PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Ducreux

Publications and source records attributed to M Ducreux.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Functional results and quality of life for patients with very low rectal cancer undergoing coloanal anastomosis or perineal colostomy with colonic muscular graft.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare functional results and quality of life (QoL) of two salvage techniques: coloanal anastomosis (CAA) or perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for very low rectal cancer. METHODS: Between 1991 and 2001, 50 patients were operated for a very low rectal adenocarcinoma and analyzed after a follow-up greater than one year and because there was no relapse or no treatment, they were included in the analysis. Thirty-eight patients had a CAA, including: straight anastomosis (n=23), J pouch (n=10), coloplasty (n=2) and intersphincteric resection (n=3). Twelve patients underwent a PC. RESULTS: Vaizey's incontinence score was equivalent for the two groups: CAA 12 (0-22) versus PC 11 (8-13). The only differences were more frequent fractioned stools for the CAA group and increased pad soiling for the PC group. Overall QoL scores (QLQ C-30) were equivalent for CAA and PC. CONCLUSIONS: For very low rectal tumors, the choice of surgical technique must be based on oncologic rather than future functional or QoL criteria, because both approaches seem to provide similar results.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Randomised trial comparing three different schedules of infusional 5FU and raltitrexed alone as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Final results of the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 trial.

LV5FU2 with high-dose leucovorin (LV), weekly infusional 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (AIO schedule) and raltitrexed have been demonstrated to be active agents in first-line treatment of colorectal cancer. We performed a 4-arm randomised trial to compare (1) a low-dose intravenous bolus of LV (20 mg/m2), followed by an intravenous bolus of 5FU (400 mg/m2), followed by a 22-hour continuous infusion of 5FU (600 mg/m2) on day 1 and day 2/2 weeks (ldLV5FU2 arm), (2) a weekly continuous infusion of high-dose 5FU (2.6 g/m2/week) for 6 weeks followed by a rest week (HD-FU arm) and (3) raltitrexed (Tomudex arm; 3 mg/m2/3 weeks) to standard LV5FU2. From 1997 to 2001, 294 patients were included. The 4 arms were well balanced for sex ratio, age, WHO performance status, the primary tumour site and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment was stopped due to low accrual. Two toxicity-related deaths were observed in the Tomudex arm. The treatments gave rise to different rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (3, 4, 11 and 14% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively, p = 0.028), leucopenia and vomiting. At least one episode of grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in 27, 25, 38 and 47% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively (p = 0.016). An objective response was observed in 28, 21, 22 and 10% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively (p = 0.04). Progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients in the Tomudex arm was statistically lower compared to that of patients treated with LV5FU2 or ldLV5FU2 (combined group; p = 0.013, log rank test). In conclusion, Tomudex is more toxic and yields shorter PFS than infusional 5FU. Despite the early closure of the study and the lack of power of the comparison, it seems that ldLV5FU2 could be considered as an active, easier and less expensive option for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer compared to classic LV5FU2 or weekly HD-FU.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Treatment of synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

AIM: To report our experience of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) discovered during abdominal exploration in patients with liver metastases (LM). METHODS: Liver resection plus cytoreductive surgery were combined in 24 patients with LM and moderate PC from colorectal origin treated with a curative intent between January 1993 and November 2003. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 357+/-112 min and median blood loss was 719 ml. One postoperative death occurred and postoperative morbidity was 58%. The mean hospital stay was 21.4+/-4.2 days. Three-year overall and disease-free survival rates were respectively 41.5% (confidence interval [CI]: 23-63) and 23.6% (CI: 11-45). Seven patients are disease-free with a mean follow-up of 27.8 months after their last surgery, 3 having a repeated hepatectomy. Three patients developed a peritoneal recurrence and 13 had recurrence in the liver. The only significant prognostic factor was a number of LMs of less than 3 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A combined treatment of LM plus PC is feasible and is beneficial in selected patients presenting three or fewer metastases.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin compared with surgery alone for gastric cancer: 7-year results of the FFCD randomized phase III trial (8801).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for gastric cancer in a randomized controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After curative resection, stage II-III-IVM0 gastric cancer patients were randomly assigned to postoperative chemotherapy or surgery alone. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m(2) daily (5-day continuous infusion) was initiated before day 14 after resection. One month later, four 5-day cycles of 5-FU (1 g/m(2) per day) plus cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) on day 2) were administered every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The study was closed prematurely after enrollment of 260 patients (79.7% N+), owing to poor accrual. At 97.8 months median follow-up, 5- and 7-year overall survival were 41.9% and 34.9% in the control group versus 46.6% and 44.6% in the chemotherapy group (P=0.22). Cox model hazard ratios were 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.02; P=0.063] for death and 0.70 (95% CI 0.51-0.97; P=0.032) for recurrence. An invaded/removed lymph nodes ratio >0.3 was the main independent poor prognostic factor identified by multivariate analysis (P=0.0001). Because of toxicity, only 48.8% of patients received more than 80% of the planned dose. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant survival benefit with this toxic cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy, but a risk reduction in recurrence was observed.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial.

