Quality imperatives in long-term care.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to M Fretwell.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Methodological issues relating to multi-site studies of inpatient geriatric evaluation and management units were the focus of this working group's deliberations. The group favored a randomized clinical trial in which the inpatient geriatric evaluation and management unit was coupled with outpatient geriatric care. Inclusion of a broad spectrum of patients stratified according to risk for poor hospital outcomes was proposed in order to obtain information on the types of patients that would be most likely to benefit. The need for a detailed definition and description of care in the unit and of "usual care" was emphasized. Serious concerns were raised about including both VA medical centers and private hospitals in the same trial due to differences in the implementation of such a program. Furthermore, fears of contamination of the control group suggested that hospitals could be randomized either to provide usual care or have a GEM unit. However, this strategy would necessitate that hospitals that have already developed inpatient GEM units would be excluded from the trial and could be costly because of the number of hospitals that would be required.
Previous studies have shown that comprehensive geriatric assessment and follow-up can improve the health of hospitalized elderly patients. To evaluate the effectiveness of consultative geriatric assessment and limited follow-up for ambulatory patients, we randomized 600 elderly patients who were enrolled in a health maintenance organization into three groups: (1) consultation by a geriatric assessment team, (2) consultation by a "second opinion" internist, and (3) only traditional health maintenance organization services (control patients). The geriatric assessment team identified previously unrecognized problems in 35% of patients and advised changes in medication regimens for more than 40%. Nevertheless, patients who received assessment achieved only a small benefit in cognitive function after 3 months, which was not sustained for 1 year. There was no difference among groups in other measures of health status. Consultative geriatric assessment with limited follow-up did not benefit most older ambulatory patients in a health maintenance organization; if such care can be used effectively for ambulatory patients, it will require either additional targeting or continuing care or both.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The evolution of health-care policy for the elderly must address existing gaps in the current system, the dilemma of increasing costs, and the problems associated with hospitalization and nursing-home use. A major fault of current approaches is their focus on these latter two institutions and the resultant increasing fragmentation of care. An approach based on the five principles of primary care may be more rational. Primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention, based on an understanding of the biology of aging and imbedded in the framework of primary care, must be a major focus of such policy evolution. The principles of primary care must be combined with two based on context, family sensitivity and community orientation, to provide the basis for policy that is truly responsive to the broad needs of the elderly and their families. Policies evolving from such an orientation may begin to address not only current financial concerns, but also the ethical issues frequently encountered in caring for the elderly.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.