PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Floridia

Publications and source records attributed to M Floridia.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Virological and immunological outcomes at 3 years after starting antiretroviral therapy with regimens containing non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, protease inhibitor, or both in INITIO: open-label randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy has greatly reduced HIV mortality and morbidity. However, the best sequence of regimens and implications of initial regimen for long-term therapeutic success are not well defined. METHODS: In INITIO, a large international randomised trial, we compared antiretroviral therapy with two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (didanosine+stavudine) plus either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (efavirenz, EFV) or a protease inhibitor (nelfinavir, NFV), or both (EFV/NFV), in patients with HIV-1 infection who had not previously received antiretroviral drugs. Primary outcomes were proportion with undetectable HIV RNA in plasma, and change in CD4 count from baseline at 3 years. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN44582462. FINDINGS: We followed up 911 participants (297 EFV, 311 NFV, 303 EFV/NFV). At 3 years, the proportion with HIV RNA less than 50 copies per mL was highest in the EFV group (188 [74%] EFV, 162 [62%] NFV, 155 [62%] EFV/NFV; p=0.004). Mean (95% CI) increases in CD4 count were 316x10(6) cells per L (288-343) for EFV, 289x10(6) cells per L (262-316) for NFV, and 274x10(6) cells per L (231-291) for EFV/NFV (p=0.1). Fewer participants in the EFV group than in the other groups stopped adequate antiretroviral therapy for more than 30 days (p=0.005). Participants in the EFV/NFV group had shorter time to stopping the initial regimen (p<0.0001) and to a treatment modifying adverse event (p=0.04) than those in the other groups. INTERPRETATION: Starting antiretroviral therapy with a three-drug/two-class regimen including efavirenz was better than starting with regimens including nelfinavir or efavirenz plus nelfinavir in terms of virological suppression and durability of the initial regimen. The shorter time on adequate antiretroviral therapy or to a treatment-modifying adverse event might explain the absence of additional benefit for the four-drug regimen.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed2006

Diagnosis of HIV infection in pregnancy: data from a national cohort of pregnant women with HIV in Italy.

We analysed the characteristics of the pregnancies with a previously undetected HIV infection in a national observational study of pregnant women with HIV in Italy. In a total of 443 pregnancies with available date of HIV diagnosis, 118 were characterized by a previously undetected HIV infection (26.6%, 95% CI 22.5-30.8). The following factors were independently associated with this occurrence in a multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratios; 95% CIs): foreign nationality (5.1, 2.8-9.3); no pre-conception counselling (35.9, 4.8-266.1); first pregnancy (2.1, 1.2-4.0); asymptomatic status (6.8, 1.5-30.6). Women with previously undetected infection started antiretroviral treatment significantly later during pregnancy (P < 0.001). Missed diagnosis was responsible for one case of transmission. A high rate of previously undetected HIV infection was observed. This suggests a good HIV detection during pregnancy, but also the need to reinforce HIV testing strategies among women of childbearing age. We identified some determinants which may be considered for intervention measures.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir in HIV-1-infected pregnant and nonpregnant women.

AIMS: To compare steady-state nelfinavir (NFV) pharmacokinetics in pregnant and nonpregnant HIV-infected women. METHODS: Twenty-five pregnant HIV-infected women were selected from an ongoing observational study evaluating the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral agents during pregnancy. Twenty of them were in the third and five in the second trimester. Data for the control group of 21 HIV-infected nonpregnant women were taken from a previous multicentre pharmacokinetic trial. All the participating women achieved steady-state plasma concentrations while on a highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen including NFV (1250 mg bid) and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Blood samples for NFV measurement were collected predose (C(trough)) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12 h post dose. RESULTS: During the third trimester of pregnancy NFV AUC(0-12 h) median (range) values were 25.76 (12.61-42.74) microg h(-1) ml(-1), and were 32.49 (19.16-63.81) microg h(-1) ml(-1) in the control group [mean difference - 9.30 microg h(-1) ml(-1); 95% confidence interval (CI) -15.76, -2.83; P < 0.05). Median oral clearance (CL/F) was significantly higher in pregnant women than in the control group (48.5 l h(-1), range 29.3-99.1 l h(-1) vs. 38.5 l h(-1), range 19.6-65.2 l h(-1); mean difference 12.6 l h(-1); 95% CI 3.3, 21.9) but the difference disappeared when CL/F was adjusted for body weight. C(trough) was significantly (P < 0.01) lower in pregnant compared with nonpregnant women (median 0.8 microg ml(-1), range 0-2.6 microg ml(-1) vs. 1.5 microg ml(-1), range 0.5-4.9 microg ml(-1); mean difference -1.0 microg ml(-1); 95% CI -1.7, -0.31). The median elimination half-life of NFV observed during pregnancy was 3.7 h (range 1.4-6.6 h), compared with 5.2 (range 3.1-10.1 h) in the control group (mean difference -1.7; 95% CI -2.8, -0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that women in the later stages of pregnancy may be exposed to subtherapeutic concentrations of NFV. Thus, adjustments in drug dosage or frequency of administration may be required.

