PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M G Trevisani

Publications and source records attributed to M G Trevisani.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Laser energy reaching the posterior pole during transscleral cyclophotocoagulation.

OBJECTIVE: To measure scattered laser energy reaching the posterior pole during transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. METHODS: Transscleral cyclophotocoagulation was performed on 4 cadaver eyes with Nd:YAG noncontact, Nd:YAG contact, and diode contact lasers. Energy was measured with a photodiode through a 7-mm trephined hole in the posterior pole. Average percentage power, average power, and average energy transmission were calculated. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) guidelines were used to calculate allowable energy exposures for each laser. RESULTS: All 3 lasers transmitted 3% to 5% of the power to the posterior pole. The average energy transmission was 240 to 260 mJ for all lasers. The contact lasers had an average power transmission of 120 mW. The noncontact Nd:YAG laser, with shorter pulse duration, had an average power transmission of 13,000 mW, significantly greater than that of the other lasers. The ACGIH guidelines for allowable energy exposures were 93 mJ for the noncontact Nd:YAG laser, 1300 mJ for the contact Nd:YAG laser, and 440 mJ for the contact diode laser. CONCLUSIONS: Three percent to 5% of laser power delivered during cyclophotocoagulation reaches the posterior pole. Exposure energies may approach or exceed ACGIH guidelines. The clinical significance of these findings remains to be shown.

Aged↗

Functional eyelid pulling in children.

Five children (three girls and two boys, aged 3 1/2 to 9 1/2 years) were referred by their pediatricians for evaluation of intermittent pulling on their eyelids. All the children were free of systemic disease. One child wore spectacles for accommodative esotropia but no child had evidence of an acute ocular disorder. The duration of symptoms before examination ranged from one to 13 months. None of the parents were able to identify temporally related stressful events. Reassurance alone was given to both parents and children; eyelid pulling resolved in all cases within two weeks. In only the youngest patient did eyelid pulling recur and no child developed other symptoms during a follow-up of six to 15 months. Following resolution, parents believed their children pulled on the eyelids to gain attention or because their eyes were initially irritated and they then developed a "bad habit." Children said they did it to "look funny" or because their "eyes were not opening enough."

Attention↗