PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M E Davidov

Publications and source records attributed to M E Davidov.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1989

Dilevalol compared with propranolol and placebo for systemic hypertension.

Dilevalol is a new antihypertensive agent that is both a vasodilator, through its beta 2-agonist action, and a nonselective beta antagonist. Two multicenter, double-blind studies were performed: study 1 compared dilevalol administered once-daily with either dilevalol or propranolol every 12 hours; study 2 compared dilevalol administered once daily with placebo. Both studies had a placebo run-in period to establish that the baseline supine diastolic blood pressures were consistent in the mild to moderate severity range (95 to 115 mm Hg) at 2 consecutive visits for study 1 and in the mild severity range (95 to 105 mm Hg) in study 2. Patients then were randomized to the double-blind titration phase, during which doses were titrated over a 9-week period to achieve a supine diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg and a decrease from baseline of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg. Patients were then maintained on a fixed dose for 2 months (study 1) or for 1 month (study 2). Dilevalol given once daily was as effective in reducing supine diastolic blood pressure as dilevalol every 12 hours and propranolol every 12 hours (study 1) and was superior to placebo (p less than 0.001) (study 2). In both studies, dilevalol given once daily was effective and well tolerated. The side-effect profile of dilevalol was similar to that of placebo and different from that of propranolol. Treatment with dilevalol resulted in significantly less fatigue (p less than 0.05), bradycardia (less than 50 beats/minute) and mental depression than with propranolol, but significantly (p less than 0.05) more diarrhea/loose stools.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1989

A multicenter double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of once and twice daily dilevalol compared to propranolol.

Dilevalol, the R,R isomer of labetalol, is a non-selective beta-adrenergic blocking drug with vasodilator properties which differ from those of labetalol in that they are attributable to beta-2 agonism rather than alpha-1 blockade. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized study compares the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of dilevalol with propranolol and, in addition, compares the efficacy of dilevalol when given once daily with twice daily. Caucasian patients with mild and moderate essential uncomplicated hypertension were divided into three treatment groups and received either propranolol twice daily (N = 59), dilevalol twice daily (N = 60), or dilevalol once daily (N = 53). Patients were given increasing doses of these medications over a 2 to 10 week period to achieve a supine diastolic blood pressure (SuDBP) of less than 90 mm Hg. The three regimens were equally effective in lowering supine blood pressure (dilevalol daily and twice daily reduced SuDBP by 14 Hg and propranolol by 13 mm Hg). Patients with at least a 5 mm Hg reduction in SuDBP then entered a two month maintenance phase. Dilevalol, whether given once (N = 40) or twice daily (N = 55) maintained the supine systolic blood pressure more effectively (dilevalol daily--15 mm Hg, twice daily--13 mm Hg, P less than .05) than propranolol (N = 53, 11 mm Hg) and dilevalol given once daily maintained diastolic blood pressure more effectively than propranolol (17 mm Hg v 14 mm Hg, P less than .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of betaxolol and chlorthalidone as monotherapy and in combination.

In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel study, the antihypertensive effects of betaxolol (20 mg once daily) and/or chlorthalidone (25 mg once daily) were analyzed in 186 patients with essential hypertension. Following a 2- to 4-week placebo baseline period, patients were randomized to one of two treatment groups (betaxolol or chlorthalidone) and studied for 6 weeks while receiving single therapy and an additional 6 weeks with a combination of the two agents. Significant decreases from baseline supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) were observed in both groups at the end of the single-therapy phase (11 mm Hg in SDBP for betaxolol and 12 mm Hg in SDBP for chlorthalidone); a further significant decrease (7 mm Hg for betaxolol and 8 mm Hg for chlorthalidone in SDBP) was observed from the end of the single-therapy phase to the end of the combination-therapy phase. Changes in supine systolic blood pressure (SSBP) from baseline to the end of the single-therapy phase were 10 mm Hg for the betaxolol and 16 mm Hg for the chlorthalidone group. In all cases, within-group changes were statistically significant. From the end of single therapy to end of combination therapy there was an additional 14-mm Hg and 13-mm Hg reduction in SSBP in the betaxolol and chlorthalidone groups, respectively. Overall, 89% of the randomized patients completed the single-treatment phase (phase I), and 89% of those patients completed the combined therapy phase (phase II). There was no significant difference between treatment groups in the clinical response rate (SDBP at or below 90 mm Hg or a decrease from baseline of at least 10 mm Hg). A substantial percentage of patients completing phase I responded to either single agent (58% for betaxolol and 65% for chlorthalidone). Among patients completing phase II therapy, the combination of the two agents produced a greater response rate (83% for the betaxolol-first group and 85% for the chlorthalidone-first group). In conclusion, both agents were effective and well tolerated. The most frequent adverse events in the single-therapy phase were headache, arthralgia, and dizziness, while bradycardia, rhinitis, arthralgia, and dizziness were most frequent in the combination-therapy phase. The combination of betaxolol (20 mg) and chlorthalidone (25 mg) once daily produced an additive antihypertensive effect regardless of which drug was administered first.