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine (Gem) is the standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Given the promising phase II results obtained with the Gem-oxaliplatin (GemOx) combination, we conducted a phase III study comparing GemOx with Gem alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were stratified according to center, performance status, and type of disease (locally advanced v metastatic) and randomly assigned to either GemOx (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a 100-minute infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks) or Gem (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a weekly 30-minute infusion). RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled; 313 were eligible, and 157 and 156 were allocated to the GemOx and Gem arms, respectively. GemOx was superior to Gem in terms of response rate (26.8% v 17.3%, respectively; P = .04), progression-free survival (5.8 v 3.7 months, respectively; P = .04), and clinical benefit (38.2% v 26.9%, respectively; P = .03). Median overall survival (OS) for GemOx and Gem was 9.0 and 7.1 months, respectively (P = .13). GemOx was well tolerated overall, although a higher incidence of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 toxicity per patient was observed for platelets (14.0% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), vomiting (8.9% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), and neurosensory symptoms (19.1% for GemOx v 0% for Gem). CONCLUSION: These results confirm the efficacy and safety of GemOx, but this study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in terms of OS compared with Gem. Because GemOx is the first combined treatment to be superior to Gem alone in terms of clinical benefit, this promising regimen deserves further development.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

A randomised phase II trial of weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil with and without folinic acid and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: results of the 40955 EORTC trial.

UNLABELLED: Previous small phase II trials have demonstrated that the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin(CDDP) could have clinical activity in metastatic biliary tract cancer. This randomised phase II trial was designed to assess the activity and safety of a high-dose infusional weekly 5FU alone (HDFU) and the combination of 5FU, folinic acid (FA) and CDDP. Patients were included if they had histologically proven locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract carcinoma, World Health Organisation (WHO) performance status < or = 2, bilirubin <2 x upper normal limit, adequate haematological and renal functions and had not received prior chemotherapy, even in the adjuvant setting. TREATMENTS: Arm A (HDFU) consisted of cycles of 5FU 3 g/m(2) intravenously (i.v.), 24 h infusion, weekly, for 6 weeks, followed by 1 week rest, every 7 weeks; Arm B (5FU+FA+CDDP) consisted of cycles of 5FU 2.0 g/m(2) i.v. with folinic acid 500 mg/m(2), 2 h-infusion, weekly, for 6 weeks, followed by 1 week rest plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), once every two weeks, for 6 weeks, followed by 1 week rest, every 7 weeks. From February 1997 to June 1999, 58 patients were randomised (29 in each arm). Patients had a median age of 58 years in Arm A and 62 years in Arm B, locally advanced disease was present in 21% of the patients in Arm A and 11% in Arm B. WHO performance status of 0/1/2 was noted in 48%/45%/7% of the patients in Arm A and 54%/43%/4% in Arm B. In both arms, the most common metastatic sites were the liver and peritoneum. Twenty-eight patients were eligible in each arm and one patient did not start the allocated therapy in Arm B. The median number of cycles was 2 [range 1-12] in Arm A and 2 [range 1-6] in Arm B. Responses for the eligible patients who started their allocated therapy were as follows: Complete Response (CR) 0% in Arm A, 4% in Arm B, Partial Response (PR) 7% in Arm A, 15% in Arm B resulting in an overall response rate [95% CI] of 7.1% in Arm A [0.9-23.5%] and 19% [6.3-38.1%] in Arm B. Disease stabilisation was observed in 46% in Arm A and 44% in Arm B. National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) grade 3-4 adverse events (% of patients in Arm A/Arm B) were neutropenia 4%/26%, thrombopenia 0%/7%, stomatitis 0%/4%, vomiting 7%/14%, diarrhoea 0%/11% and neurotoxicity 4%/0%. There was one early toxic death in Arm B. The median overall survival (OS) [95% CI] was in Arm A/Arm B: 5.0 [4.0-7.4] months/8.0 [5.8-11.8] months and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 [1.7-4.7] months/3.3 [2.3-6.7] months. Cisplatin in combination with 5FU+FA showed a higher activity than HDFU, but was more toxic. These results are not sufficient to start a phase III trial. However, our group is planning a phase III trial comparing 5FU+folinic acid versus the same schedule+oxaliplatin a platinum analogue.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2004

