PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

M G Moon

Publications and source records attributed to M G Moon.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Modifications of the impression to prevent cast breakage.

Broken teeth on a diagnostic or master cast, which usually occurs during separation from the impression, is a common problem experienced by dentists. This article aids in diagnosing and modifying noncritical areas of the impression to prevent this problem. One advantage of this method is that casts of periodontally involved teeth can be prevented from breaking. Disadvantages include time involved in modification and loss of noncritical areas of the tooth.

Calcium Sulfate

Effect of provisional luting agents on polyvinyl siloxane impression material.

Eugenol-containing cements have been traditionally selected for seating provisional restorations, but incomplete polymerization of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials has been attributed to these cements. This study clinically evaluated the inhibitory effect on polymerization of a specific polyvinyl siloxane impression material with five luting agents used for provisional restorations. Three of these luting agents contained eugenol, whereas two interim cements did not contain eugenol. A total of 60 human posterior teeth were prepared for complete crowns, fitted for provisional crowns, and cemented with interim luting agents. After 2.5 weeks the provisional crowns were removed, the cement on tooth preparations was removed with an explorer, and impressions were made. The results revealed that none of the luting agents in this investigation had an inhibitory effect on polymerization of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.

Calcium Hydroxide

The effect of various base/core materials on the setting of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material.

Five resin-modified glass ionomers and amalgam, used as a base or core buildup material, were clinically evaluated for whether they effected polymerization of a low viscosity (light body) regular set polyvinyl siloxane impression material. A total of 20 samples per group was prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Ten samples from each group were handled with latex gloves during mixing and the other 10 were handled with vinyl gloves. Five of the 10 samples had the outer surface prepared with a round diamond wheel. Impressions were made of all the samples. The impression materials were visually scored inhibited or noninhibited. Inhibited impression materials met at least one following criterion: (1) an oily substance on the surface of the impression readily collected on a sterile explorer tine as it was moved across the impression surface; (2) a rippled appearance on the surface of the impression material; or (3) unpolymerized impression material adherent to the prepared sample surface. If none of the criteria were observed, the impression was scored noninhibited. The data were analyzed with the chi square analysis (level of significance p = 0.05). Total chi square analysis revealed a significant difference between brands (p = 0.0001) and between prepared and non-prepared samples (p = 0.001). Interrater reliability data were analyzed with the kappa correlation analysis. Raters were in complete agreement (kappa = +1). The prepared samples of Vitrebond material had an inhibitory effect on the polymerization of Express impression material.

Composite Resins