PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M F Rhoton

Publications and source records attributed to M F Rhoton.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Professionalism and clinical excellence among anesthesiology residents.

BACKGROUND: During a decade of evaluating the clinical performances of anesthesiology residents at several hospitals, a consistently low frequency of faculty members' comments regarding residents' unprofessional behavior was observed. METHOD: To identify the population of residents who behave unprofessionally and the predictive categories and performance patterns associated with unprofessional behavior, an examination was undertaken of 24 months of clinical performance records regarding the behaviors of 71 residents for 15 negative categories and overall performance. The residents were in training from 1982-83 through 1989-90 at the University Hospitals of Cleveland. The performance records consisted of narrative comments from faculty that were converted into z-scores. These performance scores were evaluated by using percentage distributions, stepwise regression, and neural networks. RESULTS: Of the 71 residents, 15 (21%) received comments about unprofessional behavior, for a total of 27 comments (1% of all negative comments). Primarily, the residents' unprofessional behaviors involved unacceptable behavior (33%), abdication of responsibility (38%), and frank fabrications (15%). The 15 residents experienced significant problems in the areas of eagerness to learn, conscientiousness, composure, critical incidents, efficiency/organization, taking instruction, and knowledge. Problems with unprofessional behavior were not found for the 21 residents whose scores for overall performance were excellent. CONCLUSION: The results expose a pattern of performance associated with unprofessional behavior, and suggest that clinical excellence and unprofessional behavior rarely coexist.

Anesthesiology↗

Influence of anesthesiology residents' noncognitive skills on the occurrence of critical incidents and the residents' overall clinical performances.

The authors examined residents' clinical performances in five anesthesiology departments in U.S. teaching hospitals. The data were organized by daily use of the Clinical Anesthesia System of Evaluation, which categorizes and quantifies the narrative comments of faculty. The study was designed to identify predictor categories (particular performance characteristics of residents) for the residents' overall performances and their scores in handling critical incidents (those incidents that could or would have caused significant morbidity or mortality had faculty not intervened). More than 9,000 comments made by 163 faculty about 45 residents were analyzed. Residents' noncognitive skills that were predictors of overall performance were Conscientiousness, Management, Confidence, Critical Incidents, and Knowledge. Conscientiousness and Composure predicted two-thirds of the variability in critical incidents' scores. Path analysis verified causal relationships between the hypothesized predictors and critical incidents. For the residents studied, inadequate noncognitive performance in some areas was a powerful (p less than .0005) predictor of overall clinical performance and was related to the occurrence of critical incidents.

Anesthesiology↗

A new method to evaluate clinical performance and critical incidents in anaesthesia: quantification of daily comments by teachers.

We have found that the Clinical Anesthesia System of Evaluation (CASE) method provides information regarding clinical performance of residents and critical incidents that is not available from other sources. As a result, it expands the dimensions of the evaluation process and improves validity. In addition, the technique has helped address the concerns of many investigators. (1) It provides specific, real-time evaluations that permit early intervention, improve feedback and guide remediation; (2) it improves sampling techniques by increasing the breadth and volume of evaluators and settings; (3) it enhances the discriminatory power of the evaluation process; and (4) it improves documentation.

Anesthesia↗