Female↗
PubMed2004

Risk factors and occurrence of rash in HIV-positive patients not receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor: data from a randomized study evaluating use of protease inhibitors in nucleoside-experienced patients with very low CD4 levels (<50 cells/microL).

BACKGROUND: Most of the studies evaluating rash in HIV-positive patients have focused on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), particularly nevirapine, and little is known about the occurrence of rash and the risk factors for its development in patients receiving regimens not based on NNRTI. METHODS: We evaluated all cases of rash observed during a 48-week randomized multicentre trial in 1251 nucleoside-experienced patients who started treatment with protease inhibitors (ritonavir or indinavir) at CD4 counts below 50 cells/microL. Incidence rates for rash were calculated according to gender, clinical status, age, use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis and use of individual antiretroviral drugs at enrollment. Differences between groups defined according to the above characteristics were tested for statistical significance using the log-rank test in a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. All factors that gave results in the univariate analyses below the significance level of 0.05 were included in a multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model. RESULTS: During a follow-up period of 9690 person-months, 66 patients (5.3%) developed rash (0.68 events/100 person-months). In the univariate analyses, risk of rash did not differ with trial treatment (indinavir or ritonavir), clinical status, PCP prophylaxis, or age. During follow-up, rash was observed in 7.5% of enrolled women and in 4.5% of enrolled men (P=0.03). Serious rash occurred in 4.5% of enrolled women and in 1.6% of enrolled men (P=0.003). Use of HAART (P<0.001) and inclusion of zidovudine and of zalcitabine in the prescribed regimen (P=0.02) appeared to be associated with a lower risk of rash. In the multivariate analysis, the variables that remained significantly predictive of rash were gender (risk for women compared to men: 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-2.72, P=0.048) and use of a non-HAART regimen (risk for non-HAART patients compared to HAART: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.49-5.02, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, about 5% of HIV-positive patients who started treatment with protease inhibitors at very low CD4 counts developed rash, generally in the first few weeks after treatment. Risk was significantly higher in women and in patients who did not receive a HAART regimen. Our data indicate that women have a higher risk of rash than men, also with regimens that do not include NNRTI.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

HIV-related morbidity and mortality in patients starting protease inhibitors in very advanced HIV disease (CD4 count of < 50 cells/microL): an analysis of 338 clinical events from a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: AIDS defining events occur infrequently in the presence of CD4 counts above 200 cells/microL. It is, however, uncertain for most of the AIDS defining conditions whether this threshold can be considered equally safe in patients with a previously very low CD4 nadir. METHODS: We evaluated in detail all the AIDS defining events observed during a 48-week clinical trial in 1251 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-experienced patients who started protease inhibitors (PIs) at CD4 counts below 50 cells/microL. The type of event, immunological status at the moment of event and time between start of PI treatment and event occurrence were analysed cumulatively and by event type; event rates were calculated. RESULTS: Concomitant data on CD4 counts were available for 338 AIDS defining events (81% of total events). Median time between start of treatment with PI and event was 94.5 days and median absolute CD4 value at the occurrence of event was 20 per microL. Only 14 events (in 12 patients) were observed above the threshold of 200 CD4 cells/microL. An analysis of the 67 deaths with concomitantly available CD4 counts (57%) showed a median CD4 count of 10 cells/microL, with only four deaths occurring in the presence of a CD4 count above 100 cells/microL. CONCLUSIONS: Very few clinical AIDS defining conditions were observed in patients who start PIs at very low CD4 counts and with treatment restore absolute values in CD4 counts above 200 cells/microL. This threshold can therefore be considered a clinically effective goal of treatment with respect to occurrence of all AIDS defining conditions in patients starting PIs in very advanced HIV disease.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2000

A randomized trial comparing the introduction of ritonavir or indinavir in 1251 nucleoside-experienced patients with advanced HIV infection.

