PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M F Olsén

Publications and source records attributed to M F Olsén.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of breathing exercises on breathing patterns in obese and non-obese subjects.

Chest physiotherapy in connection with abdominal surgery includes different deep-breathing exercises to prevent post-operative pulmonary complications. The therapy is effective in preventing pulmonary complications, especially in high-risk patients such as obese persons. The mechanisms behind the effect is unclear, but part of the effect may be explained by the changes in breathing patterns. The aim of this study was therefore to describe and to analyse the breathing patterns in obese and non-obese subjects during three different breathing techniques frequently used in the treatment of post-operative patients. Twenty-one severely obese [body mass index (BMI) > 40] and 21 non-obese (BMI 19-25) subjects were studied. All persons denied having any lung disease and were non-smokers. The breathing techniques investigated were: deep breaths without any resistance (DB), positive expiratory pressure (PEP) with an airway resistance of approximately +15 cmH2O (1.5 kPa) during expiration, inspiratory resistance positive expiratory pressure (IR-PEP) with a pressure of approximately -10 cmH2O (-1.0 kPa) during inspiration. Expiratory resistance as for PEP. Volume against time was monitored while the subjects were sitting in a body plethysmograph. Variables for volume and flow during the breathing cycle were determined. Tidal volume and alveolar ventilation were highest during DB, and peak inspiratory volume was significantly higher than during PEP and IR-PEP in the group of obese subjects. The breathing cycles were prolonged in all techniques but were most prolonged in PEP and IR-PEP. The functional residual capacity (FRC) was significantly lower during DB than during PEP and IR-PEP in the group of obese subjects. FRC as determined within 2 min of finishing each breathing technique was identical to before the breathing manoeuvres.

Adult↗

Pain and pulmonary function following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate pain and pulmonary function the first two days after abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHODS: Women scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy were prospectively randomized to either laparoscopic (n=20) or abdominal (n=20) hysterectomy. Analgesics were self-administered by the patients by means of a programable infusion pump containing morphine. Postoperative pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale. Oxygen saturation was measured with an oxymeter. Pulmonary function was assessed using a peak flow meter measuring peak expiratory flow and a vitalograph measuring forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second. RESULTS: Pain scores were lower after laparoscopic hysterectomy at the first (p<0.05) and second postoperative day (p<0.01). Lung function was impaired on days 1 and 2 postoperatively, measured as peak expiratory flow, forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second, in both groups compared to the preoperative values. The patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy had less impairment of lung function measured by peak expiratory flow (p<0.01), forced vital capacity (p<0.05) and forced expiratory volume in one second (p<0.05) the first postoperative day compared to the patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. The second postoperative day differences between the groups remained for peak expiratory flow (p<0.05) and forced expiratory volume in one second (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hysterectomy results in less pain and less impairment of respiratory function compared to abdominal hysterectomy.

Female↗

Respiratory function after laparoscopic and open fundoplication.

OBJECTIVE: To compare respiratory function in the immediate postoperative period in patients undergoing open or laparoscopic fundoplication. DESIGN: Prospective non-randomised open study. SETTING: University hospital, Sweden. SUBJECTS: A consecutive series of 32 patients who underwent a conventional open fundoplication and a further 25 consecutive patients who had a similar procedure done laparoscopically. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respiratory function, oxygen saturation, body temperature, analgesic consumption, rate of mobilisation, and postoperative stay in hospital. RESULTS: In the early postoperative period the respiratory function deteriorated less in the laparoscopy group as reflected by higher oxygen saturation (mean (SEM) 95.8 (0.6)% compared with 94.0 (0.6)%) on the first postoperative day (p < 0.05) and less reduction in forced vital capacity and peak expiratory flow (2.3 (0.2) L compared with 1.8 (0.1) L and 279.8 (19.7) L/min compared with 207 (19.8) L/min respectively) (p < 0.05). Patients had significantly less fever after the laparoscopic procedure (37.5 (0.1) C degrees compared with 38.0 (0.1) C degrees) (p < 0.001) and left hospital earlier (median 2 (range 1-5) days compared with 6 (3-9) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: All fundoplication procedures impair respiratory function but significantly less if the procedure is done laparoscopically.

Female↗