Biomedical subjects

M Gasull

Publications and source records attributed to M Gasull.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Patients' autonomy in surgical care: a comparison of nurses' perceptions in five European countries.

BACKGROUND: This report forms part of the results of an international comparative study funded by the European Commission (1998-2001). AIM: To describe and compare the maintenance of patients' autonomy on surgical wards, from the point of view of nursing staff, in five European countries (Finland, Spain, Greece, Germany and Scotland). Autonomy is defined in terms of information received and decision making by patients. METHOD: The data were collected using a questionnaire specifically designed for use in this study. Responses (response rate 66%) were obtained from 1280 nurses working on surgical wards. Data analysis was based on descriptive statistics, t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA) with posthoc Tukey's HSD test and logistic regression. RESULTS: There were clear between-country differences in nurses' perceptions, especially on a north-south axis (Finland and Scotland vs. Greece and Spain), regarding the extent to which the autonomy of surgical patients is supported by nursing staff. Training and ethics education, in particular, were associated with nurses' perceptions of the maintenance of patient autonomy in Finland and Greece. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to establish whether the results obtained are caused by differences in cultures, nursing practices or roles of health-care personnel or patients in different European countries.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Privacy: a review of the literature.

The concept of privacy is used in many disciplines and is recognised as one of the important concepts also in nursing. In this review, a description about the perspectives and dimensions of the concept will be made and empirical studies in the area will be analysed. Perspectives include units experiencing privacy, desired-achieved state, and reactiveness. Dimensions are divided into physical, psychological, social and informational. In the empirical studies, the concept of the privacy has mainly been studied in hospital organisations using the physical dimension. The concept needs further clarification in future.

Confidentiality↗

PubMed2001

The role of CNSs in promoting elderly patients' autonomy in long-term institutions: problems and implications for nursing practice and research.

Autonomy has become an important focus within healthcare. Elderly patients, however, are often denied the right to independent decision making on grounds of incompetence and incapacity. In long-term institutions there are several ways in which the clinical nurse specialist can promote the autonomy of elderly patients. This article provides an overview of the concept of autonomy and discusses some of the problems in its realization in long-term nursing institutions. It also outlines strategies for supporting autonomy in elderly patients and concludes with a discussion of the implications of autonomy to nursing practice and research.

Age Factors↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Autonomy and clinical practice. 3: Issues of patient consent.

In this, the last in a three-part series considering how the concepts of autonomy, privacy and informed consent are articulated in nursing and the related literature, the authors focus on the notion of consent. Definitions of consent are considered, as are the legal elements of valid consent. Obtaining a patient's consent to treatment has several important functions. This article looks at some of these functions, such as safeguarding patient autonomy and encouraging patient participation in health care. Finally, a number of the difficulties in obtaining an informed consent from patients are considered. Some empirical studies which consider patients' understanding of the information and consent process are also discussed. From a review of the literature it appears that the issue of informed consent is very much tied up with the perceived power struggle between doctors and nurses and doctors and their patients.

Humans↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Autonomy and clinical practice. 1: Identifying areas of concern.

This article, the first of three parts, presents an analysis of the use of the concept of autonomy in the nursing and healthcare ethics literature in the UK. It commences by considering some definitions of autonomy as they appear in the literature. Some of the confusions with the use of autonomy in the nursing literature are also identified and discussed, e.g. the frequent lack of clarity regarding how closely the concept is tied to notions of freedom. In addition, it also examines the lack of any indications in the nursing literature and that when one is considering the notion of autonomy it is also useful to consider the idea of constraining factors. In the nursing literature, discussions of autonomy largely appear to centre around the power imbalance between nurses and doctors. Issues of patient autonomy thus appear to be often of only secondary concern.

Ethics, Nursing↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Autonomy and clinical practice. 2: Patient privacy and nursing practice.

This article, the second in a series of three considering issues of autonomy, privacy and informed consent in nurse/patient interactions, focuses on the wider conceptions of patient privacy and confidentiality. Given that patients in institutional care are likely to suffer intrusions into their privacy which would be considered unusual in normal social interaction, it is interesting to note the dearth of literature in this area. Some definitions of privacy are considered in an attempt to begin to raise readers' awareness of the complexity of this notion. It can be argued that privacy is a pertinent notion to consider, both in order to gain a greater understanding of what is meant by the term and in terms of the implications of this understanding for clinical practice.

