PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

M Godwin

Publications and source records attributed to M Godwin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

End-stage renal disease: factors affecting referral decisions by family physicians in Canada, the United States, and Britain.

The objective of this study is to determine how patient age, sex, creatinine level, and comorbidity affect referral decisions for the treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and whether these decisions are affected by physician characteristics in three countries: Canada, the United States, and Britain. A vignette-based questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of family physicians in Ontario, Canada (1,818 physicians); all family physicians in the state of New York (1,814 physicians); and a sample of general practitioners from the south of England (2,228 physicians) in 1996. Physicians were presented with clinical scenarios involving a patient with varying degrees of renal insufficiency and a complicating comorbidity, including angina, diabetes, cancer, mental illness, or socioeconomic circumstances. They were asked to indicate the likelihood of referral. Half the physicians received a questionnaire describing a male patient, and half, a female patient. Mean creatinine levels at which physicians would refer were 260 micromol/L for British physicians, 297 micromol/L for Canadian physicians, and 340 micromol/L for American physicians. No difference in referral rates was found based on the sex of the patient or physician. Sixty-five percent of American and Canadian physicians would refer regardless of patient age, but only 49% of British physicians would do so. Family physicians in the United States, Canada, and Britain function as gatekeepers for patients with ESRD. They are less likely to refer based on increasing severity of comorbid conditions. They also discriminate based on age, but not sex.

Adult↗

Primary care in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Health care and health status in general practice ambulatory care centres.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the health care and health status of patients attending primary care clinics in Bosnia and Herzegovina. DESIGN: Assisted administration patient survey. SETTING: Two ambulatory care clinics (ambulantas) in each of three cities in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Tuzla, Mostar, and Banja Luka. PARTICIPANTS: Patients attending the ambulantas during a 1-week period in March 1999; 885 answered questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Each patient listed demographic characteristics and answered questions on satisfaction with health care and with the physical and financial accessibility of health care services and medications. A validated health status questionnaire (EuroQoL), previously used in parts of the former Yugoslavia, was administered. RESULTS: Only 22% of patients were employed; 57% could not pay the nominal fee to see a physician; 71% walked to the clinic; mean distance from patients' homes to the clinics was 2.3 km; 63% could not get the medications prescribed (in 85% of cases because of cost, not availability); 80% to 90% of answers to satisfaction questions suggested high satisfaction with the care patients received from their doctors; 67% of the time patients were referred to a specialist by general practitioners; 33% had problems walking; 17% had problems with self-care; 36% had problems with usual daily activities; 72% had at least some pain or discomfort; and 62% described at least some anxiety or depression. The three cities showed significant differences; patients in Tuzla generally had lower health status and more problems with health care. CONCLUSION: Unemployment and financial considerations reduced health care access in Bosnia and Herzegovina. While only one third of patients had physical difficulties, two thirds had emotional problems or pain. Satisfaction with physicians' care was high.

Adult↗

What drugs are our frail elderly patients taking? Do drugs they take or fail to take put them at increased risk of interactions and inappropriate medication use?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there were discrepancies between what medications frail elderly outpatients took and what physicians thought they took and whether discrepancies put patients at risk of taking inappropriate drugs and of increasing the potential for drug interactions. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Day Hospital Program at St Mary's of the Lake Hospital in Kingston, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty community-living elderly patients attending the Day Hospital Program in 1998. Three patients and two family physicians declined to participate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lists of medications being taken by patients compared with lists of medications in physicians' charts. Category according to explicit criteria that each drug fell into and risk of drug interactions as determined by the Clinidata Drug Interaction Program. RESULTS: Of the 120 patients, 115 had at least one discrepancy between their lists of medications and their physicians' lists. Of the 1390 medications on the lists, 521 (37%) were being taken by patients without their doctors' knowledge, 82 (6%) were not being taken by patients when doctors thought they were, and 133 (10%) were on both patients' and their doctors' lists but with dosages or frequency of administration that were different. More potential drug interactions were identified on patients' lists than on physicians' lists. No increase in risk of inappropriate drug use was identified. CONCLUSION: Family physicians are often unaware of all the medications their patients are actually taking. Medications used by patients without physicians' knowledge increase the likelihood of drug interactions. Family physicians should look at and inquire about all medications, including over-the-counter drugs, their patients are actually taking.

