2001 Image-guided percutaneous breast cancer ablation meeting at the American Society of Breast Surgeons.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Breast Neoplasms↗
Biomedical subjects
M Gittleman
Publications and source records attributed to M Gittleman.
The Therapeutic Realizations Scale-Revised (TRS-R): psychometric characteristics and relationship to treatment process and outcome.
Therapeutic realizations are one of five universal, session-level change processes explicated in the Generic Model of Psychotherapy. Realizations refer to session impacts, the moment-to-moment accomplishments that patients experience within sessions. This study establishes the psychometric characteristics and factor structure of a modified patient-rated measure of session-level effects, the Therapeutic Realization Scale-Revised (TRS-R). In addition, it shows the relationship of the TRS-R to treatment process and outcome from the perspective of both patients and therapists. The findings provide support for the TRS-R as a reliable and valid, multidimensional index of session-level treatment effects.
Adolescent↗
Intracavernous alprostadil alfadex is more efficacious, better tolerated, and preferred over intraurethral alprostadil plus optional actis: a comparative, randomized, crossover, multicenter study.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, safety, and patient preference of intracavernously administered alprostadil alfadex and intraurethrally administered alprostadil. METHODS: A crossover, randomized, open-label multicenter study of 111 patients with erectile dysfunction of at least 6 months' duration compared the efficacy, safety, and patient preference of intracavernosal alprostadil (EDEX/Viridal) with MUSE plus optional ACTIS. All patients underwent an in-office dose titration with either drug before undertaking an at-home treatment phase. The most frequently used doses during the at-home phase were 40 microg (44.1% of men) and 1000 microg (86.8% of men) for EDEX and MUSE, respectively; the mean doses were 26.1 microg and 922.5 microg for EDEX and MUSE, respectively. RESULTS: More EDEX than MUSE administrations resulted in an erection sufficient for sexual intercourse (82.5% versus 53.0%); significantly more patients using EDEX achieved at least one erection sufficient for sexual intercourse (92.6% versus 61.8%; P <0.0001); and EDEX use resulted in a significantly greater percentage of patients attaining at least 75% of erections sufficient for sexual intercourse (75% versus 36.8%; P <0.0001). Penile pain was the most common side effect for both medications: 20.0% versus 30.5% (in-office) and 33.8% versus 25.0% (at-home) for EDEX and MUSE, respectively. Similar numbers of adverse events were reported with either treatment during the at-home phase. Patient and partner satisfaction was greater with EDEX, and more patients preferred this therapy, choosing to continue it during a patient preference period at the end of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Since intracavernous injection therapy was more efficacious, better tolerated, and preferred by the patients and their partners, it should be offered as the first-choice treatment if oral therapy fails or is contraindicated.
Adult↗
Intracavernous alprostadil alfadex (EDEX/VIRIDAL) is effective and safe in patients with erectile dysfunction after failing sildenafil (Viagra).
OBJECTIVES: Sildenafil (Viagra), an oral treatment for erectile dysfunction, has proved popular since its introduction in 1998. However, not all patients respond to this form of therapy. Consequently, this study investigated the efficacy of intracavernous alprostadil alfadex (EDEX/VIRIDAL) treatment in patients not responding to sildenafil. METHODS: In an open-label, multicenter study, patients with erectile dysfunction were treated with sildenafil for 4 weeks. The initial dose was 50 mg, which was increased to 100 mg if no response was achieved. Patients not responding to treatment, measured using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, entered an alprostadil alfadex in-office titration phase, to determine the optimal dose, up to 40 microgram. A 6-week alprostadil alfadex at-home treatment phase followed. RESULTS: In 67 patients who did not respond satisfactorily to sildenafil, the alprostadil alfadex at-home therapy resulted in improvements in questions 3 and 4 of the IIEF in 60 (89.6%) and 57 (85.1%) patients, respectively. The mean improvement in IIEF score for these patients was 2.75 and 2.63 for questions 3 and 4, respectively. The most common side effect was penile pain in 25 (29. 4%) of 85 patients treated with alprostadil alfadex in-office and at home. CONCLUSIONS: Alprostadil alfadex therapy can be used effectively and safely in men who fail initial therapy with sildenafil.
Administration, Oral↗
Have family income mobility patterns changed?
We examine the mobility of individuals in the United States based on equivalent family income--that is, total income of all family members adjusted for family size according to the equivalence scale implicit in the U.S. poverty line. Our analysis, which tracks movements across quintiles, centers on four questions: How much movement is there across the family income distribution? How has this mobility changed over time? To what extent are the movements attributable to factors related to changes in family composition versus events in the labor markets? In light of major socioeconomic changes occurring in the quarter-century under study, have the determinants of mobility changed over time? Our findings indicate that mobility rates in the 1980s differed little from those in the 1970s. However, individuals in families headed by a young person or a person without a college education were less likely to experience upward mobility in the 1980s than in the 1970s.
Adolescent↗
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.
BACKGROUND: The results of recent series suggest remarkable advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy over the conventional open appendectomy. To determine if clear advantages could be established, the charts of all patients admitted to our institution with a presumptive diagnosis of acute appendicitis and subsequent appendectomy were retrospectively reviewed. STUDY DESIGN: From January 1990 through June 1992, there were 300 conventional open appendectomies and 66 laparoscopic appendectomies performed. Data from both groups were compared with respect to anesthesia time, operative time, postoperative morbidity, postoperative pain, time to regular diet, hospitalization period, cost, and return to normal activities. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the laparoscopic and open appendectomy groups with respect to operative complications, postoperative morbidity, pain medication requirements, and time to regular diet. There were significantly longer anesthesia times, operative times, and operating room costs in the laparoscopic group. For complicated appendicitis, the laparoscopic technique resulted in infectious complications that required readmission in 45.5 percent of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe alternative to conventional open appendectomy for simple acute appendicitis. However, laparoscopic appendectomy is not superior to the conventional method with regard to operative time, postoperative morbidity, pain medication requirements, time to regular diet, length of stay, cost, or return to normal activity. Laparoscopic appendectomy may be contraindicated in complicated appendicitis (gangrene, perforated with abscess, or peritonitis) due to an increased rate of infectious complications requiring readmission.
Acute Disease↗
Two cases of endometrioma in cesarean scars.
The occurrence of endometrioma in cesarean scar is an infrequent event usually presenting as a tender abdominal wall mass. Two cases are reported here. Diagnosis is suggested when the symptoms are cyclic and associated with the patient's menstrual cycle, but this is not always the case. Surgical excision is the method of choice for diagnosing and ultimately treating the lesion.
Abdominal Neoplasms↗