki67-positive cells fell from a mean 19.7 +/- 2.7% (SE) to 13.4 +/- 3.4% in idoxifene-treated ER-positive tumors (n = 30; P = 0.0043), but there was no significant effect in placebo-treated ER-positive tumors (n = 27). No effect was seen on ER-negative tumors in either group. Idoxifene had no significant effect on apoptotic index but produced a statistically significant fall in idoxifene-treated ER immunohistochemical score and a small increase in PR that did not reach statistical significance (0.05 < P < 0.10). Idoxifene was well tolerated in all patients. Idoxifene has an antiproliferative effect in ER-positive but not ER-negative breast cancers, and no significant effect on apoptosis in the short-term.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Idoxifene antagonizes estradiol-dependent MCF-7 breast cancer xenograft growth through sustained induction of apoptosis.

Idoxifene is a novel selective estrogen (E2) receptor (ER) modulator that is currently in clinical development for the treatment of breast cancer. Compared to tamoxifen, idoxifene is metabolically more stable, with a higher relative binding affinity for the ER and reduced agonist activity on breast and uterine cells. Idoxifene also inhibits calmodulin, a calcium-binding protein that is involved in cell signal transduction pathways. In this study, the abilities of idoxifene and tamoxifen to antagonize E2-dependent MCF-7 xenograft growth in oophorectomized athymic mice were compared. The basis for idoxifene's antitumor activity was examined by comparing the effectiveness of the clinically used transisomer (referred to here as idoxifene) with its cis-isomer, which has a 50-fold lower relative binding affinity for ER than idoxifene but similar calmodulin-inhibitory activity. Changes in tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, and ER-dependent protein expression were studied. Both idoxifene and tamoxifen significantly inhibited E2-dependent tumor growth, whereas cis-idoxifene had little effect. Withdrawal of E2 support induced significant tumor regression due to impaired cell proliferation (Ki-67 score, 9 versus 51% compared to E2 controls) and induction of apoptosis (3.6 versus 0.9% compared to E2 controls). Both anti-E2s inhibited cell proliferation and caused a significant 3-fold induction of apoptosis in E2 supported tumors after 1 week, which was maintained for 3 months with idoxifene (3.1 versus 0.48% compared to E2 controls) but decreased back to baseline in tumors treated with tamoxifen (0.69%). In contrast, cis-idoxifene had no effect on either cell proliferation or apoptosis. Both tamoxifen and idoxifene initially induced ER expression, whereas prolonged therapy with tamoxifen significantly reduced progesterone receptor levels. In conclusion, idoxifene resulted in similar inhibition of E2-dependent MCF-7 xenograft growth compared with tamoxifen, an effect that is mediated via ER rather than through calmodulin. Sustained induction of apoptosis may contribute to prolonged antagonism of E2-dependent growth, and it occurred to a greater extent following 3 months of idoxifene, compared to tamoxifen.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1999

Reduction in angiogenesis after neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in patients with operable breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The intensity of angiogenesis, as measured by microvessel density, is a strong independent predictor of survival in breast carcinoma patients. The impact of chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy on this process is unknown. METHODS: Histologic samples from patients randomized to a trial of neoadjuvant (NEO) versus adjuvant (ADJ) chemoendocrine therapy for operable breast carcinoma were obtained. Samples from 195 patients (90 NEO samples and 105 ADJ samples) were analyzed. Immunostaining was performed with the CD34 monoclonal antibody and the scoring of microvessels was performed using the Chalkley method. RESULTS: The median score of the NEO patients was 5.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3-6.0) and the median score of the ADJ patients was 6.3 (95% CI, 6-6.7) (P=0.025). Using previously validated scoring categories, there were fewer samples with a poor prognosis (score > or =7) in the NEO group (26%) compared with the ADJ group (32%) (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that NEO chemoendocrine therapy causes a reduction in microvessel density in primary breast carcinomas, which could be secondary to tumor regression or due to a direct effect on angiogenesis.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Time-related effects of estrogen withdrawal on proliferation- and cell death-related events in MCF-7 xenografts.

Endocrine treatments for human breast cancer have been based largely upon the removal of estrogenic stimuli. The regression of tumors after estrogen deprivation has generally been characterized as being due to reduced proliferation but more recently has been recognized to also involve increased apoptosis. The aim of our experiments was to define the associated changes in certain proliferation- and cell death-related biological parameters after hormone withdrawal from estrogen-dependent MCF-7 xenografts in athymic nude mice using immunohistochemical techniques. The baseline estrogen receptor (ER) level of this MCF-7 xenograft was relatively low (average H score 23) but it was strongly Bcl-2-, PgR- and pS2-positive, indicating the functional integrity of estrogen signaling. Changes in proliferation (Ki-67), apoptosis, ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), cyclin D1, p27kip1, Bcl-2 and Bax expression were assessed during the 2 weeks after estrogen deprivation. ER levels rose markedly after estrogen ablation, whereas PgR levels fell to about 10% of baseline and pS2 levels halved. The proportion of Ki-67-positive cells was unchanged after 24 hr but by day 14 had reduced by about 80%. The normal levels of cyclin D1 also reduced after estrogen withdrawal in contrast to the rapid increase in levels of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1. This latter increase appeared to occur in advance of the changes in Ki-67. The proportion of apoptotic cells increased from a mean 1.5% at baseline to 2.9% after 3 days and 4.7% after 14 days. There were reductions in both Bcl-2 and Bax staining but these appeared to be greater for Bcl-2, effectively decreasing the Bcl-2/Bax ratio. Our results provide a framework for the use of these parameters as intermediate markers in comparisons of hormonal agents for human breast cancer treatment.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Double-blind, randomised, multicentre endocrine trial comparing two letrozole doses, in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

