PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M G Kris

Publications and source records attributed to M G Kris.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Single-agent chemotherapy trials in small-cell lung cancer, 1970 to 1990: the case for studies in previously treated patients.

PURPOSE: This review was undertaken (1) to determine the antitumor activity of agents studied in phase II trials in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients, (2) to evaluate the adequacy of published trials, (3) to determine if previously treated patients are suitable for phase II trials in SCLC, and (4) to develop an improved design for phase II trials. DESIGN: English-language, single-agent efficacy trials in SCLC, published from 1970 to 1990, were reviewed. Study design and reporting of results were assessed for clinical and statistical methodology. Response rates observed in previously treated patients were compared with those observed in previously untreated patients. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one articles evaluating 57 agents in 3,042 patients were reviewed. Eleven drugs were active (defined as a response rate greater than or equal to 20% in a trial with greater than or equal to 14 assessable patients), and 12 were inactive. Due to methodologic problems with the clinical trials, the usefulness of the remaining 34 drugs (60%) remains uncertain. Deficiencies identified in trials include inappropriate sample sizes, poorly defined response criteria, and failure to report important prognostic factors. When studied in adequate trials, all agents known to be active in SCLC had an observed response rate greater than or equal to 10% in previously treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 2 decades, phase II trials in SCLC have failed in their primary task of effectively identifying agents that warrant further clinical study and rejecting inactive agents. If only previously treated patients had been entered into these trials, no useful agent would have been missed provided that a lower observed response rate had been used as evidence of antitumor activity. We propose a two-stage sequential study design, entering previously treated patients, for future phase II trials in SCLC.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1992

Ras oncogene point mutation: an infrequent event in bronchioloalveolar cancer.

Ras oncogene point mutation, primarily activating the K-ras gene, has been reported in approximately one third of lung adenocarcinomas. This identifies a subset of early stage tumors clinically associated with smoking and an aggressive clinical course. Because of these findings, this study was undertaken to determine the occurrence of ras point mutations in bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. This uncommon form of lung adenocarcinoma is usually indolent but can sometimes present as a rapidly growing, multifocal tumor. Twenty tumor samples obtained at thoracotomy were examined for H-ras, K-ras, and N-ras oncogene mutational activation involving codons 12, 13, or 61. This was performed by an oligonucleotide hybridization technique following polymerase chain reaction amplification of these specific sequences. K-ras point mutation involving codon 12 was observed in two tumors, but not in the adjacent histologically benign lung tissue. These mutations were confirmed by direct sequencing of these polymerase chain reaction products. Both patients were smokers, had stage I tumors, and remain disease-free at 27 and 40 months postoperatively. No H-ras or N-ras point mutations were found. These findings suggest that ras activation is an infrequent event in bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. We speculate that ras activation is not a common transformational event in this form of lung adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar↗
PubMed1992

Phase II trials of ondansetron with high-dose cisplatin.

Phase II trials of ondansetron were undertaken to assess the ability of this agent to control nausea and vomiting caused by specific chemotherapeutic agents, to establish the optimal number of doses and the most appropriate schedule of administration, to see if control could be improved by the use of continuous infusion, and to ascertain if the degree of efficacy and safety of ondansetron would warrant further investigations. In each of six multiplebolus trials, ondansetron was given at 0.15 mg/kg to 0.18 mg/kg intravenously for three doses, beginning 30 minutes prior to cisplatin. No patient had received prior cancer chemotherapy. Overall, 48% of patients experienced no emesis, and 71% had zero to two emetic episodes after receiving cisplatin doses of 100 mg/m2 or greater. Comparable antiemetic control was seen with all schedules studied. Three additional trials assessed the effect of the number of doses of ondansetron on antiemetic effectiveness. A single dose gave complete protection in 25% of patients and three doses gave a 50% no-emesis rate. Complete control was not improved when six doses of ondansetron were given. Efficacy rates with multiple-bolus therapy and continuous infusion over 24 hours were similar. Side effects were mild and reversible in all trials, and there were no remarkable differences in adverse events among different schedules or numbers of doses. The complete and major control rates observed show that ondansetron is as effective as or more effective than metoclopramide in controlling cisplatin-induced emesis.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1992

Rationale for combination antiemetic therapy and strategies for the use of ondansetron in combinations.

