Biomedical subjects

M Enríquez-Denton

Publications and source records attributed to M Enríquez-Denton.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Persistence of PAD and presynaptic inhibition of muscle spindle afferents after peripheral nerve crush.

Two to twelve weeks after crushing a muscle nerve, still before the damaged afferents reinnervate the muscle receptors, conditioning stimulation of group I fibers from flexor muscles depolarizes the damaged afferents [M. Enriquez, I. Jimenez, P. Rudomin, Changes in PAD patterns of group I muscle afferents after a peripheral nerve crush. Exp. Brain Res., 107 (1996), 405-420]. It is not known, however, if this primary afferent depolarization (PAD) is indeed related to presynaptic inhibition. We now show in the cat that 2-12 weeks after crushing the medial gastrocnemius nerve (MG), conditioning stimulation of group I fibers from flexors increases the excitability of the intraspinal terminals of both the intact lateral gastrocnemius plus soleus (LGS) and of the previously damaged MG fibers ending in the motor pool, because of PAD. The PAD is associated with the depression of the pre- and postsynaptic components of the extracellular field potentials (EFPs) evoked in the motor pool by stimulation of either the intact LGS or of the previously damaged MG nerves. These observations indicate, in contrast to what has been reported for crushed cutaneous afferents [K.W. Horch, J.W. Lisney, Changes in primary afferent depolarization of sensory neurones during peripheral nerve regeneration in the cat, J. Physiol., 313 (1981), 287-299], that shortly after damaging their peripheral axons, the synaptic efficacy of group I spindle afferents remains under central control. Presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms could be utilized to adjust the central actions of muscle afferents not fully recovered from peripheral lesions.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Interaction between peripheral afferent activity and presynaptic inhibition of ia afferents in the cat.

It has been demonstrated in man that the H-reflex is more depressed by presynaptic inhibition than the stretch reflex. Here we investigated this finding further in the alpha-chloralose-anesthetized cat. Soleus monosynaptic reflexes were evoked by electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve or by stretch of the triceps surae muscle. Conditioning stimulation of the posterior biceps and semitendinosus nerve (PBSt) produced a significantly stronger depression of the electrically than the mechanically evoked reflexes. The depression of the reflexes has been shown to be caused by presynaptic inhibition of triceps surae Ia afferents. We investigated the hypothesis that repetitive activation of peripheral afferents may reduce their sensitivity to presynaptic inhibition. In triceps surae motoneurones, we measured the effect of presynaptic inhibition on excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) produced by repetitive activation of the peripheral afferents or by fast and slow muscle stretch. EPSPs evoked by single electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve or by fast muscle stretch were significantly depressed by PBSt stimulation. However, the last EPSP in a series of EPSPs evoked by a train of electrical stimuli (5-6 shocks, 150-200 Hz) was significantly less depressed by the conditioning stimulation than the first EPSP. In addition, the last part of the long-lasting EPSPs evoked by a slow muscle stretch was also less depressed than the first part. A single EPSP evoked by stimulation of the medial gastrocnemius nerve was less depressed when preceded by a train of stimuli applied to the same nerve than when the same train of stimuli was applied to a synergistic nerve. The decreased sensitivity of the test EPSP to presynaptic inhibition was maximal when it was evoked within 20 ms after the train of EPSPs. It was not observed at intervals longer than 30 ms. These findings suggest that afferent activity may decrease the efficiency of presynaptic inhibition. We propose that the described interaction between afferent nerve activity and presynaptic inhibition may partly explain why electrically and mechanically evoked reflexes are differently sensitive to presynaptic inhibition.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Presynaptic control of transmission along the pathway mediating disynaptic reciprocal inhibition in the cat.