Letrozole is an orally competitive aromatase inhibitor. This double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial was carried out to evaluate the endocrine effects of two doses of letrozole, 0.5 mg versus 2.5 mg orally daily, in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients progressing after tamoxifen. The pharmacokinetics of letrozole was also assessed. 46 patients entered the trial, 22 on letrozole 0.5 mg and 24 on 2.5 mg. A significant suppression of oestrone and oestradiol levels was achieved by both letrozole doses. Neither letrozole dose induced any changes in cortisol and aldosterone production at rest or after Synacthen stimulation. Androstenedione, testosterone, 17 alpha-OH progesterone, triiodothyronine (T3) thyroxine, (T4) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) plasma levels did not show any significant changes. Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinising hormone (LH) levels increased significantly over time. Plasma letrozole concentrations increased until reaching steady-state values after 1 month at the dose of 0.5 mg and after 2 months at 2.5 mg. In conclusion, both letrozole doses suppressed oestrogen levels without affecting adrenal activity.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Quantitative changes in cytological molecular markers during primary medical treatment of breast cancer: a pilot study.

AIM: To quantify the changes in biological molecular markers during primary medical treatment in patients with operable breast cancer and to assess their possible relationship with response to treatment. METHODS: The treatment group consisted of 31 patients with operable breast carcinomas, median age 57 years (range 41-67), treated with four 3-weekly cycles of chemotherapy with Mitoxantrone, methotrexate (+/- mitomycin C), and tamoxifen before surgery. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) was used to obtain samples from patients prior to and at 10 or 21 days post-treatment. The following molecular markers were assessed: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), p53, Bcl-2, and Ki67 measured by immunocytochemistry, and ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) by flow cytometry. To evaluate the reproducibility of the technique, repeat FNA was performed in a separate non-treatment control group of 20 patients and the same molecular markers assessed, two weeks after the first sample with no intervening treatment. RESULTS: The non-treatment control group showed a high reproducibility for the measurement of molecular markers from repeat FNA. In the treatment group there was a non-significant reduction in SPF and a significant reduction (p = 0.005) in Ki67. Patients who responded to neoadjuvant therapy were more likely to have a reduction in these two markers than those who failed to respond. Similarly, a reduction in ER scores was observed between the first and second samples (p = 0.04). For PgR, the change between the first and second samples was not significant although there was a significant difference between responders and non-responders (p = 0.03). All nine patients with an increase in PgR were responders. No significant changes in p53 or Bcl-2 were observed during treatment. CONCLUSION: Molecular markers can be adequately measured from FNA samples prior to and during neoadjuvant therapy. Changes in cellular proliferation and hormone receptors have been shown that may be related to tumour response. These relationships should be assessed in a larger cohort of patients.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Vorozole results in greater oestrogen suppression than formestane in postmenopausal women and when added to goserelin in premenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

The high potency and selectivity of new aromatase inhibitors has translated to greater efficacy and improved tolerability in comparison with established second-line hormonal agents for advanced breast cancer in phase III clinical trials. Two pharmacological studies are reported which assess the use of one of these inhibitors, vorozole, in combination or comparison with well-established methods of oestrogen deprivation in pre and postmenopausal patients. When combined with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) goserelin in 10 premenopausal patients, vorozole markedly enhanced the suppression of serum levels of oestrone, oestradiol and, oestrone sulphate beyond that achieved by goserelin alone (by a mean 74%, 83%, and 89%, respectively). The combination was well-tolerated and had no significant effects on androgen levels. Vorozole was compared with formestane in 13 postmenopausal women and serum oestrone, oestradiol, and oestrone sulphate levels were suppressed by 47%, 30%, and 70%, respectively, more by vorozole than by the steroidal aromatase inhibitor. Again the tolerability was excellent. The plasma oestrogen levels in the postmenopausal patients on vorozole were lower than in the premenopausal patients on goserelin plus vorozole, indicating that ovarian oestrogen synthesis may be relatively resistant to aromatase inhibition, even during GnRHa treatment. Thus, in both pre and postmenopausal patients substantially greater suppression of oestrogen can be achieved by vorozole compared with alternative approaches. Existing clinical-pharmacological correlates suggest that these increases in pharmacological effectiveness may result in enhanced clinical effectiveness.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