ISS-IP1, a multicenter, randomized, 48-week open trial, was designed to compare the introduction of ritonavir or indinavir in patients with previous nucleoside experience and CD4+ cell counts below 50/mm3. Concomitant antiretroviral treatment with nucleoside analogs was allowed. Primary efficacy measures were survival and time to a new AIDS-defining event or death, analyzed through the whole period of observation by the intention-to-treat approach. Primary toxicity measures were time to treatment discontinuation and adverse events, grade at least 3/serious, analyzed by an on-treatment approach. Evaluation-of efficacy also included CD4+ cell and RNA response. The trial enrolled 1251 patients in 5 months. At baseline, mean CD4+ cell count was about 20 cells/mm3 and mean HIV RNA copy number was 4.9 log10/ml in both groups. Overall, 402 patients in the ritonavir group and 250 patients in the indinavir group permanently discontinued the assigned treatment (relative risk, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.68-2.30; p = 0.0001), with most of this difference dependent on a higher number of discontinuation for adverse events in the ritonavir group. After a mean follow-up of 307 days (ritonavir, 304; indinavir, 309), 124 deaths (ritonavir, 61; indinavir, 63; relative risk, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.67-1.36; p = 0.80) and 330 new AIDS-defining events (ritonavir, 170; indinavir, 160; relative risk, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85-1.31; p = 0.60) were observed. CD4+ cell counts increased in both groups in patients still receiving treatment, with about 100 cells gained by week 24 and 150 cells gained by week 48. Body weight also increased over time in both groups. Analysis of RNA response showed a decrease of 1.5 log10 or higher in both treatment groups. Overall, 400 patients in the ritonavir group and 338 patients in the indinavir group developed at least one grade 3/serious new adverse event during follow-up (relative risk, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.28-1.72; p = 0.0001). Favorable CD4+ cell and RNA responses at 24 and 48 weeks were observed in both groups of patients remaining on treatment. Indinavir showed slightly better effects in sustaining RNA, CD4+ cell, and body weight responses. Ritonavir and indinavir results were comparable in terms of clinical outcome (survival and AIDS-defining events).

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Quality of life outcomes of combination zidovudine- didanosine-nevirapine and zidovudine-didanosine for antiretroviral-naive advanced HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the quality of life outcomes in antiretroviral-naive patients randomized to zidovudine plus didanosine versus zidovudine plus didanosine plus nevirapine for treatment of advanced HIV disease (the Istituto Superiore di Sanità 047 trial). DESIGN: A 48-week randomized, double-blind trial. METHODS: Sixty patients were enrolled and evaluated over 24 weeks. Quality of life was assessed using a modified version of the Medical Outcomes Study-HIV Health Survey. For analysis, we calculated two summary scores reflecting the physical (PHS) and the mental (MHS) components of health. RESULTS: Although the three-drug combination was superior at inducing immunologic and virologic responses, the two-drug regimen was superior for both PHS and MHS, especially at week 8 where differences were both statistically and clinically significant (5.8 and 9.2 points, respectively, P< 0.02 for both). Quality of life changes paralleled trends in body weight and Karnofsky performance status score. CONCLUSION: Although a three-drug antiretroviral therapy regimen was superior in terms of short term virologic/immunologic response, the two-drug regimen was better in terms of quality of life. In general, triple therapy remains the most effective treatment option. However, quality of life assessments can yield results that may be discordant with and complementary to those obtained using conventional endpoints. Comparative trials should collect a comprehensive range of outcome measures, including patient-reported quality of life, in order to provide clinicians and patients with additional information that may influence treatment decisions.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Plasma HIV-1 copy number and in vitro infectivity of plasma prior to and during combination antiretroviral treatment.