In cat lumbar motoneurones, disynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) evoked by stimulation of antagonist motor nerves were depressed for at least 150 ms following conditioning stimulation of flexor (1.7-2 times threshold (T)) and ankle extensor (5T) nerves. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possibility that this depression is caused by presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms acting at the terminals of group I afferent fibres projecting to the Ia inhibitory interneurones and/or the terminals of these interneurones to the target motoneurones. Conditioning stimulation of flexor, but not ankle extensor, nerves evoked a depression of the monosynaptic Ia excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) recorded intracellularly in Ia inhibitory interneurones. This depression lasted between 200 and 700 ms and was not accompanied by a depression of the monosynaptic EPSPs evoked by stimulation of descending pathways. These results suggest that flexor, but not ankle extensor, group I afferent fibres can modulate sensory transmission at the synapse between Ia afferent fibres and Ia inhibitory interneurones. Conditioning stimulation of flexor muscle nerves, extensor muscle nerves and cutaneous nerves produced a long-lasting increase in excitability of the terminals of the Ia inhibitory interneurones. The increase in the excitability of the terminals was not secondary to an electrotonic spread of synaptic excitation at the soma. Indeed, concomitant with the excitability increase of the terminals there were signs of synaptic inhibition in the soma. The unitary IPSPs induced in target motoneurones following the spike activity of single Ia inhibitory interneurones were depressed by conditioning stimulation of muscle and cutaneous nerves. Since the conditioning stimulation also evoked compound IPSPs in those motoneurones, a firm conclusion as to whether unitary IPSP depression involved presynaptic inhibitory mechanism of the terminals of the interneurones could not be reached. The possibility that the changes in excitability of the Ia interneuronal terminals reflect the presence of a presynaptic inhibitory mechanism similar to that operating at the terminals of the afferent fibres (presynaptic inhibition) is discussed.1. In cat lumbar motoneurones, disynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) evoked by stimulation of antagonist motor nerves were depressed for at least 150 ms following conditioning stimulation of flexor (1.7-2 times threshold (T)) and ankle extensor (5T) nerves. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possibility that this depression is caused by presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms acting at the terminals of group I afferent fibres projecting to the Ia inhibitory interneurones and/or the terminals of these interneurones to the target motoneurones. Conditioning stimulation of flexor, but not ankle extensor, nerves evoked a depression of the monosynaptic Ia excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) recorded intracellularly in Ia inhibitory interneurones. This depression lasted between 200 and 700 ms and was not accompanied by a depression of the monosynaptic EPSPs evoked by stimulation of descending pathways. These results suggest that flexor, but not ankle extensor, group I afferent fibres can modulate sensory transmission at the synapse between Ia afferent fibres and Ia inhibitory interneurones. Conditioning stimulation of flexor muscle nerves, extensor muscle nerves and cutaneous nerves produced a long-lasting increase in excitability of the terminals of the Ia inhibitory interneurones. The increase in the excitability of the terminals was not secondary to an electrotonic spread of synaptic excitation at the soma. Indeed, concomitant with the excitability increase of the terminals there were signs of synaptic inhibition in the soma. The unitary IPSPs induced in target motoneurones following the spike activity of single Ia inhibitory interneurones were depressed by conditioning stimulation

Action Potentials↗

PubMed1998

How do we approach the locomotor network in the mammalian spinal cord?

For a large number of vertebrate species it is now indisputable that spinal networks have the capability of generating the basic locomotor rhythm. However, because of technical difficulties, the rate of progress in defining the intrinsic properties of mammalian locomotor rhythm generators has been slow in comparison to that made in the study of such networks in lower vertebrates. Investigations on afferent and descending control of locomotor activity in mammals have demonstrated that many of these pathways interact with the rhythm generator. In this review we discuss how these interactions (resetting) can be used for outlining relevant spinal circuits as a basis for a future identification of individual neurons of the spinal locomotor networks. In this overview we have given particular emphasis to selected afferent systems to illustrate the possibilities and problems with this approach.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Synaptic signaling in an active central network only moderately changes passive membrane properties.

The membrane resistance of mammalian central neurons may be dramatically reduced by synaptic events during network activity, thereby changing their integration properties. We have used the isolated neonatal rat spinal cord to provide measurements of the effect of synaptic signaling on passive membrane properties during network activity. Synaptic signaling could take place during fictive locomotor activity with only modest (on average 35%) reduction of the input resistance (Rin) and of the cell's charging time constant (tauin). Individual synaptic signals, however, often introduced a peak conductance that was greater than the input conductance (Gin = 1/Rin) without synaptic activity. The combination of moderate average synaptic conductance and large conductance of individual synaptic signals suggests that individual presynaptic neurons have large but short-lasting influence on the integration properties of postsynaptic neurons.

Algorithms↗