PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Glegg

Publications and source records attributed to M Glegg.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Reducing cardiac dose in post-operative irradiation of breast cancer patients: the relative importance of patient positioning and CT scan planning.

Left-sided post-operative radiotherapy fields for the treatment of breast cancer inevitably encompass the heart within the treatment volume, resulting in late mortality which may negate the cause-specific survival advantage of the therapy. The effect of positioning was studied in 11 patients with left-sided tumours and five with right-sided tumours receiving routine post-operative radiotherapy to the breast or chest wall as part of primary therapy for breast cancer. Using the same arrangement of glancing fields for each patient treatment position, the optimum patient positioning resulted in a reduction in cardiac dose compared to our standard patient treatment position. On the left side the reduction in mean cardiac dose was 60% (p < 0.001) and the reduction in maximum dose was 32% (p < 0.001); on the right it was 17% and 31%, respectively. The volume of cardiac tissue irradiated was also reduced for all patients. Using this optimum treatment position, cardiac dose was investigated in a further 10 patients with left-sided tumours and our standard glancing field set-up was compared with 3-dimensional planning. A further reduction of 12% in the mean cardiac dose was achieved. 5 of 10 patients had a further small reduction of 4.6% in the maximum dose and one patient had a further reduction in maximum dose of 58%. In conclusion, sophisticated radiotherapy planning can reduce cardiac doses, but optimum patient positioning is of greater importance. The general application of such relatively simple measures could have a significant positive effect on overall survival from breast cancer.

Breast Neoplasms↗

The effect of motion on pattern-onset visual evoked potentials in adults and children.

Visual evoked potentials can be elicited by a variety of visual stimuli, including pattern-onset and motion-onset. It may be desirable to combine pattern-onset with motion-onset stimuli, for example, to make a direct comparison between optokinetic nystagmus and visual evoked potential acuity thresholds. Both procedures employ grating stimuli; however, the gratings must be moving to produce optokinetic nystagmus. We compared pattern-onset visual evoked potentials with both a static and a moving pattern to investigate the effect of motion on the pattern-onset visual evoked potential waveform. Visual evoked potential recordings were made from 10 adults (aged 20-37 years) and 10 children (aged 5-7 years) with the active electrode at Oz. Stimuli consisted of onset of high-contrast vertical bars of three sizes (12', 30' and 60') both with and without motion (3 cycles/s). In a subgroup of subjects, visual evoked potentials were recorded to motion onset of constantly present gratings. Motion of the pattern had no significant effect on any of the latency components of the visual evoked potential waveform in adults or children. The amplitude of the C2-C3 component was significantly increased (p < 0.001) in adults. The motion appears to add a late negative component to the visual evoked potential similar to that produced by the motion-only stimulus. The latency of the early components of the pattern-onset visual evoked potential was unaffected by the presence of motion. Therefore, pattern-onset visual evoked potentials with moving gratings could be used to estimate visual acuity, and direct comparisons could be made between visual evoked potential and optokinetic nystagmus acuity thresholds with the use of the same stimulus parameters.

Adult↗