Confidentiality↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Autonomy, privacy and informed consent 1: concepts and definitions.

This article is the first in a four-part series that explores the concepts of patient autonomy, privacy and informed consent in the context of the provision of nursing care. In this first article an overview of the concepts is provided, and some of the difficulties with definitions of these concepts are considered. The dearth of empirical exploration of the operationalization of the concepts of patient autonomy, privacy and informed consent within nursing practice is highlighted. The second, third and fourth articles report a series of empirical studies carried out with patients and staff in postnatal care, in continuing care of elderly people and in acute surgical care within Scottish NHS settings. These studies are part of a concerted effort to address the lack of empirical investigation of the ethical dimension of nursing care provision and clinical nursing practice.

Humans↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Autonomy, privacy and informed consent 2: postnatal perspective.

The nursing and healthcare ethics literature over the past 10 years has focused on issues of patient autonomy and patient rights. Despite the growing volume of literature exploring such topics, there is little empirical work investigating what is actually happening in clinical nursing or midwifery practice in relation to patient autonomy, privacy or informed consent, from the perspective of either patients or staff. This four-part series reports the results of a Scottish study that formed part of a multisite comparative research project funded by the European Commission, investigating issues of patient autonomy, privacy and informed consent. This article, the second of four, explores the issues of autonomy, privacy and informed consent in maternity care. The research questions asked were: (1) What is the perception of mothers' autonomy, privacy and informed consent in Scottish NHS hospitals, from the point of view of both mothers and midwives? (2) Are there differences in the perceptions of mothers and midwives on these issues? Data were collected by a self-completion questionnaire for mothers (n = 243) and staff (n = 170) on postnatal units in both district general and university teaching hospital. Results indicated that there are differences between the perceptions of mothers and midwives in relation to mothers' autonomy, privacy and informed consent. Most differences were found in the information-giving and decision-making elements of autonomy.

Decision Making↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Autonomy, privacy and informed consent 3: elderly care perspective.

Despite the growing interest in clinical healthcare ethics, there is a dearth of empirical studies investigating the ethical elements of day-to-day clinical practice from the perspective of either patients or staff. This article, the third in a four-part series, reports the results of a Scottish Study that formed part of a multi-site comparative study funded by the European Commission. It explores patient autonomy, privacy and informed consent in the care of elderly people in long-stay care facilities (i.e. nursing homes and continuing care units). A convenience sample of 101 elderly residents and their nurses (n = 160) participated in the study. Data were collected by means of a self-completion questionnaire for staff and a structured interview schedule for elderly residents. Results indicate marked differences between staff's and residents' responses on three of the four dimensions explored: information-giving, and opportunity to participate in decision-making about care and consent. There was much closer agreement between staff's and residents' responses regarding protection of patient privacy. From the results of this study there is indication of a clear need for further empirical studies exploring issues of patient autonomy, privacy and informed consent in the day-to-day nursing care of older people. Findings to date suggest there is still a significant need to educate staff concerning ethical awareness and sensitivity to the dignity and rights of patients.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Autonomy, privacy and informed consent 4: surgical perspective.

This is the fourth article in a four-part series that considers the issues of patient autonomy, privacy and informed consent. The article discusses these issues in the context of surgical patients and their nurses. There is an abundance of references to issues of autonomy and informed consent within the healthcare literature, although there are few empirical studies investigating these issues within practice. The issue of privacy has been somewhat less explored than that of autonomy or consent, particularly in the UK literature. This article reports the findings of a Scottish study that formed part of a multisite comparative study funded by the European Commission. A convenience sample of surgical patients (n = 282) and their nurses (n = 260) participated in the study. Data were collected by means of a self-completion questionnaire for both patients and nursing staff. Results indicated that there are significant differences in patient and staff perceptions on issues of patient autonomy, privacy and informed consent. However, the most marked difference in perceptions of patients and staff were found on the information-giving element of the autonomy subscale. Implications for nursing practice, education and research are highlighted.

Humans↗