PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

M G Dunlop

Publications and source records attributed to M G Dunlop.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Gene therapy for colon cancer.

The enormous number of newly diagnosed cases of colorectal cancer that occur each year and the lack of agents that are highly effective for all patients underscore the need for novel approaches to combating the disease. Gene therapy as a developing treatment modality is already well established, with a number of trials ongoing and a vast range of other approaches being assessed in animal and cell culture experiments. In this brief review, we have discussed five gene therapy trials in colon carcinoma that are ongoing or in the approval process in the United States. The gene therapy approaches being employed can be divided into three major categories: (1) enzyme/prodrug systems (HSVtk/ganciclovir; CD/5-fluorocytosine); (2) tumor suppressor gene replacement therapy with wild-type p53; and (3) immune-gene therapy which is based on cytokine or tumor antigen expression to induce tumor immunity (e.g., CEA). Replication-deficient recombinant adenoviral vectors are predominantly used for colon cancer gene therapy, because they can be produced at high titer and they readily infect a number of different cell types. One trial uses polynucleotide therapy for antitumor immunization with intramuscular injection. All of these studies are phase I trials, principally designed to evaluate safety, but they will also provide data on gene delivery. Some trials may provide some insight into potential therapeutic effects. We have alluded to some of the concerns on toxicity related to the use of adenovirus, risks and side effects from transgenes, lack of tumor-specificity of transgene expression, and potential problems with efficient gene delivery to solid tumors. The clinical trials, however, will provide insight that will inform design of future studies with respect to dose, form, and frequency of administration, as well as to the value of biologic and clinical endpoints. The molecular analysis of the fundamental basis of colon cancer has moved at a remarkable pace and that progress seems set to continue. Thus, the basic foundations for gene therapy are undoubtedly in place: a clinical need; growing understanding of basic tumor biology; and ever-improving delivery systems. The field is at a very early stage in its evolution, and one concern is that the considerable hurdles that must be overcome are seen as examples of the failure of cancer gene therapy; however, we believe these challenges will be overcome. The authors also believe that colon cancer gene therapy is likely to take new directions, such as use as adjuvant to radical surgery, rather than attempts to treat end-stage disease when the liver is replaced by metastases. Other new directions might include prophylactic gene-based immunization against a panel of well-characterized tumor antigens, at least for persons shown to be at high risk of colon cancer because of genetic or other predisposition. A marriage between gene therapy approaches and conventional anticancer treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy also seems likely. There is already evidence of this move with demonstration of synergism between p53 replacement and radiotherapy and chemotherapy. It is also likely that therapies will be developed that combine elements from the cancer gene therapies discussed previously, namely, suicide gene transfer, immune modulation, and modulation of defective cancer genes. Perhaps one of the main concerns is not that researchers in cancer gene therapy want to walk before they can run, but that the public and government agencies believe they can. The next 10 years will be an interesting time in the development of novel treatments against colon cancer.

Animals

Systematic analysis of hMSH2 and hMLH1 in young colon cancer patients and controls.

Germ-line mutations in DNA mismatch-repair genes impart a markedly elevated cancer risk, often presenting as autosomal dominant hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). However, there are no pathognomonic features of HNPCC, not all gene carriers have a family history of the disease, and families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria are relatively uncommon. Genetic testing of probands with early-onset colorectal cancer, irrespective of family history, is one approach that would allow predictive genetic testing of at-risk relatives. We cloned and sequenced hMSH2 and hMLH1 introns, to optimize genomic sequencing. We then systematically analyzed the entire hMSH2 and hMLH1 genes, by genomic sequencing and in vitro synthesized-protein-truncation assay (IVSP), in 50 colorectal cancer patients <30 years of age at diagnosis. To determine polymorphic variants, 26 anonymous donors also were sequenced. All subjects analyzed had at least 1 of 37 different polymorphic or pathogenic variants. IVSP complemented genomic sequencing, by detection of mutations not identified by genomic analysis. Fourteen cancer patients (28%) had pathogenic mutations, and a number of other variants also may have had a pathogenic significance that remains to be elucidated. Tumor replication-error status was useful in targeting sequencing efforts for this cohort of young patients: sensitivity was 86%, specificity 73%, and positive and negative predictive values 63% and 90%, respectively. These data indicate that an appreciable proportion of young colon cancer probands carry a germ-line mutation in a DNA mismatch-repair gene.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing

The case for surveillance of high-risk' families.

Patients who have an elevated colorectal cancer risk on the basis of heritable susceptibility can be identified in two ways. First, family history information may indicate empirical risks approaching 50%, while assignment of relative risks of 2.0-4.0 to groups of patients fulfilling certain family history criteria is commonplace. Second, assessment of blood samples by mutation analysis of DNA mismatch repair genes that are known to be responsible for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) now affords diagnostic assessment in increasing numbers of families. This review explores the issues involved in identifying families with genetic susceptibility to colorectal cancer and discusses the rationale for clinical screening in at-risk relatives.