Aged↗

Does a third year of emergency medicine training make a difference? Historical cohort study of Queen's University graduates.

OBJECTIVE: To describe outcomes of a third-year residency (PGY-3) program in family medicine/emergency medicine in terms of its graduates' practice characteristics and their self-assessed preparedness for practising emergency medicine. DESIGN: A questionnaire was sent to graduates of Queen's University's family medicine residency programs. SETTING: Recent graduates' practices. PARTICIPANTS: All 30 graduates of Queen's University's Family Medicine/Emergency Medicine Program (PGY-3s) from 1988 to 1997 and 90 matched controls chosen randomly from among the 250 graduates of the 2-year family medicine residency program (PGY-2s) during the same period. Six of the 120 were excluded. Response rate was 89%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current practice of family and emergency medicine, leadership activities in emergency medicine, self-assessment of preparedness to practise and to lead others at the end of training, self-report of frequency of emergency care situations in subsequent practice for which physicians felt unprepared by their training, and catchment population and "rurality" of location of current practice. RESULTS: Compared with controls, more PGY-3s practiced and took leadership roles in emergency medicine in their hospitals and communities. At the end of their training, PGY-3s reported higher levels of preparedness for practicing and providing leadership in emergency medicine. Both groups reported the same frequency of encountering emergency situations in subsequent practice for which they felt inadequately prepared. Both groups practised in communities of similar size and location. CONCLUSION: Graduates of Queen's University's third-year emergency medicine program appear to practise in accordance with their extra training.

Adult↗

Queen's University alternative funding plan. Effect on patients, staff, and faculty in the Department of Family Medicine.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of the Queen's University alternative funding plan (AFP) on the Department of Family Medicine in terms of patient, staff, and faculty satisfaction; patient encounter logistics; clinical volume; and academic activity. DESIGN: Before-after study. SETTING: Department of Family Medicine at Queen's University of Kingston, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Patients, faculty, and staff of the Department of Family Medicine's Family Medicine Centre. INTERVENTIONS: The AFP of Queen's University. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient satisfaction, staff and faculty job satisfaction, patient waiting time, time spent with patients, patient volume, number of publications, and amount of research funding obtained by faculty members. These outcomes were measured before the AFP began (time 0), 1 year post-AFP (time 1), and 2.5 years post-AFP (time 2). RESULTS: In some categories patients' satisfaction decreased at time 1, but in all cases it was either unchanged or improved at time 2. Staff and faculty job satisfaction did not change over time. Patients spent less time in the waiting room at time 2 than at time 0. Patient volume dropped about 10% between time 0 and time 2. Publication rate did not change, but external research funding increased significantly during the study period. CONCLUSION: The AFP has improved academic productivity, decreased patient volume by 10%, and improved patient flow during clinics. No negative effects on patient satisfaction or on job satisfaction of staff or faculty are apparent.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Physicians' perceptions of the effect on clinical services of an alternative funding plan at an academic health sciences centre.

BACKGROUND: In July 1994 an alternative funding plan for clinical services (global funding instead of fee-for-service payment) was established at the Southeastern Ontario Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ont. This study describes the perceptions of the referring physicians and consultants of the effects of the alternative funding plan 2.5 years after it was initiated. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to all physicians in the Kingston area in November 1996. Information was collected on demographics, referring physicians' perceptions of the funding plan's impact on their practices, consultants' perceptions of its impact on their activities, perceptions of referring and consultant physicians of its impact on services provided by consultants, and attitudes toward alternative funding in the context of the Ontario health care system. RESULTS: Of the 772 physicians 531 (68.8%) returned a completed questionnaire (323 referring physicians and 208 consultants). A sizeable proportion of the referring physicians (126 [39.0%]) indicated that they were referring fewer patients to consultants at the study centre. They did not think that their practice volume had increased, but they did report spending more time on complex cases and on patient care after referral or hospital stay, and more time coordinating community care after hospital stay. Of the consultants 81 (38.9%) believed that their time spent on patient care had increased. No consistent impact on time spent on research or teaching activities was perceived. A total of 54 (26.0%) of the consultants were concerned about the impact of the alternative funding plan on quality of care. A significant proportion of the respondents (399 [75.1%]) believed that outpatient waiting times had increased, and 116 (35.9%) of the referring physicians believed that consultants were not as available by telephone. Most (220 [68.1%]) of the referring physicians believed that the funding change had had a negative effect on health care services in the region, and 87 (41.8%) of the consultants agreed. Nevertheless, the respondents believed that other factors such as funding cuts, hospital bed closures and staff layoffs were much more responsible than the alternative funding plan for their negative perceptions. INTERPRETATION: The alternative funding plan appears to have had an impact on the practices of individual physicians. However, it was not the focus for significant opposition or support from either consultants participating in the funding plan or referring physicians.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus among Swampy Cree women in Moose Factory, James Bay.

