PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M G Patti

Publications and source records attributed to M G Patti.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Endoscopic ablation of intestinal metaplasia containing high-grade dysplasia in esophagectomy patients using a balloon-based ablation system.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the optimal treatment parameters for the ablation of intestinal metaplasia (IM) containing high-grade dysplasia (HGD) using a balloon-based ablation system for patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: Immediately before esophagectomy, patients underwent ablation of circumferential segments of the esophagus containing IM-HGD using the HALO360 system. The treatment settings were randomized to 10, 12, or 14 J/cm2 for two, three, or four applications. After esophagectomy, multiple sections from ablation zones were microscopically evaluated. Histologic end points included maximum ablation depth (histologic layer) and complete ablation of all IM-HGD (yes/no). RESULTS: Eight men with a mean age of 57 years (range, 45-71 years) were treated, and 10 treatment zones were created. There were no device-related adverse events. At resection, there was no evidence of a transmural thermal effect. Grossly, ablation zones were clearly demarcated sections of ablated epithelium. The maximum ablation depth was the lamina propria or muscularis mucosae. The highest energy (14 J/cm2, 4 applications) incurred edema in the superficial submucosa, but no submucosa ablation. Complete ablation of IM and HGD occurred in 9 of 10 ablation zones (90%), defined as complete removal of the epithelium with only small foci of "ghost cells" representing nonviable, ablated IM-HGD and demonstrating loss of nuclei and cytoarchitectural derangement. One focal area of viable IM-HGD remained at the margin of one ablation zone (12 J/cm2, 2 applications) because of incomplete overlap. CONCLUSION: Complete ablation of IM-HGD without ablation of submucosa is possible using the HALO360 system. Ablation depth is dose related and limited to the muscularis mucosae. In one patient, small residual foci of IM-HGD at the edge of the ablation zone were attributable to incomplete overlap, which can be avoided. This study, together with nonesophagectomy IM-HGD trials currently underway, will identify the optimal treatment parameters for IM-HGD patients who would otherwise undergo esophagectomy or photodynamic therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Effect of partial and total laparoscopic fundoplication on esophageal body motility.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal esophageal body motility often accompanies gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although the effect of surgery on the pressure and behavior of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) has been extensively studied, it still is unclear whether a successful fundoplication improves esophageal peristalsis. METHODS: The pre- and postoperative esophageal manometries of 71 patients who underwent a successful laparoscopic fundoplication (postoperative DeMeester score < 14.7) were reviewed. The patients were grouped according to the type of fundoplication (partial vs total) and preoperative esophageal peristalsis (normal vs abnormal): group A (partial fundoplication and abnormal esophageal peristalsis; n = 16), group B (total fundoplication and normal peristalsis; n = 41), and group C (total fundoplication and abnormal peristalsis; n = 14). RESULTS: The LES pressure was increased in all the groups. A significant increase in amplitude of peristalsis was noted in groups A and C. Normalization of peristalsis was achieved in 31% of the group A patients and 86% of the group C patients. No changes occurred in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic fundoplication increased LES pressure and the strength of esophageal peristalsis in patients with abnormal preoperative esophageal motility. A total fundoplication resulted in normalization of peristalsis in the majority of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Thoracoscopic resection of esophageal duplication cysts.