The identification of several safe and effective agents for the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting has prompted an intensive effort to develop combination antiemetic regimens. The principal rationale for development of drug combinations is the potential for blocking different types of neurotransmittor receptors controlling the emetic process. Studies have shown that the combination of a neurotransmitter receptor blocker, a corticosteroid, and a benzodiazepine improves antiemetic efficacy, lessens side effects, and decreases the length of treatment and the number of drug administrations. Ondansetron appears to be an excellent antiemetic for use in combination programs because of its highly selective, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3)-blocking properties and its proven single-agent effectiveness and safety. Preliminary data show that ondansetron can be combined with dexamethasone safely with enhanced antiemetic results. Ondansetron merits further study in combination antiemetic programs.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1992

Management of nausea and vomiting caused by anticancer drugs: state of the art.

Our understanding and management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting has progressed substantially in the past decade. We now have many effective single agents, which are even more beneficial when used in appropriate combinations. A new class of antiemetic agents, the serotonin antagonists, of which ondansetron is the first to be commercially available, promises significantly better control of the various emetic syndromes caused by cancer chemotherapy, with fewer side effects. This article summarizes the state of the art of antiemetic therapy.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1991

Phase II trial of esorubicin (4'deoxydoxorubicin, DxDx) in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Esorubicin (4'-deoxydoxorubicin or DxDx) is an analog of doxorubicin with preclinical antitumor activity and no significant cardiotoxicity in model systems. Eleven patients with small cell lung cancer who had previously received chemotherapy were given esorubicin (25 mg/m2 intravenously) every 3 weeks. No major objective responses were observed (95% confidence limits: 0-25%). Nine of the 11 patients had grade 2 or greater toxicity, with 55% of the patients experiencing grade 3 or greater toxicity [myelosuppression (4/11), anemia (2/11) or elevated liver enzymes (3/11)]. Nausea, vomiting, alopecia and intravenous site phlebitis were also seen. Three of the 11 patients received 3 or more course of esorubicin without evidence of significant cardiotoxicity. At this dose and schedule, no significant antitumor response were seen in this population of patients. Esorubicin, with this low response rate and significant toxicity, appears to be of limited utility in this disease.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Twice daily thoracic irradiation for limited small cell lung cancer.

Thoracic failure is a significant obstacle to the cure of limited stage small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC) patients treated with combined modality therapy. In 1985 we initiated a prospective trial to evaluate the impact of twice daily thoracic irradiation without concomitant chemotherapy on control of intrathoracic tumor in LSCLC. Twenty-nine patients treated in this fashion were compared with 36 patients treated from 1979-1982 with once daily thoracic irradiation and concomitant chemotherapy. Both groups received the same induction chemotherapy; cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, and vincristine (CAV) alternating with cisplatin and etoposide. For consolidation, the twice daily patients received thoracic irradiation, 45 Gy in 1.5 Gy fractions given twice daily, and the once daily patients received thoracic irradiation, 45 Gy in 2.5 Gy fractions given once daily with concomitant cyclophosphamide and vincristine. After completion of radiotherapy both groups received maintenance chemotherapy. The complete response (CR) rate after thoracic irradiation was higher for twice daily patients (86% (25/29) compared to the once daily patients [61% (22/36), p = 0.02]. However, this advantage was offset by the shorter duration of thoracic control among CR patients treated with twice daily thoracic irradiation compared to once daily thoracic irradiation (32% vs 67% at 2 years, p less than 0.05). In view of the enhanced initial response of LSCLC to twice daily thoracic irradiation, this basic radiotherapeutic approach seems appropriate, but new strategies using higher doses of twice daily thoracic irradiation or concomitant chemotherapy appear to be necessary to enhance long-term thoracic control.