A randomized, open, parallel-group trial to compare the endocrine effects of oral anastrozole (Arimidex) with intramuscular formestane in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study provides a direct randomized comparison of a new-generation, non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole (Arimidex), with a steroidal aromatase inhibitor (formestane) with respect to oestrogen (oestradiol, oestrone, and oestrone sulphate) suppression and tolerability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer were randomized to receive either anastrozole 1 mg once daily orally (n = 29), or formestane 250 mg once every two weeks by intramuscular injection (n = 31). Treatment was continued until progression of disease or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoints of this study were oestradiol suppression and tolerability. The secondary endpoints included oestrone and oestrone sulphate suppression. All laboratory analyses were conducted 'blind' of the randomized drug treatment. RESULTS: Anastrozole produced a greater and more consistent suppression of oestradiol levels compared with formestane. Based on two- and four-week measurements, the mean fall from baseline (pre-dose) in oestradiol level was 79% and 58% in the anastrozole and formestane groups, respectively (P = 0.0001). After four weeks of treatment, oestrone and oestrone sulphate levels were also suppressed to a greater extent by anastrozole compared with formestane (oestrone: 85% versus 67%, respectively, P = 0.0043; oestrone sulphate: 92% versus 67%, respectively, P = 0.0007). No statistical differences were seen between the two drugs in the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Anastrozole provides a more consistent and significantly more effective suppression of oestradiol compared with formestane. Similar results were observed for oestrone and oestrone sulphate. The clinical significance of these differences in total oestrogen suppression remains to be established.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1999

The effect of anastrozole on the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen in post-menopausal women with early breast cancer.

Thirty-four post-menopausal women with early breast cancer who had received 20 mg tamoxifen once daily as adjuvant therapy for at least 10 weeks participated in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre trial. The primary aim of the trial was to determine the effect of anastrozole upon tamoxifen pharmacokinetics, with secondary aims of assessing the tolerability of the two drugs in combination and whether or not tamoxifen had any effect upon the oestradiol suppression seen with anastrozole. Patients were randomized to receive either 1 mg anastrozole (16 patients) or matching placebo (18 patients) once daily on a double-blind basis for 28 days. No significant difference (P = 0.919) was observed in serum tamoxifen concentrations between the anastrozole and placebo groups during the trial. The serum concentration of oestradiol was significantly suppressed (P < 0.0001) in patients co-administered anastrozole compared with placebo in the presence of tamoxifen, confirming that anastrozole remained an effective suppressant of oestradiol in the presence of tamoxifen. The combination of tamoxifen and anastrozole was well tolerated, with very little difference in side-effects reported between anastrozole and placebo. In conclusion, the results of this study confirm that anastrozole does not affect the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen when the two drugs are given in combination to post-menopausal women with early breast cancer. In addition, the oestradiol suppressant effects of anastrozole appear unaffected by tamoxifen.

Anastrozole↗

PubMed1999

Biologic markers as predictors of clinical outcome from systemic therapy for primary operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether pretreatment clinical features and molecular markers, together with changes in these factors, can predict treatment response and survival in patients with primary operable breast cancer who receive neoadjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mitoxantrone, methotrexate (with or without mitomycin), and tamoxifen chemoendocrine therapy was administered to 158 patients before surgery. Clinical response was assessed after four cycles of treatment. Fine-needle aspiration cytology for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), c-erbB-2, p53, bcl-2, Ki67, S-phase fraction (SPF), and ploidy were performed pretreatment and repeated on day 10 or day 21 after the first cycle of treatment. RESULTS: Good clinical response (GCR, defined as complete response or minimal residual disease) was achieved in 31% of patients (49 of 158). Tumor size, nodal disease, response, ER, PgR, c-erbB-2, p53, bcl-2, Ki67, SPF, and ploidy were analyzed as predictors of survival. By univariate analysis, node-positive disease (P =.05), lack of ER (P <.05) and PgR (P <.05), and failure to attain GCR (P =.008) were associated with a significantly increased risk of relapse. A significantly increased risk of death was associated with node-positive disease (P =.02), lack of ER expression (P =.04), and failure to attain GCR. By multivariate analysis, GCR was an independent predictor for survival (P =.05). ER expression (P =.03), absence of c-erbB-2 (P =.03), and a decrease in Ki67 on day 10 or day 21 of the first cycle (P <.05) significantly predicted for subsequent GCR. CONCLUSION: Molecular markers may be used to predict the likelihood of achieving GCR, which seems to be a valid surrogate marker for survival.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Clinical studies of apoptosis and proliferation in breast cancer.

The interaction between cell death and cell proliferation determines the growth dynamics of all tissues. Studies are described here which relate the changes in proliferation and apoptosis that occur in human breast cancer during medical therapeutic manoeuvres. Xenograft studies strongly support the involvement of increased apoptosis as well as decreased proliferation after oestrogen withdrawal, and limited studies in clinical samples confirm the involvement of both processes. Cytotoxic chemotherapy induces increases in apoptosis within 24 h of starting treatment. However, after 3 months therapy the residual cell population shows apoptotic and proliferation indices much below pretreatment levels. Further molecular studies of this "dormant" population are important to characterise the mechanism of their resistance to drug therapy. The early changes in proliferation and apoptosis may provide useful intermediate response indices.

Adenocarcinoma↗