Betaxolol↗
PubMed1988

Comparison of betaxolol, a new beta 1-adrenergic antagonist, to propranolol in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

A double-blind, multicenter study compared the safety and efficacy of oral betaxolol 10 to 40 mg once daily (n = 68) with propranolol 40 to 160 mg twice daily (n = 73) in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. Both agents produced significant (P less than 0.01) and comparable reductions in mean supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures (7/11 mm Hg on betaxolol and 9/10 mm Hg on propranolol). Both betaxolol and propranolol significantly (P less than 0.01) reduced mean supine heart rate by 9 beats per minute. Patients achieved a more significant (P less than 0.01) reduction in blood pressure earlier (weeks 2 and 4 of the titration period) with betaxolol. By the end of treatment there was no significant difference in response between treatment groups. A higher incidence of central nervous system side effects (insomnia, bizarre dreams, depression, hallucinations, dizziness), however, was seen with propranolol than with betaxolol. Overall, the data show that in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, betaxolol 10 to 40 mg administered once daily is as effective as and better tolerated than propranolol 40 to 160 mg administered twice daily.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1988

Double-blind comparison of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Amlodipine, a new long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, was compared with hydrochlorothiazie (HCTZ) in 145 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. After 4 weeks of single-blind placebo runin, patients were randomly allocated to receive amlodipine (2.5-10 mg once daily, n = 97) or HCTZ (25-100 mg once daily, n = 48). At study week 12 response rates for amlodipine and HCTZ were 61.5 and 60.5%, respectively. There were clinically significant reductions in 24-h postdose blood pressures with both amlodipine (-18/-11 mm Hg supine: -14/-10 mm Hg standing) and HCTZ (-18/-10 mm Hg supine, -18/-9 mm Hg standing). After study week 12, atenolol (50-100 mg once daily) was added to the regimen of those patients whose hypertension was not controlled with monotherapy. Neither amlodipine nor HCTZ produced clinically significant changes in pulse rate, electrocardiogram, or chest x-ray film. Although amlodipine increased and HCTZ decreased the high-density lipoprotein (HDL)/total cholesterol ratio and the HDL/(low-density lipoprotein + very-low-density lipoprotein) ratio, the difference between the two treatments was not statistically significant. The incidence of side effects and the rate of patient withdrawal was comparable in the two groups. The incidence of laboratory abnormalities was 56% with HCTZ (mainly hypokalemia and hyperuricemia) and 16% with amlodipine. Amlodipine was an effective, well-tolerated agent for treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in this study, as single-daily-dose monotherapy and in combination with atenolol.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Serum magnesium and potassium levels in hypertensive patients after a therapeutic switch from hydrochlorothiazide plus a potassium supplement to maxzide.

Determinations of serum magnesium and potassium levels and blood pressure were made in 40 hypertensive patients in whom daily therapy with 50 mg of hydrochlorothiazide plus potassium supplements was switched to a once-daily regimen of 50 mg of hydrochlorothiazide plus 75 mg of triamterene (Maxzide). Patients showed no clinically significant changes in blood pressure or in serum magnesium or serum potassium values following the switch. It is concluded that therapy in patients receiving hydrochlorothiazide and up to 60 meq of potassium can be safely switched to Maxzide without adversely affecting serum magnesium levels, serum potassium levels, or blood pressure control.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Sodium intake and furosemide administration in hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency.

The effects of various levels of sodium intake and loop diuretic (furosemide) administration upon arterial pressure and renal function were studied in 11 patients with impaired renal function and essential hypertension. The patients were hospitalized in a metabolic ward and continued taking their usual antihypertensive medications. After a stabilization period, all patients followed the following regiments for 5 to 7 days: period I, 20 mEq sodium diet without diuretic administration; period II, 80 mEq sodium diet and furosemide, 80 mg daily; and period III, 200 mEq sodium diet and furosemide, 240 mg daily. Supine diastolic pressure was lower (P is less than 0.05) during period II than during period I and both supine and standing systolic and diastolic pressures were significantly lower in period III than in period I (P is less than 0.01). No significant differences in the renal clearance of inulin were noted between any of the study periods. In patients with essential hypertension and impaired renal function, consumption of a moderate or liberal sodium diet combined with administration of a loop diuretic agent (furosemide) appears to result in better control of arterial pressure without significant changes in renal function than does strict sodium restriction without diuretic administration.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

Vasodilator administration in the presence of beta-adrenergic blockade.

To explore the possibility that the presence of propranolol-induced beta-adrenergic blockade might have an adverse effect upon homeostatic circulatory reflexes activated by the administration of a potent vasodilator agent, arterial blood pressure and pulse rate response to rapid intravenous diazoxide injection was monitored before and after pretreatment with propranolol in ten hypertensive patients. It appeared that beta-adrenergic blockade had no clinically significant effect on the magnitude of hypotension or the degree of heart rate acceleration induced by the administration of the potent vasodilator diazoxide. This reflex vasodilator-induced cardio-acceleration after propranolol adminstration could be the result of incomplete blockade of endogenously released neurotransmitter, inhibition of the parasympathetic nervous system, or a direct pharmacologic action of diazoxide. Diazoxide administration to hypertensive patients in the presence of beta-adrenergic blockade was not associated with any clinically significant hemodynamic consequences.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1975

Nonemergency use of slow infusions of diazoxide.

Slow infusions of diazoxide were administered to 10 hypertensive patients who had stable, nonaccelerated hypertension. The 10-min diazoxide infusion was associated with a 16% average reduction in arterial pressure, a 21% average increase in heart rate, a 16% average increase in cardiac output, and a 36% reduction in total peripheral resistance. These changes in hemodynamic parameters lasted for an average of 70 min. It was concluded that slow infusions of diazoxide produce a consistent and predictable antihypertensive effect in patients with stable, nonaccelerated hypertension. Slow infusions of diazoxide may have a limited use in nonemergency situations where an abrupt change in arterial pressure is to be avoided and a parenteral antihypertensive agent is needed.

Adult↗