Biomedical subjects

M Graef

Publications and source records attributed to M Graef.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

Postoperative nausea and vomiting after Faden operation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antiemetic effect of prophylactic dimenhydrinate application prior to Faden operation and to compare the incidence of PONV between bimedial Faden operation (BMF) and horizontal recess-resect procedure (R&R). METHODS: Ninety-nine children (4-10 years) scheduled for BMF were included in this prospective double-blind study. Midazolam (0.5 mg/kg body weight, BW) was administered orally for premedication 30 min before induction of anesthesia. Additionally, children weighing >/=23 kg received either dimenhydrinate suppositories or placebo. The placebo group was compared with 148 children who underwent R&R surgery without antiemetic prophylaxis during the same period. Anesthesia was induced with thiopentone (5-10 mg/kg BW) and vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg BW) bromide and maintained with halothane (1-2 vol%) in N(2)O/O(2) (65/35 vol%). Age, height, weight, and incidence of oculocardiac reflex were documented. PONV was classified into "no vomiting", "vomiting without therapy", and "vomiting requiring rescue medication". In the latter case dimenhydrinate was given again. The chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients received placebo, while 51 received dimenhydrinate. No differences between any groups were observed concerning age, height, weight, and incidence of oculocardiac reflex. Compared to R&R surgery, PONV requiring rescue medication occurred significantly more frequently after BMF (45% vs 23% after R&R). PONV after BMF was significantly less severe in the dimenhydrinate group than in the placebo group. The total incidence of PONV after BMF, however, was not significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: The high incidence of PONV after BMF can be explained by the greater invasiveness of BMF than R&R surgery. PONV requiring antiemetic rescue medication can be reduced by preoperative administration of dimenhydrinate suppositories.

Anesthesia, Local↗

PubMed2000

Silicone intraocular lens implantation in children: preliminary results.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and outcome of foldable silicone intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in children. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany. METHODS: The results of cataract extraction and silicone IOL implantation in children having surgery between 1992 and 1997 were retrospectively analyzed in 8 eyes (7 patients). All IOLs were implanted in the capsular bag through a 3.5 mm clear corneal incision. In 4 eyes, primary posterior capsulectomy and anterior vitrectomy were performed. RESULTS: Mean patient age at the time of surgery was 5.1 years (range 8 months to 15 years). The surgeries were uneventful. All IOLs remained anatomically stable and well centered during the mean follow-up of 29.6 months (range 18 to 46 months). Postoperative inflammatory reaction was minimal. Neither fibrinoid exudation nor posterior synechias occurred postoperatively. Postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/800 to 20/20. All eyes with an intact posterior capsule developed posterior capsule opacification. In the 4 eyes that had primary posterior capsulectomy and anterior vitrectomy, the visual axis remained clear. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that silicone IOL implantation in children is a safe procedure with good and stable short-term anatomic results. Longer follow-up is necessary to answer questions about the long-term safety of silicone lens implantation in a child's eye.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Critical perimetry - functioning methods.

Visual field defects without any organic correlate require critical control to avoid inadequate management of psychogenic defects. Which methods are promising to detect psychogenic visual field defects? Twenty ophthalmologically trained volunteers motivated to pretend a concentric visual field loss were tested by manual perimetry with centripetal and centrifugal movement of the stimulus, by evoking saccadic eye movements towards a stimulus outside the subjectively claimed visual field and by observation of the volunteers' strategy searching a stimulus beyond the subjectively claimed borders. Malingering could be proven in 16 persons. The most favourable procedure is to evoke eye movements towards a peripheral stimulus. These movements yield information about the visual field outside the subjectively stated limits.

Adult↗