Carcinoma, Small Cell↗
PubMed1991

Phase II trial of amonafide in patients with stage III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

Amonafide (benzisoquinolinedione, nafidimide, NSC 308847) is an anticancer agent that functions as a DNA intercalator. Sixteen patients with stage III or IV non-small-cell lung cancer who had not previously received chemotherapy were given amonafide at an initial dose of 300 mg/m2 i.v. daily for 5 days every 21 days. No major objective responses were observed among the 14 patients adequately treated (95% confidence limits 0-20%). Local reactions at the injection site or phlebitis were seen in 14 of the 16 patients. Leukopenia (44%), nausea or vomiting (38%), and thrombocytopenia and rash (each 25%) were also noted. With the low response rate and the toxicity observed, amonafide at this dosage and schedule has limited use in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Adenine↗
PubMed1991

Limited small cell lung cancer: prognostic significance of a complete response to the induction phase of chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation.

Limited-stage small cell lung cancer is frequently treated with induction combination chemotherapy (ICC), followed by consolidation with thoracic irradiation. It has been suggested that patients who do not have a complete response to ICC are unlikely to have control of occult distant metastasis and consequently have such a poor prognosis that thoracic irradiation is unlikely to be of benefit. To examine this hypothesis, 48 patients treated on prospective protocols who achieved a complete response to ICC or subsequently to thoracic irradiation were analyzed. Twenty-four patients had a complete response to ICC (CR-ICC), and 24 subsequently converted to complete-response status after thoracic irradiation (CR-TI). The two groups had similar prognostic factors and treatment. Comparing CR-ICC and CR-TI patients, survival was 40% versus 26% at 2 years and 35% versus 4% at 5 years, respectively (P less than .05). Freedom from distant metastasis was 41% at 5 years for the CR-ICC patients and 8% for the CR-TI patients (P less than .05). A modest number of CR-TI patients were long-term survivors, suggesting a value for thoracic irradiation as consolidation therapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1991

Methodology in anti-emetic trials.

Major progress in the ability to control chemotherapy-induced emesis has been made over the past 10 years. One of the several factors contributing to this improved control has been the development of accurate assessment methodology. The application of proper study methodology fostered the identification of active single agents and led to the formation of effective anti-emetic combinations. In this communication, important areas in anti-emetic study evaluation will be outlined. Proper methodology includes selection of agents or regimens that have a good rationale for study. Patient, chemotherapy, and anti-emetic factors must be controlled or standardised in good trial design, and the evaluation techniques for determining the amount of emesis or of nausea must be performed using reliable and valid methods. The statistical design employed and number of patients entered in the trial should be determined based on achievable and relevant goals.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Detection of the anti-Hu antibody in the serum of patients with small cell lung cancer--a quantitative western blot analysis.

We looked for the presence of the anti-Hu antibody in the sera from 50 normal subjects; 44 patients with small cell lung cancer, not associated with paraneoplastic disease; and 25 patients with small cell lung cancer associated with paraneoplastic sensory neuropathy, encephalomyelitis, or both. Using the avidin-biotin immunoperoxidase method and a highly sensitive quantitative Western blot analysis, the anti-Hu antibody was not detected in the 50 normal human sera. Seven of the 44 patients with small cell lung cancer but no paraneoplastic syndrome had detectable levels (average titer, 76 U/ml) of anti-Hu antibody on Western blot. These levels are significantly lower than the average titer of the 25 patients who had small cell lung cancer and paraneoplastic sensory neuropathy or encephalomyelitis (average titer, 4,592 U/ml). In the group with nonparaneoplastic small cell lung cancer (low anti-Hu titer) there was a predominance of women (5 women: 2 men), and all patients had "limited" disease when diagnosed. In the antibody-negative group the sex ratio was 16 women to 21 men and 51% of the patients had "extensive" disease. None of the 7 patients with a low-titer anti-Hu antibody developed a paraneoplastic syndrome by the time of writing. The anti-Hu antibody appears, when present, to be a good marker for small cell lung cancer and, when present at high titer, for small cell lung cancer associated with a paraneoplastic syndrome.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Phase II trials of the serotonin antagonist GR38032F for the control of vomiting caused by cisplatin.