The doxorubicin-streptozotocin combination for the treatment of advanced well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine carcinoma; a judicious option?

Due to their rarity, only few trials have studied the role of the doxorubicin-streptozotocin (DS) combination in advanced well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine carcinomas (AWDPEC). However, the published results are inconsistent. We reviewed all AWDPEC (5-year period, 45 patients) treated in our institution with the DS combination for: objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, overall survival (OS) and toxicity. An ORR of 36% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 22-49) was obtained, with 16 partial responses (PR). The mean duration of PR was of 19.7 months. Two and 3-year OS rates were 50.2 and 24.4%, respectively. Toxicities were mainly digestive (grade > or =3 vomiting, 13%) and haematological (grade > or =3 neutropenia, 24%). Previous systemic chemotherapy and malignant hepatomegaly were associated with a poorer ORR (P=0.033, P=0.016) and OS (P=0.008, P=0.045). Multivariate analysis demonstrated previous chemotherapy as the only independent predictive-factor for survival (P=0.013). In conclusion, our data confirm the sensitivity of AWDPEC to the DS combination, with an ORR of 36% and a remarkable median response duration of 19.7 months, and suggests that it could be considered as a valid option in first-line therapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2004

Prognostic factors after surgery of primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

AIMS: To analyse the prognostic factors of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) after a complete resection of the primary tumour. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients who underwent a complete initial resection of a GIST were studied. Peritumoral resections (PTR) were compared to segmental organ resections (SOR). Overall survival (OS) and the disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Primary sites were: stomach (25), small intestine (22), rectum (7), duodenum (5). Two patients had nodal involvement. The median follow-up was 45 months. Local DFS was significantly better after SOR compared to PTR (median 63 vs. 11 months, respectively, p<0.001). Univariate analysis for OS identified the grade (p=0.005) and size (p=0.02) as prognostic factors. Only a high histologic grade was an independent factor (p=0.02) in the multivariate analysis. Out of 49 patients who relapsed, the first recurrence was local only in 12, local and distant in 10 and distant only in 27; only one had a lymph node failure. Recurrences were accessible to curative surgery in 22 cases. OS of patients submitted to complete resection of their recurrence was significantly better than patients whose recurrence could not be resected (median 52 vs. 12 months, respectively, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Complete surgery without rupture remains the mainstay of treatment in patients with localized, resectable disease. A peri-tumoral resection confers a high risk of local recurrence and should be avoided. Lymphadenectomy is not systematic. Grade is the main prognostic factor for OS and can be a decision marker for adjuvant treatment with Gleevec.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Randomized phase II study evaluating oxaliplatin alone, oxaliplatin combined with infusional 5-FU, and infusional 5-FU alone in advanced pancreatic carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: A randomized phase II, open-label multicenter study evaluating oxaliplatin alone (OXA), infusional 5-fluorouracil alone (5-FU) and an oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU combination (OXFU) in untreated, advanced pancreatic carcinoma (APC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced or metastatic, histologically/cytologically proven pancreatic carcinoma with measurable disease, received OXA [130 mg/m2, 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion] alone, OXA combined with 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day, continuous i.v., days 1-4), or 5-FU alone, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (42 males/21 females) were treated: 17 patients/52 cycles OXA, 31 patients/ 175 cycles OXFU, 15 patients/41 cycles 5-FU, with a median of three, six and two cycles/patient, respectively. Patient characteristics were similar in all arms. Median age was 57 years (range 21-75), and 83% of patients had PS 0-1. Most patients (62%) had moderate to well-differentiated tumors, 90% had metastatic disease, 81% with liver metastases. All responses (three partial responses; WHO) occurred in the OXFU arm (10% response rate). Five of 32 patients evaluable for clinical benefit were responders (OXA, 14%; OXFU, 21%). Median time to progression and overall survival were higher in the combination arm (4.2 and 9.0 months, respectively) than either single-agent arm (OXA, 2.0 and 3.4 months; 5-FU, 1.5 and 2.4 months, respectively). Moderate hematotoxicity without morbidity was seen in all arms. Two OXFU patients had grade 3 oxaliplatin neurosensory toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: With a 10% response rate, median overall survival of 9 months and an encouraging safety profile, the OXFU combination is effective, appears superior to infusional 5-FU and warrants further studies in APC patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Combination of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil bolus and infusion, and cisplatin (LV5FU2-P regimen) in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy with continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin in a monthly regimen is one of the standard treatments for advanced gastric carcinoma. This study evaluated the new LV5FU2-P regimen, designed to improve efficacy and tolerance of the 5-FU plus cisplatin combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal junction or gastric carcinoma were prospectively included in the study. They were treated every 14 days with cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2 plus folinic acid 200 mg/m(2)/day as a 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 and 2, plus bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day on days 1 and 2, plus continuous 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/day as a 22-h i.v. infusion on days 1 and 2. Ten patients received a simplified regimen (folinic acid 40 mg/m(2) day 1 + bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) day 1 + continuous 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 with cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2). RESULTS: All the patients were assessable for response and 42 for toxicity. One patient achieved a complete response and 15 a partial response, for an overall response rate of 37.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.1% to 52.3%]. The median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% CI 5.4-10.9) and the overall survival was 13.3 months (95% CI 10.1-16.4). There were no treatment-related deaths. Hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities were the most common severe toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: LV5FU2-P is an active and well tolerated regimen in the treatment of advanced gastroesophageal junction or gastric carcinomas. It warrants evaluation comparatively with other active regimens.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy of intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia with oxaliplatin in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Preliminary results in 24 patients.