Esophageal duplication is a rare congenital esophageal disorder. Surgical excision is the standard treatment for symptomatic esophageal duplication cysts. Traditionally, the resection is accomplished via thoracotomy; however, a minimally invasive approach is possible, avoiding the long hospital stay, the discomfort and the long recovery time due to a thoracotomy. The authors describe two cases of esophageal duplication resected via a left thoracoscopic approach.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Timing of surgical intervention does not influence return of esophageal peristalsis or outcome for patients with achalasia.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that abnormal function of the lower esophageal sphincter is the primary abnormality in esophageal achalasia, and that the absence of esophageal peristalsis is secondary to the outflow obstruction caused by the lower esophageal sphincter. Furthermore, it has been proposed that early elimination of the resistance at the level of the gastroesophageal junction by surgical intervention could result in return of esophageal peristalsis. This study aimed to assess whether the timing of surgical intervention affects the return of esophageal peristalsis and the clinical outcome for patients with achalasia. METHODS: Between January 1991 and May 2003, 173 patients underwent a Heller myotomy by minimally invasive surgery for treatment of esophageal achalasia. Of these patients, 41 (24%) had pre- and postoperative esophageal manometry. These patients were divided into three groups based on the duration of symptoms: group A (10 patients; duration of symptoms 12 months group B (19 patients, duration of symptoms 12 to 60 months), and group C (12 patients; duration of symptoms longer than 60 months). RESULTS: The average duration of symptoms (dysphagia was present in all patients) was as follows: group A (8 +/- 4 months), group B, (35 +/- 16 months), and group C, (157 +/- 94 months). Vigorous achalasia was present in 40%, 21%, and 17% of the groups respectively. The differences between the groups were not significant. Postoperatively, improvement in esophageal motility was seen in no patient in group A, 1 patient (5%) in group B, and 1 patient (8%) in group C. Excellent or good results were obtained for 90% of the group A patients, 95% of group B patients, and 92% of the group C patients. Again, the differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that: a) the presence of vigorous achalasia is independent of symptoms duration; b) the timing of surgical intervention does not influence the return of peristalsis; and c) the results of a Heller myotomy are independent of symptoms duration.

Esophageal Achalasia↗
PubMed2004

Preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure has little influence on the outcome of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia.

BACKGROUND: It is believed that in untreated patients with achalasia, the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) is almost always hypertensive and a Heller myotomy resolves symptoms by decreasing the LES pressure. The incidence of a normal or hypotensive LES in untreated achalasia patients is unknown. The goals of this study were to determine the incidence of a normal or hypotensive LES in untreated achalasia patients and the outcome of laparoscopic Heller myotomy in achalasia patients with either normal or low LES pressure. METHODS: Between January 1990 and May 2002, a diagnosis of achalasia was made in 239 patients. Among 109 patients (46%) who had not previously received any form of treatment, 53 patients underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication. Based on the preoperative LES pressure (normal, 14-24 mmHg) they were divided into three groups: group A--four patients (7.5%), LES pressure <14 mmHg; group B--18 patients (34%), LES pressure 14-24 mmHg; and group C-31 patients (58.5%), LES pressure >24 mmHg. RESULTS: Among the 109 untreated patients, the LES was hypertensive in 49 patients (45%), normal in 29 patients (27%), and hypotensive in 31 patients (28%). The clinical outcome was good among the three groups of patients who underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy, with poor outcome in only approximately 10% in each group. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that in 55% of untreated. achalasia patients the LES pressure is either normal or low, and that laparoscopic Heller myotomy usually relieves symptoms regardless of preoperative LES pressure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure does not affect outcome.

BACKGROUND: Concern has been raised about operating on patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and normal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure for the fear that a fundoplication may fail to control reflux and result in a high rate of postoperative dysphagia. We hypothesized that fundoplication is effective in patients with GERD irrespective of the preoperative LES pressure, and that in patients with normal LES pressure, a total fundoplication does not result in a high incidence of dysphagia. METHODS: We studied 280 unselected patients with GERD who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication. They were divided in three groups based on the preoperative LES pressure (normal, 14-24 mmHg): group A (LES pressure, 0-6 mmHg; 61 patients; 22%); group B (LES pressure, 7-13 mmHg; 178 patients; 64%); group C (LES pressure, >or=14 mmHg; 41 patients; 14%). De novo dysphagia was defined as new onset of postoperative dysphagia lasting more than 10 weeks. The average follow-up period was 17 +/- 22 months. RESULTS: There was no difference in resolution of symptoms among the three groups. Heartburn and regurgitation resolved or improved respectively in 96% of group A, 90% of group B, and 91% of group C patients. In addition, there was no difference in the incidence of de novo dysphagia, which occurred in 8% of group A, 7% of group B, and 2% of group C. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that fundoplication controlled GERD irrespective of preoperative LES pressure, and that a normal LES pressure before surgery was not associated with a higher rate of postoperative dysphagia.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2002