Adult

A prospective controlled study of the association of Streptococcus bovis with colorectal carcinoma.

AIM: To investigate the ability of Streptococcus bovis to colonise colorectal cancers. PATIENTS: 19 patients with colorectal cancer and 23 controls without malignancy. SETTING: University teaching hospital. METHODS: Prospective study comparing unselected patients with known colorectal cancer with age and sex matched controls. Carcinoma tissue from patients with colorectal cancer and normal colonic mucosa, stool, and blood from both patients and control subjects were cultured. RESULTS: In contrast to published data, the faecal carriage rate was similar in cancer (11%) and control groups (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Faecal colonisation by Str bovis in colorectal cancer patients is lower than previously reported and does not differ significantly from controls.

Adenocarcinoma

Exclusion of PTEN and 10q22-24 as the susceptibility locus for juvenile polyposis syndrome.

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS; MIM 174900) is an autosomal dominant condition with incomplete penetrance characterized by hamartomatous polyps of the gastrointestinal tract and a risk of gastrointestinal cancer. Gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyps are also present in Cowden syndrome (CS; MIM 158350) and Bannayan-Zonana syndrome (BZS; also called Ruvalcaba-Myhre-Smith syndrome; MIM 153480). The susceptibility locus for both CS and BZS has recently been identified as the novel tumor suppressor gene PTEN, encoding a dual specificity phosphatase, located at 10q23.3. A putative JPS locus, JP1, which most likely functions as a tumor suppressor, had previously been mapped to 10q22-24 in both familial and sporadic juvenile polyps. Given the shared clinical features of gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyps among the three syndromes and the coincident mapping of JP1 to the region of PTEN, we sought to determine whether JPS was allelic to CS and BZS by mutation analysis of PTEN and linkage approaches. Microsatellite markers spanning the CS/BZS locus (D10S219, D10S551, D10S579, and D10S541) were used to compute multipoint lod scores in eight informative families with JPS. Lod scores of < -2.0 were generated for the entire region, thus excluding PTEN and any genes within the flanking 20-cM interval as candidate loci for familial JPS under our statistical models. In addition, analysis of PTEN using a combination of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and direct sequencing was unable to identify a germline mutation in 14 families with JPS and 11 sporadic cases. Therefore, at least a proportion of JPS cases are not caused by germline PTEN alteration or by an alternative locus at 10q22-24.

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 10

Colorectal cancer.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli

APC expression in normal human tissues.

The tumour suppressor gene APC codes for a 2843-amino acid protein whose precise functions are still poorly understood. This paper describes the development of two new antisera to APC (to amino- and carboxy-terminal epitopes) which permit localization of the protein by immunohistochemistry in archival paraffin sections. The protein is expressed in a wide variety of normal epithelial tissues. Its distribution frequently coincides with the location of post-replicative cells within tissues. Staining patterns demonstrate that the APC protein, although often diffusely cytoplasmic in distribution, may also accumulate in the apical and immediately subapical regions, or along the lateral margins of certain cells. These results indicate that APC is significant in many tissues in addition to the colorectal epithelium. They are compatible with a function related to signalling at the adherens junction and possibly with other more complex roles in cells committed to terminal differentiation.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Protein

Cancer risk associated with germline DNA mismatch repair gene mutations.

The autosomal dominant syndrome of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) is due to germline DNA mismatch repair gene mutations in most cases. However, the penetrance of such mutations outwith classical HNPCC kindreds is unknown because families studied to date have been specifically selected for research purposes. Using a population-based strategy, we have calculated the lifetime cancer risk associated with germline DNA mismatch repair gene mutations, irrespective of their family history. We identified 67 gene carriers whose risk to age 70 for all cancers was 91% for males and 69% for females. The risk of developing colorectal cancer was significantly greater for males than for females (74% versus 30%, P= 0.006). The risk of uterine cancer (42%) exceeded that for colorectal cancer in females, emphasising the need for uterine screening. Our findings give further insight into the biological effect of defective DNA mismatch repair. We have demonstrated a systematic approach to identifying individuals at high risk of cancer but who may not be part of classical HNPCC families. The risk estimates derived from these analyses provide a rational basis on which to guide genetic counselling and to tailor clinical surveillance.

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis

APC mutations in colorectal tumors with mismatch repair deficiency.