BACKGROUND: The complete resection of macroscopic colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), followed by intraoperative intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (IPCH) to treat residual microscopic disease, leads to cure in some patients. We report preliminary results on survival in a phase II study using oxaliplatin (LOHP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with macroscopic colorectal PC underwent complete resection of the PC followed by IPCH with LOHP performed in an open abdominal cavity. The dose of LOHP was 460 mg/m(2) in 2 l/m(2), during 30 min at 43 degrees C, at a flow rate of 2 l/min. During the hour preceding IPCH, they received an intravenous administration of 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) and leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: Mean peritoneal tumoral extension (Sugarbaker's Index) was 16.9 +/- 9.5, median operative duration was 490 min and median blood loss was 965 ml. There were two postoperative deaths (8%) by intracerebral hemorrhage, and morbidity rate was 41.6%. Minimal follow-up was 18 months and median follow-up was 27.4 months (range 18.3-49.6). At 1, 2 and 3 years, overall survival rates were 83%, 74% and 65%, and disease-free survival rates were 70%, 50% and 50%, respectively. Only 32% of the 22 postoperative living patients presented a peritoneal recurrence. A peritoneal index >24 influenced survival, with a 17% recurrence rate at 2 years versus 63% when it was <24 (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: This new modality of treatment, when feasible, gives encouraging preliminary results, with a promising 3-year survival rate of 65%.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Heated intra-operative intraperitoneal oxaliplatin plus irinotecan after complete resection of peritoneal carcinomatosis: pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution and tolerance.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report the pharmacokinetics (PK) and tolerance profile of intraoperative intraperitoneal chemo-hyperthermia (IPCH) with oxaliplatin and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of either gastrointestinal or peritoneal origin underwent complete cytoreductive surgery followed by IPCH with a stable dose of oxaliplatin (460 mg/m(2)), plus one among seven escalating doses of irinotecan (from 300 to 700 mg/m(2)). IPCH was carried out with the abdomen open, for 30 min at 43 degrees C, with 2 l/m(2) of a 5% dextrose instillation in a closed continuous circuit. Patients received intravenous leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)) and 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) just before IPCH to maximize the effect of oxaliplatin and irinotecan. RESULTS: Irinotecan concentration in tumoral tissue increased until 400 mg/m(2) and then remained stable despite dose escalations. It was 16-23 times higher than in non-bathed tissues. Increasing doses of intraperitoneal irinotecan did not modify the PK of intraperitoneal oxaliplatin, and the drug concentration ratio was 17.8 higher in tumoral tissue (bathed) than in non-bathed tissues. The hospital mortality rate was 2.5% and the non-hematological complication rate was 25%. However, grade 3-4 hematological toxicity rate was 58%. CONCLUSION: Intraperitoneal heated oxaliplatin (460 mg/m(2)) plus irinotecan (400 mg/m(2)) presented an advantageous PK profile and was tolerated by patients, despite a high hematological toxicity rate.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Irinotecan is active in chemonaive patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II multicentric trial.