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chest pain. Results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic fundoplication cures heartburn and regurgitation in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) but its effect on the chest pain that is also experienced by some patients is less clear. Confusion stems from the fact that it is difficult to determine preoperatively whether the chest pain is actually caused by the reflux. Therefore, we designed a study in patients with GERD and chest pain that would assess the value of pH monitoring in establishing a correlation between the symptom and the disease, the predictive value of pH monitoring on the results of surgical treatment, and the outcome of laparoscopic fundoplication on chest pain in patients with GERD. METHODS: Of 487 patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD at our institution between October 1992 and July 2000, 165 (34%) complained of chest pain in addition to heartburn and regurgitation. Their symptoms had been present for an average of 118 months. The pH monitoring tracings were analyzed for a correlation between episodes of reflux and chest pain. The mean length of follow-up was 13 months. RESULTS: Among the 165 patients with chest pain, the relationship between pain and reflux during pH monitoring was as follows: 39 patients (group A) experienced no chest pain during the study; in 28 patients (group B), chest pain correlated with reflux in <40% of instances; in 98 patients (group C), chest pain correlated with reflux in ?40% of instances. Chest pain improved postoperatively in 65% of group A patients, 79% of group B patients, and 96% of group C patients (group C vs A and B: p <0.05). Heartburn and regurgitation resolved or improved in 97% and 95% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that pH monitoring helped to identify a relationship between chest pain and reflux; and when the two coincided, the chest pain was relieved by antireflux surgery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy relieves dysphagia in patients with achalasia and low LES pressure following pneumatic dilatation.