Some studies on untreated patients have shown a general correlation between plasma HIV copy number and plasma infectivity in in vitro models. Recent observations also indicate that HIV-RNA level is an important predictor of perinatal transmission and may also have a role in heterosexual transmission. To further analyse the correlation between HIV viral load and plasma infectivity, we studied the relationship between HIV-1 plasma copy number and plasma infectivity prior to and during treatment with antiretroviral combination regimens in HIV-1 infected adults. Plasma infectivity was assessed in vitro by coculture of plasma from HIV-positive patients with PHA-stimulated fresh PBMC from uninfected donors. A positive plasma isolation, in almost all cases (43/45) and irrespective of treatment status, was associated with an HIV viral load higher than 100000 copies per ml, with higher plasma HIV-1 RNA values in isolation-positive samples compared with isolation-negative samples (median values, 710000 vs. 37500 copies per ml, respectively). SI and NSI strains had similarly high viral load values (470000 vs. 790000 copies per ml), but CD4 counts were lower in the SI phenotype group. Our data indicate that low levels of viral load are only exceptionally associated with isolation from plasma in the in vitro model we used. This observation confirms indirectly the presence of an association between viral load and infectivity. The requisite of a high plasma viral load in order to obtain infectivity (i.e. positivity of HIV isolation from plasma) also seems maintained under antiretroviral treatment, adding confidence in the conclusion that reductions in viral load translate into reduction of plasma infectivity. Due to the extreme complexity of factors determining transmission, a very prudent interpretation of the results is essential when information from experimental studies has to be transferred to clinical situations requiring assessment of risks or clinical decisions.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Prevalence and characteristics of multinucleoside-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 among European patients receiving combinations of nucleoside analogues.

The prevalence and the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of multinucleoside-resistant (MNR) human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) variants in Europe were investigated in a multicenter study that involved centers in nine European countries. Study samples (n = 363) collected between 1991 and 1997 from patients exposed to two or more nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and 274 control samples from patients exposed to no or one NRTI were screened for two marker mutations of multinucleoside resistance (the Q151M mutation and a mutation with a 2-amino-acid insertion at codon 69, T69S-XX). Q151M was identified in six of the study samples (1. 6%), and T69S-XX was identified in two of the study samples (0.5%; both of them T69S-SS), but both patterns were absent among control samples. Non-NRTI (NNRTI)-related changes were observed in viral strains from two patients, which displayed the Q151M resistance pattern, although the patients were NNRTI naive. The patients whose isolates displayed multinucleoside resistance had received treatment with zidovudine and either didanosine, zalcitabine, or stavudine. Both resistance patterns conferred broad cross-resistance to NRTIs in vitro and a poor response to treatment in vivo. MNR HIV-1 is found only among multinucleoside-experienced patients. Its prevalence is low in Europe, but it should be closely monitored since it seriously limits treatment options.

Amino Acid Substitution↗
PubMed1999

A randomized, double-blind trial on the use of a triple combination including nevirapine, a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase HIV inhibitor, in antiretroviral-naive patients with advanced disease.

The immunologic and virologic activity of nevirapine in combination with two nucleosides (zidovudine [ZDV] and didanosine [ddI]) was evaluated in antiretroviral-naive patients with a CD4 count <200/mm3 or clinical AIDS. In all, 68 patients were enrolled in a 48-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A group of 32 patients received ZDV + ddI + nevirapine, and 36 patients received ZDV + ddI. Primary efficacy parameters were the activity on HIV-1 RNA and on peripheral blood CD4+ cells, with differences between groups analyzed by the Wilcoxon's nonparametric two-sample test. Baseline RNA was high in both treatment groups (median values, 5.8 and 5.7 log10). RNA and CD4 responses were significantly higher with the triple combination (median RNA reductions, 2.69 versus 1.05 log10 at 24 weeks and 1.97 versus 1.20 log10 at 48 weeks; median CD4 increases, 81 versus 64 cells/mm3 at 24 weeks and 101 versus 27 cells/mm3 at 48 weeks). This study demonstrates that a triple combination of ZDV + ddI + nevirapine used as first-line regimen in antiretroviral-naive patients can induce sustained virologic and immunologic response in patients with low CD4 count or a previous diagnosis of AIDS.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1998

Saquinavir. Clinical pharmacology and efficacy.