Three phase II studies of the serotonin antagonist GR38032F were conducted. In trial 1, 20 patients given initial chemotherapy with cisplatin at doses greater than or equal to 100 mg/m2 were randomized to receive three GR38032F doses (0.18 mg/kg) on an every-2-hour or every-4-hour schedule. In trial 2, eight similar patients were given three 0.04-mg/kg doses every 2 hours. In trial 3, 12 previously treated patients receiving cisplatin at 20-25 mg/m2 on 4 or 5 consecutive days each received three daily GR38032F doses (0.15 mg/kg) every 2 hours. In trial 1, 35% of the patients had no emesis [95% confidence interval (CI), 16%-58%] and 55% had one or two emetic episodes (95% CI, 32%-76%). Results were similar between the every-2-hour and every-4-hour schedules. In trial 2, only one of eight patients (13%) had no vomiting (95% CI, 1%-50%). In trial 3, in which previously treated patients were studied, complete control ranged from 75% on day 1 to 33% on day 3. Mild sedation, headache, and transient elevations of serum SGOT (AST) were observed. No extrapyramidal symptoms occurred. A dose of 0.15-0.18 mg/kg every 2 hours for three iv doses is recommended. Further comparison and combination studies of GR38032F are warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Antiemetic therapy: management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Physicians and nurses involved in the care of oncology patients share the responsibility for proper management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oncology nurses have taken an active part in the research and investigation of new antiemetic agents and the sharing of this knowledge with others. Identifying patient characteristics, using specific guidelines for antiemetic selection, and a knowledge of the antiemetic agents that are active singly or in combination can mean the difference between success and failure in preventing or controlling vomiting induced by chemotherapy. Proper dosing and scheduling of antiemetics using recommendations that have proved efficacious can further decrease a patient's discomfort during a most difficult time in his or her life.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed1989

Phase II trial of trimetrexate in patients with stage III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

Trimetrexate is a nonclassical antifolate with greater preclinical antitumor activity than methotrexate. Fourteen patients with stage III or IV non-small-cell lung cancer who had not previously received chemotherapy were given trimetrexate (12 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 days) every 3 weeks. No major objective responses were observed (95% confidence limits: 0-20%). Ten of the 14 patients had grade 2 or greater toxicity, with 50% experiencing grade 2 or greater leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia. Nausea, vomiting, rash, mucositis, diarrhea, and serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) elevations were also seen. At the dosage and schedule of trimetrexate used, no responses occurred in this population of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. With the low response rate and the observed degree of myelosuppression, trimetrexate appears to have limited utility in this disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Dose-ranging antiemetic trial of high-dose oral metoclopramide.

The present trial with high oral doses of metoclopramide was undertaken to (a) determine a well-tolerated dosage of oral metoclopramide; (b) measure the blood levels achieved with these oral doses; (c) determine the side effects of high doses; and (d) observe for antiemetic efficacy. Thirty-six patients receiving emesis-producing chemotherapy consisting primarily of high intravenous (i.v.) doses of cyclophosphamide plus adriamycin or cisplatin received 48 courses of oral metoclopramide. The metoclopramide dosage was escalated in six steps from 0.5 to 3.0 mg/kg and was given 1/2 h before chemotherapy, then 1 1/2, 3 1/2, 7 1/2, 11 1/2, and 15 1/2 after chemotherapy. Diphenhydramine (50 mg orally) was given with the first, third, and fifth dosages. Toxicity was generally mild, not dose related, and similar to that observed with the i.v. drug with the exception of an increased incidence of acute dystonic reactions. Antiemetic effects were observed at each dose level. In patients receiving oral metoclopramide doses of 2 or 3 mg/kg, all achieved serum levels greater than 1,000 ng/ml. High-dose oral metoclopramide was well tolerated and demonstrated antiemetic effects at the dose levels explored. We recommend 2-3 mg/kg oral metoclopramide doses with 50 mg diphenhydramine for use in future trials.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1989

Controlling delayed vomiting: double-blind, randomized trial comparing placebo, dexamethasone alone, and metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin.