BACKGROUND: Although pneumatic dilatation is said to relieve dysphagia in achalasia if it decreases lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure to 10 mmHg (n = 23); group C, no previous balloon dilatation and LES pressure >10 mmHg (n = 25). All patients underwent a laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication. The severity of dysphagia was gauged on a scale of 0-4. RESULTS: In group A, LES pressure was 7 +/- 2 mmHg preoperatively and 8 +/- 3 mmHg postoperatively; the dysphagia score was 3.3 +/- 0.7 preoperatively and 0.9 +/- 1.1 postoperatively. Eighty-nine percent of patients had excellent or good results. In group B, LES pressure was 23 +/- 8 mmHg preoperatively and 10 +/- 1 mmHg postoperatively; the dysphagia score was 3.3 +/- 0.7 preoperatively and 0.3 +/- 0.5 postoperatively. All patients had excellent or good results. In group C, LES pressure was 23 +/- 11 mmHg preoperatively and 14 +/- 12 mmHg postoperatively; the dysphagia score was 3.6 +/- 0.6 preoperatively and 0.2 +/- 0.5 postoperatively. All patients had excellent or good results. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that (a) a LES pressure of <10 mmHg after pneumatic dilatation does not guarantee relief of dysphagia, and (b) laparoscopic Heller myotomy relieves dysphagia in most patients with a postdilatation LES pressure <10 mmHg. Thus, a laparoscopic Heller myotomy is indicated if dilatation does not relieve dysphagia, even if LES pressure has been decreased to <10 mmHg. Esophagectomy should be reserved for the occasional failure of this simpler operation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for achalasia: analysis of successes and failures.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of achalasia, surgery has been traditionally reserved for patients with residual dysphagia after pneumatic dilatation. The results of laparoscopic Heller myotomy have proven to be so good, however, that most experts now consider surgery the primary treatment. HYPOTHESIS: The outcome of laparoscopic myotomy and fundoplication for achalasia is dictated by technical factors. SETTING: University hospital tertiary care center. DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred two patients with esophageal achalasia underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication. Fifty-seven patients had been previously treated by pneumatic dilatation or botulinum toxin. The design of the operation involved a 7-cm myotomy, which extended 1.5 cm onto the gastric wall, and a Dor fundoplication. Esophagrams, esophageal manometric findings, and video records of the procedure were analyzed to determine the technical factors that contributed to the clinical success or failure of the operation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Swallowing status. RESULTS: In 91 (89%) of the 102 patients, good or excellent results were obtained after the first operation. A second operation was performed in 5 patients to either lengthen the myotomy (3 patients) or take down the fundoplication (2 patients). Dysphagia resolved in 4 of these patients. The remaining 6 patients were treated by pneumatic dilatation, but dysphagia improved in only 1. At the conclusion of treatment, excellent or good results had been obtained in 96 (94%) of the 102 patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that a Heller myotomy was unsuccessful in patients with an esophageal stricture; a short myotomy and a constricting Dor fundoplication were the avoidable causes of residual dysphagia; a second operation, but not pneumatic dilatation, was able to correct most failures; and that the identified technical flaws were eliminated from the last half of the patients in the series.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Role of esophageal function tests in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Clinicians typically make the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from the clinical findings and then prescribe acid-suppressing drugs. Endoscopy is usually done for persistent or severe symptoms. Esophageal function tests (EFTs: esophageal manometry and 24-hr pH monitoring) are generally reserved for patients who have the most severe disease, including those being considered for surgery. We hypothesized that EFTs are more accurate than symptoms and endoscopy in the diagnosis of GERD. This was a retrospective study undertaken in a university tertiary care center. Between October 1989 and November 1998, 822 patients with a clinical diagnosis of GERD (based on symptoms and endoscopic findings) were referred for EFTs. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether the 24-hr pH monitoring score showed GERD (group A, GERD-; group B, GERD+). The groups were compared with respect to the incidence and severity of symptoms, presence of a hiatal hernia on barium x-rays, presence and severity of esophagitis on endoscopy, and esophageal motility. In all, 247 patients (30%) had normal reflux scores (group A, GERD-), and 575 patients (70%) had abnormal scores (Group B, GERD+). Eighty percent of group A and 88% of group B had been treated with acid-suppressing medications. The incidence of heartburn and regurgitation was similar in the two groups. Grade I-II esophagitis was diagnosed by endoscopy in 25% of group A and 35% of group B, and grade III esophagitis in 4% of group A and 11% of group B. Esophageal manometry showed that group B more often had esophageal dysmotility, consisting of a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter and abnormal esophageal peristalsis. These data show that: (1) symptoms were unreliable for diagnosing GERD; (2) endoscopic evidence of grade I-II esophagitis was diagnostically nonspecific, and grade III was much less certain than claimed in other reports; and (3) pH monitoring identified patients with GERD and stratified them according to the severity of the disease. We conclude that esophageal manometry and pH monitoring are important in diagnosing GERD accurately. More liberal use of these tests early in patient management would avoid much improper and costly medical therapy and would help single out for special attention the patients with GERD who have the most severe disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for esophageal achalasia in children.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In the past, surgical treatment in achalasia usually has been reserved for patients whose dysphagia does not respond to pneumatic dilatation. The success of minimally invasive myotomy, however, has resulted in a shift in practice in adult patients, whereby laparoscopic surgery is becoming preferred as primary treatment by most gastroenterologists and surgeons. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication for esophageal achalasia in children. METHODS: Thirteen patients with esophageal achalasia (median age, 15 years; 6 boys and 7 girls; median duration of symptoms, 24 months) underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication between 1996 and 1999. Two patients had been treated previously by pneumatic dilatation, and 1 patient had received intrasphincteric Botulinum toxin injections. RESULTS: Median duration of the operation was 130 minutes. The patients were fed after an average of 33 hours, and they all left the hospital within 2 days. At a median follow-up of 19 months, there was no residual dysphagia in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication were effective and safe for children with esophageal achalasia. Hospital stay and recovery time was short, and the functional results were excellent. These data support the notion that laparoscopic Heller myotomy should become the primary treatment of esophageal achalasia in children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Preoperative evaluation of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

All patients who are candidates for laparoscopic fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) should have a symptom review, barium swallow imaging, endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and ambulatory pH monitoring. The presence of a typical primary symptom, an abnormal 24-hour pH score, and a good response to acid-suppression therapy are predictive of a successful surgical outcome. The surgeon should be particularly wary of the following types of patients who may be referred for fundoplication but not have GERD: those who do not respond to proton pump inhibitors, those without esophagitis, those with only atypical symptoms, those in whom pH monitoring was done without previous manometry, and those with a borderline reflux score, severe vomiting, severe dysphagia and heartburn, unusual symptoms, severe depression, or morbid obesity.