We have investigated the influence of genetic instability [replication error (RER) phenotype] on APC (adenomatous polyposis coli), a gene thought to initiate colorectal tumorigenesis. The prevalence of APC mutations was similar in RER and non-RER tumors, indicating that both tumor types share this step in neoplastic transformation. However, in a total of 101 sequenced mutations, we noted a substantial excess of APC frameshift mutations in the RER cases (70% in RER tumors versus 47% in non-RER tumors, P < 0.04). These frameshifts were characteristic of mutations arising in cells deficient in DNA mismatch repair, with a predilection for mononucleotide repeats in the RER tumors (P < 0.0002), particularly (A)n tracts (P < 0.00007). These findings suggest that the genetic instability that is reflected by the RER phenotype precedes, and is responsible for, APC mutation in RER large bowel tumors and have important implications for understanding the very earliest stages of neoplasia in patients with tumors deficient in mismatch repair.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli

Microsatellite instability and the role of hMSH2 in sporadic colorectalcancer.

Microsatellite instability (MSI) occurs in most tumours from patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and in around 17% of sporadic colorectal cancers. Germline defects in mismatch repair (MMR) genes are responsible for the majority of large HNPCC families, with hMSH2 accounting for at least 50%. MMR gene defects also occur in a small proportion of sporadic colorectal tumours with MSI. Here we report a systematic analysis of mismatch repair deficiency in 215 Scottish patients with sporadic colorectal tumours. We found that 16.4% of tumours exhibited MSI; survival analysis by Cox proportional hazards method showed a substantial survival advantage for patients with tumours showing MSI, independent of other prognostic factors. Tumours with MSI were screened for hMSH2 mutations and although 61% were found to have alterations, of these only 1/24 was exonic. The majority of these changes were reductions in length at intronic mononucleotide tracts and we postulate that these alterations are the result of a genetic defect elsewhere, although they may compromise hMSH2 function as a second step in tumourigenesis. Our findings indicate that instability confers an improved prognosis in colorectal cancer and, despite the fact that these two groups of tumours share similar biological characteristics, the genetic basis of HNPCC and sporadic colorectal cancer with MSI is different.

Base Sequence

Detailed physical and deletion mapping of 8p with isolation of YAC clones from tumour suppressor loci involved in colorectal cancer.

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of markers at chromosome 8p is frequently noted in many different tumour types, including colorectal cancer. Numerous investigations indicate the presence of more than tumour suppressor gene (TSG) located on 8p. In this study, we describe a detailed LOH map in colorectal cancer and relate this to physical mapping data from reduced radiation 8p hybrids, yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) co-localisation of markers and fluorescence in situ hybridisation data. These data indicate the presence of two regions harbouring putative TSG's between the polymorphic markers for the LPL gene-D8S298 (approximately 4 Mb) and the markers D8S136-D8S137 (approximately 8 Mb). Yeast Artificial Chromosomes (YAC) have been isolated from these regions of interest to aid the localisation of the putative TSG's.

Chromosome Mapping

Cranial desmoid tumor associated with homozygous inactivation of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene in a 2-year-old girl with familial adenomatous polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a dominantly inherited disorder characterized by the presence of more than 100 adenomatous polyps in the colon and rectum starting in the second decade of life. FAP is associated with extra colonic manifestations, including desmoid tumors. METHODS: A 2-year-old girl presented with a rapidly enlarging tumor of the forehead and a family history of FAP. The tumor was cultured for cytogenetic studies. A DNA linkage study using flanking and intragenic polymorphisms of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene was performed to identify the allele loss in the tumor. Germline mutation identification was by single strand conformation polymorphism analysis of exon 15 of the APC gene, with subsequent double stranded sequencing of fragments with conformational changes. A mutation-induced loss of a restriction site was used to confirm allele loss in the tumor. RESULTS: Microscopically, the tumor had desmoid features. Cytogenetic analysis of the tumor demonstrated loss of chromosome region 5(q21q22). A truncating adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene mutation was identified in the leukocyte DNA from the child and her affected father. Linked DNA markers suggested that the tumor had lost the maternal, wild-type allele. A mutation-induced restriction endonuclease site alteration demonstrated hemizygosity of the mutant sequence in the tumor DNA. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are compatible with the presence of a "second hit" inactivation of the APC gene and implicate this gene in the pathogenesis of desmoid tumors.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli

Expression of the human mismatch repair gene hMSH2 in normal and neoplastic tissues.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer is caused by inherited mutations of mismatch repair genes. We developed monoclonal antibodies to the prototype human mismatch repair gene hMSH2 and used them to detect an immunoreactive protein of M(r) 100,000 in mismatch-proficient cell lines. In addition, a M(r) 150,000 protein coimmunoprecipitated with the hMSH2 gene product in cell lines expressing hMSH2. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that the hMSH2 protein was exclusively nuclear. Whereas the hMSH2 protein was expressed in a variety of tissues, the most striking pattern was observed in esophageal and intestinal epithelia, where expression was limited to the replicating compartment. Neoplastic cells within benign and malignant mismatch repair-proficient tumors expressed the protein, but no hMSH2 immunoreactivity was observed in the colorectal tumors of patients with germline hMSH2 mutation. These results have implications for tumorigenic mechanisms and, potentially, for diagnosis.