Saquinavir is an HIV protease inhibitor with no, or limited, effect on the activity of other structurally related human aspartic proteinases. As with other HIV protease inhibitors, saquinavir inhibits the cleavage of the gag-pol protein substrate leading to the release of structurally defective and functionally inactive viral particles. It is active on both HIV-1 and HIV-2, and also has activity on chronically infected cells and HIV strains resistant to reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Synergy of action has been observed with other antiretroviral drugs. Saquinavir is characterised by a low bioavailability which is further reduced in the fasting state. Metabolism is mainly hepatic through cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, but intestinal metabolism through the same system has also been reported. To achieve higher drug plasma concentrations and increase the antiviral effect, a new formulation of saquinavir with a higher bioavailability has recently been introduced. Higher plasma drug concentrations may also be obtained by combining the drug with CYP blockers, such as ritonavir or ketoconazole. Because of its metabolic interference with the CYP system, saquinavir cannot be coadministered with astemizole, terfenadine or cisapride. Rifampicin (rifampin) is also contraindicated because coadministration can lead to decreases in saquinavir concentrations. Interactions have also been reported with other drugs metabolised through the same system, including non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and HIV protease inhibitors. Resistance has been observed after both in vitro and in vivo drug exposure, with a relatively specific mutation profile compared with other protease inhibitors. Saquinavir is generally well tolerated, with mild gastrointestinal symptoms representing the most commonly observed adverse effects. Although characterized by low bioavailability, in phase III trials saquinavir has been shown to have clinical efficacy in terms of survival and progression rate. As with the other protease inhibitors, saquinavir should be used in combination with other antiretroviral drugs. Current therapeutic guidelines, however, recommend the selection of an initial treatment regimen with other protease inhibitors with higher in vivo activity in terms of RNA and CD4 response. The results of ongoing studies will clarify to what extent a new saquinavir formulation, recently introduced, is superior to the previous one in terms of antiviral activity and to provide comparisons with other protease inhibitors. Further studies are also needed to define the best place of saquinavir within treatment strategies based on protease inhibitors, particularly in respect to the optimal sequence for its use with other protease inhibitors, and the dynamics of cross-resistance and its role within regimens based on the combination of protease inhibitors.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1997

A randomized trial (ISS 902) of didanosine versus zidovudine in previously untreated patients with mildly symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection.

In this multicenter study (ISS 902), 554 previously untreated patients with <500 CD4 cells/mm3 and mildly symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus disease were randomized to receive zidovudine or didanosine (ddI). After a mean follow-up of 20 months, 80 patients (40 zidovudine, 40 ddI) had died and 146 had at least one AIDS-defining event (73 zidovudine, 73 ddI). Overall, no difference was found between treatments with respect to progression to AIDS or death. The analysis of relative risk (RR) of progression over time, however, showed an initially minor risk for zidovudine patients and an inversion in the zidovudine-ddI RR in the second and third years of follow-up. Didanosine showed a greater effect on CD4 cell count response. The two drugs confirmed the toxicity patterns already reported in other trials, with a low occurrence of pancreatitis (ddI 1.3%, zidovudine 0.4%). The overall results suggest that, in this population, zidovudine and ddI monotherapies have comparable long-term clinical efficacy and that more powerful regimens should be preferred.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1996

A randomized trial (ISS 901) of switching to didanosine versus continued zidovudine after the diagnosis of AIDS.

Although the efficacy of switching from zidovudine (AZT) to didanosine (ddI) has already been evaluated in controlled studies, prior investigations were not specifically designed to evaluate this issue in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). This open, randomized, multicenter study (ISS 901) was designed to evaluate the clinical benefit in patients with AIDS of switching to ddI after 6-18 months of AZT and no major intolerance. Patients were randomized to continue AZT, maintaining the current dosage at randomization (n = 79), or to receive ddI (n = 80) at the dosage of 375 mg and 250 mg b.i.d. for body weight > 60 and < or = 60 kg, respectively. Primary efficacy measures were survival and time to new AIDS-defining events, analyzed by the intent-to-treat approach. The two groups were comparable for baseline characteristics, follow-up (15 months), and time spent on allocated treatment. At the end of the study, 104 patients (48 AZT, 56 ddI) had died and 90 had at least one new AIDS-defining event (44 AZT, 46 ddI). Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival and of time to first new AIDS-defining event showed no differences between the treatment groups. No differences were detected in other efficacy measurements (p24 antigenemia, CD4+ count, Karnofsky score, and body weight), occurrence of severe toxicities, and treatment modifications. Pancreatitis occurred only in ddI-treated patients (6%). In our population of patients with advanced disease, switching from AZT to ddI did not produce apparent benefits, suggesting that application of this strategy earlier in the course of human immunodeficiency virus disease should be considered.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1996