Deglutition Disorders↗
PubMed1999

Laparoscopic Heller myotomy relieves dysphagia in achalasia when the esophagus is dilated.

BACKGROUND: It has been said that a Heller myotomy cannot improve dysphagia in achalasia when the esophagus is markedly dilated or sigmoid shaped. Those who hold this belief recommend esophagectomy as the primary treatment in such cases. This study aimed to compare the results of laparoscopic Heller myotomy combined with Dor fundoplication in 66 patients with and without esophageal dilatation, all of whom had achalasia. METHODS: On the basis of the maximal diameter of the esophageal lumen and the shape of the esophagus, the patients were placed into four groups: group A (esophageal diameter <4.0 cm; 26 patients), group B (diameter 4.0-6.0 cm; 21 patients), group C1 (diameter >6.0 cm and straight esophageal axis; 12 patients), and group C2 (diameter >6.0 cm and sigmoid-shaped esophagus; 7 patients). All patients underwent a laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication. RESULTS: The duration of the operation and the length of hospital stay were similar among the four groups. Excellent or good results were obtained in 88% of group A, 100% of group B, 83% of group C1, and 100% of group C2. No patient in this consecutive series ultimately required an esophagectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with achalasia who have esophageal dilation, a laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication (a) took no longer and was no more difficult, (b) was associated with no more postoperative complications, and (c) gave just as good relief of dysphagia. We conclude that esophageal dilation by itself should rarely serve as an indication for esophagectomy rather than myotomy as the initial surgical treatment.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Effects of previous treatment on results of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia.

Until recently, pneumatic dilatation and intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin (Botox) have been used as initial treatments for achalasia, with myotomy reserved for patients with residual dysphagia. It is unknown, however, whether these nonsurgical treatments affect the performance of a subsequent myotomy. We compared the results of laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication in 44 patients with achalasia who had been treated with medications (group A, 16 patients), pneumatic dilatation (group B, 18 patients), or botulinum toxin (group C, 10 patients). The last group was further subdivided according to whether there was (C2, 4 patients) or was not (C1, 6 patients) a response to the treatment. Results for groups A, B, C1, and C2, respectively, were: anatomic planes identified at surgery (% of patients)--100%, 89%, 100%, and 25%; esophageal perforation (% of patients)--0%, 5%, 0%, and 50%; hospital stay (hrs)--26+/-8, 38+/-25, 26+/-11, and 72+/-65; and excellent/good results (% of patients)--87%, 95%, 100%, and 50%. These results show that: (1) previous pneumatic dilatation did not affect the results of myotomy; (2) in patients who did not respond to botulinum toxin, the myotomy was technically straightforward and the outcome was excellent; (3) in patients who responded to botulinum toxin, the LES muscle had become fibrotic (perforation occurred more often in this setting, and dysphagia was less predictably improved); and (4) myotomy relieved dysphagia in 91% of patients who had not been treated with botulinum toxin. These data support a strategy of reserving botulinum toxin for patients who are not candidates for pneumatic dilatation or laparoscopic Heller myotomy.

Botulinum Toxins, Type A↗
PubMed1999

Cardiomyotomy.

During the last decade, minimally invasive surgery has replaced open surgery in the treatment of esophageal achalasia. This new approach, in fact, determines results similar to the open approach, but is associated to a shorter hospital stay, minimal postoperative discomfort, and faster return to regular activity. Between 1991 and 1998, 168 patients underwent a cardiomyotomy by minimally invasive techniques. Good or excellent results were obtained in 85% of patients after thoracoscopic myotomy, and 93% of patients after laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication. The latter procedure was followed by a lower incidence of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux (60% versus 17%). Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and partial fundoplication has emerged as the procedure of choice for esophageal achalasia, and it should be considered today the primary form of treatment for this disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Minimally invasive surgery for achalasia: an 8-year experience with 168 patients.