The majority of patients receiving cisplatin at a dose of 120 mg/m2 experience delayed nausea and vomiting occurring between 24 and 120 hours after chemotherapy administration. Ninety-one patients who were receiving cisplatin (120 mg/m2) as initial chemotherapy were entered into this double-blind trial. All patients received intravenous (IV) metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam for the control of acute emesis during the period from 0 to 24 hours after cisplatin. Patients were then randomized to one of three treatment regimens: placebo; oral dexamethasone, 8 mg twice daily for two days, then 4 mg twice daily for two days; or the combination of oral metoclopramide, 0.5 mg/kg four times daily for four days, plus oral dexamethasone administered as above. Forty-eight percent of individuals who received the two-drug combination of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone experienced delayed vomiting as opposed to 65% who were administered dexamethasone alone and 89% who received placebo (P = .006). Scores assessing the severity of delayed nausea and vomiting were consistently worse in individuals receiving placebo. The incidences of sleepiness, restlessness, heartburn, hiccoughs, loose bowel movements, insomnia, and acute dystonic reactions did not differ significantly among the three regimens and were mild and self-limited. The two-drug combination of oral metoclopramide plus dexamethasone is well tolerated, safe, and more effective than dexamethasone alone or placebo in controlling delayed vomiting following cisplatin.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Phase I trial and clinical pharmacological evaluation of 10-ethyl-10-deazaaminopterin in adult patients with advanced cancer.

10-Ethyl-10-deazaaminopterin (10-EDAM) is an analogue of methotrexate with improved preclinical anticancer activity, more selective entry, and greater conversion to polyglutamate forms in neoplastic cells. In this Phase I trial, we have treated 62 adults with advanced solid tumors, giving 10-EDAM i.v. on either a weekly x 3 schedule (35 patients) or a weekly schedule (27 patients). The dosage levels ranged from 5 to 120 mg/m2. The toxicity observed with 10-EDAM was qualitatively similar to that of methotrexate. Oral mucositis was the dose-limiting toxicity; diarrhea, skin rash, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and mild elevations of serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, prothrombin, and partial thromboplastin times were also observed, but were not dose limiting. A weekly dosage of 80 mg/m2 with escalation or attenuation in accordance with patient tolerance, or 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks, followed by a 2-week "rest period" are recommended for Phase II assessment. 10-EDAM produced partial remissions in three patients with non-small cell lung cancer and one patient with breast cancer lasting 6, 40+, 26+, and 15 months, respectively. Pharmacokinetic studies carried out at the 5, 30, and 100 mg/m2 dosage levels demonstrated the drug to have a triphasic disappearance from plasma. Elimination was independent of dose over the range tested, with mean plasma half-lives of: alpha = 12.9 min, beta = 1.5 h, and gamma = 11.9 h. Cumulative urinary excretion of the drug ranged from 13 to 55% of the administered dose (mean = 33%); 88% of the urinary drug appeared within the first 4 h following drug administration. The pharmacokinetic behavior of the first and second weekly dosages were consistent within a given patient. The metabolites 7-hydroxy-10-EDAM, and 10-ethyl-10-deaza-2,4-diamino-pteroic acid were demonstrated in the plasma and urine of treated patients. In studies of tissue homogenates from two patients with skin metastases, more extensive retention of the drug and of its polyglutamates was observed in the breast cancer metastases than in the metastases from a kidney cancer or in normal skin.

Adult↗