To assess the response rate and the tolerance of irinotecan as first-line therapy, 40 patients with metastatic gastric cancer received irinotecan 350 mg m(-2) every 3 weeks administered as a 30 min infusion. Among the 35 patients evaluable for response, two complete and five partial responses were recorded (response rate: 20.0% (95% CI:8.4-36.9%)). In total, 16 patients achieved stable disease and 12 progressive disease. In all, 66 percent of the patients benefited from tumour growth control. The median time to progression was 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.4%). The median overall survival was 7.1 months (95% CI: 5.2-9.0%). The probability of being alive at 6 months and 9 months was 61.0 and 32.4%, respectively. The median number of cycles per patient was 3 (range 1-14), and the relative dose intensity was 0.98. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities by patients were diarrhoea 20%, asthenia 10%, nausea 7.5%, vomiting 5.0%, abdominal pain 5%, neutropenia 38.5%, leucopenia 28.2%, anaemia 12.8% and thrombocytopenia 5.1%. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 12.5% of patients. These findings indicate that irinotecan is active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and warrants further evaluation in this clinical setting.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Hepatic arterial infusion using pirarubicin combined with systemic chemotherapy: a phase II study in patients with nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: A prospective phase II study was performed to determine the feasibility, efficacy and safety of arterial hepatic infusion (HAI) using pirarubicin combined with intravenous chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1991 to April 1994, 75 patients with unresectable colorectal metastases confined to the liver were included in this multicenter study to receive intra-arterial hepatic pirarubicin and a systemic monthly regimen of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid. Sixty-four patients were analyzed in the intention-to-treat analysis and 61 in the per-protocol analysis. RESULTS: Tolerance of this regimen was rather good; however, functional catheter problems were observed in 29 patients (45%) resulting in failure of HAI in 21 cases (33%) after a median of three cycles; vomiting grade 3 was present in 12.5% of patients, neutropenia grade 4 in 23% and alopecia grade 3 in 19%. The overall response rate was 31.9% in intention-to-treat analysis, and 39.3% in per-protocol analysis. Extrahepatic progression was reported in only 21.7% of patients. Time to hepatic progression and extra-hepatic progression was 8.3 and 15 months, respectively, in intention-to-treat analysis, and 11 and 18 months, respectively, in per-protocol analysis. Median survival was 19 and 20 months in intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the combination of intra-arterial pirarubicin and intravenous chemotherapy demonstrated some efficacy and good tolerance in the treatment of isolated colorectal liver metastases. This treatment seems to prevent extra-hepatic spread and prolong survival time. The results of this study have to be confirmed by new trials using more active systemic chemotherapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer: dose intensification and combination with new agents, including biological response modifiers.

Phase I/II studies suggest that the combination of irinotecan with capecitabine is feasible and has promising activity. Diarrhea and neutropenia are dose limiting. Overall response rates (RRs) in the 40% to 60% range are seen from preliminary data. Work in progress is assessing the combination of irinotecan with UFT/leucovorin (LV). The use of irinotecan together with raltitrexed is also being investigated, as is its combination with oxaliplatin. Two phase II studies of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin in second-line patients report median survivals of 11-12 months. It seems possible to safely escalate the dose of single-agent irinotecan to 500 mg/m(2) in patients showing good tolerance of the drug. Irinotecan can be used in combination with LV5FU2 at doses up to 260 mg/m(2), especially if only one bolus of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is given. Control of tumor growth is achieved in 90% of patients. Preliminary data suggest that regimens based on 5-FU/LV and irinotecan can safely be combined with the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab. In patients with EGFR-positive tumors, this may prove an effective means of increasing response rate or combating treatment resistance. Following evidence that COX-2 inhibition can slow progression in familial adenomatous polyposis, celecoxib is to be studied in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In vitro, the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol enhances the induction of apoptosis by chemotherapy. Clinically, it can safely be administered with irinotecan, and studies in CRC are planned.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