PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

M E Amasio

Publications and source records attributed to M E Amasio.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

[Complications of rhinoplasty].

For an operation as technically demanding as rhinoplasty, surprisingly few studies have examined the results of this procedure. A retrospective study was, therefore, made of 5470 patients who had undergone rhinoplasty, performed by different surgeons, from 1970 to 1989. The patients were followed up for a minimum of one year. As for all forms of surgery, aspecific complications such as infections, hemorrhage and side-effects from anesthesia will occasionally occur but, fortunately, such cases are quite rare. The specific classification included both early and late complications. Post-rhinoplasty failures may be estimated at approximately 28% of all cases; this figure taking into account typical deformities, both minor and severe, as well as functional sequelae and patient dissatisfaction. Approximately 4% have required secondary procedures. Some causes for failure derive from patient characteristics; for example, the importance and complexity of initial deformity are, of course, partly responsible, particularly after trauma. The skin quality (i.e. thickness, or whether it is fatty or loose) also affects the results. Furthermore, uncontrollable factors inherent to healing (i.e. excessive scar contraction in the intranasal area, connective tissue hyperplasia, particularly at the tip, and periosteal proliferation either to the osteotomy site or over the nasal dorsum) can all lead to residual deformities. Nevertheless, most failures can be attributed the operator. The commonest mistakes are linked to cartilaginous dorsum and nasal tip (approx. 22%). There are several polymorphic deformities the main sites of which should be known well in order to prevent, or at least reduce, such risks.

Adolescent

[Hypothyroidism following combined treatment of pharyngolaryngeal carcinoma].

The onset of hypothyroidism following surgery and/or radiotherapy for head and neck cancer varies from 25 to 67% and it is fostered by some clinical conditions. However, these percentages increase when one takes into consideration the latent hypofunctioning brought about by high levels of T.S.H. The present case study involves 15 laryngeal or pharyngolaryngeal cancer patients: 3 had undergone surgery alone although most of them had received a combination of radiotherapy and surgery. For these patients both the clinical conditions of any hypothyroidism and the laboratory parameters for thyroid function were studied. Of these the most significant proved to be T.S.H. The patients were monitored at 4 month intervals over the course of a year. In three of the 15 pharyngolaryngeal cancer subjects who had undergone a combined treatment including surgery and radiotherapy comparison of the parameters studied proved statistically highly significant (with an increase in T.S.H.). The damage sustained does not so much depend on the total dose of radiation but rather on the number of fractions employed. It may, therefore, be suggested that making changes in surgery to the detriment of oncological radicality is not worth while. It would appear that a different scheme for distribution of radiotherapy doses should, rather, be devised.

Adult