BACKGROUND: Although high rates of gestational diabetes mellitus have been documented in native populations, few studies have examined rates of the disease among native Indians in Canada. The authors conducted a study to estimate the prevalence of gestational diabetes among Swampy Cree women, to identify factors predictive of the occurrence of gestational diabetes, and to identify delivery and infant outcomes related to the presence of the disease. METHODS: Information on Swampy Cree women who gave birth at Weeneebayko Hospital, Moose Factory, James Bay, Ont., between 1987 and 1995 was obtained from medical charts. Patients with and without gestational diabetes were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of gestational diabetes. Delivery and infant outcomes that occurred secondary to gestational diabetes were also identified by means of logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1401 deliveries occurred at Weeneebayko Hospital over the study period, of which 1298 were included in the study. Gestational diabetes was diagnosed in 110 (8.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.9%-9.9%]) of the 1298 pregnancies. Factors predictive of gestational diabetes were age 35 years or more (relative risk [RR] 4.1, 95% CI 1.5-11.7), a history of gestational diabetes in a previous pregnancy (RR 6.4, 95% CI 3.5-11.7), diastolic blood pressure of 80 mm Hg or higher at the first prenatal visit (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.8), weight greater than 80 kg at the first prenatal visit (RR 4.9, 95% CI 1.8-12.9) and having a first-degree relative with diabetes (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.1). The only delivery outcome independently associated with the presence of gestational diabetes was an increased likelihood of needing assisted delivery (forceps or vacuum extraction) (RR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.0). Shoulder dystocia was indirectly associated with gestational diabetes owing to increased infant birth weight. Infant outcomes associated with the presence of gestational diabetes were birth weight greater than 4500 g (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-3.8), hyperbilirubinemia (RR 2.9, 95% CI 1.4-6.1), hypoglycemia (RR 7.3, 95% CI 3.7-14.4) and hypocalcemia (RR 8.9, 95% CI 2.3-33.7). INTERPRETATION: Gestational diabetes occurred in a significant minority of Swampy Cree women and was associated with a number of adverse outcomes.

Adolescent↗

Rural background and clinical rural rotations during medical training: effect on practice location.

BACKGROUND: Providing health care services in rural communities in Canada remains a challenge. What affects a family medicine resident's decision concerning practice location? Does the resident's background or exposure to rural practice during clinical rotations affect that decision? METHODS: Cross-sectional mail survey of 159 physicians who graduated from the Family Medicine Program at Queen's University, Kingston, Ont., between 1977 and 1991. The outcome variables of interest were the size of community in which the graduate chose to practise on completion of training (rural [population less than 10,000] v. nonrural [population 10,000 or more]) and the size of community of practice when the survey was conducted (1993). The predictor or independent variables were age, sex, number of years in practice, exposure to rural practice during undergraduate and residency training, and size of hometown. RESULTS: Physicians who were raised in rural communities were 2.3 times more likely than those from nonrural communities to choose to practise in a rural community immediately after graduation (95% confidence interval 1.43-3.69, p = 0.001). They were also 2.5 times more likely to still be in rural practice at the time of the survey (95% confidence interval 1.53-4.01, p = 0.001). There was no association between exposure to rural practice during undergraduate or residency training and choosing to practise in a rural community. INTERPRETATION: Physicians who have roots in rural Canada are more likely to practise in rural Canada than those without such a background.

Adult↗