AIDS dementia complex in the Italian National AIDS Registry: temporal trends (1987-93) and differential incidence according to mode of transmission of HIV-1 infection.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the occurrence of AIDS dementia complex (ADC) in Italy and its incidence over time, examining possible correlations between this condition and some demographic and immunological variables. DESIGN: Inception cohort. Data collected from the case notification forms of the Italian National AIDS Registry. SUBJECTS: 16813 consecutive AIDS cases reported to the National AIDS Registry from August 1, 1987 through October 31, 1993 were included. STATISTICAL METHODS: All data refer to the time of AIDS diagnosis as reported on the case notification forms. Main analyses of the monthly proportion of ADC cases were by multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: 1364 subjects (8.1%) were reported with a diagnosis of ADC as the first AIDS defining disease, either as the only manifestation or associated with other AIDS defining conditions. At the time of AIDS diagnosis, the observed ADC/AIDS proportion was significantly higher among intravenous drug users (IVDU), 9.1%, compared to heterosexuals, 6.3%, and homo-bisexual men, 5.2%. Simple logistic regression analysis showed a significant (p < 0.0001) quadratic trend in the monthly ADC/AIDS proportion, peaking in March 1990 and decreasing thereafter. Multiple logistic regression, adjusting for month of diagnosis, showed that IVDUs have consistently the highest risk and homo-bisexual men the lowest, although differences tended to decrease with increasing age. Older age, in fact, was highly associated with an increased risk, especially within the homo-bisexual and heterosexual transmission categories. CD4 + cells counts proved to have no significant effect on the risk of progressing to AIDS with ADC rather than with any other AIDS indicative disease. CONCLUSIONS: ADC is a relatively frequent manifestation at diagnosis of AIDS among Italian patients, and particularly in IVDUs. Differences in its occurrence were found according to time of diagnosis, transmission category and age.

AIDS Dementia Complex↗
PubMed1996

A randomized controlled trial of a protease inhibitor (saquinavir) in combination with zidovudine in previously untreated patients with advanced HIV infection.

This study assessed the activity and tolerability of an HIV-protease inhibitor, saquinavir, alone or in combination with zidovudine. A total of 92 previously untreated HIV-infected patients with CD4 cell counts < 300 cells/mm3 participated in a parallel, randomized double-blind study. Patients were randomized to receive one of five treatments, each three times a day: 600 mg of saquinavir; 200 mg of zidovudine; 75, 200 or 600 mg of saquinavir in combination with 200 mg of zidovudine. The primary treatment period was 16 weeks, with monthly extensions in patients who did not show major disease progression or toxicity. The main measures of the efficacy of therapy used were changes in CD4 cell counts and in the concentration of HIV-1 RNA in the plasma (as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction). The 600 mg dose of saquinavir in combination with zidovudine induced a 1.6 log (after 4 weeks) and a 0.7 log (after 16 weeks) median reduction in plasma RNA concentration; this reduction was greater than those seen in the other four treatment groups. The combination of 600 mg of saquinavir with zidovudine also resulted in a larger and more sustained improvement in the CD4 cell count than either saquinavir or zidovudine monotherapy or the other combination therapies. In the group receiving 200 mg of saquinavir in combination with zidovudine, the maximal median change in CD4 cell count occurred at week 2 (85 cells/mm3), and by week 16 had fallen to 15 cells/mm3. In the group receiving 600 mg of saquinavir plus zidovudine, the median change in CD4 cell count remained high for the 16-week period (median change of 48 cells/mm3 at week 2 and 61 cells/mm3 at week 16). Saquinavir was safe and very well tolerated, either alone or in combination with zidovudine. The incidence of adverse events was greater in the four groups receiving zidovudine therapy, and all the most commonly reported adverse events have previously been associated with zidovudine therapy. Few changes in laboratory values occurred during the study, except for known zidovudine-associated toxicities. The most frequent abnormalities were raised aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels, depressed calcium levels, and abnormally high or low phosphate levels. Despite the low oral bioavailability of saquinavir, combined virological and immunological data show definite antiviral activity in vivo for the combination of saquinavir at 600 mg plus zidovudine at 200 mg (each three times daily). The combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action represents an advance in the treatment of HIV infection.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Effect of sex, age and transmission category on the progression to AIDS and survival of zidovudine-treated symptomatic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of transmission category and demographic, clinical and immunological characteristics on the progression to AIDS and survival of zidovudine-treated patients. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre cohort study of symptomatic non-AIDS patients. SETTING: Eighty-three clinical centres reporting data to the National Zidovudine Registry. PATIENTS: A total of 1468 patients enrolled between July 1987 and January 1991 were analysed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three-year AIDS-free survival probability estimates since therapy start. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of progression to AIDS and survival. RESULTS: Faster progression was associated with increasing age (8% risk increase for a 5-year increase), low baseline CD4+ count (39% risk increase for 100 x 10(6)/l cells decrease), and zidovudine > 1000 mg/day (20% risk increase compared with < or = 1000 mg/day). Homosexual men had a 33% risk increase compared with other risk groups. The presence of fever and oral candidiasis at enrolment were also independently associated with a higher risk of progression. Differences in the risk of progression were not significant between men and women. Older age, baseline CD4+ count, homosexual behaviour, fever and oral candidiasis were independently associated with a shorter survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that age and baseline CD4+ count are independent predictors of progression, but do not provide evidence for differences in clinical outcome between the sexes. The higher risk of progression to AIDS and shorter survival for homosexual men appears to be correlated with the higher risk of developing Kaposi's sarcoma.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1994