BACKGROUND: Seven years ago, the authors reported on the feasibility and short-term results of minimally invasive surgical methods to treat esophageal achalasia. In this report, they describe the evolution of the surgical technique and the clinical results in a large group of patients with long follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1991 and October 1998, 168 patients (96 men, 72 women; mean age 45 years, median duration of symptoms 48 months), who fulfilled the clinical, radiographic, endoscopic, and manometric criteria for a diagnosis of achalasia, underwent esophagomyotomy by minimally invasive techniques. Forty-eight patients had marked esophageal dilatation (diameter >6.0 cm). Thirty-five patients had a left thoracoscopic myotomy, and 133 patients had a laparoscopic myotomy plus a partial fundoplication. Follow-up to October 1998 was complete in 145 patients (86%). RESULTS: Median hospital stay was 72 hours for the thoracoscopic group and 48 hours for the laparoscopic group. Eight patients required a second operation for recurrent or persistent dysphagia, and two patients required an esophagectomy. There were no deaths. Good or excellent relief of dysphagia was obtained in 90% of patients (85% after thoracoscopic and 93% after laparoscopic myotomy). Gastroesophageal reflux developed in 60% of tested patients after thoracoscopic myotomy and in 17% after laparoscopic myotomy plus fundoplication. Laparoscopic myotomy plus fundoplication corrected reflux present before surgery in five of seven patients. Patients with a dilated esophagus had excellent relief of dysphagia after laparoscopic myotomy; none required an esophagectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive techniques provided effective and long-lasting relief of dysphagia in patients with achalasia. The authors prefer the laparoscopic approach for three reasons: it more effectively relieved dysphagia, it was associated with a shorter hospital stay, and it was associated with less postoperative reflux. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and partial fundoplication should be considered the primary treatment for esophageal achalasia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

An analysis of operations for gastroesophageal reflux disease: identifying the important technical elements.

BACKGROUND: Better understanding of the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in recent years has not been accompanied by appreciable advances in the design of antireflux operations. In many cases, operations are still being performed just as they were described 30 years ago. It is important now to go beyond the eponymous procedures traditionally associated with antireflux operations and to identify the technical elements that contribute to effective and durable fundoplications. OBJECTIVES: To compare antireflux operations and identify the important technical elements. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study in a university-based tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Two hundred one patients had laparoscopic fundoplications for gastroesophageal reflux disease. The first 22 patients underwent Nissen-Rossetti procedures (360 degree wrap; no division of short gastric vessels). Subsequently, 82 patients had a total (360 degree Nissen wrap) fundoplication and 97 patients had a partial (240 degree Guarner wrap) fundoplication (both with the short gastric vessels divided), with the choice between them based on the quality of esophageal peristalsis. The 3 groups of patients were similar in age, duration of symptoms, incidence of hiatal hernia, and incidence of esophagitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resolution of heartburn, incidence of postoperative dysphagia, and stability of the reconstruction. RESULTS: The resolution of heartburn was achieved for 15 patients (68%) who had the Nissen-Rossetti procedure, 73 patients (89%) who had a 360 degrees Nissen wrap, and 88 patients (91%) who had a 240 degree Guarner wrap. Postoperative dysphagia occurred in 3 patients (14%) having the Nissen-Rossetti procedure, 5 patients (6%) having a 360 degree wrap, and 2 patients (2%) having a 240 degree wrap. Herniation or disruption of the wrap occurred postoperatively in 9 patients (4.5%). Review of the videotapes of these 9 operations showed that important technical elements had been omitted in 8. Seven patients required a second operation. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic antireflux operations control symptoms without producing adverse effects if the following technical elements are included: the hernia is repaired and the hiatus reduced to a normal size, the short gastric vessels are divided, a total or partial wrap is used based on the quality of esophageal peristalsis, and the wrap is anchored in the abdomen.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures↗