Animals

Molecular genetic basis of colorectal cancer susceptibility.

The past decade has seen considerable advances in understanding of the molecular processes involved in the development of colorectal cancer. With an increased awareness of genetic aspects of the disease there have already been significant changes in clinical management. This is exemplified by familial adenomatous polyposis, where identification of mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene in affected individuals can be used directly to reduce the requirement for clinical screening in at-risk relatives. In other more common but less well defined heritable forms of colorectal cancer, testing to identify individuals for early diagnosis and treatment will soon become routine practice. This review does not set out to discuss all aspects of the molecular genetics of colorectal cancer but concentrates on the roles of the APC gene and the recently discovered DNA mismatch repair genes in colorectal cancer. The identification of these genes and their functional significance in the neoplastic process is discussed, and the relevance of such discoveries to future research and clinical management explored.

Colorectal Neoplasms

Mutator genes and mosaicism in colorectal cancer.

Recent studies have shed light on the role of defective DNA mismatch repair in human cancer. An elevated mutation rate associated with mismatch repair deficiency has been demonstrated in the germline and normal tissue from patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and transgenic animals respectively. Thus mismatch repair deficiency may permit the accumulation of mutations in cancer genes that do not confer growth advantage. This represents one potential mechanism for the induction of mutational mosaicism in humans.

Animals

Extracolonic features of familial adenomatous polyposis in patients with sporadic colorectal cancer.

We have investigated the occurrence of attenuated extracolonic manifestations (AEMs) of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in patients with non-polyposis colorectal cancer. In a prospective case-control study, we observed that significantly more colorectal cancer patients exhibited AEM than did age and sex-matched controls (19.5% vs 7.5%, P < 0.004). However patients with AEMs do not have occult FAP, as we found no heterozygous adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene mutations despite extensive analysis of constitutional DNA. Genome-wide DNA replication errors (RERs) occur in a proportion of colorectal cancers, particularly right-sided lesions and in almost all tumours from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients. As AEMs have been reported in familial colon cancer cases, we investigated the relationship of AEMs to tumour RER phenotype. There was indeed an excess of AEMs in patients with right-sided tumours (30.2% of 53 patients vs 14.7% of 116 patients, P < 0.03) and in those with RER tumours (3 out of 12 patients with RER tumours vs none out of 21 patients with non-RER tumours, P < 0.05). Two patients with AEM were from HNPCC families compared with none of those without AEM (P < 0.05). The association of AEMs with colorectal cancer is intriguing, and we speculate that it may be a manifestation of mutational mosaicism of the APC gene, perhaps associated with a constitutional defect in DNA mismatch pair.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli

Genetic instability occurs in the majority of young patients with colorectal cancer.

Replication errors (RER) associated with genetic instability have been found in cancers of several different types and particularly in the tumours of patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). We have here determined the prevalence of such instability in relation to age among patients without HNPCC. Colorectal cancers (CRCs) in the majority of patients 35 years of age or younger exhibited instability (58% of 31 patients), whereas CRCs from patients older than 35 uncommonly did (12% of 158, p < 0.0001). Twelve of the patients under 35 with instability were evaluated for alterations of mismatch repair genes, and five were found to harbour germline mutations. These data suggest that the mechanisms underlying tumour development in young CRC patients differ from those in most older patients, regardless of HNPCC status. The results have important implications for genetic testing and management of young CRC patients and their families.

Adult

Suggested screening guidelines for familial colorectal cancer.

Guidelines for screening for colorectal cancer in subjects with a positive family history of the disease, without the use of DNA based screening, are outlined. These suggestions are derived from (a) the experience of screening 644 subjects at an estimated lifetime risk of dying from colorectal cancer of 10% or more, in the St Mark's Family Cancer Clinic, over six years, and (b) a review of published studies, particularly incorporating the experience of the International Collaboration Group on Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC). Selection of subjects for surveillance depends upon the empirical evaluation of their risk of colorectal cancer, based upon family history details, with the exclusion of a diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis in the family. When DNA predictive tests for genes predisposing to HNPCC are available, surveillance can be directed at subjects with a germline mutation known to confer an increased genetic risk of colorectal cancer and discontinued in those at lower (or average) risk. In many subjects, however, DNA testing may still not be possible because of the failure to identify a predisposing mutation in an affected subject in their family. Any surveillance protocol can only be evaluated by long term follow up of those subjects in multiple centres.

Colonoscopy