Differential survival of patients with AIDS according to the 1987 and 1993 CDC case definitions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the 1993 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revised classification system for human immunodeficiency virus and expanded surveillance case definition for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) on the number of cases and on survival of patients with AIDS. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from a prospective cohort study of patients treated with zidovudine. PATIENTS: A total of 3515 patients enrolled in the Italian National Registry of Zidovudine-Treated Patients between July 1987 and December 1991 were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers and survival probability estimates (using the Kaplan-Meier method) for patients satisfying the 1993 CDC case definition compared with patients fulfilling the 1987 CDC classification. Multiple regression analysis was also used to analyze the combined effect of independent variables on survival. RESULTS: According to the new classification system, the number of AIDS cases in the study population would increase by 188%. While the median survival of patients meeting the 1987 definition was 24 months, at the end of 57 months 53% of patients meeting the 1993 definition were still alive. Among the patients meeting the laboratory criteria for AIDS diagnosis using the new definition (CD4+ lymphocyte count < 0.20 x 10(9)/L [200/microL]), the presence of an AIDS-defining illness was a strong independent predictor of death. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the new definition results in a considerable increase in the number of cases. Survival for patients classified according to the 1993 definition is much longer than for those classified with the 1987 definition. Clinical status plays a major role in predicting survival outcome among patients whose CD4+ lymphocyte counts meet the new case definition.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1994

Long-term follow-up of zidovudine therapy in asymptomatic HIV infection: results of a multicenter cohort study. The Italian Zidovudine Evaluation Group.

In 1990 the results of a placebo-controlled study conducted within the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG 019) showed that in the short term, zidovudine was effective in slowing progression to advanced disease in HIV-infected asymptomatic patients with low CD4 cell counts. More recently, the preliminary results of the Concorde Trial suggested that while the data at 1 year agreed with those of ACTG 019, no sustained clinical benefit was detectable at 3 years for early versus deferred therapy. Therefore, the length of the clinical usefulness of zidovudine in this population is still to be determined. We evaluated the 2-year outcome of zidovudine therapy in asymptomatic patients through the prospective follow-up of a cohort of 936 subjects with low CD4+ (< 500/mm3) counts who strictly satisfied, at enrollment, the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the ACTG 019 trial. The clinical end point of the analysis was the development of AIDS. The majority (72.2%) of the individuals in the cohort acquired HIV infection through intravenous drug use; 26.6% were women. The median baseline CD4 cell count was 308/mm3. At 55 weeks of mean follow-up, the progression rate to AIDS (3.2 events per hundred person-years) appears to be comparable to that already reported at the same mean follow-up time for the ACTG 019 zidovudine-treated asymptomatic patients. After 124 weeks of mean follow-up, the overall rate of progression to AIDS was 5.2 per hundred person-years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