Biomedical subjects

M F Dorbe

Publications and source records attributed to M F Dorbe.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

An arabidopsis T-DNA mutant affected in Nrt2 genes is impaired in nitrate uptake.

Expression analyses of Nrt2 plant genes have shown a strict correlation with root nitrate influx mediated by the high-affinity transport system (HATS). The precise assignment of NRT2 protein function has not yet been possible due to the absence of heterologous expression studies as well as loss of function mutants in higher plants. Using a reverse genetic approach, we isolated an Arabidopsis thaliana knock-out mutant where the T-DNA insertion led to the complete deletion of the AtNrt2.1 gene together with the deletion of the 3' region of the AtNrt2.2 gene. This mutant is impaired in the HATS, without being modified in the low-affinity system. Moreover, the de-regulated expression of a Nicotiana plumbaginifolia Nrt2 gene restored the mutant nitrate influx to that of the wild-type. These results demonstrate that plant NRT2 proteins do have a role in HATS.

Anion Transport Proteins↗

PubMed2001

Identification and expression analyses of two genes encoding putative low-affinity nitrate transporters from Nicotiana plumbaginifolia.

Higher plants have both high- and low-affinity nitrate uptake systems (HATS and LATS respectively). Here we report the isolation and characterization of two genes, NpNRT1.1 and NpNRT1.2, from Nicotiana plumbaginifolia whose structural features suggest that they both belong to the NRT1 gene family, which is involved in the LATS. Amino acid sequence alignment showed that the N. plumbaginifolia proteins have greater similarity to their corresponding tomato homologues than to each other. Genomic Southern blot analysis indicates that there are probably more than two members of this family in N. plumbaginifolia. Northern blot analysis shows that NpNRT1.2 expression is restricted strictly to roots, whereas NpNRT1.1, in addition to roots, is expressed at a basal level in all other plant organs. Likewise, differential expression in response to external treatments with various N sources was observed for these two genes: NpNRT1.1 can be considered as a constitutively expressed gene whereas NpNRT1.2 expression is dependent strictly on high nitrate concentrations. Finally, over-expression of a gene involved in the HATS does not lead to any modification of LATS gene expression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1992

The tomato nia gene complements a Nicotiana plumbaginifolia nitrate reductase-deficient mutant and is properly regulated.

A nitrate reductase (NR) deficient mutant of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia totally impaired in the production of functional nia transcript and protein was restored for NR activity by transformation with a cloned tomato nia gene. The transgenic plants expressed from undetectable to 17% of the control NR activity in their leaves. Restoration of growth rates comparable to the wild type was obtained for transgenic plants expressing as little as 10% of the wild-type activity showing that nitrate reduction is not a growth-limiting factor in the wild-type plant. The analysis of the transgene expression showed that the tomato nia gene transcription was regulated by light, nitrate and a circadian rhythm as in tomato plants. These results suggest that all the cis-acting sequences involved in these regulations are contained in the 3 kb upstream region of the tomato nia gene and are still functional in transgenic N. plumbaginifolia plants. The amount of NR transcript synthesized from the tomato nia gene was reduced when a functional N. plumbaginifolia nia locus was introduced by sexual crosses. These data support the hypothesis that nitrate reduction is regulated by nitrate-derived metabolites as demonstrated in fungi.

Ammonia↗

PubMed1989

Cloning and analysis of the tomato nitrate reductase-encoding gene: protein domain structure and amino acid homologies in higher plants.

We have cloned and sequenced the nitrate reductase (NR)-encoding gene (nia) from tomato. When compared to the two Nicotiana tabacum nia structural genes, this 5-kb tomato gene shows a highly conserved structure, the coding sequence being interspersed with three introns at the same positions. Nucleotide sequences of the 5' promoter regions are not homologous, except for a 250-bp fragment. This small region might be involved in the similar regulation of the nia expression in tomato and tobacco plant species. The tomato gene codes for a 911 amino acid (aa) polypeptide chain. This sequence was aligned with and compared to other higher plant NR sequences. This alignment clearly identifies the three catalytic domains of NR, namely, a molybdopterin cofactor-binding domain, a heme domain and a FAD/NADH domain. On the other hand, it suggests that the less conserved 80-aa N-terminal region, containing a striking acidic aa cluster, is an additional domain bearing regulatory or structural function.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1988

Expression of leaf nitrate reductase genes from tomato and tobacco in relation to light-dark regimes and nitrate supply.

The influence of light-dark cycles and nitrate supply on nitrate reductase (NR) mRNA levels was studied in two plant species, tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) using specific NR DNA probes. In the same series of experiments, changes in the levels of NR protein (NRP) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and changes in the level of NADH-nitrate reductase activity (NRA) were also followed. During a light-dark cycle, it was found that in both tomato and tobacco, NR mRNA accumulation increased rapidly during the dark period and reached a maximum at the beginning of the day, while NRP reached a peak 2 and 4 hours after mRNA peaked, for tomato and tobacco, respectively. At the end of the day, the amount of mRNA was decreased by a factor of at least 100 compared to sunrise in both species. These results demonstrate that light is involved, although probably not directly, in the regulation of the NR gene expression at the mRNA level. The peak of NRA in tobacco coincided with the peak in NR mRNA accumulation (i.e. sunrise), whereas in tomato the peak of NRA was approximately 5 to 6 hours after sunrise. There is no obvious correlation between NRP and NRA levels during the day. In nitrogen starvation experiments, a rapid decrease of NRP and NRA was detected, while NR mRNA levels were not significantly altered. Upon nitrate replenishment, nitrogen-starved plants accumulated NR mRNA rapidly. These results suggest that the availability of nitrogen affects the expression of NR activity at the transcriptional as well as at the post-transcriptional levels.

Journal Article↗